Trump's Supreme Court To Hear Trump's Immunity Case

[jomar]

The just following illegal orders immunity defense, lol

 

[dmallord]

So, when will we be indicting and charging Barack Obama for the extrajudicial murder On October 14, 2011, of Anwar al-Awlaki, a 16-year-old American citizen, was killed in Yemen in an American drone strike. President Obama directed the CIA to assassinate him despite the fact that he had never been charged with or convicted of any crime.

You repeat this lie, again and again. I've given you sources to correct this. The boy was not a target. You are perpetuating lies.

 

[Pad_Foot]

You repeat this lie, again and again. I've given you sources to correct this. The boy was not a target. You are perpetuating lies.

If you leave out enough words, that’s what the report says! It’s a lie of omission. Oh, maybe swap around a few words afterwards for grammatical reasons.

 

[ll74]

Was listening to the lawfare pod today and they made a good observation: with the entire "the court is blind to the timing" aspect of things.. The court seems to acknowledge that they are deliberating a decision for the ages while ignoring the age itself.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Was listening to the lawfare pod today and they made a good observation: with the entire "the court is blind to the timing" aspect of things.. The court seems to acknowledge that they are deliberating a decision for the ages while ignoring the age itself.

Worth repeating that Bush v. Gore was signed, sealed and delivered in 72 hours, yet Trump immunity sees the partisan Supreme Court slow-walking this case until June, at which time they'll most likely kick it back down to the Court of Appeals for re-hearing.

Speed apparently is highly dependent upon teh needs of the Republic celebration (formally know as the "Republcan Party" until Judge JimArpy informed us on what words REALLY meant yesterday).

 

[Rightguide]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1786532208334852584

Who's orders were these? Click the link.

 

[ll74]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1786532208334852584

Who's orders were these?

Lol

 

[Rightguide]

Worth repeating that Bush v. Gore was signed, sealed and delivered in 72 hours, yet Trump immunity sees the partisan Supreme Court slow-walking this case until June, at which time they'll most likely kick it back down to the Court of Appeals for re-hearing.

Speed apparently is highly dependent upon teh needs of the Republic celebration (formally know as the "Republcan Party" until Judge JimArpy informed us on what words REALLY meant yesterday).

In Bush V Gore they were up against a certification deadline. No such deadline here.

 

[RobDownSouth]

In Bush V Gore they were up against a certification deadline. No such deadline here.

Categorically not true, as you once again bring shame to yourself and soil your family's name.
The "deadline" is the first Tuesday in November, which is Election Day.

Trump has a vested interest in pushing court cases out past that date, knowing there is a good chance that people in America won't vote for a convicted felon.

He's counting on the combined legal pettifoggery of Federal judge Aileen Cannon and six compromised Supreme Court Justices to defer his various federal conspiracy charges for as long as possible.