Karen Kraft?

estevie said:
If we can believe that people meet, fall in love, get married and have another Lit member make their wedding dress, what is so far fetched in this story?
I'm sorry, but I'm just not buying the "Cheyenne" character's marriage story until I have some solid proof.

Bring me reproductions of the "husband" character's and her birth certificates, their wedding certificate, and her broomstick, and I'll be convinced.

And pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
 
Killswitch said:
Minx....I have no clue....Im not up to speed and am redears digesting this thread, but it seems to me that when she's asked to answer the type of question you posed, things are out of control, and beginning to resemble lunacy.

Nothin personal......but for the casual observer it looked pretty goofy.
Lunacy? Hah! Like you should be one to talk.

Anyway, I don't think it's lunacy at all- she's the one who inferred it, not me.
 
So this is what you people do all day when the rest of us are at real jobs? LOL

I bet Kevin enjoys paying Karen. For working, I mean. :D


And no, I still think the Karen and the Kevin are poorly written characters. I still think that rape thread that "she" deleted back in the beginning of her writing career at Lit was written by a male who was guessing at what a woman would think/feel. And no, in the real world of business, I don't see any lawyer that I know being stupid enough to find and hire an intern from a porn board.
There are way too many lawsuits for sexual harrassment these days that a judge would just laugh at such a lawyer putting himself in that position.

In other words, I agree with Pookie and Ellie. I think it is way more unlikely than Dixon does that there is any remote possibility that the Karen and the Kevin aren't characters being played.
 
BUT WE NEED MORE PROOF, DAMMIT!

I WON'T SLEEP UNTIL WE GET PROOF THAT YOU ARE RIGHT!



*cough*
 
Cheyenne said:
And no, I still think the Karen and the Kevin are poorly written characters. I still think that rape thread that "she" deleted back in the beginning of her writing career at Lit was written by a male who was guessing at what a woman would think/feel. And no, in the real world of business, I don't see any lawyer that I know being stupid enough to find and hire an intern from a porn board.
There are way too many lawsuits for sexual harrassment these days that a judge would just laugh at such a lawyer putting himself in that position.

In other words, I agree with Pookie and Ellie. I think it is way more unlikely than Dixon does that there is any remote possibility that the Karen and the Kevin aren't characters being played.
It's become clear to me now that my A.I. simulation of Karen, Kevin, Dixon, Ginny, et alia, has been met by a less well-contructed simulation of characters by another programmer. I won't say who I think is behind this, but I'm fairly certain my hunch is correct. Sir: throwing in the "Cheyenne" character's supposed marriage was a great diversion, but her "personality" is simply too flat and one-dimensional to be taken for a real person. With your "Pookie" and "Ellie" characters, you are left generating a bad script for an "Angela Lansbury meets The Snoop Sisters" pilot. My program is much less predictable, I must say. However, I do appreciate the work you put into yours, and hope that the interaction of our programs will continue to entertain the Lit audience.
 
Cheyenne said:
. . . I don't see any lawyer that I know being stupid enough to find and hire an intern from a porn board . . .

You obviously don't know any middle aged male lawyers.

Most of 'em would fight like cats in a sack for a KK to brighten up their offices and make the tea.
 
Borscht said:
You obviously don't know any middle aged male lawyers.

Most of 'em would fight like cats in a sack for a KK to brighten up their offices and make the tea.

Unfortunately, I know quite a few of them. And no, they wouldn't.
 
RawHumor said:
Let me get this straight. Kevin saw your posts on Lit and adored your pics and your personality. Even though he's married, he contacted you about a job based on your Lit personality and hired you for an internship. His wife knows all of this and is cool with all of it, including the fact that he is infatuated with you and would gladly bend you over in his office.

Although you were working toward going to law school at some point, your new job has you thinking about a different career.

Okay, I requoted myself because Karen said that my summary was pretty much correct. I guess my question isn't so much why a lawyer would hire an intern from a site such as this one, but how his wife wouldn't find anything fishy about it.

Karen, with all of her youth and her God complex (there's a psych term for that which I can't pull from the back of my head at the moment) seems capable of typing and of expressing herself. Does Kevin make you take the retainer out of your mouth when you're answering the phone though?
 
Karen Kraft said:
NOW HEAR THIS:
Okay, Chey: a challenge. If you want to put your reputation and your "research" horse shit to the test, why not challenge me? Why not agree that, if I can establish that Call Me Kevin is my boss, a fifty-year-old guy, and I am me, (two different people) you will make a public apology here on Lit as a separate thread and co-chair the Karen Kraft Fan Club (along with Call Me Kevin).

Most people who can follow what is going on can plainly see that I am The Karen and that Kevin is someone else. You know how, when someone calls you a thief, you had better suspect him of theft? Or when someone calls you a liar, you better double check what they say for truthfulness? Well, your claims about Call Me Kevin being an "alt" of mine makes me suspect that you, my dear, have so many "alts" that you can't believe the simple and obvious fact that I am Me and Kevin is Kevin.

If you have any guts, you will accept the challenge and abide by its outcome. Maybe DCL and I should have lunch here in L.A. (if he is willing) and have Kevin join us.

. . . . or would you prefer not to take my challenge and remain on the sidelines claiming shit that is plainly untrue?

"Don't wait for the translation. . . yes or no?"

Hey, I missed this one until now when the latest contradiction showed up in my PMs.

When did Kevin lose a few years in age? He was "mid-50's" the last time you mentioned his age just days ago. I'll bet he could market that anti-aging potion he uses! LMAO!

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=7117961#post7117961

Spreadsheets, people. They are your friend!
 
Cheyenne said:
Hey, I missed this one until now when the latest contradiction showed up in my PMs.

When did Kevin lose a few years in age? He was "mid-50's" the last time you mentioned his age just days ago. I'll bet he could market that anti-aging potion he uses! LMAO!

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=7117961#post7117961

Spreadsheets, people. They are your friend!
This is all done in C, Javascrip.t, and 386 assembly.

What dorkhead is using, I don't know.

Probably Visual Basic... lol
 
Byron In Exile said:
This is all done in C, Javascrip.t, and 386 assembly.

What dorkhead is using, I don't know.

Probably Visual Basic... lol

I'd take VB over assembly language any day.
 
My. Karen's not here this morning.

I expect "Kevin" will be along very soon, no doubt to tidy up all those loose ends.

Expecting Excuses,
Ellie
 
Byron In Exile said:
It's become clear to me now that my A.I. simulation of Karen, Kevin, Dixon, Ginny, et alia, has been met by a less well-contructed simulation of characters by another programmer. I won't say who I think is behind this, but I'm fairly certain my hunch is correct. Sir: throwing in the "Cheyenne" character's supposed marriage was a great diversion, but her "personality" is simply too flat and one-dimensional to be taken for a real person. With your "Pookie" and "Ellie" characters, you are left generating a bad script for an "Angela Lansbury meets The Snoop Sisters" pilot. My program is much less predictable, I must say. However, I do appreciate the work you put into yours, and hope that the interaction of our programs will continue to entertain the Lit audience.

- - - - - - - -
 
Last edited:
Byron In Exile said:
That's why you're not a real programmer.

Right now I only program in Excel.

Tell me something that VB can't do, however. Convince me that it's not a real programming language.
 
Call Me Kevin said:
I find that very funny, Byron.
As my creation, I would have programmed you to find my humor amusing.

As a human being, thanks!
As for Karen, she is on her own here. I said what I had to say and I don't care to get involved in Literotica controversies. That's why I read and almost never post.
You wield supernatural powers, however, when you don't post. Then, your postings are like tablets from Mount Sinai, posted amidst drunken orgies with golden calves and whatnot. You should stop in from time to time, just to say, "Fie!"
For clarification with respect to my age: I was born in Long Beach, California on June 30, 1947.
Data.

Cheyenne & Ellie? Data. Hop on it.
 
RawHumor said:
Right now I only program in Excel.

Tell me something that VB can't do, however. Convince me that it's not a real programming language.
VB can't acknowledge interrupts from the second 8259 interrupt controller.

Learn a real language, like Fortran IV.
 
Byron In Exile said:
VB can't acknowledge interrupts from the second 8259 interrupt controller.

Learn a real language, like Fortran IV.

Okay, Fortran is a good example of a language that can do things that VB has trouble with. I once was trying to use imaginary numbers and had to code all of my own routines in VB.

I was then wishing that I could write a Fortran Add-In.
 
EllieTalbot said:
Oh my word. You just can't help it, can you?
June 30, 1947, Long Beach.

How many babies were born on that day?

Couldn't have been more than a dozen.
 
Oh, Byron, if only you could read between the lines.
You're a decently smart guy.
You should know better.

*sigh*
 
RawHumor said:
Okay, Fortran is a good example of a language that can do things that VB has trouble with. I once was trying to use imaginary numbers and had to code all of my own routines in VB.

I was then wishing that I could write a Fortran Add-In.
Sir, that cracks me up. I was kidding about Fortran IV — that's from 30 years ago! lol

But I wasn't kidding about VB — it's a bit retarded.

You can do anything you want to in C.

Start there, the rest is optional.

What were you using imaginary numbers for? — was that a class, or a real-world problem?
 
EllieTalbot said:
Oh, Byron, if only you could read between the lines.
You're a decently smart guy.
You should know better.

*sigh*
Yeah, I'm kinda shitty with the whole "between the lines" thing.

You need to say what you want to say in the actual lines themselves, or I may miss it.

I'm a bit daft that way.
 
Karen Kraft said:
No underage pictures were posted. That's a fact.

Underage pix? Where???

They love it when I make the Furby say, "Yuummmmmmmm"

I know just what to do. You put your finger in its mouth and hold it for just a second. Oh yes.
 
Back
Top