Netanyahu Speech

He doesn't. Fact is Obama is being praised in this speech.

Really? Like in the part where he fears the president will make a mistake?

Who the fuck is this guy to roll in and tell our country what we should do? Him being allowed at all to speak before Congress is ridiculous, much less without the approval of the white house.

The obvious fact that you turds aren't enraged by this really shows your stupidity.
 
Who the fuck is this guy to roll in and tell our country what we should do? Him being allowed at all to speak before Congress is ridiculous, much less without the approval of the white house.

The obvious fact that you turds aren't enraged by this really shows your stupidity.

Well said.
 
This thread brings out the NIGGERS

CowSHIT

ELEMENT

Killswitch

all we need is ROB SOUTH and we will have a full house of NIGGERS
 
Unofficial count: 23 standing ovations, 13 interruptions for seated applause

meanwhile when NIGGER "spoke", he got a

GET THE FUCK OUTA HERE:D
 
You're such a fuckin dickhole bizzydummy.

Why aren't you enraged at Boner inviting this guy to come question our country like that? What's wrong with you? (other than the obvious) :rolleyes:
 
Really? Like in the part where he fears the president will make a mistake?

Who the fuck is this guy to roll in and tell our country what we should do? Him being allowed at all to speak before Congress is ridiculous, much less without the approval of the white house.

The obvious fact that you turds aren't enraged by this really shows your stupidity.

He's not a racist person, but Cold War Relic Boy there just effortlessly enabled the shitstain's direct racist rhetoric in reference to Obama. No problem quote-supporting bullshit as long as he can take the back door way out because it didn't come from his horse lips directly.

That's the only reason he's all into this shitty speech, looking for any thrown dart against the President to boost up back here and pretend he's in the know. He could give a fuck about Israel or Jewish/Israeli concerns.

A Nut-And-Yahoo is listening to Netanyahu.
 
cowslinger64

This message is hidden because cowslinger64 is on your ignore list.


MULLAH NIGGER COWSHIT pissing in the wind
 
AH!

the HEAD NIGGER shows up

IrezumiKiss This user is on your Ignore List.
 
I didn't think my opinion could possibly be any lower. I was wrong. You are pure fucking garbage.
 
Facing a gubmint shutdown, boner and McConnell don't speak for the two weeks before it came down to a last second deal to extend it for a week.

They do find time for a foreigner to come in and advise us on our foreign policy.

When are you lunatics gonna wake up?
 
cowslinger64

This message is hidden because cowslinger64 is on your ignore list.






NIGGER craves attention
 
Michael Lerner writes:

Using quotes from the last prime minister of Iran, who talked about wanting to eliminate the “Zionist regime” from the earth, ignoring that that Iranian prime minister had his supporters severely defeated in the last Iranian elections, ignoring the fact that their supreme leader seeks to avoid confrontation with both Israel and the U.S. and says that it is a sin against Islam for anyone to use nuclear weapons, Netanyahu evokes the great guilt that many Christians feel about the way that Jews were demeaned by Christianity for 1,700 years and then abandoned to the genocidal acts of the Nazis. He uses that as an argument for why the Iranians must be stopped from developing any nuclear capacity, even for transparently peaceful purposes.

The irony here is that the escalation of sanctions at this point would strengthen those in Iran who do not wish to make any accommodations to the U.S., which it quite reasonably sees as mostly doing Israel’s bidding in the Middle East. If we escalate the sanctions, there are two predictable consequences: A.) The anger that many Iranians feel toward the oppressive regime of the mullahs would be redirected against Israel and the U.S., thereby strengthening the Islamic extremists as national pride replaces concerns about democracy and human rights, and weakening those who, I hope, will someday be able to non-violently overthrow the human-rights denying regime of the mullahs; and B.) Iran would move quickly to escalate its nuclear capacities and turn them toward military use, understanding the deepening sanctions as an act of war that might soon be followed by military attacks either from Israel or the U.S. (in short, actually creating the situation that Netanyahu says he fears, but which does not currently exist).

Now Netanyahu and his cheerleaders in both parties of the U.S. Congress are no dummies. They can see this same plausible outcome. So why would they be advocating it? Sadly, the answer is that they actually want another war, this time with Iran. For some Israelis, a war led by the U.S. against Iran would be a perfect way to get rid of a state that has been funding Islamic groups closer to Israel like Hezbollah (though Iran has actually been attacking supporters of ISIS—the self proclaimed Islamic State whose barbarism rightly frightens most civilized people). For some American capitalists, the securing of Iranian oil reserves will give Big Oil several more decades of flourishing. For some right-wing Christians, fighting a war to rid the Middle East of Israel’s most significant competitor for regional influence is a way of alleviating their guilt from past failures to save the Jews. And for still other right-wing Christians, a war that decimated Iran would be a major step toward the Apocalypse that they hope will yield a return of their messiah to earth.

We’ve already seen what this kind of a war looks like—we just barely are ending the Iraq war, which cost us a trillion dollars and led to the emergence of the ISIL/Islamic state. The dismantling of the regime in Iran (if not done, as I hope it someday will be, by a powerful internal Iranian movement just as the Soviet Union was dismantled by its own people and not by an invasion by the U.S.) would likely yield power to forces even worse than the current Iranian regime and more likely like the Islamic state in Iraq . It is unwinnable, and it will lead to the loss of many lives, the possibility of terrorism being spread to the U.S. as many people around the world see and resent the U.S. once again intervening in a country that is not intervening here in the U.S.
 
Even Captain Constitution finds nothing wrong with bypassing the office of the president, allowing a foreigner to come in and lecture to our Congress on what the USA should or shouldn't do.. And gets cheered.

Wow.
 
Thank you Khomeini KO for the timely anti-Semitic pro Iran response.:rolleyes:

during the 1980's, when Ronald Raygun was dismantling the Soviet Union....the PRESS allowed the SOVIETS airtime to REBUT RayGun's SOTU speeches.....they undermined America then, they still do
 
TWO THINGS PEOPLE ARE MISSING ABOUT NETANYAHU’S SPEECH: (1) He didn’t just make a case for why the U.S. should be harder on Iran. He made the case for unilateral Israeli military intervention too, sub silentio. (2) The most damaging thing to Obama here isn’t even the substance, but the contrast in style. Netanyahu, as someone said on Twitter, was better in his second language than Obama is in his first. And he presented himself as a leader who cares about his country, rather than one, like Obama, who makes excuses for its enemies.
 
Truman, Eisenhower, and George C. Marshall were all in on the plan.:D

Our resident shitbirds forget Turkey conquered Palestine, then the British took it from Turkey and partitioned it between the Jews and the Palestinians, and the Arabs terrorized the Jews and lost the war. They made war again in 1967 and 1973, and got their asses kicked some more. It sux to be Palestinian.
 
Back
Top