Today approximately 6 million Americans got health insurance via the ACA

[RobDownSouth]

Republicans unveil their Obamacare replacement plan

In short: remove the mandate so that people who don't really love their children (VatAss, Julybaby04, etc) don't have to cover them.

How will the Republicans pay for this?

Simple! Just allow insurance companies to drop those with pre-existing conditions! Just like in the good ole days!

It's not gonna happen. No way in hell.

 

[Busybody]

I know

He didn't say what he said

“I’m afraid that the millennials, if you will, are less likely to sign up. I think they feel more independent, I think they feel a little more invulnerable than prior generations,” Moran says. “But I don’t think we’re going to get enough young people signing up to make this bill work as it was intended to financially.”

so he didn't say what he said, what he said he didn't mean to say, so he said it but he meant to say something else, so why did he say what he said and what did he mean t say when he said what he said?

Please tell us, RoberToe!

Oh, I think you mean to CON the TEXT, you mean to QUEER its meaning

TELL US

WHAT

HE

MEANT

TO

SAY

 

[Busybody]

Republicans unveil their Obamacare replacement plan

In short: remove the mandate so that people who don't really love their children (VatAss, Julybaby04, etc) don't have to cover them.

How will the Republicans pay for this?

Simple! Just allow insurance companies to drop those with pre-existing conditions! Just like in the good ole days!

It's not gonna happen. No way in hell.

You made that SHIT up,

Firstly, It was YOU that said that ANYONE that fucks around with THIER insurance should STFU and deal with it, remember?

So if they stopped getting insurance, FUC EM....YOUR WORDS

. But those with pre-existing conditions who fail to maintain continuous coverage at any time could be denied coverage.



also The plan would also continue to allow dependents to stay on their parents’ insurance coverage until they are the age of 26,



So you are as usual, a fucking lair! What exactly Is teh point of the LIE?

and

pay for it?

since when did you give a shit about paying for anything?

WHO TEH FUCK PAYS FOR NIGGERCARE?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Poor busybody, deluding himself that somehow, someway, we'll go back to the old way of healthcare.

Not going to happen, untermensch.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Thought for the day
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfDcxD4CcAA7Cvf.jpg

 

[Liar]

Republicans unveil their Obamacare replacement plan

Down in the end of the article:

"It addresses the tax advantage those who obtain coverage through their employer have over those who purchase through the private market. The employer tax exclusion — one of the largest expenditures in the tax code — would be reduced to 65 percent of the average cost of a plan."

They wanna raise taxes?

 

[Busybody]

Thought for the day
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfDcxD4CcAA7Cvf.jpg

makes no sense, BTW

 

[Busybody]

Poor busybody, deluding himself that somehow, someway, we'll go back to the old way of healthcare.

Not going to happen, untermensch.

non responsive to points made

can the untermensch shit

I don't give a shit!

 

[RobDownSouth]

makes no sense, BTW

Agree with you. It make absolutely no sense to claim you are "Pro Life" (sic) out of one side of your mouth, then out of the other side claim that people don't "deserve" health care.

 

[Busybody]

, then out of the other side claim that people don't "deserve" health care.

who said that?

 

[Busybody]

who said that?

tell me

its OK

I'll wait

 

[RobDownSouth]

Julybaby04, Eyer and Vetteman come to mind.

 

[Busybody]

I don't recall anyone saying some don't DESERVE



show me


Its OK

I'll wait

 

[RobDownSouth]

I'm not here to play defense, especially when Jew keep moving the goal posts.

Go hump someone else's leg for a while, or post another of your passive aggressive "Tee Hee I Molest Kids" to gin up attention 'n outrage.

 

[Busybody]

I'm not here to play defense, especially when Jew keep moving the goal posts.

Go hump someone else's leg for a while, or post another of your passive aggressive "Tee Hee I Molest Kids" to gin up attention 'n outrage.

so what YOU really mean to say

is YOU accuse us of something we never advocate.....just so you can shove something that DOESNT WORK, WONT WORK, WILL HURT MORE PEEPS then it may HELP


BTW, if you turds believe in KILLING BABIES and we should stay outa your way

why shove all the smoking/drinking/seat belt.16 oz shits etc etc etc restrictions on OUR actions

 

[Busybody]

I'm not here to play defense, especially when Jew keep moving the goal posts.

Go hump someone else's leg for a while, or post another of your passive aggressive "Tee Hee I Molest Kids" to gin up attention 'n outrage.

your Knee Grrrr stole the GOAL POSTS

 

[julybaby04]

I don't recall anyone saying some don't DESERVE



show me


Its OK

I'll wait

You will wait for a VERY long time, at least as far as I am concerned. I never said some do not deserve healthcare. He jumped to that conclusion because it is easier for him to believe that than to understand how more people losing healthcare for a few to be covered is a bad idea.

My suggestion (which he also does not understand), was to leave the current system alone....and CREATE a sister-system to incorporate those who had slipped through the cracks or had pre-existing....whomever had not coverage and wanted it.

What he did not like about this was that those with pre-existing would have to pay more because there would not be the "healthy" people in that pool to cover them. I would imagine though, if people were sick, getting good, quality healthcare would be a blessing to them, even if their premiums were more.

I see this as the same with car insurance. Like it or not, teenage boys/young adult men have higher insurance premiums because they are in a "risk group". As it is a law to provide at least the basic insurance for them, this would be no different with healthcare. To have car insurance coverage for this group, the cost is more.

This has NOTHING to do with some deserving and some not. It has everything to do with everyone not having to bow down to a politically correct position and a government who has not a clue that they even paid by those same people whose lives they are ruining (assuming we are speaking of actual taxpayers).

 

[RobDownSouth]

You will wait for a VERY long time, at least as far as I am concerned. I never said some do not deserve healthcare. He jumped to that conclusion because it is easier for him to believe that than to understand how more people losing healthcare for a few to be covered is a bad idea.

My suggestion (which he also does not understand), was to leave the current system alone....and CREATE a sister-system to incorporate those who had slipped through the cracks or had pre-existing....whomever had not coverage and wanted it.

What he did not like about this was that those with pre-existing would have to pay more because there would not be the "healthy" people in that pool to cover them. I would imagine though, if people were sick, getting good, quality healthcare would be a blessing to them, even if their premiums were more.

I see this as the same with car insurance. Like it or not, teenage boys/young adult men have higher insurance premiums because they are in a "risk group". As it is a law to provide at least the basic insurance for them, this would be no different with healthcare. To have car insurance coverage for this group, the cost is more.

This has NOTHING to do with some deserving and some not. It has everything to do with everyone not having to bow down to a politically correct position and a government who has not a clue that they even paid by those same people whose lives they are ruining (assuming we are speaking of actual taxpayers).

Having sick people pay more for insurance than healthy people defeats the purpose of insurance. Congress has decided that two....and only two...factors can be considered: Age and tobacco usage. Therefore, the cost for 20-somethings is cheaper than, say, 50-somethings. So you got your wish.

Once again, you're wishing pain and suffering upon the weak and sick.

It's your middle child's turn today. You know the deal: I pray to God that He in his infinite wisdom visits pain and suffering threefold upon your middle child so that you may come to know the error of your ways. Let her child's agony and wails of pain show her how very wrong it is to wish pain and suffering upon others. In Jesus' name we pray, AMEN.

 

[contrifan32]

Agree with you. It make absolutely no sense to claim you are "Pro Life" (sic) out of one side of your mouth, then out of the other side claim that people don't "deserve" health care.

Very typical of the unfounded accusations made by you and your ilk. Try to demonize any opposing views with slander. You say that if you don't agree with Obamacare you are a racist. If you don't think women should get free contraceptives because of your religious beliefs you are part of the "war against women." Merc is the #1 demagog here but you are catching up.

Are you able to debate and be civil?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Very typical of the unfounded accusations made by you and your ilk. Try to demonize any opposing views with slander. You say that if you don't agree with Obamacare you are a racist. If you don't think women should get free contraceptives because of your religious beliefs you are part of the "war against women." Merc is the #1 demagog here but you are catching up.

Are you able to debate and be civil?

Pointing out the inherent disconnect when a person espouses two fundamentally opposed positions simultaneously is not "unfounded", nor is it "slander".

I have never opined that disagreement with Obamacare implies one is racist. That's a straw-man argument.

I am able to debate and be civil. I will point out, however, that your idea of "debate" seems to be complaining that about people who refuse to accept your own opinion as fact. You do an extremely poor job of presenting your case, and complain bitterly when people don't accept your absurd premises.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Very typical of the unfounded accusations made by you and your ilk. Try to demonize any opposing views with slander. You say that if you don't agree with Obamacare you are a racist. If you don't think women should get free contraceptives because of your religious beliefs you are part of the "war against women." Merc is the #1 demagog here but you are catching up.

Are you able to debate and be civil?

Nobody ever claimed that not agreeing with Obamacare made you a racist. You are part of a war on women if you don't think women should get free contraceptives however.

 

[contrifan32]

Nobody ever claimed that not agreeing with Obamacare made you a racist. You are part of a war on women if you don't think women should get free contraceptives however.

And women who don't think that women should get free contraceptives are part of the war on women?

 

[contrifan32]

Pointing out the inherent disconnect when a person espouses two fundamentally opposed positions simultaneously is not "unfounded", nor is it "slander".

I have never opined that disagreement with Obamacare implies one is racist. That's a straw-man argument.

I am able to debate and be civil. I will point out, however, that your idea of "debate" seems to be complaining that about people who refuse to accept your own opinion as fact. You do an extremely poor job of presenting your case, and complain bitterly when people don't accept your absurd premises.

No, expressing your view is not the issue. Its when you insist on making personal and unfounded attacks on others or statements to demean or shock that makes you a demagog.

I have never complained when you or anyone else don't accept my opinion on the subject of Omamacare. Just another example of how you say things that are not true in an attempt to deflect attention from the real issues.

 

[Busybody]

Having sick people pay more for insurance than healthy people defeats the purpose of insurance..

so someone with a CIVIC should pay the same as someone with a Rolls?

someone with a mansion should pay the same home owners insurance as someone with a 2 bedroom?

 

[Sean Renaud]

And women who don't think that women should get free contraceptives are part of the war on women?

Yep. They wouldn't be the first people working against their own self interests nor will they be the last.