Bump this every day Trump doesn't release the Epstein list that ultra-dumb Deplorables swore he would

[coati]

Bondi and the rest of the Pig's Mob need more time to redact and tamper evidence.

Thus, Speaker Johnson has been instructed to delay swearing in House-elect Grijalva.

 

[RoryN]

Where list?

 

[Saint_Ann]

Where list?

Have you checked up your butt?

 

[whiskeytangofoxtrot]

enough of the bs distractions from bellicose trade and tariffs to pursuing political enemies to voodoo medical practices to more bad publicity, produce the list already

 

[RobDownSouth]

The republicans blocking the release included Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, and Joni Ernst…

Republican women..,

Such good little handmaidens…

Shame.



We. Told. Them. So.

Today we found out exactly WHY Lisa Murkowski voted to block the release of the Epstein files.

The reason? Self-preservation.

Trump in the Epstein files is bad.
Epstein himself was ten times worse.
Epstein's procurer, Ghislane Maxwell is one hundred times worse....at least according to the email dump that was released this week.

Ghislane in the email trove is uniquely in the center of a spider's web of intrigue.

Murkowski is mentioned in a shit-ton of Epstein files.
Why?

Murkowski represents Alaska as an "independent". Independents do not have access to state party treasuries, and although Murkowski herself was rather wealthy, she relied on a couple of big money donors to help fund her campaigns.


Her biggest donor was a shipping tycoon named Scott Borgerson, a happily married Christian with a wife and kids. Borgerson was also Ghislane Maxwell's fuckbuddy, these two had a long standing extramarital affair (Maxwell and Borgerson).

Borgerson offered to introduce Maxwell to Murkowski, telling Murkowski that Maxwell knew all these rich and powerful men and Murkowski latched on to Maxwell something fierce, promising all sort of legislation she could get passed in the Senate for generous millionaires and multimillionaires in Maxwell's Rolodex in exchange for some campaign contributions.

Lots of emails promising this and that.
Lots of files of Murkowski's "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" in Epstein's trove.

Maxwell was used as a "cutout" between the wealthy and Murkowski.

Small wonder Murkowski opted not to run for re-election next year!

Her donor list mysteriously dried up after Maxwell was convicted.

Murkowski knows she's radioactive to the elite now.

She's attempting to salvage her reputation by blocking the release of the files.

 

[DraggonStone]

Epstein

 

[Lazaran]

Today we found out exactly WHY Lisa Murkowski voted to block the release of the Epstein files.

The reason? Self-preservation.

Trump in the Epstein files is bad.
Epstein himself was ten times worse.
Epstein's procurer, Ghislane Maxwell is one hundred times worse....at least according to the email dump that was released this week.

Ghislane in the email trove is uniquely in the center of a spider's web of intrigue.

Murkowski is mentioned in a shit-ton of Epstein files.
Why?

Murkowski represents Alaska as an "independent". Independents do not have access to state party treasuries, and although Murkowski herself was rather wealthy, she relied on a couple of big money donors to help fund her campaigns.


Her biggest donor was a shipping tycoon named Scott Borgerson, a happily married Christian with a wife and kids. Borgerson was also Ghislane Maxwell's fuckbuddy, these two had a long standing extramarital affair (Maxwell and Borgerson).

Borgerson offered to introduce Maxwell to Murkowski, telling Murkowski that Maxwell knew all these rich and powerful men and Murkowski latched on to Maxwell something fierce, promising all sort of legislation she could get passed in the Senate for generous millionaires and multimillionaires in Maxwell's Rolodex in exchange for some campaign contributions.

Lots of emails promising this and that.
Lots of files of Murkowski's "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" in Epstein's trove.

Maxwell was used as a "cutout" between the wealthy and Murkowski.

Small wonder Murkowski opted not to run for re-election next year!

Her donor list mysteriously dried up after Maxwell was convicted.

Murkowski knows she's radioactive to the elite now.

She's attempting to salvage her reputation by blocking the release of the files.

Jesus fuck…



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[whiskeytangofoxtrot]

Today we found out exactly WHY Lisa Murkowski voted to block the release of the Epstein files.

The reason? Self-preservation.

Trump in the Epstein files is bad.
Epstein himself was ten times worse.
Epstein's procurer, Ghislane Maxwell is one hundred times worse....at least according to the email dump that was released this week.

Ghislane in the email trove is uniquely in the center of a spider's web of intrigue.

Murkowski is mentioned in a shit-ton of Epstein files.
Why?

Murkowski represents Alaska as an "independent". Independents do not have access to state party treasuries, and although Murkowski herself was rather wealthy, she relied on a couple of big money donors to help fund her campaigns.


Her biggest donor was a shipping tycoon named Scott Borgerson, a happily married Christian with a wife and kids. Borgerson was also Ghislane Maxwell's fuckbuddy, these two had a long standing extramarital affair (Maxwell and Borgerson).

Borgerson offered to introduce Maxwell to Murkowski, telling Murkowski that Maxwell knew all these rich and powerful men and Murkowski latched on to Maxwell something fierce, promising all sort of legislation she could get passed in the Senate for generous millionaires and multimillionaires in Maxwell's Rolodex in exchange for some campaign contributions.

Lots of emails promising this and that.
Lots of files of Murkowski's "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" in Epstein's trove.

Maxwell was used as a "cutout" between the wealthy and Murkowski.

Small wonder Murkowski opted not to run for re-election next year!

Her donor list mysteriously dried up after Maxwell was convicted.

Murkowski knows she's radioactive to the elite now.

She's attempting to salvage her reputation by blocking the release of the files.

Sleazy AF, political whore

 

[Saint_Ann]

Let me get this straight. The rallying cry for the Democrats is to shout out the name of a dead pedophile, in the hopes he will save them from Trump. Wrong side of every issue.

 

[dmallord]

Let me get this straight. The rallying cry for the Democrats is to shout out the name of a dead pedophile, in the hopes he will save them from Trump. Wrong side of every issue.

Your smirk says it all. You want to make Epstein into a partisan punchline, but what you’re really doing is dismissing the women and children who were trafficked and abused. Shouting his name isn’t a “rallying cry for Democrats” — it’s a demand to unlock files that may expose the powerful people who thought their money and influence put them above the law.

Thousands of victims over decades — their cries aren’t partisan. They’re evidence. And pretending this is about Trump versus Democrats is just a convenient dodge to keep from admitting that the files are being protected by those in power right now. A DA, a champion of justice, would be on this in a heartbeat. It's telling that she isn't meeting those victims' cries; it points to a DA playing partisan politics over the names hidden within the files.

So let me put it to you directly: would you raise your hand and say those women don’t deserve to be heard? Because that’s the side you’re on when you treat their suffering as a joke.

 

[whiskeytangofoxtrot]

Your smirk says it all. You want to make Epstein into a partisan punchline, but what you’re really doing is dismissing the women and children who were trafficked and abused. Shouting his name isn’t a “rallying cry for Democrats” — it’s a demand to unlock files that may expose the powerful people who thought their money and influence put them above the law.

Thousands of victims over decades — their cries aren’t partisan. They’re evidence. And pretending this is about Trump versus Democrats is just a convenient dodge to keep from admitting that the files are being protected by those in power right now. A DA, a champion of justice, would be on this in a heartbeat. It's telling that she isn't meeting those victims' cries; it points to a DA playing partisan politics over the names hidden within the files.

So let me put it to you directly: would you raise your hand and say those women don’t deserve to be heard? Because that’s the side you’re on when you treat their suffering as a joke.

Well said and on point. So many of the maga world suffer from TDS, truth deficiency syndrome.

 

[RoryN]

This is the issue that has MTG swearing off Trump for good.

She's going completely nutter butters in her social media posts. Even more than usual.

 

[eric_erosfan]

I've been away for a while. Did they release everything?

 

[butters]

This is the issue that has MTG swearing off Trump for good.

She's going completely nutter butters in her social media posts. Even more than usual.

it's less about standing up for the women and girls harmed by epstein and his buds, and more about being pissed that the black-haired witch laura loomer has trump's ear now instead of mtg.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Saving it for an October surprise for the ages.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Bump!
Let the women talk and name names !!

 

[Baztrachian]

Release the fucking files. Publish the fucking names.

 

[MajorRewrite]

This is the issue that has MTG swearing off Trump for good.

She's going completely nutter butters in her social media posts. Even more than usual.

Greene says she is ‘not suicidal’: ‘If something happens to me’

MTG has added extreme paranoia to her long list of mental issues?

She thinks the MAGA loons are going to kill her and make it look like suicide because she wants the Epstein files released.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I've been away for a while. Did they release everything?

Mostly redacted stuff that was previously released.

The only "new" info is someone got into Epstein's dormant Yahoo mail account and dumped the contents. Sent them to Bloomberg news. The biggest reveal is how intricately involved with Epstein's affairs Ghislane Maxwell was in virtually every aspect of his life.

Oh, and she wanted Epstein to pay for experimental fertility treatments in the Bahamas because she desperately wanted a child by him.

It was an interesting reveal about the foibles of the rich 'n famous, person X wanted to hold a party on Epstein Island but wanted to make sure persons Y and Z would not attend, that sort of thing.

Oh and everyone who spoke English wanted to rub shoulders with the British Royal Family members.

The "Great Gatsby" of our times.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Where list?

Let's talk to the victims of statutory rape at Pedophile Island and ask them for the list.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Bump

 

[coati]

Let's talk to the victims of statutory rape at Pedophile Island and ask them for the list.

^^^Easy thing for a privileged white male to say. He has no concept about how powerful misogynists blame the victim and put a target on the backs of victims.

One of the victims who dared to blow the whistle was driven to shame, gaslighting, ridicule, and suicide.

Simple minds seek simplistic "solutions". That is the basis for political cults.

Release all the files, and expand the scope of investigations. Let the evidence speak for itself and quit allowing the powerful to cover up the creepy aspects of their lives.

 

[JohnEngelman]

^^^Easy thing for a privileged white male to say. He has no concept about how powerful misogynists blame the victim and put a target on the backs of victims.

One of the victims who dared to blow the whistle was driven to shame, gaslighting, ridicule, and suicide.

Simple minds seek simplistic "solutions". That is the basis for political cults.

Release all the files, and expand the scope of investigations. Let the evidence speak for itself and quit allowing the powerful to cover up the creepy aspects of their lives.

I am a white male. I do not think I'm privileged. I have never blamed victims of rape, statutory rape or lesser sex offences for the offenses. I think sex offenders are evil. They are very different from me. I agree with your last sentence.

Teenage girls and women who are raped, statutory raped, or sexually abused in any way have an obligation to report the offenses. Sex offenders will keep offending until they are punished. In the case of rape or statutory rape they need to report the offense immediately, so that there will be a semen sample for DNA analysis.

 

[coati]

I am a white male. I do not think I'm privileged. I have never blamed victims of rape, statutory rape or lesser sex offences for the offenses. I think sex offenders are evil. They are very different from me. I agree with your last sentence.

Teenage girls and women who are raped, statutory raped, or sexually abused in any way have an obligation to report the offenses. Sex offenders will keep offending until they are punished. In the case of rape or statutory rape they need to report the offense immediately, so that there will be a semen sample for DNA analysis.

You are definitely a simple-minded and sheltered white male. This is yet another issue where you demonstrate this lack of awareness.

 

[JohnEngelman]

You are definitely a simple-minded and sheltered white male. This is yet another issue where you demonstrate this lack of awareness.

Saying that I am simple minded, sheltered, and lack awareness is an example of the ad hominem fallacy. Let's keep insults out of this discussion. I have not insulted you.