Who Would You Chose? (this should be fun)

RESULT : 3. 2. 5. 1. 4.

3 was a runaway winner.
2 and 5 only separated by a single fifth preference vote for 2.
Last place between 1 and 4 separated by fourth preference votes.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ONLY A RESULT, NOT A VOTING POST. 5 votes counted on 11 Jan 25. Voting is still open via the original post on Page 4! 0667-01.jpg
 
RESULT : 2. 3. 4. 5. 1.

2 narrowly beat 3 on points, 3 having had more first places but fading on second preference scores.
Likewise 4 na d 5 were very close.
1 was way behind the field, meriting her last place.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ONLY A RESULT, NOT A VOTING POST. 6 votes counted on 11 Jan 25. Voting is still open via the original post on Page 5! View attachment 2464755
 
Who would you chose?

If you were handed a group photo who would you choose to have sex with?

Here is the rules for this game.

1st Rule- For a photo to be considered it must at least have three models.

2nd rule- If possible help the readers and mark the models/people so the reader knows who they are choosing. If a photo isn't marked assume the farthest left model is number one and the farthest right model is the last numbered model. If there is more than one row the numbering starts with the top row, goes left, the marking continues on the far left, it continues until the last model on the bottom row on the far right. Make this easy and try to mark the models. Below is an example.

3rd Rule - to make this fun choose based upon the Choice Chart below. When choosing more than one model rank them best to worst. For the sake of this game it's assumed you'd have sex with one model at a time. (Exception is couples. THEY have to be clearly marked as couples, so you'd be picking the couple. To be considered a couple they have to standing next to one another. Plus: there has to be an even amount of models/people in the photo. Never forget the rule one at a time NO group sex. When I say all. This isn't all at once. It means you'd have to have sex with each model/couple right after another. Think about that. LOL

4th Rule - Don't be rude or NO sex acts. Nudes are fine. Please no one under 18.

5th rule- NO LINKS (nothing more lazy than links)

Choice Chart-RULES FOR THE PHOTO-PLEASE POST WITH PIC.
3 models = have to choose one single, choose none, or choose all (if choose all remember to rank the models best to worst)
4 to 8 models = choose up two, choose none, or choose all (remember to rank the models best to worst)
9 to 12 models = have to choose two, or choose five, or none, or choose all (remember to rank the models best to worst)
13 to 15 = have to choose two, or choose five, or choose ten, or none, or choose all (remember to rank the models best to worst)
16 to 20 = have to choose three, or choose six, or choose thirteen, or none, or choose all(remember to rank the models best to worst)
20 or more = Have to choose three, or choose six, or choose twelve, or choose none, or choose all (remember to rank the models best to worst)
Remember my game my rules. Lol. Lets keep this fun.

Feel free to post your own photo's and choose. Help readers out and post the rule with the photo.

Below is an example on how to mark the models.
View attachment 2235030
2
 
RESULT : 2. 3. 4. 1.

2 and 3 took a healthy lead and were an exact tie on first, second and third preference votes. The winner was only decided, for the first time on this thread, by 3 having a single last place vote causing her a tie-breaker lost point.
4 and 1 were a way behind with 4 easily beating 1 into last place.
An impressive field of talent on display no matter the result.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ONLY A RESULT, NOT A VOTING POST. 6 votes counted on 12 Jan 25. Voting is still open via the original post on Page 5!
View attachment 2465902
 
RESULT : 2. 4. 5&1. 3. 6. 7.

2 won by defeating 4 on second preference votes.
5 and 1 were a dead heat and could not be separated.
3 challenged but fell away with a clear split in the field then emerging, leaving 6 and 7 trailing behind.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ONLY A RESULT, NOT A VOTING POST. 4 votes counted on 12 Jan 25. Voting is still open via the original post on Page 5!
View attachment 2465915
 
We don't really need to do this.

I'm not even sure we need to keep doing the thread.
It's annoying, to be sure, but is there any actual harm? (I'm being serious; as in, is it a data issue or anything?) Also, has anybody reached out & asked him/her/them to stop?
 
RESULT : 2. 3. 4. 1.

2 and 3 took a healthy lead and were an exact tie on first, second and third preference votes. The winner was only decided, for the first time on this thread, by 3 having a single last place vote causing her a tie-breaker lost point.
4 and 1 were a way behind with 4 easily beating 1 into last place.
An impressive field of talent on display no matter the result.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS ONLY A RESULT, NOT A VOTING POST. 6 votes counted on 12 Jan 25. Voting is still open via the original post on Page 5!
View attachment 2465902
Love the analysis.
 
It's annoying, to be sure, but is there any actual harm? (I'm being serious; as in, is it a data issue or anything?) Also, has anybody reached out & asked him/her/them to stop?
I'm the one who started this thread. I've wondered what the stats have been.
I encouraged it because I don't have the time to do what he's doing.
 
Back
Top