Afghanistan s turning into a quagmire...

Yeah, and you wanted the war too dumbass...

In fact, the Friday Night before the Saturday Morning liberation of Afghanistan, your party's leaders took to the airways to bash Bush for doing nothing about the Taliban and how they would already be kicking ass and taking names if they were in charge of the war effort.

Are you a gambler, AJ?

Wanna play for high stakes, AJ? Are you man enough?

Here's the bet:

I'll give you TWENTY FOUR HOURS to find one SINGLE GODDAMNED POST of mine where I state that I "wanted war" in Iraq.

You find ONE SINGLE GODDAMNED POST, and I'll leave Lit forever, and send my password for "RobDownSouth" to you.

You DON'T find ONE SINGLE GODDAMNED POST, and you leave Lit for 30 days and send me the password to your Crisco account.

You fail to remember that I was against the war in Iraq from the absolute beginning. You and your fellow coward Vetteman had a lotta fun questioning my patriotism back then, remember?

SOooooooo....what's it gonna be, boy?

Your mouth writing checks your ass can't cash?

:D

p.s. I'm betting you won't answer this post at all, taking in your history of cowardice in the face of hostile fire.
 
Bumpin' for the suddenly oh-so-quiet AJ.

Cat got your tongue, punk?

Or are you just waitin' for the Hur-Hur-Hur posse to back you up?
 
I think there are plenty of people in Afghanistan who see the Taliban as a less than desirable option.

Unfortunately, Afghanistan is committed to the concept of tribalism. The central government means nothing out in the countryside. Some of those tribes were never enamored with each other to begin with, so the inability to unite in a manner similar to the old "Northern Alliance" usually gives the Taliban the upper hand in dealing with local tribes, and in taking over the country as a whole.

Its the usual problem the United States faces in fighting and winning any war. If we prevail and attempt to engage in nation building, we are the 'ugly Americans.' If we prevail and let the post-war chips fall where they may, there is no guarantee we won't have to eventually go back in and fight the same fight all over again.

In fact, I believe we are doing that in Afghanistan right now.

Paying the price for letting the chips fall when the Russians left. The Taliban filled the vacuum.
 
Iraq Throb?

Boy are you a stupid mother-fucker. The topic is, was, and remains Afghaninam. Go back and re-read the post that set you off this time.

You kept screaming partition and quagmire when it came to Iraq ignoring the fact tat Iran and Turkey would promptly move in to keep down the Kurds and the Sunnis. But again, that wasn't the topic or I would have discussed why the Democratic Party demanded TWO votes for war due to the looming election and the desire to look tough on national defense, just like Obama is now doing what he thinks it takes to make him look tough to his voters.

But, thanks for the bump, it helps remind everyone here why they shouldn't attempt a dialog with you; again, you lack the tools and temperament. You have a serious screw loose.
 
Show me where I said it was "Kewl" or anything but war. You accused our Marines of first degree murder, I suggested we wait for the facts, you said I had no honor. The facts came in, those Marines were acquitted, or charges were dropped, you were wrong, you have no honor, your rush to judgment was motivated by hate, hate for your country, hate for our military, and hate for the Commander In Chief. You're a spiteful little nothing, a piece of roadkill on the highway of truth.

Yeah, and you wanted the war too dumbass...

In fact, the Friday Night before the Saturday Morning liberation of Afghanistan, your party's leaders took to the airways to bash Bush for doing nothing about the Taliban and how they would already be kicking ass and taking names if they were in charge of the war effort.

Yeah, coward under fire, show us where vette said the war was "kewl."
 
Boy are you a stupid mother-fucker. The topic is, was, and remains Afghaninam. Go back and re-read the post that set you off this time.

You kept screaming partition and quagmire when it came to Iraq ignoring the fact tat Iran and Turkey would promptly move in to keep down the Kurds and the Sunnis. But again, that wasn't the topic or I would have discussed why the Democratic Party demanded TWO votes for war due to the looming election and the desire to look tough on national defense, just like Obama is now doing what he thinks it takes to make him look tough to his voters.

But, thanks for the bump, it helps remind everyone here why they shouldn't attempt a dialog with you; again, you lack the tools and temperament. You have a serious screw loose.

Just like I thought....trying to bluster your way out. "But....but....but..."

You got caught lyin' again, and your cowardice and lack of honor prevents you from admitting you were wrong.

Small wonder your daddy kicked your ass to the curb as soon at it was legally possible.
 
Yeah, coward under fire, show us where vette said the war was "kewl."

Goin' all Orwellian on us now?

"We have never supported the war"
"We will never support the war"
"We don't believe war is a good thing"


You and your fellow coward Vetteman have been the biggest arm-chair war supportin' chest thumpin' nationalist trash since the war began. You two are the living embodiment of the "War is soo Kewl!" crowd.
 
You can't prove it because you're the big fat liar...





You can't even keep the fucking topic straight.


Time for your meds 70/30...
 
Boy are you a stupid mother-fucker. The topic is, was, and remains Afghaninam. Go back and re-read the post that set you off this time.

You kept screaming partition and quagmire when it came to Iraq ignoring the fact tat Iran and Turkey would promptly move in to keep down the Kurds and the Sunnis. But again, that wasn't the topic or I would have discussed why the Democratic Party demanded TWO votes for war due to the looming election and the desire to look tough on national defense, just like Obama is now doing what he thinks it takes to make him look tough to his voters.

But, thanks for the bump, it helps remind everyone here why they shouldn't attempt a dialog with you; again, you lack the tools and temperament. You have a serious screw loose.

Ad hominem.
 
The Democratic polity in a nutshell.

If we froze North Korea out of diplomacy, they wanted talks.
If we talked to them one-on-one, they wanted "partners."
If we held six-party talks, they wanted one-on-one talks.





:rolleyes:

No hypocrisy, just doublespeak.

Ad hominem by class. Not that such a thing exists. :rolleyes:
 
Where did vetteman call the war "kewl?"




'Cause John Kerry went through the Korean-talk machinations...
 
Yeah, and you wanted the war too dumbass...
You're going to have to come up with some evidence of that.

I don't remember anything ever being posted by Rob that wasn't against that war.

What I recall is that he was as much against it as I was.

The Russians tried for how many years? And they're like, right there.

And the US is going to clean house from halfway around the world?

It will never happen. Pull. The. Fuck. Out.

Before any more Americans lose their lives, their arms, or their legs, in a futile excercise.
 
Isolation is our only hope.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.
 
You're going to have to come up with some evidence of that.

I don't remember anything ever being posted by Rob that wasn't against that war.


What I recall is that he was as much against it as I was.

The Russians tried for how many years? And they're like, right there.

And the US is going to clean house from halfway around the world?

It will never happen. Pull. The. Fuck. Out.

Before any more Americans lose their lives, their arms, or their legs, in a futile excercise.

Throb wasn't here for the Afghan invasion, I said his party (See his join date, unless he finally wants to cop to being 70/30 and having a mental meltdown). Throb went straight to Iraq, which we all know he was opposed to even though his party voted for it. How many times do I have to quote myself?

Originally Posted by Frisco_Slug_Esq
Yeah, and you wanted the war too* dumbass...

In fact, the Friday Night before the Saturday Morning liberation of Afghanistan, your party's leaders took to the airways to bash Bush for doing nothing about the Taliban and how they would already be kicking ass and taking names if they were in charge of the war effort.
_____

Obama cannot continue to defend the cities while rocketing the hills, he's only going to give them reason to come down and blow shit up in retaliation.



* Now, it's up to Throb to show me where he came out against The Invasion of Afghanistan, because that was what I was clearly talking about, not Iraq, and if I remember right, he would have had to have been in the 10% of America opposed to going in and kicking some Taliban ass and killing bin Laden.

He also needs to answer Vette's challenge before he goes around flinging the gauntlet like some wounded kitten.
 
Back
Top