Another new bug

Griffin and Sabine might kill Britva 🤣
That came out around the same time as an old hippie artist was working with me in Multimedia Gulch in San Francisco at a startup during the first Dotcom boom, very shortly before the crash.

He would say, "I remember when 'multimedia' meant you sewed a button on your canvas."

And speaking of cyberpunk, not very long after Griffin and Sabine, William Gibson came out with Pattern Recognition, which also intersects with the "experimental media" theme.

I mean, it isn't experimental media, itself. It's just a novel with .txt
 
Last edited:
I'm also very tickled that my attitude toward writing/literature/text can apparently only be assailed by comparisons to some very, very out-there counterexamples which were fully intended to break out of, rather than adhere to, storytelling and printing paradigms.

(y) 😉
 
This is kind of how I feel about very nearly ANY formatting in a story. The only exceptions I myself would ever consider using are italics and bold, and even then, the appropriate and necessary uses for either of them are very, very limited.

If a story can't be read in a plain-.txt file, absent any formatting (or, as in this case, superfluous characters) at all, then, rendering is not the problem.
Wait! How come I say exactly the same thing, and I get sacrificed on a stone altar by the witch @onehitwanda ?

@YmaOHyd no, it's not judgemental at all. I don't give a fuck about the way people format their content, but when there's a whole thread about a self-inflicted problem, I must admit, I'm amused. Particularly since, whenever html issues come up, I nearly always cite how I got bitten with a story that really got fucked up, trying to use over-clever formatting which went dramatically wrong.

Minimal, or no use of html, is guaranteed not to cause a problem, but now I'm the evil beast, suggesting that?
 
Minimal, or no use of html, is guaranteed not to cause a problem, but now I'm the evil beast, suggesting that?
There is a big difference here.

You're justifying it based on "causing problems."

That's not where I'm coming from at all, though it's a nice side effect.
 
Slow down, slow down, I'm taking notes

Wait, it says "BASIC LATIN" - Does that mean I need to know Latin in order to use it?
It also says "Neutral", which means you can only use it between scenes that involve neither nor protagonists nor antagonists.
 
*ducks in, understands about 20% of what any of these posts say, ducks out again*

Agreed that this is annoying; we should all expect the code to work. Also agreed that pulling all one's stories over this isn't quite the flex one might think it is. It's a bit much.

I just submit as a docx. Nary a problem.
 
For fuck sakes Penny we talked about this
Day 124 of being objectified by Wanda...

Also, plot bunny about HTML Witches in a fantacyberpunk world where all of the programmers were killed by a Snowcrash virus and now the server infrastructure is maintained by barely understood dark magic and AI vibe-coding
 
There is a big difference here.

You're justifying it based on "causing problems."

That's not where I'm coming from at all, though it's a nice side effect.
No, that's a misread. Fundamentally, your position is absolutely right, special formatting is rarely if ever needed.

My comment was that it's an avoidable problem, and I cite myself as an example - I was trying to be clever, after someone showed me how to use html (for something as simple as italics in a story), and it went wrong

Ironically, I'm editing a story from that time, which has a bunch of code for italics that didn't render (why not, I don't know), still in the text. Which demonstrates that it added nothing, didn't matter, and not a single person noticed, worth a comment. But gosh, now I need to remove the story from the site because, fuck, you know, what a terrible situation to be in!
 
Back
Top