What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[koalabear]

Dizzybooby rule #1:
When he asks for you to "show me, I'll wait", he won't. In fact if he is shown he will simply spew ethnic slurs until whoever did "show him" finally places him on ignore.

Dizzybooby rule #2:
The louder and more often he posts on a subject consecutively, the most sure you can be that he's completely full of shit.

Dizzybooby rule #3:
When in doubt, try to play victim. Invoke rule #1 if at all possible.

Dizzybooby rule #4:
Insert rule #1 as needed any time your position is brought into question.

It's a non-accredited "institute of higher learning". They will issue you a certificate of completion and everything.. For the low, low cost of just $95.

The standard disclaimer re: grades and accredidation;
Grades and Certificates
The final grade will depend on quizzes. Taking the course for a grade is optional. The Mises Academy is currently not accredited, but this course is worth 3 credits in our own internal system. Feel free to ask your school to accept Mises Academy credits. (LMAO! Good luck getting credits accepted from a non-accredited "institute" at an actual college.) You will receive a digital Certificate of Completion for this course if you take it for a grade, and a Certificate of Participation if you take it on a paid-audit basis.

Still know counseling, it shows, you need to fix that self hate.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Obama talks about the best universities, the best entrepreneurs, etc., he fails to note, the worst fucking President in history.

What does "W" have to do with it? You know, I mean other than presiding over the conservative economic policies that caused this mess.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

What does "W" have to do with it? You know, I mean other than presiding over the conservative economic policies that caused this mess.

typical NIGGER

blaming OTHERS

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Market flirting with a 600 point sell off, all part of the UD recovery.

"We got 98% of what we wanted." - John Boehner

Apparently what they wanted was to trash the economy well into 2012. Mission accomplished!

 

[koalabear]

"We got 98% of what we wanted." - John Boehner

Apparently what they wanted was to trash the economy well into 2012. Mission accomplished!

Keep up, S&P is to blame now, then seek counseling.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cjh]

S&P said in its report that the failure by politicians to act on increasing government revenue also was a consideration in its decision. It no longer assumes that the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts would expire by the end of 2012 “because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues.”
Politics is listed as one of five “key factors” in S&P’s methodology for grading governments. “Part of our analysis assesses how government policymaking affects a sovereign’s credit fundamentals,” Ed Sweeney, a spokesman for the ratings company, said yesterday in a telephone interview.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-to-tea-party-at-expense-of-u-s-taxpayer.html

 

[busybody..]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-to-tea-party-at-expense-of-u-s-taxpayer.html

lets arrest the S n Peee guys, shall we?

 

[cjh]

lets arrest the S n Peee guys, shall we?

I'm only the piano player.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

"We got 98% of what we wanted." - John Boehner

Apparently what they wanted was to trash the economy well into 2012. Mission accomplished!

oh come on, tell us how this is Bush's fault

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Hey clown, it's all about Obama and the Democrats spending 5 trillion they don't have and Democrat intransigence in cutting costs. It isn't about a failure in raising taxes and driving us further into recession.

During negotiations over raising the debt ceiling, President Obama proposed several comprehensive plans that would have cut up to $4 trillion in spending for modest revenue increases. Republicans refused every one. When he abandoned negotiations on July 22, Boehner said the deal presented by Obama “was going to be nothing more than a tax hike on the American people.” That deal contained $3.5 trillion in spending cuts and about $1 trillion in revenue increases and Republicans rejected it.

The reason given for the downgrade, which caused the turmoil in the markets was given by S&P. They said it made the move in part because Republicans took the debt ceiling hostage and refused to consider raising taxes. In fact, several outlets have reviewed the report from S&P and determined that it's difficult to see it as anything but a smashing blow to Republicans, as the National Journal stated: ‘It’s hard to read the S&P analysis as anything other than a blast at Republicans’.

Now you can continue to insist otherwise, spewing the latest FauxNews spin (who incidentally tried to play off this downgrade as no big deal or even a good thing, before it actually happened)... If you want to look like even more of an idiot than normal.

After being told that the downgrade is advantageous, FauxNews viewers are now being told that it's economic doom at the hands of Obama. You're suffering from political whiplash from the spin as your side of the aisle desperately tries to blame everyone, anyone, except of ocourse the people who are actually responsible for this mess, themselves.

 

[busybody..]

During negotiations over raising the debt ceiling, President Obama proposed several comprehensive plans that would have cut up to $4 trillion in spending for modest revenue increases. Republicans refused every one. When he abandoned negotiations on July 22, Boehner said the deal presented by Obama “was going to be nothing more than a tax hike on the American people.” That deal contained $3.5 trillion in spending cuts and about $1 trillion in revenue increases and Republicans rejected it.

The reason given for the downgrade, which caused the turmoil in the markets was given by S&P. They said it made the move in part because Republicans took the debt ceiling hostage and refused to consider raising taxes. In fact, several outlets have reviewed the report from S&P and determined that it's difficult to see it as anything but a smashing blow to Republicans, as the National Journal stated: ‘It’s hard to read the S&P analysis as anything other than a blast at Republicans’.

Now you can continue to insist otherwise, spewing the latest FauxNews spin (who incidentally tried to play off this downgrade as no big deal or even a good thing, before it actually happened)... If you want to look like even more of an idiot than normal.

After being told that the downgrade is advantageous, FauxNews viewers are now being told that it's economic doom at the hands of Obama. You're suffering from political whiplash from the spin as your side of the aisle desperately tries to blame everyone, anyone, except of ocourse the people who are actually responsible for this mess, themselves.

you MADE THIS UP

Obama NEVER PROPOSED a plan at all

 

[busybody..]

you MADE THIS UP

Obama NEVER PROPOSED a plan at all

Axelrod went so far as to say

when AXED what Obama's plan was

to say

it was SECRET

you lied

HE PUT NO PLAN OUT THERE

YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR!

 

[busybody..]

I'm only the piano player.

juan note Charlie

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Market flirting with a 600 point sell off, all part of the UD recovery.

☝☝Rank revisionism at its finest

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Total bullshit son. Total bullshit. Obama had no plan.

He had a plan. Even Crybaby Boehner was down with it because it included most of you assholes. But you fucks shitted on it just to be fucks as usual.

This is where we are because you fucks are deliberate fucks. As you are wont to say, own it.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

RubDownSow=Rank, period.

Ad Hominem, as usual.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Total bullshit son. Total bullshit. Obama had no plan.

You must have missed the speech back in April, did FauxNews not cover it? Do you think Boehner just made up the comment about the President's plan "being nothing but a tax hike on the American people" when it was in fact nearly 4 to 1 spending cuts vs tax increases?

I guess the NYT made it up.. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/us/politics/14obama.html

Oh look, FauxNews did cover it.. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/13/obama-debt-plan-revives-debate-bush-era-tax-cuts/
So there's no excuse for your ignorance. unless it's just willful.
The bullshit here "Son" seems to be dribbling from your fingertips.