Justice for Trayvon??

Ha ha ha...they make it so easy, these pressed shitstains...

da derp da derp da derp da derp...
 
If Zimmerman hadn't wanted trouble he would have listened when he was told not to follow and to stay in his car. Instead he got out and followed a frightened kid with a loaded weapon. Whatever happened after that had to be his fault, if the kid, in fear for his life with this guy he didn't know, circled back and jumped him in self defense, he would still be wrong for stalking the kid and causing the confrontation. The kid was talking on the phone telling his friend about how he was being followed. Zimmerman was wrong any way you look at it.

Well that isn't true, if you are a right wing racist who fears and hates blacks, like so many in the south seem to be, you can plainly see that he was walking on a dangerous sidewalk and deserved to be shot if he tried to defend himself from your actions.

If you are a reasonable person with common sense you can see that is why he was told not to follow.

TM had plenty of time to get home, had he been afraid of the short, fat man following him. However, he told his friend on the cell phone he could take the "creepy-ass cracker." Z was not TOLD to stay in his vehicle; it was suggested he do so.
 
However, he told his friend on the cell phone he could take the "creepy-ass cracker." Z was not TOLD to stay in his vehicle; it was suggested he do so.

Man, I hate revisionist derp.

really really really hate it.

but oh wells it's all they got

derp
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post
However, he told his friend on the cell phone he could take the "creepy-ass cracker." Z was not TOLD to stay in his vehicle; it was suggested he do so.


Man, I hate revisionist derp.

really really really hate it.

but oh wells it's all they got

That's not revisionist; I heard the friend's testimony and read the transcript. The operator said "You don't have to do that" or something very close to those words. I did paraphrase TM's words slightly, but not their sense.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post
However, he told his friend on the cell phone he could take the "creepy-ass cracker." Z was not TOLD to stay in his vehicle; it was suggested he do so.




That's not revisionist; I heard the friend's testimony and read the transcript. The operator said "You don't have to do that" or something very close to those words. I did paraphrase TM's words slightly, but not their sense.

stahp

stahp

There's no like or as if or virtually or essentially or kinda sorta going on here, guy.

Your "paraphrasing" cred flew out the window with that MMA malarkey. It joined the rest of the "thug" and "criminal" and "burglary tools" faux TM narrative that's been pushed by the terminally pressed since derp day one.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post
However, he told his friend on the cell phone he could take the "creepy-ass cracker." Z was not TOLD to stay in his vehicle; it was suggested he do so.




That's not revisionist; I heard the friend's testimony and read the transcript. The operator said "You don't have to do that" or something very close to those words. I did paraphrase TM's words slightly, but not their sense.

If you tell a lie long enough.

Ishmael
 
If Zimmerman hadn't wanted trouble he would have listened when he was told not to follow and to stay in his car. Instead he got out and followed a frightened kid with a loaded weapon. Whatever happened after that had to be his fault, if the kid, in fear for his life with this guy he didn't know, circled back and jumped him in self defense, he would still be wrong for stalking the kid and causing the confrontation. The kid was talking on the phone telling his friend about how he was being followed. Zimmerman was wrong any way you look at it.

Well that isn't true, if you are a right wing racist who fears and hates blacks, like so many in the south seem to be, you can plainly see that he was walking on a dangerous sidewalk and deserved to be shot if he tried to defend himself from your actions.

If you are a reasonable person with common sense you can see that is why he was told not to follow.

Zimmerman was told that he didn't need to follow Martin after he was already out of his car and already following him. The 911 operator can advise citizens, but cannot order them to stop following someone. Zimmerman walked past the T-intersection of the sidewalk to the other street, and had lost sight of Martin. So, on the advice of the 911 operator, he was on his way back to his vehicle when he encountered Martin. So Zimmerman was retreating when the encounter took place. So it is the 911 operator's fault for advising him to return to his vehicle.

So that means Martin, who cut between the houses on the sidewalk leading away from the T intersection had successfully eluded Zimmerman. Only 70 yards from home, and safety, from the creepy cracker. Yet the frightened Martin didn't sprint home and lock the doors and call 911. Instead the frightened Martin either waited for Zimmerman to come back, or returned to the T intersection. Yet it is all Zimmerman's fault.

Zimmerman was a resident of the community, and as one juror stated, had every legal right to be where he was. Zimmerman following Martin, or as actually happened, was retreating from following Martin, was not an illegal act. The illegal acts began when Martin assaulted Zimmerman.
 
For a man who has just gunned down a kid who was only armed with a sidewalk, I think Zimmerman should get to see how it feels to be hunted by an armed man wanting to kill him. I hope he enjoys the experience and then dies a slow death.

Hopefully you and your family are TREVONNED
 
COMPARISON: George Zimmerman & Ted Kennedy. One of them killed an innocent.:cool:
 
stahp

stahp

There's no like or as if or virtually or essentially or kinda sorta going on here, guy.

Your "paraphrasing" cred flew out the window with that MMA malarkey. It joined the rest of the "thug" and "criminal" and "burglary tools" faux TM narrative that's been pushed by the terminally pressed since derp day one.

Give us the quote if you are so sure you are right.

She said you do not have to do that, not do not do that, and she was only a dispatcher, not "THE POLICE."
 
Zimmerman was told that he didn't need to follow Martin after he was already out of his car and already following him. The 911 operator can advise citizens, but cannot order them to stop following someone. Zimmerman walked past the T-intersection of the sidewalk to the other street, and had lost sight of Martin. So, on the advice of the 911 operator, he was on his way back to his vehicle when he encountered Martin. So Zimmerman was retreating when the encounter took place. So it is the 911 operator's fault for advising him to return to his vehicle.

So that means Martin, who cut between the houses on the sidewalk leading away from the T intersection had successfully eluded Zimmerman. Only 70 yards from home, and safety, from the creepy cracker. Yet the frightened Martin didn't sprint home and lock the doors and call 911. Instead the frightened Martin either waited for Zimmerman to come back, or returned to the T intersection. Yet it is all Zimmerman's fault.

Zimmerman was a resident of the community, and as one juror stated, had every legal right to be where he was. Zimmerman following Martin, or as actually happened, was retreating from following Martin, was not an illegal act. The illegal acts began when Martin assaulted Zimmerman.

The jury paid attention to this, the real racists absolutely refuse to.
 
Give us the quote if you are so sure you are right.

She said you do not have to do that, not do not do that, and she was only a dispatcher, not "THE POLICE."

who the fuck cares

do you really THINK anyone gives a flying fuck about a DEAD BLACK KID?

NO!:rolleyes:
 
At this point it is clear that this trial and its continuing aftermath was about intimidating specific groups, whites, gun-owners, states that permit self-defense and neighborhood watch groups.

Those that live in safety think all of this is unnecessary.

Those who live in affluence know it is.
 
Zimmerman was told that he didn't need to follow Martin after he was already out of his car and already following him. The 911 operator can advise citizens, but cannot order them to stop following someone. Zimmerman walked past the T-intersection of the sidewalk to the other street, and had lost sight of Martin. So, on the advice of the 911 operator, he was on his way back to his vehicle when he encountered Martin. So Zimmerman was retreating when the encounter took place. So it is the 911 operator's fault for advising him to return to his vehicle.

So that means Martin, who cut between the houses on the sidewalk leading away from the T intersection had successfully eluded Zimmerman. Only 70 yards from home, and safety, from the creepy cracker. Yet the frightened Martin didn't sprint home and lock the doors and call 911. Instead the frightened Martin either waited for Zimmerman to come back, or returned to the T intersection. Yet it is all Zimmerman's fault.

Zimmerman was a resident of the community, and as one juror stated, had every legal right to be where he was. Zimmerman following Martin, or as actually happened, was retreating from following Martin, was not an illegal act. The illegal acts began when Martin assaulted Zimmerman.


Bingo...This incident was not racially motivated and the law was broken when Martin jumped and attacked Zimmerman. Verdict was right and just. The bottom line of all this to do is the mass media is trying to make a racial issue out of stand your ground laws and any 2nd amendment right issues.
 
Give us the quote if you are so sure you are right.

She said you do not have to do that, not do not do that, and she was only a dispatcher, not "THE POLICE."

That's right she was "only" the dispatcher, not "THE POLICE".

...and Zimmerpunk was the judge, jury and executioner, not "THE VICTIM".
 
Everyone in this thread is missing the point. Again, just another example of how the cyber world mirrors the real world.
 
Give us the quote if you are so sure you are right.

She said you do not have to do that, not do not do that, and she was only a dispatcher, not "THE POLICE."

"We don't need you to do that."

Who the fuck is "we," you six-A.M.-daily bullshitting apologist prick, The On-The-Phone Dispatchers' Club Of America?

Is THAT who the fuck Zimmerman called instead of Sanford Police?


http://media.tumblr.com/7f49af67374e45355d02de2fe0c44bac/tumblr_inline_moye2k1fwI1qz4rgp.gif

Basic beige bitches stay being basic beige bitches, to the motherfucking end
 
TM had plenty of time to get home, had he been afraid of the short, fat man following him. However, he told his friend on the cell phone he could take the "creepy-ass cracker." Z was not TOLD to stay in his vehicle; it was suggested he do so.

Z was asked by a Dispatcher that has as much authority as a Meter Maid!

Trayvon Martin Evidence
 
Back
Top