Today approximately 6 million Americans got health insurance via the ACA

So ROBBER TOE

has 5 posts since I axed him questions

and

hasn't answered

WE KNOW WHY
 
You don't complain, you simply insist on framing the debate to stack the deck in your favor.

You do this repeatedly. To give you an example, nobody thinks Obamacare is perfect in its perfect form. However, you insist on framing the debate as (paraphrasing here) "Now that we can all agree that Obamacare is an absolute failure, let's discuss how to fix or replace this....".

No.

I do not agree with your premise.

And that seems to grate on you.

I know it grates on me, it's very tiresome to have to continually issue corrections when you do this. You're a puppy that insists on pissing on the carpet.

Until you learn to frame the debate in neutral terms, I'm afraid all you can expect from me is ridicule and personal attacks. It seems to be the only way to get your attention.

You want to debate? I'm game.

You want to dish slop and play the victim? I'll help ya through that too.

It's your call.



"Frame the debate in neutral terms?" No, debate does not work that way. Thanks, but I am done with you and your constant need to put words in my mouth or resort to name calling. Its childish, even for you.
 
"Frame the debate in neutral terms?" No, debate does not work that way. Thanks, but I am done with you and your constant need to put words in my mouth or resort to name calling. Its childish, even for you.

Again, you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend the basic tenets of debate.

You do not get to specify parameters of the debate. You do not have the option of presenting your opinion as established fact.

If you choose to do so, as you have often done in the past, you will get scorn and ridicule from me. That's not debatable.

You can insist on demanding that "Obamacare is a failure" as a pre-condition of debate, however, I will challenge your pathetic attempts to reframe the debate.

Every single time.

The choice is yours.
 
Again, you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend the basic tenets of debate.

You do not get to specify parameters of the debate. You do not have the option of presenting your opinion as established fact.

If you choose to do so, as you have often done in the past, you will get scorn and ridicule from me. That's not debatable.

You can insist on demanding that "Obamacare is a failure" as a pre-condition of debate, however, I will challenge your pathetic attempts to reframe the debate.

Every single time.

The choice is yours.

still waiting for answers to questins AXED
 
Again, you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend the basic tenets of debate.

You do not get to specify parameters of the debate. You do not have the option of presenting your opinion as established fact.

If you choose to do so, as you have often done in the past, you will get scorn and ridicule from me. That's not debatable.

You can insist on demanding that "Obamacare is a failure" as a pre-condition of debate, however, I will challenge your pathetic attempts to reframe the debate.

Every single time.

The choice is yours.




You are a ass juice smoker... no need to debate with your mentally fucked head
 
Interesting column about the latest Republican plan to replace Obamacare, which is going to run into the same political problem that Obamacare did: everyone wants "the good stuff" (universal coverage, no discrimination wrt preexisting conditions) but no one likes the price tag.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2014/01/28/the-proposed-republican-replacement-for-obamacare-is-a-big-tax-hike/

That's a fucking huge regressive tax. There is no way in hell that's going to be enacted. Even Julybaby04, who enjoys the pain and suffering of poor people more than anyone, would be aghast at that plan.
 
That's a fucking huge regressive tax. There is no way in hell that's going to be enacted. Even Julybaby04, who enjoys the pain and suffering of poor people more than anyone, would be aghast at that plan.

congrats

NO ANSWER TO MY LEGIT QUESTIONS

BYE BYE

IGGY!
 
According to a new Brookings study, #ObamaCare reduces incomes for 80% of Americans. pic.twitter.com/Dp1TkQW45g”
 
Yes it's what you're saying.

If the girl is not married, she is not required to have sex.

Again you're saying she's married she's required to have sex.

Nope. What I said was.....

(and this ONLY is speaking of unmarried women...has ZERO to do with married women).....

That if a women is NOT married, then she DOES NOT have to have sex. Meaning, it is her choice to have sex or not, therefore her choice to pay for her own birth control.

For Married women, it is completely up to the couple when they have sex. Also on them as to pay for it as well.
 
Nope. What I said was.....

(and this ONLY is speaking of unmarried women...has ZERO to do with married women).....

That if a women is NOT married, then she DOES NOT have to have sex. Meaning, it is her choice to have sex or not, therefore her choice to pay for her own birth control.

For Married women, it is completely up to the couple when they have sex. Also on them as to pay for it as well.

Sex is a natural part of the human experience, no matter what they tell you in your coven.

As such, it should be covered under insurance as long as birth control pills are considered "prescription".

If they were over the counter, I'd agree with you.
 
Again, you seem unwilling or unable to comprehend the basic tenets of debate.

You do not get to specify parameters of the debate. You do not have the option of presenting your opinion as established fact.

If you choose to do so, as you have often done in the past, you will get scorn and ridicule from me. That's not debatable.

You can insist on demanding that "Obamacare is a failure" as a pre-condition of debate, however, I will challenge your pathetic attempts to reframe the debate.

Every single time.

The choice is yours.

Once again you put words in my mouth, I have never demanded that Obamacare is a failure as a precondition of debate. The fact is that I don't need to. When I or others refute the initial "statement" of the thread with facts you resort to personal attacks or statements like this....

"Still think there's a chance Murica is gonna go back to the old way of doing things? Hmmm?"

... instead of defending your position with facts. I understand the reason why you insist on doing this. Like POTUS you refer to major problems with the "law" and its implementation as glitches.

Let me know if you want to adjust that 6 million number.
 
Once again you put words in my mouth, I have never demanded that Obamacare is a failure as a precondition of debate. The fact is that I don't need to. When I or others refute the initial "statement" of the thread with facts you resort to personal attacks or statements like this....

"Still think there's a chance Murica is gonna go back to the old way of doing things? Hmmm?"

... instead of defending your position with facts. I understand the reason why you insist on doing this. Like POTUS you refer to major problems with the "law" and its implementation as glitches.

Let me know if you want to adjust that 6 million number.

I have found that it is just best to completely ignore him. After he wished for the death of my children, I was completely done with him.

He has no basis for a conversation except to insult people or threaten children. He is on his own, as far as I am concerned.
 
Let me know if you want to adjust that 6 million number.

I certainly DO wish to adjust this number.

I wish to adjust this number to 13.64 million

This number includes the following:
  • 3.10 million sub-26ers
  • 7.38 million Medicaid/Chip expansion (NON-RENEWALS)
  • 3.16 million Healthcare exchange enrollments
  • The remaining 112K are other/uncertain programs

To show you that I can back up my assertion with hard data, I am supplying you a LINK

You will please note that this link is an aggregation that contains links to verifiable data (other links).

If you choose to dispute any of the above numbers, please have the courtesy to provide links to support your claim. I would point out that an editorial is not generally considered support, even if it agrees with your confirmation bias.

I look forward to your response.
 
I have found that it is just best to completely ignore him. After he wished for the death of my children, I was completely done with him.

He has no basis for a conversation except to insult people or threaten children. He is on his own, as far as I am concerned.

I did nothing of the sort. I simply pray that God visits the pain and suffering you routinely wish on the poor and unfortunate threefold upon your children, so that you may be shown the error of your heartless ways.

The fact that you continue to wish pain and suffering upon others shows us how little you care for your children, and how much your desire to inflict pain upon others trumps even the love for your children.

You're an abomination. I'll pray for your soul.
 
...and just in case The Rob decides to deny he wished death on my kids, here is a copy of the post...


Originally Posted by julybaby04
You truly, honestly, wish for the death of children? Really?

There are no words for someone such as yourself. Pity and disgust are all that come to mind.

If you are a representation of the Liberals, no wonder there is so much wrong in this nation.

Absolutely I truly and honestly wish that. I pray for that.

You deserve no less. You have opined time and again how much you truly desire that other people and their children should suffer in the name of your ideological purity, and I'm of the opinion that your children should not be spared some of that sufferin' you seem to truly enjoy wishing upon others.

You've told us time and again how if something doesn't affect you personally, it simply doesn't matter. I'm hoping God hears my prayer and has visits that sort of suffering upon your family so it does indeed "affect you personally".

"Mommy! Please stop!"

Now I realize in the short term this allows you to "play the victim", but let's be honest here....you're bringing it on yourself and your family.

Have a great 2014!!
 
...and just in case The Rob decides to deny he wished death on my kids, here is a copy of the post...


Originally Posted by julybaby04
You truly, honestly, wish for the death of children? Really?

There are no words for someone such as yourself. Pity and disgust are all that come to mind.

If you are a representation of the Liberals, no wonder there is so much wrong in this nation.

Absolutely I truly and honestly wish that. I pray for that.

You deserve no less. You have opined time and again how much you truly desire that other people and their children should suffer in the name of your ideological purity, and I'm of the opinion that your children should not be spared some of that sufferin' you seem to truly enjoy wishing upon others.

You've told us time and again how if something doesn't affect you personally, it simply doesn't matter. I'm hoping God hears my prayer and has visits that sort of suffering upon your family so it does indeed "affect you personally".

"Mommy! Please stop!"

Now I realize in the short term this allows you to "play the victim", but let's be honest here....you're bringing it on yourself and your family.

Have a great 2014!!

And I absolutely stand by that. I pray that your children suffer the pain and suffering you wish upon others. The fact that you realize they'll likely die shows us that at some level you realize what you are doing is wrong.
 
Back
Top