3-some

[ted_cinti]

most men love 3 somes....some are in in just for the sex. The best is where 2 guys who are good lovers make love to the same woman with the goal of making her feel as good as possible.

ted

 

[Laster]

most men love 3 somes....some are in in just for the sex. The best is where 2 guys who are good lovers make love to the same woman with the goal of making her feel as good as possible.

ted

Oh my god I'm in love with you. I could not have said it any better.
Now just blindfold me so I don't know who you are.

 

[Homburg]

In the sack; it was kinda cool yet hideously frustrating all at the same time.

This is an apt way to describe it. It's less frustrating when you have coping mechanisms, but it can still be bloody frustrating.

 

[sexmadgirl]

So if women are open to a male and two females. Why are men not as open to two men and one female?

I much prefer mmf to ffm and have even had a few mmmf experiences..... yum!

 

[Homburg]

A couple of nights ago, we had a first. viv has a bit of a hang-up about "joining in". If MIS and I are involved, viv will generally avoid. I keep telling her she's welcome, but she couldn't bring herself to do it. Well, the night before this happened, she asked me to help her be more aggressive. I gave her some tips, and mostly just reinforced that it really was cool if she just joined in. Sure, get the nod first to make sure it is okay, but it is very likely to be.

Anyway, MIS and I were in my office/workout area, and things were getting interesting. I hear a knock on the (locked) door, and it's viv. She comes in with a grin on her face, and tells me that she doesn't have a whole lot of time due to dinner and all, but wants to play too. So she got involved, and we had some nicely hot fun for a few minutes.

Then, utterly without fanfare or drama, she says she really should go back upstairs, and, after getting the nod there too, does. MIS and I went back to what we were doing.

After the fact, I talked to viv about it, and she was brilliantly happy. Sure, she wanted to stay longer, but recognised that she had a pot or two on the stove, and couldn't leave it alone for long. MIS had a blast as well. Yeah, it would've been nice for her to stay, sure, but it was incredibly cool for her to be willing to join in for a bit and leave when she had to sans even minor grumpiness or jealousy.

It was actually a big moment. Good stuff. And a big "Good on ya," to viv

 

[Albee]

There is no worse feeling in the entire world than just lying there watching the other two people ignore you.

Well, BiBunny, I guess it takes all kinds. Because I don't think there are many better feelings. My wife and I haven't done any actual threesomes, but we've done something analogous.

First I have to preface by saying we've been married a long time (21 years) and love each other very deeply. We are in it for the long haul. And that my 47 year old wife turns me on more now than when she was 26 is one of life's obvious truths.

So, back to being ignored. As I said, we haven't actually done a threesome (except through phone sex), but my wife has fucked me in a rushed, perfunctory, watch-peeking hurry before she ran out of the house to fuck another man.

The first time she did it was the night she went to sleep with someone else for the first time after 20 years of fidelity. We had agreed that she would do this after, literally, years of negotiation.

In contrast to her perfunctory hurry, I longed for intimacy. I desperately wanted to savor the last feel of my wife's pussy that had, for so many years, had only me inside of it.

All of it, her fidelity...her rush to see him...how sexy she looked...the sensation of the inside of her body...even that she wasn't turned on by me at all...turned me on almost unbearably.

Then, later on, I found out that she had already been fucking him for months.

Even the pretense of our shared milestone of fidelity, was just that. A pretense. It was bullshit. The moment of intimacy I so treasured: meaningless to her. Even more, in light of what had really been going on, truly meaningless.

I was even more turned on.

For me, there is nothing more erotic than longing for that piece of my wife's sexuality that will always elude me.

 

[Netzach]

Well, BiBunny, I guess it takes all kinds. Because I don't think there are many better feelings. My wife and I haven't done any actual threesomes, but we've done something analogous.

First I have to preface by saying we've been married a long time (21 years) and love each other very deeply. We are in it for the long haul. And that my 47 year old wife turns me on more now than when she was 26 is one of life's obvious truths.

So, back to being ignored. As I said, we haven't actually done a threesome (except through phone sex), but my wife has fucked me in a rushed, perfunctory, watch-peeking hurry before she ran out of the house to fuck another man.

The first time she did it was the night she went to sleep with someone else for the first time after 20 years of fidelity. We had agreed that she would do this after, literally, years of negotiation.

In contrast to her perfunctory hurry, I longed for intimacy. I desperately wanted to savor the last feel of my wife's pussy that had, for so many years, had only me inside of it.

All of it, her fidelity...her rush to see him...how sexy she looked...the sensation of the inside of her body...even that she wasn't turned on by me at all...turned me on almost unbearably.

Then, later on, I found out that she had already been fucking him for months.

Even the pretense of our shared milestone of fidelity, was just that. A pretense. It was bullshit. The moment of intimacy I so treasured: meaningless to her. Even more, in light of what had really been going on, truly meaningless.

I was even more turned on.

For me, there is nothing more erotic than longing for that piece of my wife's sexuality that will always elude me.

I just got hot reading that.

 

[Albee]

I just got hot reading that.

Thanks Netzach. Between your intellect, your kinks, and some of your self portraits, you've gotten me hot a few times over the years.

 

[BiBunny]

Well, BiBunny, I guess it takes all kinds. Because I don't think there are many better feelings. My wife and I haven't done any actual threesomes, but we've done something analogous.

First I have to preface by saying we've been married a long time (21 years) and love each other very deeply. We are in it for the long haul. And that my 47 year old wife turns me on more now than when she was 26 is one of life's obvious truths.

So, back to being ignored. As I said, we haven't actually done a threesome (except through phone sex), but my wife has fucked me in a rushed, perfunctory, watch-peeking hurry before she ran out of the house to fuck another man.

The first time she did it was the night she went to sleep with someone else for the first time after 20 years of fidelity. We had agreed that she would do this after, literally, years of negotiation.

In contrast to her perfunctory hurry, I longed for intimacy. I desperately wanted to savor the last feel of my wife's pussy that had, for so many years, had only me inside of it.

All of it, her fidelity...her rush to see him...how sexy she looked...the sensation of the inside of her body...even that she wasn't turned on by me at all...turned me on almost unbearably.

Then, later on, I found out that she had already been fucking him for months.

Even the pretense of our shared milestone of fidelity, was just that. A pretense. It was bullshit. The moment of intimacy I so treasured: meaningless to her. Even more, in light of what had really been going on, truly meaningless.

I was even more turned on.

For me, there is nothing more erotic than longing for that piece of my wife's sexuality that will always elude me.

Intriguing story, but it appears to me that you and I are talking about apples and elephants as far as the thread goes.

 

[Albee]

Intriguing story, but it appears to me that you and I are talking about apples and elephants as far as the thread goes.

Well, I'm allergic to apples and I've never given much thought to elephants, and you might be right, but get the sense we're in the same ballpark.

With this same guy, my wife once fucked me while she had phone sex with him. She and I went to bed. After my wife assumed I was asleep, she got up and did about an hour of cyber with him, waking me up with all her swearing and moaning. Then she got on the phone and the moaning became screaming.

Assuming I was awake and looking for any cock that was available, my wife climbed on top of me without ever saying a word or looking into my eyes. She came with him in a series of throaty groans, thrashing her body and elbowing me, over and over again, in the face.

She wasn't trying to elbow me in the face. She just wasn't paying attention. My experience was the farthest thing from her mind. She wasn't even making a conscious effort to ignore me. She was just using my body as a convenient conduit to experiencing him.

Over the past few years my wife has slept with other men a lot. At times, it has heightened our sexual ecstacy and intimacy. At others, she's used my body simply as a vehicle to enhance her memories of them.

Is it the same as winding up in a chair in the corner of the bedroom, watching your boyfriend and your best girlfriend make earth-shaking passionate love as if you weren't there?

No.

But I think it's akin.

 

[roomfor1more]

To begin with I feel many males fantasize about having a threesome and I feel the true test of how serious they are comes down to if they are willing to have a two male threesome. I am sure some will disagree with me on this point but I feel a two male threesome is a lot easier to arrange than a two female threesome due to the fact there is probably 30 - 100 males for every 1 female that is interested in having a threesome with a couple.

Moving on, there is a lot of good advice in this thread and from my experience with threesomes a lot comes down to how well all three of you communicate. Communication does not mean asking your partner, "hey, do you want a threesome?" to which they reply, "sure." Then from there the two of you look for someone and it just happens. Instead communication means talking about and being prepared to talk about issues that the majority of couples never discuss, such as feelings about watching your partner having sex with someone else while you watch. Also communication means, being able to discuss needs in an open caring way, being able to negotiate on needs that are more "nice to have" and not willing to negotiate on those needs you feel are vital to you so that you can participate in the threesome. Essentially this requires that you are assertive, diplomatic, and have good social skills. If you can do that, speak to a third person about your expectations for a threesome, and be prepared to listen to them talk about their expectations then you have a reasonable chance that the threesome you will have is going to be successful.

 

[Breezee2857]

I'd say the majority of men are probably turned on by it, at least as a fantasy, provided the mix is M/F/F.

I would have to agree. Most men would jump at the chance to have two women in the sack. I personally love it either way. There is nothing better then feeling a woman go after your cock while she has her pussy licked and sucked. It fires a hunger in her you just can't explaine.

 

[DVS]

Fear.

I'm just starting with this thread but I had to respond to this. I've had several M/ff threesomes, and no MM/f. I don't see it as fear at all, just no interest. With me, I want to be the only male so I'm always involved. And the less I see of another man's body the better, because I don't necessarily see another hairy body as sexy.

A friend and I were even offered a foursome by two beautiful blondes and we both looked at each other and declined. It had nothing to do with the women, but neither my friend or I would have enjoyed the situation. We tried to get the women to make it two couples, but they said a foursome only. It's too bad, because they were quite beautiful. But, I have a thing about another male body in anything I do sexually.

Now, if it were an orgy or something where there were a lot of both sexes involved, I'd be OK. There would be enough women to go around without a problem. I don't call it fear at all. I call it just not interested.

 

[satindesire]

Wow, there's been a lot of old threads bumped lately.

 

[Lizzie_Borden]

I want to be the only male so I'm always involved.

Women have three orifices. At least 2, often all 3, will be available. And between the two of you, there's 2 dicks. The odds are still considerably in your favour of getting some action and being involved.

lol

 

[DVS]

Women have three orifices. At least 2, often all 3, will be available. And between the two of you, there's 2 dicks. The odds are still considerably in your favour of getting some action and being involved.

lol

Oh, but when it comes to sexual fun, I don't like to share my toys. And look at it from the male point of view, when you're talking about sharing orifices. Case in point:Man #1 takes the woman from behind, doggie style. Man #2 takes her mouth at the same time. Instead of seeing much of the woman, both men actually have a better view of each other.

And to make matters worse, with her mouth busy, nobody would hear much from the woman. The only sounds of pleasure would be masculine. That scene has to do strange things to a heterosexual man's mind.

 

[ownedsubgal]

Oh, but when it comes to sexual fun, I don't like to share my toys. And look at it from the male point of view, when you're talking about sharing orifices. Case in point:Man #1 takes the woman from behind, doggie style. Man #2 takes her mouth at the same time. Instead of seeing much of the woman, both men actually have a better view of each other.

totally not true. um, have you seen my profile picture? do you really think my Master and the guest he invited were checking out each other, or my poked, prodded and hard-used little body?

oh and as for the sounds of pleasure...not all women make them. i'm quiet one-on-one, in a 3some or moresome. i'm just quiet, and focused purely on pleasing. hence any "sounds of pleasure" heard during sex with me will always be coming from my male partner, and i actually find that pretty gosh darn hot.

 

[midwestyankee]

Oh, but when it comes to sexual fun, I don't like to share my toys. And look at it from the male point of view, when you're talking about sharing orifices. Case in point:Man #1 takes the woman from behind, doggie style. Man #2 takes her mouth at the same time. Instead of seeing much of the woman, both men actually have a better view of each other.

And to make matters worse, with her mouth busy, nobody would hear much from the woman. The only sounds of pleasure would be masculine. That scene has to do strange things to a heterosexual man's mind.

Re: bolded part. No it doesn't have to do any such thing at all. It likely will for some men and may have little or no "strange things" impact on others.

 

[DVS]

totally not true. um, have you seen my profile picture? do you really think my Master and the guest he invited were checking out each other, or my poked, prodded and hard-used little body?

oh and as for the sounds of pleasure...not all women make them. i'm quiet one-on-one, in a 3some or moresome. i'm just quiet, and focused purely on pleasing. hence any "sounds of pleasure" heard during sex with me will always be coming from my male partner, and i actually find that pretty gosh darn hot.

Re: bolded part. No it doesn't have to do any such thing at all. It likely will for some men and may have little or no "strange things" impact on others.

It's not totally not true, and it's not totally true, either. Without going into a lot of detail, I'll just say it all depends on the position and the person. Personally, I don't like to share women with other men. I also don't enjoy gang bangs, if someone thinks I should.

I could go into lengthy detail, but I'd probably lose many of you in that explanation. It partially may be an aspect of control for me. I like to run the show. When there's another man, it's no longer my show to control. And while I don't assume every man feels as I do, of the millions hetero men in the world, I know I can't be that unique.


EDITED to fix the damn editing!

 

[Lizzie_Borden]

It's not totally not true, and it's not totally true, either. Without going into a lot of detail, I'll just say it all depends on the position and the person. Personally, I don't like to share women with other men. I also don't enjoy gang bangs, if someone thinks I should.

I could go into lengthy detail, but I'd probably lose many of you in that explanation. It partially may be an aspect of control for me. I like to run the show. When there's another man, it's no longer my show to control. And while I don't assume every man feels as I do, of the millions hetero men in the world, I know I can't be that unique.


EDITED to fix the damn editing!

I think that's a mindset that can be altered.

We've had a couple of group efforts, and there was no question that Mr was in charge of the show. I think it depends on whether you're 'hosting' or 'attending' and the mindset that comes with.

 

[DVS]

Women have three orifices. At least 2, often all 3, will be available. And between the two of you, there's 2 dicks. The odds are still considerably in your favour of getting some action and being involved.

lol

That's just it. I want all of the orifices for myself, to savor in my own time. I wasn't stingy with my toys as a kid, but I think I might have been, if I didn't have a lot of toys.

 

[DVS]

I think that's a mindset that can be altered.

We've had a couple of group efforts, and there was no question that Mr was in charge of the show. I think it depends on whether you're 'hosting' or 'attending' and the mindset that comes with.

I'm not so sure it can be changed, but I'm sure some don't share my views. I'm too old to change my ways, even if I wanted to. Maybe I'm not explaining it as well as I could be. And maybe I'm just strange. I can live with that.

 

[ownedsubgal]

I could go into lengthy detail, but I'd probably lose many of you in that explanation. It partially may be an aspect of control for me. I like to run the show. When there's another man, it's no longer my show to control. And while I don't assume every man feels as I do, of the millions hetero men in the world, I know I can't be that unique.

if it's your girl, it's your show to control. there has never been any question or slightest doubt during any of my multiple M sexual experiences as a slave that my Master was The Boss...the other men have always been quite aware that they are touching me at all only with his permission, that they could only engage in the acts specifically laid out by my Master beforehand, and that if they stepped out of bounds in any way or hurt me at all, there would be hell to pay. it's not so difficult for a Dominant male personality to hold others well in check, while still allowing enough freedom for self-expression.

and btw DVS, if you're not into the MFM, you're just not into it, and that's fine. it's just some of the reasons you've presented here don't really hold true for those of us who've actually engaged it, particularly those of us with a D/s nature.

 

[DVS]

I think you all should be glad that I deleted the rest of this post.

 

[subish2009]

My first threesome is so funny to think back on now. I was 18 and it was me and my best friend and her ex-boyfriend. He and I wanted to hook up but I wouldn't do it without her there; some misplaced sense of loyalty or something. But it was funny because all three of us were virgins, and intended to stay that way, and she and I weren't bi...so there's really not ALL that much 2 girls and a guy can do if all parties are not ALL that experienced. It was boring as hell!

Most of my other multiples experiences have been MFM, which I love. One with two Doms, which worked surprisingly well. I think it went so smoothly (a) because the other guy was a major voyeur and (b) a Dom understands that there are property lines and when it's your buddy's sub, you only touch what you have permission to touch. We're still very close friends with him and I think of him affectionately.

Several MFMFs, or MfMfs, with varying levels of success. The only truly bad experience I ever had was when I was 19 and let myself get too drunk and talked into a MFM with two guys I barely knew. Who picked me up at my boyfriend's (now husband's) birthday party. An experience which somehow triggered the recall of a repressed memory of being raped the year before. That was a big bad mess of disaster that had nothing to do with the fact that it was a threesome.

Threesomes can be hot, boring, or a big hot mess. One has to pick one's partners, as with any sex act, carefully.