GB Hall Of Fame Round Two:Vote Here

GB Hall Of Fame, Original Round Two

  • Just Pet

    Votes: 37 28.2%
  • Lancecastor

    Votes: 28 21.4%
  • Killer Muffin

    Votes: 24 18.3%
  • Ishmael

    Votes: 50 38.2%
  • Cheyenne

    Votes: 24 18.3%
  • Peregrinator

    Votes: 43 32.8%
  • Gravyrug

    Votes: 31 23.7%
  • Phelia

    Votes: 45 34.4%
  • Hobbit

    Votes: 24 18.3%
  • Doll Parts

    Votes: 24 18.3%

  • Total voters
    131
  • Poll closed .
Unless a few disagreeable folks chime in occasionally, as I noticed you did earlier. :D
 
Oh darn, did I mess up? I am not really all here right now, it's a good thing I don't do brain surgery, air traffic control or work on websites live on the fly ;)
 
Does Phelia have the required number of posts?

No, she does not.

I will take the blame for not checking when she was nominated. For as long as she's been around, I took it for a given. So, mea culpa on that.

So, what should we do about it?

I propose that, if she finishes in the top 5, she be set aside with an asterisk, and be inducted to the Hall when, and if, she ever gets to 10,000 posts. The question is, do we induct the Top 5, not including her? I am inclined to say yes, but what do you think?

If someone has a better idea (and no, Eyer, whining like a little titty sucking baby does not constitute "having an idea"), please propose it.

And thanks, MeeMie, for catching this.
 
Oh darn, did I mess up? I am not really all here right now, it's a good thing I don't do brain surgery, air traffic control or work on websites live on the fly ;)




Nobody is blaming you dear. But, the rules ARE the rules, you know.

A simple disqualification will rectify the error.
 
Oh darn, did I mess up? I am not really all here right now, it's a good thing I don't do brain surgery, air traffic control or work on websites live on the fly ;)

It's my fault, I should have checked.
 
No, she does not.

I will take the blame for not checking when she was nominated. For as long as she's been around, I took it for a given. So, mea culpa on that.

So, what should we do about it?

I propose that, if she finishes in the top 5, she be set aside with an asterisk, and be inducted to the Hall when, and if, she ever gets to 10,000 posts. The question is, do we induct the Top 5, not including her? I am inclined to say yes, but what do you think?

If someone has a better idea (and no, Eyer, whining like a little titty sucking baby does not constitute "having an idea"), please propose it.

And thanks, MeeMie, for catching this.
Your Hall; your rules. I say do what you will.
 
No, she does not.

I will take the blame for not checking when she was nominated. For as long as she's been around, I took it for a given. So, mea culpa on that.

So, what should we do about it?

I propose that, if she finishes in the top 5, she be set aside with an asterisk, and be inducted to the Hall when, and if, she ever gets to 10,000 posts. The question is, do we induct the Top 5, not including her? I am inclined to say yes, but what do you think?

If someone has a better idea (and no, Eyer, whining like a little titty sucking baby does not constitute "having an idea"), please propose it.

And thanks, MeeMie, for catching this.

I think that sounds good. What if she makes it to 10,000 by the 24 ? ;)
 
Hmmmmm... not really.

Since THE RULES say no one should be NOMINATED unless they have the required number of posts.

Not nobody should win ... rather nobody should be NOMINATED

The only course of action is a disqualification until the required number of posts is reached to qualify another future poll.
 
Hmmmmm... not really.

Since THE RULES say no one should be NOMINATED unless they have the required number of posts.

Not nobody should win ... rather nobody should be NOMINATED

The only course of action is a disqualification until the required number of posts is reached to qualify another future poll.

I'd like to argue with that, but I can't. You are right. I made the rules, I need to abide by them, and not try to split the difference.

With apologies to Phelia, to Noor and Fata, who nominated her, and to anyone who voted for her, Phelia is disqualified.
 
I love the fact that someone who hasn't been on Lit in ages seemingly popped only in this thread and then bothered to check up on one particular poster's post count, a poster who hasn't even posted in this thread.

But yeah, roolz are roolz, in the end.
 
If someone as popular and well known as Phelia doesn't qualify, maybe the 10,000 post rule is a mistake.

I didn't expect to get 100 people to vote in the poll, I thought it might be 20-30. So, I set a minimum in order to prevent any fooling around with creating alts and having them get put in, and things like that. But, with this much participation, any manipulation is going to be minimized.

So, I'm considering junking the 10k rule after this week. If I do, then Noor can nominate Phelia again. Or not. Maybe they'll have a big cat fight before then.
 
yeah yeah blah blah


How about the site owner and dead guy rule. Any movement on that?
 
I remember when just pet ruled late night with breakwall, bob bitchin, and heavy stick.

And the women's click. Their parts were generally interchangeable with one or two being more affable then the next until the snark kicked in.

Juicy fruit was great fun. Dillinger had the most tilted, smart mind around. He always amazed me. He was a part of the killer muffin, problem child, risya Skye, cymbidia lavender, mishka crowd. Lancecastor is the only survivor of that time. And there's lucky knight and however he misspelled it.

The newer posters would never know them even though they set the tone of the board as being intelligent with deep humor.

There was a whole kiwi (Debbie is still around now and then) and Aussie contingent that were also great fun.

All long gone but definitely are on my hall of fame.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top