Planned Parenthood Annual Report: Record Number Of Babies Killed In 2011, Record-High

[badbabysitter]

"Illegitimacy"?? hahahhaha people still use that term?

they learned after last year that calling women sluts was backfiring.. so they had to go back to golden oldies

 

[badbabysitter]

Educated people do.

You meant " People educated in the 19th century do."

 

[unregistered]

 

[badbabysitter]

Whoopie, in the politically correct nation we now call it "births to unmarried women." This from Wiki:


"In 2009, 41% of children born in the United States were born to unmarried mothers (up from 5% a half-century ago). That includes 73% of non-Hispanic black children, 53% of Hispanic children and 29% of non-Hispanic white children."

This too:

"Use of the term "illegitimate child" is now rare, even in legal contexts. Terms such as "extramarital child", "love child" and "child born out of wedlock" are more commonly used. Also used in Britain is "bastard", though expressions such as "natural child" are preferred in polite society."

And this:

Despite the decreasing legal relevance of illegitimacy, an important exception may be found in the nationality laws of many countries, which discriminate against illegitimate children in the application of jus sanguinis, particularly in cases where the child's connection to the country lies only through the father. This is true of the United States,[6] and its constitutionality was upheld by the Supreme Court in Nguyen v. INS.[7]
Legitimacy also continues to be relevant to hereditary titles, with only legitimate children being admitted to the line of succession. However, some monarchs such as Elizabeth I of England succeeded to the throne despite the controversial status of their legitimacy, due to special legislation.
Annulment of marriage does not change the status of illegitimacy of children born to the couple during their putative marriage, i.e., between their marriage ceremony and the legal annulment of their marriage. For example, canon 1137 of the Roman Catholic Church's Code of Canon Law specifically affirms the legitimacy of a child born to a marriage that is declared null following the child's birth."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_(law)

so there are more single mothers now?


your point being?


being raped and beaten by your husband is now a crime too... unlike half a century ago... which according to your stats is when it started going up

weird huh

 

[BotanyBoy]

Educated people do.

I got me an edumacation, it's in science though...not that hypothetical circle jerk degree political "science" but fo shizzle science .....so maybe I didn't get that class.

Never even occurred to me that a child is any more or less of a legitimate human being b/c his or her mom wasn't married in the eyes of CHRIST THE LORD AND SAVIOR ALL FUCKIN' MIGHTY!!!!!

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[badbabysitter]

I made my point. You can spin it anyway you want but the term "illegitimate" is still a fact of life, legally and otherwise.

so you use a term that according to your own c&p is almost never used... then backed it up by discussing Roman Catholic doctrine and something that happened to an english monarch in the 17th century..............as relevant?


tell us about coloured folks next, because , hey, that term is still used too

 

[badbabysitter]

Doesn't have anything to do with being a human or not. Why do you think the government keeps stats on births to unwed mothers?

they also keep stats on unwed fathers


or does that sound a bit stupid?


are they single fathers or unwed fathers?

all those unwed fathers raising illigetimate bastards... for shame , for shame

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[RjThoughts]

Educated people do.

NO, they don't.

But of course, only people educated BEFORE 1960 do.

 

[RjThoughts]

Does the government keep stats on the births to unwed fathers? Knock off the deflection.

It's called obfuscation, something you're very good at. But, the government should keep tabs on these unwed fathers, as well. They should take care of their children!!

 

[badbabysitter]

Does the government keep stats on the births to unwed fathers? Knock off the deflection.

so you're saying that the government has NO stats on single fathers?


that the government has NO stats on dead beat dads?


really?


really?

seriously?

 

[badbabysitter]

It's called obfuscation, something you're very good at. But, the government should keep tabs on these unwed fathers, as well. They should take care of their children!!

why should they.. its the fault of those inner city sluts that can't keep their legs crossed...

 

[BotanyBoy]

Doesn't have anything to do with being a human or not. Why do you think the government keeps stats on births to unwed mothers?

Then why define them as such by designating them a legitimate or illegitimate child? Just sayin'..

The gov keeps stats on births to unwed mothers because it's too fucking nosy that's why. As far as I'm concerned they only really need to know how many boys there are and how many girls there are as that is our nations most precious resource and is very relevant in determining how shit is run.

The socioeconomic status of the mother should be inconsequential because she should be taking care of her shit....the choice to have a kid was 100% hers and as such she is solely responsible, thank you feminist for taking that responsibility off our shoulders.

 

[badbabysitter]

the other thing I loved in his thinly veiled race-tinged rant about ethnicity were the stats


"oh looks, all those non white mothers"

looks really bed


till you look at the numbers


yes, there does seem to be a higher percentage of black single moms.... but when you look at thier pre centage of the population

by and far there are WAY WAY more single white moms.. simply because the popuation is bigger


welcome to racial aggregation.. its works both ways

 

[BotanyBoy]

so you're saying that the government has NO stats on single fathers?


that the government has NO stats on dead beat dads?


really?


really?

seriously?

Oh they do...I was watching a doc the other day that said a larger percentage black men pay their child support than white men, and that children of single fathers perform better in school and are higher achievers than those of single mothers. Pay off? While kids raised by mom on average are considerable underachievers compared to the average kid raised by dad, they tend to be happier as adults, esp boys. They learn better interpersonal communication skills, develop better more meaningful interpersonal relationships with people.

Another cool thing they found was that girls raised by their fathers simply kick the shit out of any other kid when it comes to being a hard charging go getter!! A surprising number of high achieving female fighter pilots, scientist, astronauts high ranking gov officials etc. are raised by single fathers. Converse of that was girls raised by single mothers tend to do very poorly by comparison to either single mom raising a son or single father raising a daughter.

It was a really cool documentary about family dynamics in modern america from child rearing to care for the elderly. Which when you get into geriatrics Americans as a whole really are assholes from a familial perspective.

 

[badbabysitter]

Oh they do...I was watching a doc the other day that said a larger percentage black men pay their child support than white men, and that children of single fathers perform better in school and are higher achievers than those of single mothers. Pay off? While kids raised by mom on average are considerable underachievers compared to the average kid raised by dad, they tend to be happier as adults, esp boys. They learn better interpersonal communication skills, develop better more meaningful interpersonal relationships with people.

Another cool thing they found was that girls raised by their fathers simply kick the shit out of any other kid when it comes to being a hard charging go getter!! A surprising number of high achieving female fighter pilots, scientist, astronauts high ranking gov officials etc. are raised by single fathers. Converse of that was girls raised by single mothers tend to do very poorly by comparison to either single mom raising a son or single father raising a daughter.

It was a really cool documentary about family dynamics in modern america from child rearing to care for the elderly. Which when you get into geriatrics Americans as a whole really are assholes from a familial perspective.

I totally concur and have my own antecdotal proof

my best male friend was raised by a single father... he went to be an engineer, has had incredible success financially

he also happens to be an incredible womanizer, a short temper , can be completely self absorbed untill called on his shit, and incredibly vain

 

[BotanyBoy]

I totally concur and have my own antecdotal proof

my best male friend was raised by a single father... he went to be an engineer, has had incredible success financially

he also happens to be an incredible womanizer, a short temper , can be completely self absorbed untill called on his shit, and incredibly vain

I hear you, my sister and I are perfect examples (which is why she told me to watch it).

When we were 13-14 neither of our parent's could support both of us very well nor afford courts/lawyers so sis went to live with mom and I went to live with dad. Fucked both of us up, and caused a shit storm spanning some 6-8 years.

She is the totally empathetic communicator, and a lazy as hell underachieving procrastinator. 10 years to get her BS....but she has a really great man and a wonderful home full of love and all that warm fuzzy shit.

Me? borderline sociopath...I won the Army game, went to schools most will never even see and did shit no one will hear about and it was fucking bad ass, I will never again do anything that fucking cool. To top it off I even finished my degree in biology in 3 1/2 years immediately after retirement from the Army. With WA opening up I'm on the tip of the spear, no better opportunity for my industry than right now...I have no doubt I will carve my self out quite a niche and kick ass, it's what I do.

But I couldn't maintain anything beyond a casual friendship and apparently not any sort of romantic or even really tight platonic relationship if my life depended on it, any sort of positiveness or affection and I block people out. It's knee jerk for me to do it and nearly impossible for me to stop. I'm not bitching, I have accepted it and realized I'm just one of those people who is better off going at the whole life bit alone.

But not having a parent around most definitely has negative effects on the kids, and some positive too depending on how you look at it.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

I asked you why.

I told you...because they are a bunch of nosy mother fuckers.

 

[Busybody]

... he went to be an engineer, has had incredible success financially

he also happens to be an incredible womanizer, a short temper , can be completely self absorbed untill called on his shit, and incredibly vain

I have a TWIN?

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

That's not good enough, and it's false. The do so because these are cases where the legal liability for the support of those children cannot be fixed and will likely fall on the shoulders of the American taxpayer. So it's a tool to gauge future budget outlays for that support.

Well that wouldn't be a problem if they weren't funding peoples fuck trophies now would it?

Womenz have 100% choice and control on the issue I don't think they should be entitled to SHIT from the gov.