Harvard orders professors to remove Black Lives Matter sign from office window

[ll74]

In other words, you cannot even justify your name calling.

Yes, I already knew that you'd declare some sort of victory.

We had this discussion and argument many times before.

As with many here...the goal is to "win" rather than argue.

I've given my reasoning in previous discussions,...others can find them as needed, but you already know what we discussed and argued.

And if you don't it's because you're likely experiencing early onset dementia.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Name-calling is the use of offensive, insulting, or demeaning labels to attack a person or group, often in place of a reasoned argument or discussion. It is a form of bullying or a manipulative propaganda technique aimed at discrediting an individual or idea without objective consideration of the facts.

https://www.google.com/search?q="na...gcCMTO4B-cGwgcHMC4yLjguNMgHTg&sclient=gws-wiz

 

[JohnEngelman]

Yes, I already knew that you'd declare some sort of victory.

We had this discussion and argument many times before.

As with many here...the goal is to "win" rather than argue.

I've given my reasoning in previous discussions,...others can find them as needed, but you already know what we discussed and argued.

And if you don't it's because you're likely experiencing early onset dementia.

Name calling and personal insults seem to be all you are capable of.

I do not claim to be infallible. If I have made a statement that is factually incorrect, quote me. Let's discuss it, after proving that my statement is incorrect.

 

[ll74]

Name calling and personal insults seem to be all you are capable of..

Neat

I do not claim to be infallible. If I have made a statement that is factually incorrect, quote me. Let's discuss it, after proving that my statement is incorrect.

Weve already had a vast discussion on this topic. I see no need to rehash it.
You can acknowledge that or continue to play stupid

 

[JohnEngelman]

Neat


Weve already had a vast discussion on this topic. I see no need to rehash it.
You can acknowledge that or continue to play stupid

You rehashed the discussion by calling me a racist. You have never defined racist, and you have never explained how I fit your definition.

 

[ll74]

You rehashed the discussion by calling me a racist.

I reiterated my position by expressing that position again.

You want to argue again...I get that.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I reiterated my position by expressing that position again.

You want to argue again...I get that.

A position of that nature needs to be substantiated.

 

[ll74]

A position of that nature needs to be substantiated.

Maybe you just need to search for our previous discussions on the topic to feel better. You seem to believe that when you demand something someone else is required to provide that.

I already provided what you're requesting ......and I don't have any desire to do it again.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Maybe you just need to search for our previous discussions on the topic to feel better. You seem to believe that when you demand something someone else is required to provide that.

I already provided what you're requesting ......and I don't have any desire to do it again.

Then repeat it again. I do not mind repeating arguments I am confident in.

i do not have any real desire to read your childish insults. Nevertheless, if you repeat them, I will call you on them. If I ignored your insults it would seem that I am consenting to them. I do not resort to name calling. I try to keep my arguments at or near the top of his pyramid:

 

[ll74]

Then repeat it again. I do not mind repeating arguments I am confident in.

Neat. I already told you I wasn't interested as we've already discussed this.

If you need help with forum searches, there are forums for that.

i do not have any real desire to read your childish insults. Nevertheless, if you repeat them, I will call you on them. If I ignored your insults it would seem that I am consenting to them. I do not resort to name calling. I try to keep my arguments at or near the top of his pyramid:

I told you I wasn't interested and you've spent five or six replies trying to do anyway.

What part of that is difficult for you?

 

[JohnEngelman]

Neat. I already told you I wasn't interested.


I told you I wasn't interested and you've spent five or six replies trying to do anyway.

What part of that is difficult for you?

Of course you are not interested. You started an argument you know you can't win. Now you are backing away from it.

 

[ll74]

Of course you are not interested. You started an argument you know you can't win. Now you are backing away from it.

I didn't start any argument.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I didn't start any argument.

You started it by name calling, which is the lowest form of argument.

 

[ll74]

You started it by name calling, which is the lowest form of argument.

I made an accurate description of your behavior and you want to argue that description.

And, as I mentioned, we've already had this discussion.

So please, feel free to search our previous engagement on the topic as needed.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I made an accurate description of your behavior and you want to argue that description.

And, as I mentioned, we've already had this discussion.

So please, feel free to search our previous engagement on the topic as needed.

How was your description of my behavior accurate?

I decline to respond in kind to your insults.

 

[ll74]

How was your description of my behavior accurate?

Lol...already answered fucknut

 

[JohnEngelman]

Lol...already answered fucknut

Then answer it again. You do not seem to think much of your answer, or you would be proud to repeat it.

 

[ll74]

Then answer it again

No

.You do not seem to think much of your answer, or you would be proud to repeat it.

Lol...I've repeated it multiple times already. If you don't remember, that seems to be your own impairment.

You're a racist.

Whether you believe yourself to be or not isn't my issue.

Your continued "race realist" argument is shit.

 

[JohnEngelman]

No

Lol...I've repeated it multiple times already. If you don't remember, that seems to be your own impairment.

You're a racist.

Whether you believe yourself to be or not isn't my issue.

Your continued "race realist" argument is shit.

How is my race realist argument incorrect?

 

[ll74]

How is my race realist argument incorrect?

Already answered.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Already answered.

Race realism is a number of testable hypotheses. To the best of my knowledge none of them have been disproved. "Look at the data."

 

[ll74]

Race realism is a number of testable hypotheses.

Yes, you repeat this often.

To the best of my knowledge none of them have been disproved. "Look at the data."

Yes, you also repeat this often.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Yes, you repeat this often.


Yes, you also repeat this often.

No one has disproved my repetitions.

 

[ll74]

No one has disproved my repetitions.

Yes, you also repeat this

No one is required to disprove your assertions. And others may have positions you disagree with that aren't proven to you.

That's how opinions work.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Yes, you also repeat this

No one is required to disprove your assertions. And others may have positions you disagree with that aren't proven to you.

That's how opinions work.

Opinions not based on facts that can be documented are not worth anything.