2015 GB Hall Of Fame Election Thread

2015 GB Hall of Fame Ballot


  • Total voters
    94
  • Poll closed .
"This type of thing."

*long stare*

And you have. So there.

Yay! Duh <dribble> Duh! Yay! <dribble> we goth him! we goth him! he's spell Eton so very wrongly that he Duh prolly never went there . Now we dont wear the dunce caps for a week!!:rolleyes:


:p:p:p:p:

:D:D:nana::D
:D
Cheers
Boom
 
Precisely. I would never do one this clumsily. Also, I would never vote for Wings, except as a cautionary example, and she would have to be inducted with her little pet sociopath as a duo.

Of course you wouldn't.
 
all you non-n00bs need to start a special thread about this.
Seriously. I'm getting confused.
Everyone's accusing everyone else of being an alt or a dude pretending to be a woman who's pretending to be a dude etc…just read some of today's threads...
(myself included - even though I've given my honest biography in Reci's thread)
 
Precisely. I would never do one this clumsily. Also, I would never vote for Wings, except as a cautionary example, and she would have to be inducted with her little pet sociopath as a duo.

:rose:
 
Yay! Duh <dribble> Duh! Yay! <dribble> we goth him! we goth him! he's spell Eton so very wrongly that he Duh prolly never went there . Now we dont wear the dunce caps for a week!!:rolleyes:

I wish you were just a little bit entertaining, even accidentally. This persona is so mediocre, it barely inspires annoyance. Do better.
 

So three people have @60% of the votes and two@50% that makes a total of 280% not counting the votes received by the other five. How Can this happen? If this is correct then the votes should not be listed in '%" . If it is a % count then obviously people are voting multiple times or folks like "pookie" are using what they call "alts' in a big way.:eek:

Maybe you should reconsider fresh polls ?:confused:Dudes like des dont stand the chance of a snowflake in hell.
Queersetti, While there may not be a clique controlling this election, there certainly are gangs of voters who may just be altering their names ever so slightly to vote multiple times. I had suggested an election committee in jest but now I think such a committee would be a good idea, you cannot be responsible for both the conduct and then the monitoring, my friend, no tonly too tough but well neigh impossible as it were.

:D:D:D:D:D
cheers
BoomsIanger
 
It's a performance alt, whether it is Query's or not. I'm betting it is.
 
So three people have @60% of the votes and two@50% that makes a total of 280% not counting the votes received by the other five. How Can this happen? If this is correct then the votes should not be listed in '%" . If it is a % count then obviously people are voting multiple times or folks like "pookie" are using what they call "alts' in a big way.:eek:

Maybe you should reconsider fresh polls ?:confused:Dudes like des dont stand the chance of a snowflake in hell.
Queersetti, While there may not be a clique controlling this election, there certainly are gangs of voters who may just be altering their names ever so slightly to vote multiple times. I had suggested an election committee in jest but now I think such a committee would be a good idea, you cannot be responsible for both the conduct and then the monitoring, my friend, no tonly too tough but well neigh impossible as it were.

:D:D:D:D:D
cheers
BoomsIanger

So Laurel put a horse mask beneath one of your posts… Meaning that she knows that your IP address coincides with some other user's.
Who on earth are you, Boom?
I can't believe that I fell for that.
I feel like such an idiot
 
So three people have @60% of the votes and two@50% that makes a total of 280% not counting the votes received by the other five.
I have to admit that bit does sound like me. Except he is mathematically wrong. Apparently, they do not teach word problems in the maths form at Eaton.

The percentages represent "What percentage of the voters that cast ballots included this poster in their chosen slate of candidates?"

He also missed this bit:
Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.
 
WHICH MAD FUCK SAID I WAS TRYING TO ENTERTAIN YOU DUDE? i HAVE PROMISED NOT TO BE RUDE AND NASTY SO:rose:I:kiss: LOVE YOU:heart: TOO, AND HOPE GOOD SENSE SEEPS INTO YOUR TOUGH EBONY HEAD.:rolleyes:
HAVE FUN LAUGH, SPREAD GOOD CHEER, IT IS EASY TO BE NASTY IT REQUIRES INTELLIGENCE TO BE NICE:)


:D:D:D:D:D
CHEERS
BOOM
 
So three people have @60% of the votes and two@50% that makes a total of 280% not counting the votes received by the other five. How Can this happen? If this is correct then the votes should not be listed in '%" . If it is a % count then obviously people are voting multiple times or folks like "pookie" are using what they call "alts' in a big way.:eek:

Maybe you should reconsider fresh polls ?:confused:Dudes like des dont stand the chance of a snowflake in hell.
Queersetti, While there may not be a clique controlling this election, there certainly are gangs of voters who may just be altering their names ever so slightly to vote multiple times. I had suggested an election committee in jest but now I think such a committee would be a good idea, you cannot be responsible for both the conduct and then the monitoring, my friend, no tonly too tough but well neigh impossible as it were.

:D:D:D:D:D
cheers
BoomsIanger

Yeah, here's the thing. I don't care.
 
I wish you were just a little bit entertaining, even accidentally. This persona is so mediocre, it barely inspires annoyance. Do better.

"This sort of thing?'

*blink*

I could author such a character, but I would have a hard time not going back and repairing the HTML tags.

Besides, I was not educated at Eaton <sic>.

and PROBABLY NEVER GOT ANY EDUCATION ANYWHERE EITHER.
 
WHICH MAD FUCK SAID I WAS TRYING TO ENTERTAIN YOU DUDE? i HAVE PROMISED NOT TO BE RUDE AND NASTY SO:rose:I:kiss: LOVE YOU:heart: TOO, AND HOPE GOOD SENSE SEEPS INTO YOUR TOUGH EBONY HEAD.:rolleyes:
HAVE FUN LAUGH, SPREAD GOOD CHEER, IT IS EASY TO BE NASTY IT REQUIRES INTELLIGENCE TO BE NICE:)

Seriously. Do better. So much effort for so little return.
 
So Laurel put a horse mask beneath one of your posts… Meaning that she knows that your IP address coincides with some other user's.
Who on earth are you, Boom?
I can't believe that I fell for that.
I feel like such an idiot

I AM WHO I SAY I AM. WHERE IS THE POST WHERE lAURELI put SAID MARK AND WHERE AND HOW CAN i SEE THE VOTE CASTER'S LIST?
 
I AM WHO I SAY I AM. WHERE IS THE POST WHERE lAURELI put SAID MARK AND WHERE AND HOW CAN i SEE THE VOTE CASTER'S LIST?

Click on any of the underlined tally numbers. It will then show you all the voters.
 
It's not like 'salli Scabcrest and this, his latest episode of GB Idol...

...could be anything else but the obvious puppets they are of their sponsor, Fluffers Internationale.
 
So Laurel put a horse mask beneath one of your posts… Meaning that she knows that your IP address coincides with some other user's.
Who on earth are you, Boom?
I can't believe that I fell for that.
I feel like such an idiot

Guy in horse mask holding cat with "wat" typed on screen means "I know this dudes IP address and he's an alt"?

Wow, I had no idea. You kids and your cryptic gif codes!
 
Guy in horse mask holding cat with "wat" typed on screen means "I know this dudes IP address and he's an alt"?

Wow, I had no idea. You kids and your cryptic gif codes!

Too late trying to cover your tracks now Laurelle. Clouseau is on to you.
 
Back
Top