When your feminist stories get rejected on Lit

[LJ_Reloaded]

that's kinda gotta hurt, right?

Right, lovecraft68?

Damn.

 

[sr71plt]

Depends on what it got rejected for.

 

[lovecraft68]

I couldn't say. But I do know that even though women on top stories make your eyes bleed "feminism" doest break the rules here.

But thanks for asking and proving what a hard on you have for me. Always good to know who my stalkers are.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I couldn't say. But I do know that even though women on top stories make your eyes bleed "feminism" doest break the rules here.

Apparently Laurel says it does break the rules.

But thanks for asking and proving what a hard on you have for me. Always good to know who my stalkers are.

Hard on

says the coward who trolls my threads and then runs away like a scared bitch when my backhand meets your pimply face in response.

BTW people are pirating your shit.

 

[lovecraft68]

You can link me to the rule "feminisim" breaks the rule and I'll look at it.

As for cowards? Who sent who a threatening message through their blog, hmmm?

Cowards? You tout a coward who killed two war veterans in cowardly fashion as a hero. Shows what you know about bravery. Is that what you do LJ? Sneak up on people and sucker shot them then run?

And a hard on is what you have when you start threads about someone. Hate to tell you, but your man crush is showing.

And of course there is always this m from your misogynistic woman hating blog. The way you truly feel

Big words from a big man

Oh and by the way....no one runs from you LJ, we all give you a little slap in the back of the head on your idiotic threads and then lose interest. Because you're tedious and boring.

 

[sr71plt]

Apparently Laurel says it does break the rules.

What rules? Until/unless you quote what the rejection notice says, there's no grounding for whatever you're claiming for anyone to get hold of. This isn't a question of agreeing or disagreeing with you. It's a question what the rejection is for, because we can't agree or disagree with you until we know that.

 

[lovecraft68]

What rules? Until/unless you quote what the rejection notice says, there's no grounding for whatever you're claiming for anyone to get hold of. This isn't a question of agreeing or disagreeing with you. It's a question what the rejection is for, because we can't agree or disagree with you until we know that.

You're wasting words and time.

No one has been rejected for 'feminist' writing.

LJ's a woman hating troll that follows me because I point out(and I am far from alone, just his favorite target) his raging misogyny and bitterness towards women. Just look at his profile and the title of every thread he starts

 

[sr71plt]

I'm fully aware of RJThought's behavior on the forum, just as I'm fully aware of yours.

There's no wind in his sails on this unless/until we know what the story was rejected for--in the words of the rejection notice. That's why I'm asking.

 

[lovecraft68]

I'm fully aware of RJThought's behavior on the forum, just as I'm fully aware of yours.

There's no wind in his sails on this unless/until we know what the story was rejected for--in the words of the rejection notice. That's why I'm asking.

I'm glad you are aware of RJthoughts behavior. But the OP here is LJ reloaded

And of course there is no wind in his sails, he's chain yanking. You know there are very few rules here and 'feminist' writing, which to him is any story where a woman is in any way shape or form in control, is not a 'violation' here.

 

[AZMotherLover]

How would anyone besides the author and Laurel know when a story is rejected?

 

[sr71plt]

How would anyone besides the author and Laurel know when a story is rejected?

Well, nobody. That's why I asked what the actual rejection notice said. (Was this a trick question?)

So, unless the OP provides that, this is an eminently ignorable thread.

 

[AZMotherLover]

Well, nobody. That's why I asked what the actual rejection notice said. (Was this a trick question?)

So, unless the OP provides that, this is an eminently ignorable thread.

Oh, just like all of LJ's other threads.

 

[lovecraft68]

Well, nobody. That's why I asked what the actual rejection notice said. (Was this a trick question?)

So, unless the OP provides that, this is an eminently ignorable thread.

Apparently its not "ignorable" to you because you continue to post on it even though its obvious there has been no rejection.

Not to mention the fact you read it so quickly you don't even know who the OP is.

 

[lovecraft68]

Oh, just like all of LJ's other threads.

This was much nicer than the rest of LJ's threads; he's not calling for any women to be thrown in jail for their 'unfair treatment' of men.

 

[elfin_odalisque]

This was much nicer than the rest of LJ's threads; he's not calling for any women to be thrown in jail for their 'unfair treatment' of men.

As a girly-whirly here I could point out that most femdom and much lesbian writing here is authored by XY chromosome writers.

Feminism on Lit? Even female writers write good gay sex.

 

[elfin_odalisque]

Well, nobody. That's why I asked what the actual rejection notice said. (Was this a trick question?)

So, unless the OP provides that, this is an eminently ignorable thread.

Unlike your usual positive self, you seem to be trying to evade the issue here.

 

[sr71plt]

Apparently its not "ignorable" to you because you continue to post on it even though its obvious there has been no rejection.

Not to mention the fact you read it so quickly you don't even know who the OP is.

I'm doing it all so that you can have your biweekly stalk on me, Hatecraft.

We know how cranky you can get when you go three days without showing your sick obsession with me.

 

[sr71plt]

Unlike your usual positive self, you seem to be trying to evade the issue here.

What the hell are you posting about? The issue is that the OP claims his story was rejected by Laurel for being feminist. All I've done other than see your and Hatecraft's usual turning of this to razz me is asked the OP to back up the claim by quoting the rejection notice.

Talk about evading issues, Elfin, you certainly dropped out of the Donna Leon thread fast.

 

[lovecraft68]

I'm doing it all so that you can have your biweekly stalk on me, Hatecraft.

We know how cranky you can get when you go three days without showing your sick obsession with me.

No, I was posting to you not to waste your time, that its a trolling thread. But you kept making a fool of yourself asking questions about a rejection that never existed. Not to mention the fact your 'gun jumping' is in full swing because you didn't even know the name of the person who started the thread...

Here

http://www.literotica.com/stories/memberpage.php?uid=1187955&page=submissions

LJ reloaded is not an author here, never has been, he is a GB troll with a hate on for me. Hence his mentioning my name.

Now maybe you will stop asking for information on a rejection for a reason that is non existent from a poster who has never written a story.

Jeez Pilot, you're making me appreciate LJ here, at least he can put up a fight and also knows who the hell he is talking to and about.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

Well this thread was a waste of time.

 

[lovecraft68]

Well this thread was a waste of time.

Not really, we found out Pilot is even dumber than we thought.

 

[JaxRhapsody]

...Lovecraft is a woman....????

 

[lovecraft68]

...Lovecraft is a woman....????

If you believe that I have some very nice property available in death valley at a reasonable price, just for you.

 

[JKendallDane]

I'm doing it all so that you can have your biweekly stalk on me, Hatecraft.

We know how cranky you can get when you go three days without showing your sick obsession with me.

We gotta get the schedule down in writing somewhere, LC. I thought it was *MY* week to be the "sick, obsessed, stalker."

(you really do need to share whatever it is you put in your bong, pilot )

 

[lovecraft68]

We gotta get the schedule down in writing somewhere, LC. I thought it was *MY* week to be the "sick, obsessed, stalker."

(you really do need to share whatever it is you put in your bong, pilot )

You can have him. He's obviously losing his marbles and a battle of wits with an unarmed person isn't any fun.

BTW congrats on grabbing another spot in the GM all time 250.

I should start writing there just because the GM top list actually works