MoveOn.org In Support Of Boko Haram

Huh.

This must mean there are no moderate Catholics.

BB once posited the idea that Imams should be locked up when any of their congregation committed a terrorist act. I asked him if he thought every Catholic priest in Ireland should be locked up for IRA bombings. No answer.
 
BB once posited the idea that Imams should be locked up when any of their congregation committed a terrorist act. I asked him if he thought every Catholic priest in Ireland should be locked up for IRA bombings. No answer.

Speaking of unanswered questions, when do you think Vette will return to this thread?
 
Speaking of unanswered questions, when do you think Vette will return to this thread?

Never. He tends to run away when his bullshit is exposed as bullshit. But it's funny when he does come back and keeps digging.
 
Well it DID seem to have something to do with education and you know if it is about educating kids it HAS to be a good thing.

That's why the like communists. All that re-education by the commissars.

I can hear Petey and Frodo now, "Why do you HATE education?"


;) ;)
 
5. The abduction of the schoolgirls is only the latest in a huge string of atrocities.

The world has only begun to notice them because of the abduction of the schoolgirls, but the Nigerian jihad terror group Boko Haram has been around for years. Without attracting the international outrage they have drawn upon themselves now, they have committed innumerable acts of unimaginable savagery, murdering over 2,500 people in the first three months of 2014 alone and torching numerous churches and Christian homes.

...

Of course, in the Obama administration it hasn’t been fashionable to talk about jihad activity other than within the context of al Qaeda, and Boko Haram is not al Qaeda. Therefore it essentially did not exist (either for the administration or for the mainstream media that it carries around in its pocket like so many nickels), or if it did, it wasn’t a terrorist group: Hillary Clinton’s State Department was notoriously slow to designate it as such, even as the dead bodies piled up.
 
4. Their real name is Party of the People of the Sunnah for Dawah and Jihad.

Boko Haram means “Western education is sin,” or more literally, “Books bad.” The mainstream media has reported this as if the group were a bunch of Luddites with AK-47s – people who for some unexplained reason object to modern technology except for the weaponry. But actually the moniker “Boko Haram” is a specifically Islamic name, referring to the sinfulness of any system of education that is not based and centered upon the Qur’an and Islam.

And the actual name of the group is not Boko Haram at all; it is the Party of the People of the Sunnah for Dawah and Jihad. Sunnah is accepted Islamic practice as derived from the Qur’an and Hadith; dawah is Islamic proselytizing; and jihad, of course, is (according to mainstream Islamic tradition) primarily warfare against unbelievers in order to establish the hegemony of Islamic law. Clearly, then, the group’s focus and motivation is entirely Islamic – which is probably why the media never calls the group by its actual name: too much focus on Islam in connection with terrorism is, for the media, as verboten for today’s media as it would have been for Der Stürmer to run a piece favorable to Jews.
 
3. Muslim clerics recruit for them in mosques.

The British tabloid The Sun reported in late April that “Nigerian Muslim clerics living in the border towns of Cameroon and Nigeria are recruiting Boko Haram members in their mosques, the government of Cameroon has alleged.” It quoted StrategyPage, an American military news site:

Cameroon is also concerned about pro-Boko Haram clerics from Nigeria quietly preaching and recruiting for Boko Haram in Cameroon mosques. Islamic conservative clergy are not unusual on either side of the border, but those who do not denounce Boko Haram are suspected of quietly recruiting young men to join the “jihad” (struggle) and fight (and often die) in Nigeria.
 
2. The taking of infidel women as sex slaves is justified in Islamic law.

Muslim leaders worldwide have recently rained down condemnations on Boko Haram and declared their abduction of the schoolgirls un-Islamic. This was necessary because Abubakar Shekau, the leader of Boko Haram, has said: “I abducted your girls. I will sell them on the market, by Allah….There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell.”

There is, unfortunately, a case for the idea that Allah did indeed say that. The Qur’an does allow for the owning of sex slaves:

If you fear that you will not act justly towards the orphans, marry such women as seem good to you, two, three, four; but if you fear you will not be equitable, then only one, or what your right hands own; so it is likelier you will not be partial. (Qur’an 4:3)

And:

And also prohibited to you are all married women except those your right hands possess. (Qur’an 4:24)

The mainstream Muslim commentary Tafsir al-Jalalayn explains that 4:3 tells Muslims to “marry only one, or, restrict yourself to what your right hands own, of slavegirls, since these do not have the same rights as wives.” The twentieth-century Qur’an commentator Maulana Bulandshahri explains the wisdom of this practice, and longs for the good old days:

None of the injunctions pertaining to slavery have been abrogated in the Shari’ah. The reason that the Muslims of today do not have slaves is because they do not engage in Jihad (religion war)….Muslims have been denied a great boon whereby every home could have had a slave.
 
1. Their leader has said: “The reason why I will kill you is you are infidels.”

On Wednesday, John Kerry blamed the phenomenon of Boko Haram on poverty:

Much of this challenge comes out of this poverty where young people are grabbed at an early stage, proffered a little bit of money. Their minds are bended, and then the money doesn’t matter anymore. They’ve got the minds, and they begin to direct them into these very extreme endeavors.

Among those who would disagree that throwing money at Boko Haram will make their jihad go away would be none other than Abubakar Shekau, who has said:

The reason why I will kill you is you are infidels, you follow Democracy.…Whoever follows Democracy is an infidel. This is Shekau, this is why I’m in enmity with you….You are all infidels. What makes you infidels is Democracy and constitution and western education…I therefore call on brethren in Kano to rise up and replicate the Baga attack. All these infidels we are the ones killing them. We enjoy shedding their blood. The Qur’an must be supreme, we must establish Islam in this country.

http://pjmedia.com/blog/5-things-th...nt-tell-you-about-boko-haram/?singlepage=true
 
After all, all Muslims aren't terrorists, but all terrorists are proving to be Muslim.:rolleyes:

What's truly bothersome is the attempt on the part of many politicians to broaden the use of the term "terrorist" to include acts of civil disobedience, especially if those acts are perpetrated by any group not among the favored few (read that as mostly white Christians).

It's ironic that a group of individuals that stood up to (peacefully) BLM overreach and strong arm tactics are labeled as 'domestic terrorists' whilst a group that kidnaps 600 school girls to sell into slavery isn't labeled at all.

Ishmael
 
According to ABC News and the Daily Beast, the Obama administration failed to reply to requests by lobbying firm Patton Boggs, on behalf of the Nigerian government, for intelligence information and aid to help fight the militant Islamist terrorist group Boko Haram.
 
What's truly bothersome is the attempt on the part of many politicians to broaden the use of the term "terrorist" to include acts of civil disobedience, especially if those acts are perpetrated by any group not among the favored few (read that as mostly white Christians).

It's ironic that a group of individuals that stood up to (peacefully) BLM overreach and strong arm tactics are labeled as 'domestic terrorists' whilst a group that kidnaps 600 school girls to sell into slavery isn't labeled at all.

Ishmael

ironic?

DELIBERATE!
 
What's truly bothersome is the attempt on the part of many politicians to broaden the use of the term "terrorist" to include acts of civil disobedience, especially if those acts are perpetrated by any group not among the favored few (read that as mostly white Christians).

It's ironic that a group of individuals that stood up to (peacefully) BLM overreach and strong arm tactics are labeled as 'domestic terrorists' whilst a group that kidnaps 600 school girls to sell into slavery isn't labeled at all.

Ishmael

Oh those poor persecuted Christians.. :rolleyes:

Since when does standing up peacefully to a federal organization mean showing up armed to the teeth and threatening government officials there to enforce a court order? Lying prone behind concrete barricades taking aim on government officials doing there jobs is not "civil disobedience", nor is it remotely "peaceful".

You have a really funny idea of what peacefully and civil disobedience mean. But then you and the Cap'n have been inventing your own definitions since I've been reading Lit.
 
Oh those poor persecuted Christians.. :rolleyes:

Since when does standing up peacefully to a federal organization mean showing up armed to the teeth and threatening government officials there to enforce a court order? Lying prone behind concrete barricades taking aim on government officials doing there jobs is not "civil disobedience", nor is it remotely "peaceful".

You have a really funny idea of what peacefully and civil disobedience mean. But then you and the Cap'n have been inventing your own definitions since I've been reading Lit.


Jesus, you are one stupid man
 
"Government Officials" in full SWAT gear to herd cows. "Government Officials" that generously cordoned off a small "First Amendment Area".

Should they have cordoned off a "Second Amendment Area?"
 
"Government Officials" in full SWAT gear to herd cows. "Government Officials" that generously cordoned off a small "First Amendment Area".

Should they have cordoned off a "Second Amendment Area?"

Wrong bucko..

Armed personnel were brought in because Bundy had already informed law enforcement that he had "a virtual army of supporters from all over the country ready to protect him." which turned out to be an actual army of over 300 armed civilians.

Their strategy?
A former Arizona sheriff named Richard Mack, told Fox News about the militia's plans if violence broke out in Bunkerville. “We were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front. If they are going to start shooting, it’s going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers.”

So brave.. Such manliness.. they planned to shoot at federal officers from behind the skirts of their womenfolk.
 
I dunno, when they nabbed the boys, he didn't claim that they would look like his son.


He didn't say boo...


I guess that what got his attention was the Republican War on Women.
 
Nothing like 2 year old "current events".

So some morons are still signing it? Some morons still stand behind that birther bullshit too. :cool:

its as if you keep looking for MORE BLACK PAINT to paint the NIGGER on yourself

Yo Dude, that was so 8 yrs ago....Brendan Eich

Yo, Dude, that was 25 yrs ago......Pee Dean

Yo, Dude, that rock was 35 yrs ago....R Perry

Yo, Dude, that haircut was 55 yrs ago
 
Back
Top