Well, here's something some of you might find interesting.

[Peregrinator]

because only one person here has

And how could you possibly know THAT?

 

[blunt_trauma]

And how could you possibly know THAT?

it's a secret.

 

[Image]

I think Fuckette is a chick.

And of course, you assume it's true that I can't be trusted, right?

But I do thank you for the tone of your previous post. If I have been untrustworthy at all, it's not malicious or purposeful.

Like I said, I don't think you'd purposely out anyone. But, just for arguments sake, you mentioned meeting Glo and Sheremembers. Are you sure they're OK with you mentioning a real life situation? I'm not making any kind of hook up accusations, mind you. But while maybe they're fine with it, often, people like you, as an open book online) don't think about it.

 

[Cheyenne]

I do not know you but I like you...

Me, too.

 

[trysail]

This exchange nearly jumped off the page when I encountered it. It was an epiphany. I'd always known it intuitively; I'd never seen anyone express it quite so baldly.

"Terrible, isn't it, not being able to trust anyone."

"Oh, no, Anjin-san, so sorry," she answered, "That's just one of life's most important rules-- no more, no less."

-James Clavell
Shōgun
New York, N.Y. 1975
​

As did this:

Open your eyes to the ways of the world, my son— the promises of kings have no value, they can claim expedience. If this Shah or the next, or even your great general has to choose between your life and something of more value to them, which would they choose? Put no trust in princes, politicians, or generals, they will sell you, your family, and your heritage for a pinch of salt to put on a plate of rice they won't even bother to taste.

-James Clavell
Whirlwind
New York, N.Y. 1986

​

​

​

 

[Peregrinator]

it's a secret.

Point being, once the pics are out there...

Like I said, I don't think you'd purposely out anyone. But, just for arguments sake, you mentioned meeting Glo and Sheremembers. Are you sure they're OK with you mentioning a real life situation? I'm not making any kind of hook up accusations, mind you. But while maybe they're fine with it, often, people like you, as an open book online) don't think about it.

I get that. In those two specific cases, yes, I'm sure they don't mind. Hell, SheRem was posting about housesitting for us. I think it's safe to assume that we've met if she's living in my house and scoping out my sex toy and underwear drawers. And then there's the time she did laundry and left a pair of panties, which I put on my head, took a picture of, and posted with her permission.

Glo has posted, herself, about us meeting up.

Generally speaking, I think you're right; it's possible that I've slipped in that sort of benign-neglect way. I could have emailed with someone and then assumed they, like I, didn't care if I mentioned such. It's an easy mistake to make.

I don't think I've ever done something like sent Nipples Powertone's facebook page. That crosses a line for me.

 

[Lorilei]

In all honesty, that particular thought DID cross my mind. You "too good to be true" folks generally are.

I'm going to choose to take this as a compliment.

 

[Sonny Limatina]

Point being, once the pics are out there...


I get that. In those two specific cases, yes, I'm sure they don't mind. Hell, SheRem was posting about housesitting for us. I think it's safe to assume that we've met if she's living in my house and scoping out my sex toy and underwear drawers. And then there's the time she did laundry and left a pair of panties, which I put on my head, took a picture of, and posted with her permission.

Glo has posted, herself, about us meeting up.

Generally speaking, I think you're right; it's possible that I've slipped in that sort of benign-neglect way. I could have emailed with someone and then assumed they, like I, didn't care if I mentioned such. It's an easy mistake to make.

I don't think I've ever done something like sent Nipples Powertone's facebook page. That crosses a line for me.

You had Powertone's Facebook page?

 

[Peregrinator]

You had Powertone's Facebook page?

He was friends with Ken.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

http://backseatcuddler.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Cheers-season-box-cover.jpg

All those night when you've got no lights,
The check is in the mail;
And your little angel
Hung the cat up by it's tail;
And your third fiance didn't show;

Sometimes you want to go
Where everybody knows your name,
And they're always glad you came;
You want to be where you can see,
Our troubles are all the same;
You want to be where everybody knows your name.

 

[patient1]

I do not know you but I like you...

Thank you, and you're welcome.

 

[HB1965]

Like I said, I don't think you'd purposely out anyone. But, just for arguments sake, you mentioned meeting Glo and Sheremembers. Are you sure they're OK with you mentioning a real life situation? I'm not making any kind of hook up accusations, mind you. But while maybe they're fine with it, often, people like you, as an open book online) don't think about it.

I was there when Perg met Glo. Not only did she give permission for him to discuss it but she posted a picture of the two of them that I took. Perg doesn't violate people's privacy. He always asks how much people are ok with being discussed or shown on the boards.

 

[December]

Mama-samas want to see cold hard cash now. I know we fuck with Vette over the corn shit but really it was the times. WWII vets traded chocolate bars, cigarettes and hosiery for pussy.

Pisses me off that now we invade countries that a pussy smells like a camels ass. I can't see why we don't invade Columbia. Sexy women in Columbia. I want to take Shakira prisoner and interrogate her a little.

You're disgusting. Truly.

He was friends with ****.

Why is it not ok to post other RL names but you're posting that one without any regard for privacy? Would you be addressing anyone else by their supposed real name on this site? No? So why are you doing it now?

 

[pinkstarfish]

you've not seen the gratuitous cunt spread pics.

i have.

 

[Sean]

You're disgusting. Truly.



Why is it not ok to post other RL names but you're posting that one without any regard for privacy? Would you be addressing anyone else by their supposed real name on this site? No? So why are you doing it now?

Do fuck off, Ken pretended to be a chick. He solicited rape stories from other Lit women as a chick. He solicited addresses from other litsters as a chick. He gets NO leeway. None at all.

 

[Image]

I was there when Perg met Glo. Not only did she give permission for him to discuss it but she posted a picture of the two of them that I took. Perg doesn't violate people's privacy. He always asks how much people are ok with being discussed or shown on the boards.

I have to laugh at this because, personality wise speaking, you two are peas in a pod. You are another one who loves people to know that "you know people". We used to call that name dropping

As I've said, there's nothing malicious about it, either one of you. It's just an ego thing...

 

[warrior queen]

You're disgusting. Truly.



Why is it not ok to post other RL names but you're posting that one without any regard for privacy? Would you be addressing anyone else by their supposed real name on this site? No? So why are you doing it now?

I think the attempts to get r/l details from other litizens by using an alt to pretend to be a woman kinda nullifies any rights Karen/Ken may have had to privacy.
Besides, all the r/l info was linked by them anyway.

 

[December]

Do fuck off, Ken pretended to be a chick. He solicited rape stories from other Lit women as a chick. He solicited addresses from other litsters as a chick. He gets NO leeway. None at all.

It is unfortunate, if in fact KK is him and he did do all of those things. However, fair goes both ways. Even if he were a murdering rapist, he would still have rights. The rules are not made to be followed only for people you enjoy. Since Perg is notoriously neutral it would make sense that he would remain impartial, no?

 

[HB1965]

I have to laugh at this because, personality wise speaking, you two are peas in a pod. You are another one who loves people to know that "you know people". We used to call that name dropping

As I've said, there's nothing malicious about it, either one of you. It's just an ego thing...

If that's your perception then I'm sorry to report to you that it's mistaken. For me it's always been about the joy of making a new connection and wanting to share it with other people on the boards who I wished were also there to share the experience. At the other off shoot boards (and on Facebook) pictures have been posted of such meetings for exactly that purpose. There is nothing "ego" about it.

 

[December]

I think the attempts to get r/l details from other litizens by using an alt to pretend to be a woman kinda nullifies any rights Karen/**** may have had to privacy.
Besides, all the r/l info was linked by them anyway.

Unfortunately what you think doesn't justify. I think if some man were to hurt my child I would surely have the right to pluck out his eyeballs or feed his genitals to a hungry dog. In actuality, that sleazebag would still have rights, and so does the poster known as KK.

 

[warrior queen]

Unfortunately what you think doesn't justify. I think if some man were to hurt my child I would surely have the right to pluck out his eyeballs or feed his genitals to a hungry dog. In actuality, that sleazebag would still have rights, and so does the poster known as KK.

There are unwritten rules that apply here also.
For the most part, people respect them.
One is that you do not attempt to obtain personal details by fraud - and the KK/Ken persona did exactly that.
How do you think the people who fell into the tomato seed subterfuge feel?
It was an elaborate scam, set up solely to obtain information.

What if YOU had passed over your home address? Would you feel differently then?

 

[December]

There are unwritten rules that apply here also.
For the most part, people respect them.
One is that you do not attempt to obtain personal details by fraud - and the KK/**** persona did exactly that.
How do you think the people who fell into the tomato seed subterfuge feel?
It was an elaborate scam, set up solely to obtain information.

What if YOU had passed over your home address? Would you feel differently then?

If I had passed my RL home address to a wacky political maniac who was obsessed with rape stories, growing a perfect tomato (of all things) and rail thin barely legal women, I would expect to be duped somehow because there are a hell of a lot of red flags in just this one sentence alone. The bottom line is, the people who gave over their addresses were grown adults.They came to the internet knowing it could be scandalous. They read KK's posts and still handed over their addresses. They were lucky nobody showed up to add them to a long line of serial killer victims, and I doubt those people will make a mistake like that again.

That being said, not everyone is good with judging where red flags may or may not be, I can understand that, as we are all individuals and we all possess varying degrees of intelligence and/or insight. I do feel bad for people that may have been too trusting and too oblivious to the signs, however in the long run, luckily in this case, those people were not harmed. Maybe some of them received some seeds, but surely none of them were raped, kidnapped, murdered or otherwise abused.

Unwritten rules? LoL. Yeah, no. It wasn't ok when trolls posted NotNowHunny's RL name and info. It wasn't ok when Robdownsouth's info was posted, nor Killswitch's info. It wasn't ok when I posted bits of SS's RL info, it wasn't ok when my RL info was posted. It wasn't ok when that crazy stalker chick's RL name was posted, or when Blacksnake's RL name was posted. It wasn'tok when Starfish was stalked in her RL and some of her RL info was posted. It wasn't ok when any fucking body's RL info was posted here. I know it wasn't ok because my moral compass agreed with Laurel removing the info I just mentioned above.

But you're going to tell me that this one guy, he has no rights? Every other instance of personal info being posted here was deemed inappropriate and removed by the site owner, but this one fucking guy somehow has "unwritten rules" working against him?

Uh huh.

 

[Peregrinator]

I was there when Perg met Glo. Not only did she give permission for him to discuss it but she posted a picture of the two of them that I took. Perg doesn't violate people's privacy. He always asks how much people are ok with being discussed or shown on the boards.

Well, to be sure, I try to ask that every time. Occasionally I may forget.

Why is it not ok to post other RL names but you're posting that one without any regard for privacy? Would you be addressing anyone else by their supposed real name on this site? No? So why are you doing it now?

It is unfortunate, if in fact KK is him and he did do all of those things. However, fair goes both ways. Even if he were a murdering rapist, he would still have rights. The rules are not made to be followed only for people you enjoy. Since Perg is notoriously neutral it would make sense that he would remain impartial, no?

Whose real name is that? As far as I know, Karen says it's not hers. So then why would it matter? If people were claiming your real name were Aloysius, would it be wrong to post that name? Besides which, "Ken" is fast becoming a meme. It's almost not about a person named Ken any more. It's like an archetype now. And the truly impartial view would be to say that the name Ken is of no relevance at all. Right?

I have to laugh at this because, personality wise speaking, you two are peas in a pod. You are another one who loves people to know that "you know people". We used to call that name dropping

As I've said, there's nothing malicious about it, either one of you. It's just an ego thing...

If that's your perception then I'm sorry to report to you that it's mistaken. For me it's always been about the joy of making a new connection and wanting to share it with other people on the boards who I wished were also there to share the experience. At the other off shoot boards (and on Facebook) pictures have been posted of such meetings for exactly that purpose. There is nothing "ego" about it.

Pretty much. Image seems to see ego in the motivation for everything, except her own oh-so-clever observations.

 

[December]

Whose real name is that? As far as I know, Karen says it's not hers. So then why would it matter? If people were claiming your real name were Aloysius, would it be wrong to post that name? Besides which, "Ken" is fast becoming a meme. It's almost not about a person named Ken any more. It's like an archetype now. And the truly impartial view would be to say that the name Ken is of no relevance at all. Right?

You're dancing merrily on the very thin strands of a technicality. It's a sticky little area, but there is a line. It's a blurry line, but it is there, and I note the side you chose to stand on.

 

[Peregrinator]

You're dancing merrily on the very thin strands of a technicality. It's a sticky little area, but there is a line. It's a blurry line, but it is there, and I note the side you chose to stand on.

That's one way of seeing it, I guess. Another way is to take Karen's side and see the name Ken as having nothing at all to do with her or any other poster here.

Right, Aloysius?

Have you even asked me what I think the truth is yet?