the_kuntess
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Posts
- 629
Obama care drives up the price of food there always food stamps
So long mom and pops food stores and job's
Umm...Ok.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama care drives up the price of food there always food stamps
So long mom and pops food stores and job's
Obama care drives up the price of food there always food stamps
Supermarket owners argue a pending federal food-labeling rule that stems from the new health care law would overburden thousands of grocers and convenience store owners -- to the tune of $1 billion in the first year alone.
Store owner Tom Heinen said the industry's profit margins already are razor thin. "When you incur a significant cost, there is no way that that doesn't get passed on to the customer in some form," he said.
The rule stems from an ObamaCare mandate that restaurants provide nutrition information on menus. Most in the restaurant industry were supportive of the idea, but when the FDA decided to extend the provision to also affect thousands of supermarkets and convenience stores, the backlash was swift.
The proposed regulation would require store owners to label prepared, unpackaged foods found in salad bars and food bars, soups and bakery items. Erik Lieberman, regulatory counsel at the Food Marketing Institute, said testing foods for nutritional data will require either expensive software or even more costly off-site laboratory assessments.
Plus the health care plans of 7 million Americans.
Obama is not only going to cost 7 million working Americans their health care programs, he's going bankrupt the nation trying to buy the voted of Hispanics:
Pathway to citizenship could increase Obamacare cost up to $300 billion over a decade
Any immigration package in which current illegal immigrants are made eligible for Obamacare — in the form of either exchanges or Medicaid — could increase costs to the federal government by between $120 billion to $200 billion in its first decade, according to internal calculations by the Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee that were obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller.
GOP Senate Budget Committee staffers explained to TheDC that the estimates assume that the law’s provision capping total spending on exchange subsidies, which is set to begin in 2019, is enforced.
However, should the provision fall by the wayside, as some analysts believe it could, the staffers estimate the cost of Obamacare could increase between $210 billion to $300 billion over the next 10 years.
They add that if the capping provision is sustained, making millions of illegal immigrants eligible for Obamacare could also result in a benefit cut of approximately $1,100 annually for the average American receiving a subsidized benefit through the exchanges, which are now called “marketplaces” by the administration.
Last March the minority side of the Senate Budget Committee estimated that Obamacare would increase unfunded obligations — or federal spending without a dedicated funding source — for federal health care programs by $17 trillion over 75 years, or from $65 trillion to $82 trillion.
Adding currently illegal immigrants, via a pathway to citizenship or other means, to Obamacare would further increase those unfunded obligations by another $2 trillion, based on their calculations.
To reach their conclusions, the staffers applied Congressional Budget Office estimates that 7 million illegal immigrants are without insurance, approximately 85 percent of whom have incomes low enough to qualify for the benefits — or less than 400 percent of the federal poverty line.
They further applied demographic data from the U.S. Census Current Population Survey to estimate that about half of the eligible illegal immigrants would be eligible for Medicaid, and the other half would be qualified for the subsidized exchange benefits.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/05/p...p-to-300-billion-over-a-decade/#ixzz2K3tFkrw2
And this is one of the most dishonest articles you've ever posted.
Remove user from ignore listmercury14
This message is hidden because mercury14 is on your ignore list.
STFU, PUTRID PIG
we know
You question the source and its only a few with eggs
STFU!
I didn't remove him
I cant abide by LIARS and DISTORTERS and HIPPOS CREEPZ
the egg comment is about his response to MASS MUSLIM KILLERS......he says its only a few that merely throw eggs
You removed him
Guess the stupid ass clown doesn't think some local farmer doesn't sale to a local store![]()
I heard a radio reporter this morning saying that diesel is over $4 / gallon now, and that 10 years ago it was $1.14 / gallon...
...an increase of roughly 400%.
Thank goodness inflation isn't a concern during this repression...
I know that only the NYT can be believed when it comes to anything Obama, but here's one finding that hasn't been massaged by the Times:
<cns spew snip>
The Commies at the Wall Street Journal said:The problem is that the employment hole is much bigger this time around. The U.S. lost nearly 8.8 million jobs from 2008 to 2010, more than in the previous four recessions combined.
Restored Payroll Tax Pinches Those Who Earn the Least
The tax break, which was pushed by the White House to stimulate spending in 2011 and extended in 2012, was always supposed to be temporary. But with pressure building in Washington to reduce the deficit and politicians fighting bitterly over whether to raise taxes on the very rich, the question of how the increase in Social Security taxes would affect the poorest workers did not seem to garner much debate on either side of the aisle.
“I don’t see any reason to consider supporting its extension,” said Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, in testimony last year. Even Nancy Pelosi, a reliable liberal who leads the Democratic minority in the House of Representatives, was for letting it expire.
The higher rate applies to all earned income up to $113,700. For a household earning $100,000 a year, the two-percentage-point increase means an additional $2,000 a year in payroll deductions. Economists estimate that the payroll tax increase will reduce disposable income by about $120 billion and shave half a percentage point from economic growth in the first quarter — a significant blow given that the economy is expected to expand only 1 to 2 percent in the first half of 2013.
“If you wanted to design a policy to squeeze the spending of lower- and middle-income households, raising the payroll tax is the way to do it,” said Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomic Advisors. “It’s very regressive.”
Retailing analysts and economists say high-end earners will largely be spared.
“I wouldn’t expect it to have much of an effect on BMW consumption,” said Richard H. Thaler, a professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. “The people who will notice it the most are the ones making the least.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/08/b...-those-with-the-smallest-checks.html?hp&_r=1&
And thank goodnessx2 the President and his gang of Dems went after the $400K+ elitists, but left the po' folk alone...
...huh?