Ulaven_Demorte
Non-Prophet Organization
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Posts
- 30,016
Isn't it nice that ten executives at Fannie Mae received almost 13 million in bonuses?
That's all? Those bonuses were paid for reaching performance goals. You know, doing their jobs. You neglect to mention that those bonus figures are 40% lower than before the economic crisis.
Now compare those to the compensation packages paid out to other banking executives for failing to do thier jobs..
In 2007, the year before Lehman Brother's collapsed, the CEO Richard Fuld was paid $22,030,534, which included a base salary of $750,000, a cash bonus of $4,250,000, and stock grants of $16,877,365.
or more recently..
October 21, 2011 2:49 PM EDT
Goldman Sachs has set aside $10 billion for compensation and bonuses this year, it announced on Oct. 19 -- the same day it reported a third-quarter loss of $428 million.
The $10 billion figure is 24 percent less than the bonus pool at this time last year, but if the bonus pool actually fluctuated based on the company's profits, it would have decreased by 70 percent, because that's how much Goldman Sachs's profits have declined since 2010.
The company's stock, meanwhile, has fallen by 43 percent since the beginning of 2011, and 1,300 employees were laid off in the third quarter alone, with 1,000 more layoffs expected by the end of the year. It doesn't seem unreasonable to say that if executive bonuses were lower, some of those layoffs could have been avoided.
