Trump vs Universities

[Rebel5soul]

Harvard is going to lose.

 

[Baztrachian]

Harvard is going to lose.

Yup. Looks like Trump is going to effectively end foreign student visas via intentional bureaucratic logjams.

This will undercut incomes for the major universities across the board.

Upside is it will also make about 40% more university slots available to American students. That alone is going to be a huge plus for young people as it will open up opportunities they would have otherwise been denied.

 

[Politruk]

Harvard is going to lose.

Trump won't be as much of a challenge as Yale.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Harvard is going to lose.

Lose their effort to protect their institution from Trump’s unprovoked attacks?

Your support for the federal government’s attempt to control a private university isn’t surprising. It’s exactly what we expect from authoritarian MAGA sheep.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Upside is it will also make about 40% more university slots available to American students. That alone is going to be a huge plus for young people as it will open up opportunities they would have otherwise been denied.

The foreign students were funding the poorer kids! Their endowment also helps make college affordable for those without platinum spoons up their ass

How many companies HERE the US were started by students at these universities
We used to attract brainpower from the rest of the world. Trump is driving our best brains across the board elsewhere.

Do you have to go to Harvard and the like? Fuck no!! Go to your community college first to get your basic education! That is, if we keep funding junior colleges !!

 

[ll74]

Harvard has the best lawyers in the world.

Trump has truly shitty lawyers who can't even file a brief properly and get fired for admitting in court that the administration are blatant lawyers.

Seems obvious which side I would pick

 

[Baztrachian]

Trump has truly shitty lawyers

Which is irrelevant since six of them are on the Supreme Court.

 

[ll74]

Which is irrelevant since six of them are on the Supreme Court.

Those aren't his lawyers, dipshit.

Hell, most of the time they rule against him

 

[Baztrachian]

Those aren't his lawyers, dipshit.

Hell, most of the time they rule against him

No, most of the time they rule in his favor.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/projec...tion/tracking-trump-administration-litigation

 

[ll74]

No, most of the time they rule in his favor.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/projec...tion/tracking-trump-administration-litigation

Recently, yes. Historically, no.

Either way, you're deflecting from his shit lawyers.

 

[MajorRewrite]

No, most of the time they rule in his favor.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/projec...tion/tracking-trump-administration-litigation

Do you support the government’s attempt to seize control of a private university’s hiring, admissions and curriculum? Or are you a sheep that doesn’t actually care as long as Trump gets what he wants?

 

[icanhelp1]

Lose their effort to protect their institution from Trump’s unprovoked attacks?

Your support for the federal government’s attempt to control a private university isn’t surprising. It’s exactly what we expect from authoritarian MAGA sheep.

Unprovoked attacks??? Private and public entities have to abide by our laws.

 

[Baztrachian]

Do you support the government’s attempt to seize control of a private university’s hiring, admissions and curriculum? Or are you a sheep that doesn’t actually care as long as Trump gets what he wants?

Harvard is not permitted to violate Title Seven of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of race and color as well as national origin, sex, or religion.

It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race or color in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment. Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups.

Title VII prohibits both intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that disproportionately exclude minorities and that are not job related.

Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied because of marriage to or association with an individual of a different race; membership in or association with ethnic based organizations or groups; attendance or participation in schools or places of worship generally associated with certain minority groups; or other cultural practices or characteristics often linked to race or ethnicity, such as cultural dress or manner of speech, as long as the cultural practice or characteristic does not materially interfere with the ability to perform job duties.

 

[Politruk]

Unprovoked attacks??? Private and public entities have to abide by our laws.

And Harvard does. Nobody has suggested otherwise.

 

[Politruk]

Harvard is not permitted to violate Title Seven of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

And it doesn't.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Unprovoked attacks??? Private and public entities have to abide by our laws.

If Harvard broke laws, why hasn’t the Clown Show administration charged them with crimes?

Nope. The government is just demanding control of a private university’s hiring, admissions and curriculum without actually charging them with anything.

It has nothing to do with breaking laws. It’s purely an attempt to grab control.

 

[Baztrachian]

And it doesn't.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has initiated an investigation into Harvard University, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC is investigating whether Harvard has engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminatory hiring and promotion practices against white, Asian, male, or straight employees, applicants, and training program participants. This investigation focuses on potential discrimination in hiring, promotion, compensation, and other career development programs, and covers entities managed by or affiliated with Harvard, including medical and public health schools, and affiliated hospitals.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Harvard is not permitted to violate Title Seven of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of race and color as well as national origin, sex, or religion.

It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race or color in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment. Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain racial groups.

Title VII prohibits both intentional discrimination and neutral job policies that disproportionately exclude minorities and that are not job related.

Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied because of marriage to or association with an individual of a different race; membership in or association with ethnic based organizations or groups; attendance or participation in schools or places of worship generally associated with certain minority groups; or other cultural practices or characteristics often linked to race or ethnicity, such as cultural dress or manner of speech, as long as the cultural practice or characteristic does not materially interfere with the ability to perform job duties.

Nobody has proven Harvard violated the civil rights act. They haven’t even been charged with violating it.

 

[heathrowinneo]

Unprovoked attacks??? Private and public entities have to abide by our laws.

J6

 

[MajorRewrite]

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has initiated an investigation into Harvard University, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

An investigation isn’t a crime charge and obviously isn’t proof of committing a crime.

The investigation is part of the government’s use of coercion to try to grab control of a private university.

You haven’t answered the question: Do you support the government’s attempt to seize control of a private university’s hiring, admissions and curriculum? Or are you a sheep that doesn’t actually care as long as Trump gets what he wants?

 

[Rebel5soul]

The foreign students were funding the poorer kids! Their endowment also helps make college affordable for those without platinum spoons up their ass

How many companies HERE the US were started by students at these universities
We used to attract brainpower from the rest of the world. Trump is driving our best brains across the board elsewhere.

Do you have to go to Harvard and the like? Fuck no!! Go to your community college first to get your basic education! That is, if we keep funding junior colleges !!

Lie.

 

[icanhelp1]

If Harvard broke laws, why hasn’t the Clown Show administration charged them with crimes?

Nope. The government is just demanding control of a private university’s hiring, admissions and curriculum without actually charging them with anything.

It has nothing to do with breaking laws. It’s purely an attempt to grab control.

The DOJ is currently investigating civil rights violations and fraud.

 

[Politruk]

The DOJ is currently investigating civil rights violations and fraud.

The DOJ will investigate anything the president wants it to -- which was not true under previous administrations.

 

[icanhelp1]

J6

And people were charged, convicted and sentenced, what's your point?

 

[icanhelp1]

The DOJ will investigate anything the president wants it to -- which was not true under previous administrations.

You're confusing Trump with Biden.