Derek Chauvin .....innocent

Yes, you continue to accuse me of values and qualities I don't hold and blame me for it.

You're a self identified democrat.....you regularly defend the most insane social justice fem commie queers for al-queda (D)umb fuckery possible day in and day out around here.

Yet you want me to believe you don't have any problem with the evil scourge of whiteness and oppressive patriarchy???

You're like the open borders pro-communism fuck whitee MAGA who doesn't realize he's actually a democrat.
 
You're a self identified democrat.....you regularly defend the most insane social justice fem commie queers for al-queda (D)umb fuckery possible day in and day out around here.
Yes, I get your ascription.

Yet you want me to believe you don't have any problem with the evil scourge of whiteness and oppressive patriarchy???
You're incapable of understanding, no matter how many times we've discussed it. That isn't my issue.

You're like the open borders pro-communism fuck whitee MAGA who doesn't realize he's actually a democrat.
I'm not like anything of the sort.
 
Which "world view" are you ascribing to me today?
Not ascribing any to you except one that doesn't align with the autopsy report.

You can't accept what the report says because you believe other parts of the report conflict, when they don't.

The conclusion is clearly printed at the top of page one and was verified under oath in two court proceedings and was corroborated with a separate independent autopsy as well as review by a separate medical examiner.
 
Last edited:
That he died of an OD........
That's not what two autopsies concluded.
Nor did the independent review and court testimony change.

So leftoids paid for one to say he was suffocated and racist like you lapped it up because white man BAD!!
Yes, the conclusions of autopsies are difficult for you to accept and you continue to dispute the record
 
That he died of an OD........

So leftoids paid for one to say he was suffocated and racist like you lapped it up because white man BAD!!
Most stupid people resort to fantasy conspiracies to deal with the fact that they are defective. You're not special in that regard.
 
That's not what two autopsies concluded.
Nor did the independent review and court testimony change.

I understand the paid for shit confirms your world view and you're ok with that just like you're ok with (D) congress critters publicly threatening a jury and you consider that a fair trial.


Yes, the conclusions of autopsies are difficult for you to accept and you continue to dispute the record
I understand you and the rest of the "White man BAD!" bigots stick to your paid for bullshit and ignore the initial autopsy done by the impartial (not paid for by leftoids) autopsy because it confirms your narrative....white man bad.
 
I understand the paid for shit confirms your world view and you're ok with that just like you're ok with (D) congress critters publicly threatening a jury and you consider that a fair trial.
The official autopsy explains the cause of death and you disagree with that.

No other source agrees with your position that he died from an OD, including the defense's medical examiner expert who testified under oath.

I understand you and the rest of the "White man BAD!" bigots stick to your paid for bullshit and ignore the initial autopsy done by the impartial (not paid for by leftoids) autopsy because it confirms your narrative....white man bad.
Yes, I agree with the autopsy as well as testimony, review and rulings.

And you don't and therefore need to lie about their credibility because your feels. And you need to lie about my position on race as well.
 
Last edited:
I can post the link again if necessary. The SCIENCE says the animated sack of shit died of a pre-existing heart condition (acute) aggravated by drug overdose. End of story, let that piece of shit rot in hell.
 
By not falling prey to the narrative pushed by the lying media?

By pushing a narrative of irrelevancies.

The coroner's report said Floyd died of heart failure. So too will the report of someone who dies of natural causes in a hospital. Thus, this line in the report isn't as damning as you'd like to think it is. It is akin to saying someone's death was a homicide without understanding that homicide merely means the death of a human being by another. That doesn't automatically make homicide illegal. Neither does heart failure automatically mean that the decedent's death wasn't caused by another.

Second; Testimony about police procedures falls into 1 of 2 categories. It's irrelevant in either of those 2 categories because the accuracy of what's in the manual isn't the basis for Floyd's death; and, 2, merely following orders/procedures isn't a valid defense.

Third; Floyd was in custody at the time of his death. That alone creates a unique situation whereby the State, via its officers, is responsible for the welfare of the person in custody. Guess who didn't do that and who ACTIVELY prevented it from happening.

In the end, an appeal, at the core, hinges on only 1 question: Was there clear error that prejudiced the outcome? The answer here is, no. Nothing that was testified to at the trial changes what was captured on video and it was the video which convicted Chauvin.

The video is what also convicted the other officers by their failure to intervene to attempt to save Floyd's life. They had an affirmative duty to intervene and did not. By that failure they became co-actors and are just as culpable.

And finally, had any of them stopped what was happening and allowed paramedics to try to help Floyd, NONE OF THEM would have been responsible had Floyd died anyway. Which is where, ultimately, the line was crossed by all concerned.

You need to take a step back and understand that what you're saying isn't relevant nor is it the law. It's an emotion based narrative designed to invoke an anti-social response.
 
The official autopsy explains the cause of death and you disagree with that.

No, it agress with me. The paid for by leftist autopsy is the one I disagree with.

Yes, I agree with the autopsy as well as testimony, review and rulings.


The bought and paid for autopsy, the bougth and paid for testimony, the political pressure and threats FROM CONGRESS against the jury and you agree with it...because white man bad!!
 
I understand the paid for shit confirms your world view and you're ok with that just like you're ok with (D) congress critters publicly threatening a jury and you consider that a fair trial.



I understand you and the rest of the "White man BAD!" bigots stick to your paid for bullshit and ignore the initial autopsy done by the impartial (not paid for by leftoids) autopsy because it confirms your narrative....white man bad.
It was a murder and the video evidence, coroner report, and 12 jurors agree.

You're just out here being weird as fuck for no reason other than to be a contrarian retard.
 
No, it agress with me. The paid for by leftist autopsy is the one I disagree with.
No autopsy agrees with you.

The bought and paid for autopsy, the bougth and paid for testimony, the political pressure and threats FROM CONGRESS against the jury and you agree with it...because white man bad!!
Delusional man is delusional .

The report that says things I don't like really says the things I say it does because it does!
 
Back
Top