LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

President Obama's energy policies result in 5 1/2 year low for oil

cowslinger64 said:
You two and jen are the most spectacularly stupid people I have ever seen.
Click to expand...

so you cant show me

is that it, NIGGER?

so they weren't INNOCENT? they were combatants...and in WAR.....COMBATANTS de....right, NIGGER? but hey, gas is cheap fro your PIMP MOBILE:D....you pimpin out your COLORED relations?:confused:
 
vettecoward said:
Yet, you cannot meet the challenge of backing up your charges with facts. We know why, and we know who is stupid.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we know about you and "facts". :rolleyes:

See also "Drudge #1 News Site on Internet" and "Frank Zappa always stoned".
 
Not all the losses in Iraq were in vain. In fact just today, Shell reached an agreement to build a plant in Iraq.

Shell's a Dutch company, so that can be counted against the sacrifice The Netherlands made in the Iraq War, and the two Dutch soldiers who lost their lives.
 
KingOrfeo said:
And that drove oil prices down how?
Click to expand...

It didn't. If something happens despite his actions it means that it did not happen because of his actions.

No one has even posited a single policy or action that the Obama administration has done that had the intention or the direct result in increasing production. The oil industry found ways around the slow walking of permits, the denial of areas previously open to exploration.

As to how his restrictive policies influenced the prices of oil in the early period of his administration, it is because when actions are taken and policies are stated that OUGHT to have the effect of lowering production levels, traders anticipate and react to those conditions.

When industry (again despite the administrations stated and actual policies) outstripped expectations, the price of oil fell.

Not that you want to actually consider the logic of any of this.

Keep pretending that it is logical to assign zero blame for his stated policies and actual actions having the effect initially of reducing expectation for productions and that when those policies intended to reduce production failed, give him the credit for increased production.

While you are at it, continue to give him credit for reversing the cozy relationship that that was charged that the Bush/Cheney administration had with the oil industry, and for fostering an environment that was allegedly good for the earth by making fossil fuels of all sorts less available and more expensive as his actual Energy Secretary recommended.

Go ahead give him credit for the environment AND production that he had absolutely nothing to do with. Makes sense. To you and your kind incapable of following a linear train of thought from a to b to c.

Anyone that can read the foregoing and the OP and decide that the OP makes sense is either a partisan hack or incapable of reason. Don't you have some Salon copies to be delivering, paperboy?
 
NeverEndingMe said:
did you put some gas in the home? guess you got new tires too or is it still on cinder blocks?
Click to expand...

It would be, but all the blocks are taking up the space in your head right now...

Which explains why you didn't catch the unnecessary apostrophes when each person wrote "its".
 
Busybody posts the wildest lies in his thread titles, and none of the RWCJ ever call him on them.
 
phrodeau said:
Busybody posts the wildest lies in his thread titles, and none of the RWCJ ever call him on them.
Click to expand...

By drawing the comparison you are acknowledging that the thread title is a lie.

Progress.
 
phrodeau said:
Are you acknowledging that busybody's thread titles are lies?
Click to expand...

It was your assertion that Busy's thread titles contain "the wildest of lies." The clear implication is you are acknowledging that this thread is BS.

I made no such assertion or judgment of Busy's threads. If you have one in mind, post a link.

Busy, I will grant you engages in hyperbole. Hyperbole is an exaggeration of some underlying truth. Rob's thread here is opposite day. As you well know, none of Obama's energy policies had the stated goal or the effect of increasing production which is the reason that prices or lower. Rob's op is not even partially true. There is not a single energy policy or action one can point to as having contributed in any way at all, no matter how insignificant to the current boom in oil production.

Analogies are not a strength of yours, are they?



Busybody said:
really?

show me

its OK

I'll wait:cool:
Click to expand...

I am interested to know what his vote for "wildest" lie will be. Especially since he is under the impression that "The hottest year in all of recorded history" is not a lie.
 
query said:
I am interested to know what his vote for "wildest" lie will be. Especially since he is under the impression that "The hottest year in all of recorded history" is not a lie.
Click to expand...

we WONT get answer from FREAK DOH!

and me thinks we wont get answer from Robby Sow

#unexpectedly:D
 
query said:
It was your assertion that Busy's thread titles contain "the wildest of lies." The clear implication is you are acknowledging that this thread is BS.

I made no such assertion or judgment of Busy's threads. If you have one in mind, post a link.

Busy, I will grant you engages in hyperbole. Hyperbole is an exaggeration of some underlying truth. Rob's thread here is opposite day. As you well know, none of Obama's energy policies had the stated goal or the effect of increasing production which is the reason that prices or lower. Rob's op is not even partially true. There is not a single energy policy or action one can point to as having contributed in any way at all, no matter how insignificant to the current boom in oil production.

Analogies are not a strength of yours, are they?





I am interested to know what his vote for "wildest" lie will be. Especially since he is under the impression that "The hottest year in all of recorded history" is not a lie.
Click to expand...
Go back and read the first page of this thread. You might want to edit your post afterward.
 
phrodeau said:
Go back and read the first page of this thread. You might want to edit your post afterward.
Click to expand...

nope I don't.

The slogan "All of the above" is a) not a policy, and had no effect at all on production and b) was intended to be a statement DEemphasizing our untilization of fossil fuels.

Fail.

Try again.

I notice you haven't posted any of Busy's "wildest lies." Or responded about the lie about "2014 being the hottest year in all of record history"
 
query said:
nope I don't.

The slogan "All of the above" is a) not a policy, and had no effect at all on production and b) was intended to be a statement DEemphasizing our untilization of fossil fuels.

Fail.

Try again.

I notice you haven't posted any of Busy's "wildest lies." Or responded about the lie about "2014 being the hottest year in all of record history"
Click to expand...
When you ignore or shrug off legitimate answers to your many questions, then ask them again, nobody is interested in indulging you.

It's taken fifteen pages for you to notice, so I thought I'd tell you directly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Obama's Solar Boondoggle In The California Desert To Finally Shut Down.
Replies
2
Views
51
Bn2f
Bn2f
Rightguide
Trust In Media Hits New Low
2
Replies
32
Views
297
DeluxAuto
DeluxAuto
Rightguide
Why Trump's Alaska Trip Was A Master Stroke
6 7 8
Replies
189
Views
3K
ll74
ll74
RobDownSouth
Happy Talk 'Bout The Holocaust
2
Replies
25
Views
392
Rightguide
Rightguide
Rightguide
Comey Under Investigation For Threatening The President
3 4 5
Replies
115
Views
2K
YDB95
YDB95
Back
Top