The Most Disgusting Conspiracy In American History

That’s a small selection from July. Bluster and misrepresentation all the way.

A windbag for the ages.
Quote me by post number, clown, and make sure those are my words and not quoted from an article written by somebody else. Then prove with authority that those written by me are false.
 
Quote me by post number, clown, and make sure those are my words and not quoted from an article written by somebody else. Then prove with authority that those written by me are false.
There’s no need to prove you’re a lieing fool, the board already knows.
 
I knew you to be a cowardly ass crack unable to back your lies. Now go off somewhere and whimper alone.
The fact that you feel Biden’s senility is the most disgusting conspiracy over a connected pedo is illuminating too.
 
No lies, copy and pasted unchanged. Your words all from the half of july you were here posting.
You have provided no proof that what I actually said was false. Before yesterday, I had only posted up to July 9th, hardly half a month.
 
47 said arrest him so obviously that's an order and Bondi must comply 🤣🤣
 
You said in post # 26 in reference to me, "yet another claim of yours that turned out wildly inaccurate." Show us how any of my posts in question were "wildly inaccurate."
Hitler was a socialist 🤣, a claim of yours you posted voluminously about, the only one not from early July but a classic.
 
You said in post # 26 in reference to me, "yet another claim of yours that turned out wildly inaccurate." Show us how any of my posts in question were "wildly inaccurate."
“All the Democrats care about is destroying America.”
July 6

If that were true all they’d have to do is sign up as Maga fellow travellers.
And in both the uk and us it’s acknowledged that the main internal security threads are from the extremist right.
 
“When he has lost his appeals. By law, he isn't a felon until he is sentenced.“

July 3rd.
“Yes, a person is typically considered a felon immediately upon conviction for a felony offense. The conviction, whether by guilty plea or jury verdict, signifies the legal determination that the individual committed the crime.” AI overview
 
“That fantasy of yours has nothing to do with it. That was Biden's war. he spoke the words that allowed Putin to think it was okay to invade Ukraine.”
Doh putin invaded crimea in 2014,
Biden became potus in what year?
Self explanatory, it can’t possibly be Biden’s war.
 
“You're too stupid for words. Get a business education, then come back to me. Inflation has not gone up due to Trump's tariffs”
July 3
Do we need to continue?
Even you can’t believe tariffs of up to 145% aren’t inflationary.
 

Joe Biden & The Biggest Cover-up in American History​

By Jeff Crouere • May. 4, 2025

For several years, it has been apparent that Joe Biden is mentally incompetent and suffering from a significant cognitive decline. Honest observers noticed Biden was having trouble in the 2020 presidential campaign. In response, his political advisers sidelined Biden to the “basement” throughout the campaign as he held few public events.

As President, Biden spent his entire term making embarrassing gaffes, displaying forgetfulness, and having a challenging time communicating. Repeatedly, he was unable to identify his cabinet members and called Vice President Kamala Harris the “President.”

At one event, Biden asked for a deceased member of Congress to come forward and be recognized. Even worse, Biden was regularly unable to exit the stage after a speech and was seen shaking hands with invisible people.

Along with the mental decline, Biden experienced significant physical problems. He suffered spectacular tumbles on stage, on the stairs of Air Force One, and on his bike.
However, when his critics mentioned videos highlighting his deteriorating condition, his defenders, including former White House Press Secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, called them “cheap fakes.” In an interview on MSNBC, Jean-Pierre fumed that the criticism was “very insulting” and filled with “much misinformation.”

Much more here: https://thelibertydaily.com/joe-biden-biggest-cover-up-american-history/

Democrats need to atone for their crimes against America and should be made to dwell aimlessly in the political wilderness before ever being allowed into the White House again.
first part accurate
but what crimes?
have we become FoxNews*? (*not journalism)
 
Do we need to continue?
Even you can’t believe tariffs of up to 145% aren’t inflationary.
There is no evidence that Trump's tariffs have been inflationary.
“Yes, a person is typically considered a felon immediately upon conviction for a felony offense. The conviction, whether by guilty plea or jury verdict, signifies the legal determination that the individual committed the crime.” AI overview
You're ignorant, as is Ai from time to time. When I made that statement, it was true (prior to July 11th).

Now go and ask AI if Judge Merchan had entered a Judgement of Conviction as of the date of my statement. That is the key because in NY nobody is officially convicted until a judge does so. On July 11th, the Judge did enter a Judgment of Conviction. The sentence: Trump received a conditional discharge and no jail time. Prior to sentencing, Trump was found guilty, but not yet formally convicted in the full legal sense. At that point, someone might argue that: “There is a verdict, but no judgment of conviction until sentence is imposed.” That’s legally true under criminal procedure. But now that sentencing has occurred, that distinction no longer applies in this case. I was out of the country that day.

You can find it all here:

§ 7.15 1. Formal Judgment in Criminal Case

"A formal judgment of guilt, i.e., a judgment of conviction and sentence in a criminal case, constitutes a conviction. A “judgment” means “A court’s final determination of the rights and obligations of the parties in a case.”[23] A “judgment of conviction” means ”[t]he written record of a criminal judgment, consisting of the plea, the verdict or findings, the adjudication, and the sentence.”[24] Thus, a formal judgment does not exist unless sentence has been formally imposed."


[23]
Black’s Law Dictionary 846 (7th ed. 1999).

[24] Id. at 847, citing F.R.Crim.P. 32(d)(1).

https://nortontooby.com/node/15884

You're welcome, you can consider yourself briefed.

 
There is no evidence that Trump's tariffs have been inflationary.

You're ignorant, as is Ai from time to time. When I made that statement, it was true (prior to July 11th).

Now go and ask AI if Judge Merchan had entered a Judgement of Conviction as of the date of my statement. That is the key because in NY nobody is officially convicted until a judge does so. On July 11th, the Judge did enter a Judgment of Conviction. The sentence: Trump received a conditional discharge and no jail time. Prior to sentencing, Trump was found guilty, but not yet formally convicted in the full legal sense. At that point, someone might argue that: “There is a verdict, but no judgment of conviction until sentence is imposed.” That’s legally true under criminal procedure. But now that sentencing has occurred, that distinction no longer applies in this case. I was out of the country that day.

You can find it all here:

§ 7.15 1. Formal Judgment in Criminal Case

"A formal judgment of guilt, i.e., a judgment of conviction and sentence in a criminal case, constitutes a conviction. A “judgment” means “A court’s final determination of the rights and obligations of the parties in a case.”[23] A “judgment of conviction” means ”[t]he written record of a criminal judgment, consisting of the plea, the verdict or findings, the adjudication, and the sentence.”[24] Thus, a formal judgment does not exist unless sentence has been formally imposed."

[23] Black’s Law Dictionary 846 (7th ed. 1999).

[24] Id. at 847, citing F.R.Crim.P. 32(d)(1).

https://nortontooby.com/node/15884

You're welcome, you can consider yourself briefed.
And the others, or is this just a lone fantasy rebuttal?
 
You said in post # 26 in reference to me, "yet another claim of yours that turned out wildly inaccurate." Show us how any of my posts in question were "wildly inaccurate."
All of your Arizona election fraud threads failed miserably, Jack. Fuck right the fuck off.
 
Just correcting my earlier.post - the Senate report by the intelligence committee was led by Burr not Cotton.

Rubio was also a member and Warner was vice Chair.
 
There is no evidence that Trump's tariffs have been inflationary.
In which parallel universe can tariffs, any tariffs, not be inflationary.
The whole point is to put a charge on the goods involved thus they cannot be anything but inflationary.
 
Back
Top