๐Ÿ”ฎ What are you doing right now? ๐Ÿ”ฎ

Basking in the afterglow of a lifetime of experience gained blowjob.

You know my cock, babe.
And I know your throat.
We met again. The pleasure is always mine. ๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
 
Couldnt hold out anymore...
Using my sex toy manually, havent turned it on yet though
Sliding the tip of the dildo part in and out of my wet pussy
No vibration
No clit stimulation
Just back and forth in pussy to hear how wet I am at 7am before work, like a filthy horny perverted black cumslut
That wet sloshy sound is so, so sexy. :love:
 
Yesterday, I got a text from a random number asking me when the last time I masturbated was. I assumed itโ€™s spam so I deleted it. My friend (in the same area code) got the same text, too. How odd! Anyway, Iโ€™m lying in bed watching a documentary.
 
Sitting giggling at the desk in my shared office, nearly peeing myself. My colleagues are looking at me in a funny way.
I just received a text from someone stating that a cut penis shoots cum farther. I don't know about that, so I had to reply
"I can't elaborate that.
We should investigate this systematically.
We can probably approximate this with a Weibull distribution curve and make a distribution statement.
Should we also take into account the quantity distribution of the individual splashes? I think we should.
Then we only have to compare the two populations, which of course must have a certain minimum size. I don't think we need to start with less than 120 individuals per population, otherwise we won't get the individual factors such as age, health status and possibly genetic dispositions."

Gents, of you make such statements towards an engineer, don't expect boring answers like "show me".
๐Ÿ˜
 
Sitting giggling at the desk in my shared office, nearly peeing myself. My colleagues are looking at me in a funny way.
I just received a text from someone stating that a cut penis shoots cum farther. I don't know about that, so I had to reply
"I can't elaborate that.
We should investigate this systematically.
We can probably approximate this with a Weibull distribution curve and make a distribution statement.
Should we also take into account the quantity distribution of the individual splashes? I think we should.
Then we only have to compare the two populations, which of course must have a certain minimum size. I don't think we need to start with less than 120 individuals per population, otherwise we won't get the individual factors such as age, health status and possibly genetic dispositions."

Gents, of you make such statements towards an engineer, don't expect boring answers like "show me".
๐Ÿ˜
Now I'm curious too! What information is that statement based on? I don't say that the person i wrong, but I'm curious about the source.

I think you are right but I've learned that it's needed 200 of each to be based on statistic information, and 1000 of each to be sure.
 
Now I'm curious too! What information is that statement based on? I don't say that the person i wrong, but I'm curious about the source.

I think you are right but I've learned that it's needed 200 of each to be based on statistic information, and 1000 of each to be sure.
 
I don't know the data basis of the thesis. I would only investigate this systematically so that a theory can be created.
I had forgotten that the shooting angle must of course be constant. This of course has a big influence on the throwing parabola. You could clamp the pipe to have constant parameters. This can greatly facilitate the release of the shot for individual individuals. Perverts.
 
I don't know the data basis of the thesis. I would only investigate this systematically so that a theory can be created.
I had forgotten that the shooting angle must of course be constant. This of course has a big influence on the throwing parabola. You could clamp the pipe to have constant parameters. This can greatly facilitate the release of the shot for individual individuals. Perverts.
Well, the easiest way must be a rig of some kind were you mount a fleshlight in a specific angle and then you draw rings on the floor with inch, feet or cm marked on them. ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ˜Š
 
Sitting giggling at the desk in my shared office, nearly peeing myself. My colleagues are looking at me in a funny way.
I just received a text from someone stating that a cut penis shoots cum farther. I don't know about that, so I had to reply
"I can't elaborate that.
We should investigate this systematically.
We can probably approximate this with a Weibull distribution curve and make a distribution statement.
Should we also take into account the quantity distribution of the individual splashes? I think we should.
Then we only have to compare the two populations, which of course must have a certain minimum size. I don't think we need to start with less than 120 individuals per population, otherwise we won't get the individual factors such as age, health status and possibly genetic dispositions."

Gents, of you make such statements towards an engineer, don't expect boring answers like "show me".
๐Ÿ˜
Sounds like you understand the mechanical theory behind a prostate better than most urologists LOL๐Ÿ˜‚ never mind penis owners LOL๐Ÿ˜‚
 
Well, the easiest way must be a rig of some kind were you mount a fleshlight in a specific angle and then you draw rings on the floor with inch, feet or cm marked on them. ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ˜Š
Inches?
Wasn't that the folklore unit that hasn't really existed for ages since the Mendenhall Order? I read somewhere that there are still a few tribes in a distant land who have not yet recognized the supremacy of the meter.
Personally, I would always specify lengths in atto parsecs. This is easy to understand from any point on earth, provided you have a long ruler and a protractor.
 
Back
Top