The Isolated Blurt Thread XIII: I'll Gladly Pay You Tuesday for Slap and Tickle Today

[Garnate]

i think they should just fuck and get it over with already.

^^My vote.

 

[eyer]

i think they should just fuck and get it over with already.

You've reminisced here how you've enjoyed giving and taking it up the butt, right?

Why don't you just go ahead and take my place in your fantasy, then?

 

[girlsmiley]

"all the shit that comes after"?

What "shit" would that be, Girlsmiley?



I'm believe most who read you find you as hysterically "threaten"ing as I always have...

...so I can personally vouch for you that I never feel "threatened" by any words you ever post, Girlsmiley, and certainly not any you posted in your now infamous, ways to kill eyer thread.

BTW:

I asked you a question in your infamous thread, but it was deleted before I saw a response from you, so I'll ask again:

When you referred to "Flamethrower", were you alluding to yourself or to me?

All the behind the scenes shit is what I mean. I asked why was my thread removed, and apparently it was because rule # 5. I don't get it, and doubt I ever will. Threatening other posters. Yeah right. You said yourself - you didn't feel, and don't feel threatened by me. I knew that before I started the thread.

Not to mention the fact that I was told by Laurel, that the long-time female poster (who reported the thread and sent Laurel the long pm about how my thread was inappropriate and setting a bad example/precedent) is in fact friendly with me on the board. And because SHE wasn't happy about my thread, Laurel removed it. What kinda fucken bullshit is that.

That hurt a bit. That I was told. I wasn't given a name. I didn't need to know that.

I never, not even for one second, thought it was you who reported the thread. Even if you had reported the thread, I wouldn't have cared. I don't care who it was. What bothers me is that I was told my thread was deemed inappropriate by some posters and then removed by admin.

Laurel removed it. Why? Because it was against the rules. What rule? Rule #5. Ugh. It's like banging your head against a brick wall. That's what I mean by shit.

Bums me out a bit. But you know what? I'm glad we can all talk about it in an open way.

When I asked you "You don't mind, do you?" I was being serious. I wanted to make sure you knew the thread was a joke before continuing on.

That said, I guess you were right about admin. And now I'm sorry for all the silly drama. It was supposed to be a bit of fun.

 

[Noor]

I finally figured out this was about. I tried to find my post earlier but I couldn't.

 

[Laurel]

Not to mention the fact that I was told by Laurel, that the long-time female poster (who reported the thread and sent Laurel the long pm about how my thread was inappropriate and setting a bad example/precedent) is in fact friendly with me on the board. And because SHE wasn't happy about my thread, Laurel removed it. What kinda fucken bullshit is that.

Completely incorrect.

Girlsmiley PMed repeatedly to ask why her thread was removed.

I explained that the thread violated Rule #5.

I explained this more than once.

I explained - again, at least once - that we had removed similar threads by other users before.

I then tried to explain the reasoning behind our rule - that threats of violence make other people feel that they cannot share themselves here. They inhibit Free Speech.

I explained the reasoning expressed to us one of the users who contacted us to express concern/discomfort with the thread - who told me that she feels comfortable here - and would feel very very much less so were she to browse to the Gee Bee and find a thread titled "Please Tell Me How You Would Rape and Kill [her username]".

I had already moved the thread off the site by the time I read the woman's PM.

I removed the thread because it was brought to my attention by multiple reports, and that after reading it I decided it violated Rule #5.

I wrote to Girlsmiley that, "I believe she is friendly with you on the boards," to reassure girlsmiley that I believe the woman's concerns were genuine and not motivated by her interactions with girlsmiley.

For the last time: the thread violated our rules. That's why it was removed. Period.

 

[Equinoxe]

Curious.

 

[Sean]

LTR putting away the black pudding like a proper northern lass.

 

[girlsmiley]

Completely incorrect.

Girlsmiley PMed repeatedly to ask why her thread was removed.

I explained that the thread violated Rule #5.

I explained this more than once.

I explained - again, at least once - that we had removed similar threads by other users before.

I then tried to explain the reasoning behind our rule - that threats of violence make other people feel that they cannot share themselves here. They inhibit Free Speech.

I explained the reasoning expressed to us one of the users who contacted us to express concern/discomfort with the thread - who told me that she feels comfortable here - and would feel very very much less so were she to browse to the Gee Bee and find a thread titled "Please Tell Me How You Would Rape and Kill [her username]".

I had already moved the thread off the site by the time I read the woman's PM.

I removed the thread because it was brought to my attention by multiple reports, and that after reading it I decided it violated Rule #5.

I wrote to Girlsmiley that, "I believe she is friendly with you on the boards," to reassure girlsmiley that I believe the woman's concerns were genuine and not motivated by her interactions with girlsmiley.

For the last time: the thread violated our rules. That's why it was removed. Period.

Oh repeatedly, was it?

We had a conversation of 4 messages from me in total. And not once did you explain anything. All you did was tell me how inappropriate my thread was to other posters. Not once did you explain how my thread violated Rule #5

Laurel, what part of I don't understand why my thread was removed do you not understand?

You never once mentioned "threats of violence" in our private messages.

You were reassuring me? You told me that a person who was supposedly my friend on the board had messaged you in private. They thought my thread was inappropriate, and then you tried to scold me for bringing it to the board! Why?

That's fucking bullshit!

 

[girlsmiley]

This is what I meant about the shit being so much worse behind the scenes.

So over it. Let's move on.

 

[Laurel]

Curious.

Wow, that is very odd!

LTR putting away the black pudding like a proper northern lass.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/8b5ed26d1e4572323aa30a2618cd623c/tumblr_n3gf4sV0i31smcbm7o1_400.gif

 

[Equinoxe]

Wow, that is very odd!

We're being watched.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

http://41.media.tumblr.com/eb8ad6302bb643447a709d3e790490a4/tumblr_nd3mmaFvZW1u0k9obo1_500.jpg

BASQUIAT & MADONNA // BASQUIAT’S APARTMENT -NYC // 1985

 

[Never]

Hot muesli is the breakfast of champions.

 

[Equinoxe]

I adore that little flute-ish part in "There is a Light That Never Goes Out".

 

[dolf]

http://stayonfountain.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/guess-who.jpg

 

[Tathagata]

Oh dear God... Paul McCartney

Someone hand me some earplugs. I thought it was a joke

A man who is so ego driven he can't resist any offer to be in the spotlight.
He's awful.

I have a friend who, every time he sees McCartney or hears him mentioned says " They shot the wrong Beatle"

 

[Tathagata]

Curious.

eyer's alts left all their laptops on

 

[Wife of Bath]

I didn't report the thread and I didn't message anyone about it, but I did find it in poor taste and it made me uncomfortable. Had it been in the Personals/Playground/extremely fast-moving French Literotica I would absolutely have moderated it for violating that same rule.

ETA: holy buckets, 1285 viewing?! We're all celebrities, you guys.

 

[MonaLittle]

A man who is so ego driven he can't resist any offer to be in the spotlight.
He's awful.

I have a friend who, every time he sees McCartney or hears him mentioned says " They shot the wrong Beatle"

By some of the reactions here, I thought I was the only one who thought he sounded awful. He was pitchy and off key and straining not only to hit the high notes but throughout the entire song. I was embarrassed for him. You know how SNL shows satirical commercials that you sometimes don't catch right away? I thought his singing was a joke. And then, I realized it wasn't.

 

[Tathagata]

By some of the reactions here, I thought I was the only one who thought he sounded awful. He was pitchy and off key and straining now only to hit the high notes but throughout the entire song. I was embarrassed for him. You know how SNL shows satirical commercials that you sometimes don't catch right away? I thought his singing was a joke. And then, I realized it wasn't.

It is embarrassing. I am sure no one has the nerve to tell him and as long as people will come see him and applaud he will go on.
A real live Beatle.

I remember a quote from John Lennon basically saying " I don't want to be 40 years old playing " Love Me Do" in Las Vegas."
Which has been McCartney's career since 1990 or so

 

[RobDownSouth]

A man who is so ego driven he can't resist any offer to be in the spotlight.
He's awful.

I have a friend who, every time he sees McCartney or hears him mentioned says " They shot the wrong Beatle"

The guy is an entertainer by trade, the spotlight is second nature to him.

Having said that, his voice really has sounded shot to hell in the past two years.

 

[Tathagata]

The guy is an entertainer by trade, the spotlight is second nature to him.

Having said that, his voice really has sounded shot to hell in the past two years.

He wasn't much of an entertainer last night.

It's like saying the ring is second nature to a boxer. There comes a point where you back out gracefully.
Just my opinion.

 

[MonaLittle]

It is embarrassing. I am sure no one has the nerve to tell him and as long as people will come see him and applaud he will go on.
A real live Beatle.

I remember a quote from John Lennon basically saying " I don't want to be 40 years old playing " Love Me Do" in Las Vegas."
Which has been McCartney's career since 1990 or so

Loved Lennon. He was my favorite Beatle and actually one of my favorite musicians. I would have loved to have seen where he would have gone with his career had he not be shot down in cold blood. I loved his spirit and his controversial political and religious views. He was such a trail blazer.

As far as it being time to retire and put down the microphone - the same rule applies today to so many musicians who once stood in the spotlight of fame. So many are well past their prime and should no longer be performing. The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan come to mind. Also, Tony Bennett. It makes me nervous watching these guys try to reach the notes that once came so naturally to them.

 

[MonaLittle]

He wasn't much of an entertainer last night.

It's like saying the ring is second nature to a boxer. There comes a point where you back out gracefully.
Just my opinion.

Yes. ^^^ This is an unwritten rule of life in countless scenarios. Walk away gracefully and at a point where people remember you for what you've contributed and in a positive light.

Seems so simple yet so many people have a hard time following through with that simple action.

*Also Notice that I wrote "contributed" and not "accomplished" Key.To*****.

 

[Tathagata]

Loved Lennon. He was my favorite Beatle and actually one of my favorite musicians. I would have loved to have seen where he would have gone with his career had he not be shot down in cold blood. I loved his spirit and his controversial political and religious views. He was such a trail blazer.

As far as it being time to retire and put down the microphone - the same rule applies today to so many musicians who once stood in the spotlight of fame. So many are well past their prime and should no longer be performing. The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan come to mind. Also, Tony Bennett. It makes me nervous watching these guys try to reach the notes that once came so naturally to them.

I don't like Baldwin at all, but the Jeopardy sketch was hysterical with him playing Tony Bennett talking into the buzzer.

The few times I've seen him on talk shows in the last few years was just sad.


Lennon was a complex guy and you have to get beyond the " Ono Fairy Tale" perpetuated by Elliot Mintz for all those years.
I will say if he believed something he believed it all the way, and when it no longer served him a week or a year later he had no reservations dropping it and moving on.
He was also painfully honest in his music.
Rumor has it Sir Paul wrote "Silly Love Songs" in response to a comment from Lennon, who when asked if he had heard McCartneys new album said something like " What is it, more silly love songs?"