Justice for Trayvon??

On that account, you may very well be correct.

It is the black and white un-nuanced us against them compartmentalization of thought that they employ in the quest for tilting at Social Justice windmills...

The official blabbering seems to be eerily muted since the verdict. Larry, Moe, Shemp, and Curly (prosecution) were on tv but made no coherent/cohesive sense. Certainly no one has come forward to congratulate their performance, like Chamberlain saluted Lee's army at the Appomattox surrender.

It was a tipping point. RINO Rich Scott, who appointed Angela Corey to slay Zimmerman, is prolly toast for 2014 after Hispanics absorb how he played the fool for the Libruls. And the GOP celebrities remain mute. I haven't heard or read of any applause from the Hispanic team for the Zimmerman show-trial.
 
And you are??? Oh right, you're nobody.

Eat a dick, dipshit.

LOL.... typical elementary playground stuff. You are called out, have no intelligent response and resort to calling names......

A very clear picture of you is coming into focus
 
The official blabbering seems to be eerily muted since the verdict. Larry, Moe, Shemp, and Curly (prosecution) were on tv but made no coherent/cohesive sense. Certainly no one has come forward to congratulate their performance, like Chamberlain saluted Lee's army at the Appomattox surrender.

It was a tipping point. RINO Rich Scott, who appointed Angela Corey to slay Zimmerman, is prolly toast for 2014 after Hispanics absorb how he played the fool for the Libruls. And the GOP celebrities remain mute. I haven't heard or read of any applause from the Hispanic team for the Zimmerman show-trial.

In the light of free phones, food stamps and entry into the country, it will probably all be forgotten by the time they vote, at least that is what the Democrats hope...
 
In the light of free phones, food stamps and entry into the country, it will probably all be forgotten by the time they vote, at least that is what the Democrats hope...

in light of the shitty economy and the mow increased inflation, the DUMZ will be stronger then ever

the HIS and HER PAN ICKS and the COLOREDS and the MOOSEFUCKS all live on handouts
 
In the light of free phones, food stamps and entry into the country, it will probably all be forgotten by the time they vote, at least that is what the Democrats hope...

When pols start tsunamis its hard to guess where the damage will be the worst.
 
So many witnesses, so little time, in the aftermath of acquittal, the try, try again theory shall be used, as it is in all cases.
No, but seriously, who/whom should we blame, let's start with the educational system and what's right and what's wrong with the way people are brought up, it kinda fits in to play here, the rest conjuncture.
 
Evidence will not be surpressed in a civil trial. For instance, the stolen jewelry and drug paraphenalia found in Martin's backpack will definitely be introduced, along with photos of a weapon and his propensity to fight.

Apparently, the school system chose to hide this information to falsely project a record of less crime. When they found the stolen jewelry, instead they suspended him only for grafitti. There's a lot of blame to go around for this kid's bad behavior.
 
Evidence will not be surpressed in a civil trial. For instance, the stolen jewelry and drug paraphenalia found in Martin's backpack will definitely be introduced, along with photos of a weapon and his propensity to fight.

Apparently, the school system chose to hide this information to falsely project a record of less crime. When they found the stolen jewelry, instead they suspended him only for grafitti. There's a lot of blame to go around for this kid's bad behavior.

Different rules of evidence are used in civil and criminal trials?
 
Evidence will not be surpressed in a civil trial. For instance, the stolen jewelry and drug paraphenalia found in Martin's backpack will definitely be introduced, along with photos of a weapon and his propensity to fight.

Apparently, the school system chose to hide this information to falsely project a record of less crime. When they found the stolen jewelry, instead they suspended him only for grafitti. There's a lot of blame to go around for this kid's bad behavior.

And the liberal chief that put that policy into place was forced to resign after having two charges of sexual assault levied against him. Go figure.

Ishmael
 
Different rules of evidence are used in civil and criminal trials?

Hold on while he tries to find an answer to c+p. He probably heard that the burden of proof is different and made up the rest from whole cloth.
 
And the liberal chief that put that policy into place was forced to resign after having two charges of sexual assault levied against him. Go figure.

Ishmael

Sexual deviant = liberal?

My, you are painting with a broad brush these days.
 
zumi are you upset about the violent protests?

or are you cool with it, cuz, you know, black?
 
Sexual deviant = liberal?

My, you are painting with a broad brush these days.

My oh my, how you do like to project.

Apparently he accosted a couple of co-workers/underlings which in and of itself is not deviancy. It does exhibit a serious lack of judgement and poor emotional control and it's the latter that seems to be a predominant liberal trait.

Ishmael
 
I agree. Once the Hispanic community gets the sense that they are being pushed to the back of the bus by the liberal black race industry, then they may cast about for a bigger tent...

I can only wonder if that's one of the reasons that the NYT has gone out of their way to paint Zimmerman as a 'white Hispanic?' If so I think they've made a serious miscalculation.

Ishmael

I hope he cleans CBS's clock in the lawsuit and then goes after them next with the proceeds...

That is where the true lynching of the white guy began.

Hispanics should wake up.

The NAACP does not speak for their color and DC only wants their votes in exchange for poverty and unskilled labor with limited benefits tossed in as bait.

They knew the case was weak, so weak that it would not even pass as a ham sandwich before a grand jury.


The same goes for the civil case, which I believe will be brought as part of the circus and bread routine that the militant, radical black community demands. Holder does not want a conviction, Holder does not want an honest conversation on race, he wants to break and destroy Zimmerman purposefully as a message to the next person being beaten by young black thugs; take your beating, you deserve it, do not dare defend yourself or you will be the next person re-lynched by the hip-hop mentality of the current Administration.

No, in many ways, they are doing to the Hispanic community that which they have done to the black community through the magic of Progressive education.

They are expected to accept the insult, wait at the back of the bus, and then when a white person shoots a brown hispanic under similar circumstances, then they get their political lynching...

My point is Democrats have no awareness that they insulted Hispanics.

To hell with that vette. If the blacks start targeting Hispanics there's going to be hell to pay. Quite frankly from a political stand point it's like a God send, the liberal Dems have already aligned themselves with the "Justice for Trayvon" group. If the wail away on Hispanics idea catches hold the Hispanics are going to do some serious re-evaluation of which horses to back in the next election. Even though the mainstream media will try to suppress the news of any such trend you can bet your ass Univision will be right on top of it.

As far as the chaos side goes, if this is the start of a trend the boys from MS-13 and others like the Latin Kings are going to go do some hunting of their own. As bad as the inner city gang banger blacks think they are, when it comes to vicious they can't hold a candle to the likes of MS-13. It could end up being a long, bloody, summer.

Ishmael


Those damn liberals: always making EVERYTHING about race.



I'm still waiting for some explanation as to how this case had anything to do with race.
 
zumi are you upset about the violent protests?

or are you cool with it, cuz, you know, black?

You do know that these protests have been multiracial, right?

And that the "violence" in the very few protests that you can count on one hand with maybe three fingers has been less than the "oh that's okay, they're just boys being boys" hooliganism done at virtually every hockey game riot...cuz, you know, white?
 
You do know that these protests have been multiracial, right?

And that the "violence" in the very few protests that you can count on one hand with maybe three fingers has been less than the "oh that's okay, they're just boys being boys" hooliganism done at virtually every hockey game riot...cuz, you know, white?

i wasn't asking about the demographics of the protesters, more so just asking if you were ok with the level of violence (actual violence, not "violence") that's occured because you deem it a justifiable reaction to the trial outcome?

but i take it your answer is "others do it, so it's ok for us to do it"

two wrongs, et al :(
 
i wasn't asking about the demographics of the protesters, more so just asking if you were ok with the level of violence (actual violence, not "violence") that's occured because you deem it a justifiable reaction to the trial outcome?

but i take it your answer is "others do it, so it's ok for us to do it"

two wrongs, et al :(

First of all, what makes you think that I'd be accepting of violence in protests? In any protest?

What makes you think I deem it a justifiable reaction?

Because I don't ship white privilege and not shipping it most especially in this bullshit travesty, that automatically means I advocate violence?

Where the fuck does that blatant cognitive dissonance come from? How do people jump from A to Q lickety-split like that without a Starfleet transporter?

And what does that have to do with "cuz you know, Black?"
 
First of all, what makes you think that I'd be accepting of violence in protests? In any protest?

What makes you think I deem it a justifiable reaction?

Because I don't ship white privilege and not shipping it most especially in this bullshit travesty, that automatically means I advocate violence?

Where the fuck does that blatant cognitive dissonance come from? How do people jump from A to Q lickety-split like that without a Starfleet transporter?

And what does that have to do with "cuz you know, Black?"

i didn't assume, i asked. hence the question mark.

and i asked because in our previous dialogue you made it known that you very adamantly stand up for trayvon in spirit because you advocate justice for a system which you feel hasn't acted to provide adequate justice to blacks.
so, in that vein, i was asking if you felt that violent protests were an acceptable function of that advocacy. no disrespect intended, it seemed a fair question to pose.
 
Back
Top