The anti-Christian Morality of Ethics

[bronzeage]

But you didn't list necrophilia as a fetish. Internet dating is so confusing.

For necrophilia to be a fetish, one has to desire to have sex with a dead body. Pete actually has a peace and quite fetish, and the dead body thing is just a means to an end.

 

[about_average]

I forgot the parse master would pick out one word; I think to be more precise I should have said normative for the majority of non-liberals....

You don't even know what you post anymore, if you ever did.
The key phrase in your editorial is, "That is not a normal human reaction". Could have stripped out everything else and your reply would have meant exactly the same.
So again, you're trying to define what is normal and what isn't.
Move the goal posts all you want, but it is what you're said and are doing.

You have yet to refute anyone's comments on it with anything even approaching a rational argument.

So, if someone calls themselves a Libertarian, to avoid being called a fanatic, they must conform to your, obviously not fanatical, purview...

Nope, I never said that.
But I know if you disapprove of something (like same sex marriage) you oppose permitting it. Nothing libertarian at all about that. Maybe you're just a fair weather libertarian. i.e., as long as it doesn't require your parade getting rained on.
I certainly wouldn't call you a fanatical libertarian, given your willingness to meddle in the private affairs of others.

Sounds pretty damned extreme to me.

What is extreme about it? Examples?

You seem to have a real animus towards the welfare of the less fortunate.

Nope, never said that either. You sure like ascribing positions to other people.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Nope, never said that either. You sure like ascribing positions to other people.

The Chief was the 'gold standard' for #AscriptionAgain for many years, until query came along.
:nods:

 

[wrant]

Oh, I get it now...



I forgot the parse master would pick out one word; I think to be more precise I should have said normative for the majority of non-liberals, but increasingly, as pointed out in the piece, normative for those steeped in Leftist Liberal Academia where defending cop-killers and Hamas are badges of authenticity for their belief system.

Much as your belief system believes in collapsing Central and South American governments and militarizing your police force? What separates you from Joe McCarthy? Or is he a hero of yours?

 

[wrant]

I have to agree with about_average, he never stated that he had a problem with the less fortunate. In fact, I got the impression that he actually feels a level of compassion for them. He even understands if we, dare I say collectively, help them.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I like to call myself a murderer-rapist.

It is all about the order of operations.

Do you mean to say you kill somebody and then you rape her? My god, that's really perverted. You're supposed to rape her first, then kill her.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You don't even know what you post anymore, if you ever did.
The key phrase in your editorial is, "That is not a normal human reaction". Could have stripped out everything else and your reply would have meant exactly the same.
So again, you're trying to define what is normal and what isn't.
Move the goal posts all you want, but it is what you're said and are doing.

You have yet to refute anyone's comments on it with anything even approaching a rational argument.

Nope, I never said that.
But I know if you disapprove of something (like same sex marriage) you oppose permitting it. Nothing libertarian at all about that. Maybe you're just a fair weather libertarian. i.e., as long as it doesn't require your parade getting rained on.
I certainly wouldn't call you a fanatical libertarian, given your willingness to meddle in the private affairs of others.

What is extreme about it? Examples?

Nope, never said that either. You sure like ascribing positions to other people.

What would be a "normal" reaction?

I would reject a man if he were pro-life?

Would I reject him is he weren't romantic? sensitive?

If normal is a bell-curve... what the hell percentage thinks first and foremost homophobe?

As far as Gay Marriage, I never opposed the legal sanction of same-sex couples anymore than I oppose the sanction of polygamy or polyandry. I do not sanction the remaking of the definitions to make the former Steve-John-Paul or the latter Jane-Julie-Sandy...

Words have meaning. It is come to me in our conversations that to you meaning is situational, but I believe that changing meanings has a consequence.

But I am forcing nothing on nobody. Ever.

What is extreme about Libertarianism?



Whenever the attacks on Libertarians commence here, when they call them anarchists and Republicans, do you somehow think they mean every Libertarian but you???

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

What would be a "normal" reaction?

I would reject a man if he were pro-life?

Would I reject him is he weren't romantic? sensitive?

If normal is a bell-curve... what the hell percentage thinks first and foremost homophobe?

As far as Gay Marriage, I never opposed the legal sanction of same-sex couples anymore than I oppose the sanction of polygamy or polyandry. I do not sanction the remaking of the definitions to make the former Steve-John-Paul or the latter Jane-Julie-Sandy...

Words have meaning. It is come to me in our conversations that to you meaning is situational, but I believe that changing meanings has a consequence.

But I am forcing nothing on nobody. Ever.

What is extreme about Libertarianism?



Whenever the attacks on Libertarians commence here, when they call them anarchists and Republicans, do you somehow think they mean every Libertarian but you???

Gay means happy. Words have meaning!!!

 

[unregistered]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Gay means happy. Words have meaning!!!

2. Lighthearted and carefree

Like so many other words, the LIberals simply co-opted the term to avoid saying homosexual just like retarded is now passe...



Grow up.

:Fremdschämen:

 

[RobDownSouth]

Right now the country is being governed from the bench. Almost like martial law. We are supposed to be 50 sovereign states, but everywhere federal judges are overthrowing state laws that have stood through history. We find ourselves sitting around waiting to hear our fate from the next SCOTUS decision. Do we still have this right, do we still have that right? Can the states defend themselves? Or do we have to submit to a conspiracy of faithless execution of the law from a lawless president? Is this how our republic was designed to work?

Tell us again, Gunny Pantload, about the direct harm to you if two gay guys get married.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Right now the country is being governed from the bench. Almost like martial law. We are supposed to be 50 sovereign states, but everywhere federal judges are overthrowing state laws that have stood through history. We find ourselves sitting around waiting to hear our fate from the next SCOTUS decision. Do we still have this right, do we still have that right? Can the states defend themselves? Or do we have to submit to a conspiracy of faithless execution of the law from a lawless president? Is this how our republic was designed to work?

The bench and the administrative, but the nation has become so Balkanized that its House (and wrongfully acquired Senate) are paralyzed to act outside of the ever-shifting consensus and we know what that historical pattern tends to.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Much as your belief system believes in collapsing Central and South American governments and militarizing your police force? What separates you from Joe McCarthy? Or is he a hero of yours?

Jesus fuck.

:Fremdschämen:

I have no idea what this means or how the hell you even reached that conclusion.

I am not a smart man.

 

[RjThoughts]

Get that?

In 2009, Princeton sociologists Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Radford demonstrated that poor, white Christians are underrepresented on elite college campuses. Leftists add insult to injury. A blue-collar white kid, who feels lost and friendless on the alien terrain of a university campus, a campus he has to leave immediately after class so he can get to his fulltime job at MacDonald's, must accept that he is a recipient of "white privilege" – if he wants to get good grades in mandatory classes on racism.

Talk about your compartmentalization!

The important part of your ENTIRE statement is...

POOR

Poor, no matter what color, what religion, are ALWAYS going to be underrepresented. I was the ONLY poor Native Catholic on my campus. Should I have whined like you are?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I have to agree with about_average, he never stated that he had a problem with the less fortunate. In fact, I got the impression that he actually feels a level of compassion for them. He even understands if we, dare I say collectively, help them.

Jesus Fuck.

:Fremdschämen:

Stand up. Our conversation seems to be passing over your head.

 

[RjThoughts]

I wonder if Vette knows there aren't 50 states: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Massachusetts and Kentucky are Commonwealths!

 

[RobDownSouth]

The bench and the administrative, but the nation has become so Balkanized that its House (and wrongfully acquired Senate) are paralyzed to act outside of the ever-shifting consensus and we know what that historical pattern tends to.

"Wrongfully Acquired"?

El Oh El.

Such a bitter little situational native american you are.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The important part of your ENTIRE statement is...

POOR

Poor, no matter what color, what religion, are ALWAYS going to be underrepresented. I was the ONLY poor Native Catholic on my campus. Should I have whined like you are?

That's not my statement.

:Fremdschämen:

I was the only half-breed in my school and thus had my ass kicked often and vigorously. Then, praise be to Allah, Judge Clark ordered that the crackers had to take in the minority community. Then the black kids kicked my ass too, only this time for being a ficking wetback.

PS - They knew more fucking Spanish than I did! I took me six months to figure out what they meant by puta and bendejo!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I wonder if Vette knows there aren't 50 states: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Massachusetts and Kentucky are Commonwealths!

Uhm...



Unless you are a racist, there are 57 states.

 

[RjThoughts]

That's not my statement.

:Fremdschämen:

I was the only half-breed in my school and thus had my ass kicked often and vigorously. Then, praise be to Allah, Judge Clark ordered that the crackers had to take in the minority community. Then the black kids kicked my ass too, only this time for being a ficking wetback.

PS - They knew more fucking Spanish than I did! I took me six months to figure out what they meant by puta and bendejo!

You got your ass kicked because you're an asshole.

 

[Ishmael]

I wonder if Vette knows there aren't 50 states: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Massachusetts and Kentucky are Commonwealths!

They can call themselves whatever they want but there is NO constitutional distinction, they're states.

Ishmael

 

[RobDownSouth]

That's not my statement.

You usually use quotes to hide behind the words of others.
:nods:

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You got your ass kicked because you're an asshole.

Maybe.



Probably because I was smart enough to stay on topic, pay attention and earn A grades...



They then had to make me the target of their angst, much like you are doing now.

 

[about_average]

What would be a "normal" reaction?

I would reject a man if he were pro-life?

Would I reject him is he weren't romantic? sensitive?

If normal is a bell-curve... what the hell percentage thinks first and foremost homophobe?

You're the one who claims to know what "normal" is, within some closely defined parameters. You tell us.

As far as Gay Marriage, I never opposed the legal sanction of same-sex couples anymore than I oppose the sanction of polygamy or polyandry. I do not sanction the remaking of the definitions to make the former Steve-John-Paul or the latter Jane-Julie-Sandy...

Words have meaning. It is come to me in our conversations that to you meaning is situational, but I believe that changing meanings has a consequence.

Good cop out. TRADITION!

But I am forcing nothing on nobody. Ever.

Umm..yeah, you are. Wanting to force them to live according to your views. How you define marriage

What is extreme about Libertarianism?

I was asking you. You're the one who said my views were extreme.

Whenever the attacks on Libertarians commence here, when they call them anarchists and Republicans, do you somehow think they mean every Libertarian but you???

Beats me. I get called a liberal all the time.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Maybe.



Probably because I was smart enough to stay on topic, pay attention and earn A grades...



They then had to make me the target of their angst, much like you are doing now.

It's very hard to believe that at one time in your life you were able to stay on topic. Your career at Lit can be summed up with the following six catch-phrases

• But...but...Benghazi!
• Abortion!
• Von Mises!
• Education BAD!
• Rob is bein' mean to me!
• and of course, That's DIFFERENT!