The Democratic Party in the nutshell!

icanhelp1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Mar 23, 2019
Posts
15,808
https://americanmind.org/salvo/thus-always-to-bad-elites/

Future

In 2021, we are experiencing a similar disjunction, between an elite that seeks to alter the conditions of American life—everything from folkways to the administrative and legal rules that structure our society—and a wide variety of folks (plural peoples) who are victims of this new governing elite. The corresponding reaction to these innovations and abuses is causing a raucous struggle to find leaders (elites) who can give voice, direction, and guidance to the inevitable resistance to our own imperial elite.

Today, we have a very different elite than America did as recently as the 1980s in terms of their nature, goals, ambitions, style, and ways of exercising power. The deepest fact of our time is that America has a bad elite, a mendacious one whose skills, values, goals, tastes, and types of knowledge are hostile to our nation’s inherited cultures and plural people. The new elite that has emerged in the last generation or two has no interest in preserving anything but perhaps their own power. They lack historical knowledge and vision, which they supplant by, or exchange for, the powers of transformation and change. Intoxicated by the power possible with emerging technologies, inspired by visions that only a deracinated globalist perspective could make attractive, this elite thinks of creative destruction as applied to culture.

As winners in what they imagine to be a meritocratic struggle, they can see nothing of an inherited world worth preserving for their very success. The peculiar characteristics of their evolving power have given to our new elite the soul of adolescent art applied to a global canvas. They lack any experiential or historical ballast to weigh them down, to slow them in remaking everything according to their desires. For them, streamlining power is key to creation and the annoying obstacles to their new creations are not really checks to prevent tyranny but, rather, limitations—unnecessary friction in the headlong rush to transform.

For this new elite, for instance, the good of free speech has become invisible because, for them, free speech is simply friction, resistance to their goals. The elimination of hate speech is the goal, the unimpeachable good, that the openness of free speech prevents. In half a generation, the work of centuries is undone and the levers of tyranny put in place.
 
Well I'll give you credit, at least you used the correct name. Rightguide keeps fucking it up, maybe you could help him out with that eh?
 
I'd say that transactional and immediate gratification has ruined patience and thought. That's not uniquely a (D) or (R) thing.

As for leadership following politics, it's a tough line to walk in order to protect institutions, especially with many on both sides of the spectrum preferring authoritarianism
 
https://americanmind.org/salvo/thus-always-to-bad-elites/

The Logic of Decay

No society lives without elites, and so the task ahead of us is the elimination of one elite and the cultivation of another. The resistance movement must be about reclaiming our heritage by bringing forward elites who understand America in all its layered reality—its rich pluralism, its complicated history, its enduring beliefs and aspirations, and its deep and abiding devotion to liberty—the political reality, not the freedom to live out one’s fantasies—as the glue of our national mosaic.

To be sure, we are prone to forget the truths our heritage conveys. In the messiness of real life, moral reasoning is complex, textured, and—when tested by certain kinds of trials—laden with uncertainties. Add to that the intellectual torpor born of moral indolence, and life, along with our picture of its potential improvement, grows messy. The greater the mess, the more attractive are moral shortcuts.

Since most of us cannot function well without feeling as though we are governed by moral ideals that make us feel righteous, our attraction to simplistic moral declarations is greater when existential complexity makes moral reasoning hard. Once we have embraced the simple moral equation, we rush to adopt an intellectual framework that shields us from the impossible complexity of the world beyond our heads.

This is the problem we have today: a longing for intellectual command of an unruly reality encourages us to use a very restrictive vocabulary that forces all the phenomena of our lives into a few conceptual containers, producing a sense of order and control. As a result, we operate with a distorted view of our world, and this has serious consequences.
 
https://americanmind.org/salvo/thus-always-to-bad-elites/

The Logic of Decay

No society lives without elites, and so the task ahead of us is the elimination of one elite and the cultivation of another. The resistance movement must be about reclaiming our heritage by bringing forward elites who understand America in all its layered reality—its rich pluralism, its complicated history, its enduring beliefs and aspirations, and its deep and abiding devotion to liberty—the political reality, not the freedom to live out one’s fantasies—as the glue of our national mosaic.

To be sure, we are prone to forget the truths our heritage conveys. In the messiness of real life, moral reasoning is complex, textured, and—when tested by certain kinds of trials—laden with uncertainties. Add to that the intellectual torpor born of moral indolence, and life, along with our picture of its potential improvement, grows messy. The greater the mess, the more attractive are moral shortcuts.

Since most of us cannot function well without feeling as though we are governed by moral ideals that make us feel righteous, our attraction to simplistic moral declarations is greater when existential complexity makes moral reasoning hard. Once we have embraced the simple moral equation, we rush to adopt an intellectual framework that shields us from the impossible complexity of the world beyond our heads.

This is the problem we have today: a longing for intellectual command of an unruly reality encourages us to use a very restrictive vocabulary that forces all the phenomena of our lives into a few conceptual containers, producing a sense of order and control. As a result, we operate with a distorted view of our world, and this has serious consequences.
Nailed it!! VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Where, other than the fantasy in your head, you've not once ever shown a shred of verifiable evidence. You're worse than a broken clock, you're never even right twice a day....just a sad old white guy watching your world crumble and change since you're not in the majority anymore. Those people you've shit on for decades are now getting there turn at the ring.
 
https://americanmind.org/salvo/thus-always-to-bad-elites/

Future

In 2021, we are experiencing a similar disjunction, between an elite that seeks to alter the conditions of American life—everything from folkways to the administrative and legal rules that structure our society—and a wide variety of folks (plural peoples) who are victims of this new governing elite. The corresponding reaction to these innovations and abuses is causing a raucous struggle to find leaders (elites) who can give voice, direction, and guidance to the inevitable resistance to our own imperial elite.

Today, we have a very different elite than America did as recently as the 1980s in terms of their nature, goals, ambitions, style, and ways of exercising power. The deepest fact of our time is that America has a bad elite, a mendacious one whose skills, values, goals, tastes, and types of knowledge are hostile to our nation’s inherited cultures and plural people. The new elite that has emerged in the last generation or two has no interest in preserving anything but perhaps their own power. They lack historical knowledge and vision, which they supplant by, or exchange for, the powers of transformation and change. Intoxicated by the power possible with emerging technologies, inspired by visions that only a deracinated globalist perspective could make attractive, this elite thinks of creative destruction as applied to culture.

As winners in what they imagine to be a meritocratic struggle, they can see nothing of an inherited world worth preserving for their very success. The peculiar characteristics of their evolving power have given to our new elite the soul of adolescent art applied to a global canvas. They lack any experiential or historical ballast to weigh them down, to slow them in remaking everything according to their desires. For them, streamlining power is key to creation and the annoying obstacles to their new creations are not really checks to prevent tyranny but, rather, limitations—unnecessary friction in the headlong rush to transform.

For this new elite, for instance, the good of free speech has become invisible because, for them, free speech is simply friction, resistance to their goals. The elimination of hate speech is the goal, the unimpeachable good, that the openness of free speech prevents. In half a generation, the work of centuries is undone and the levers of tyranny put in place.

https://americanmind.org/salvo/thus-always-to-bad-elites/

The Logic of Decay

No society lives without elites, and so the task ahead of us is the elimination of one elite and the cultivation of another. The resistance movement must be about reclaiming our heritage by bringing forward elites who understand America in all its layered reality—its rich pluralism, its complicated history, its enduring beliefs and aspirations, and its deep and abiding devotion to liberty—the political reality, not the freedom to live out one’s fantasies—as the glue of our national mosaic.

To be sure, we are prone to forget the truths our heritage conveys. In the messiness of real life, moral reasoning is complex, textured, and—when tested by certain kinds of trials—laden with uncertainties. Add to that the intellectual torpor born of moral indolence, and life, along with our picture of its potential improvement, grows messy. The greater the mess, the more attractive are moral shortcuts.

Since most of us cannot function well without feeling as though we are governed by moral ideals that make us feel righteous, our attraction to simplistic moral declarations is greater when existential complexity makes moral reasoning hard. Once we have embraced the simple moral equation, we rush to adopt an intellectual framework that shields us from the impossible complexity of the world beyond our heads.

This is the problem we have today: a longing for intellectual command of an unruly reality encourages us to use a very restrictive vocabulary that forces all the phenomena of our lives into a few conceptual containers, producing a sense of order and control. As a result, we operate with a distorted view of our world, and this has serious consequences.
you support a rapist, fraudster, and racist to lead what's left of your crumbled party.
 
you support a rapist, fraudster, and racist to lead what's left of your crumbled party.
Like WTF is wrong with ican't and AJ. They show up here, fresh out of the fart sack, sipping on their coffee, the day isn't even broke yet, and their bitching.

Must be the wife didn't give em a hummer, so now they are going to do nothing but bitch all day?
 
Like WTF is wrong with ican't and AJ. They show up here, fresh out of the fart sack, sipping on their coffee, the day isn't even broke yet, and their bitching.

Must be the wife didn't give em a hummer, so now they are going to do nothing but bitch all day?

Same difference.
But hey nice try, show's you're paying attention....PS ever read a movie or play script....you'll find "they are" and "the're".Why?
 
Like WTF is wrong with ican't and AJ. They show up here, fresh out of the fart sack, sipping on their coffee, the day isn't even broke yet, and their bitching.

Must be the wife didn't give em a hummer, so now they are going to do nothing but bitch all day?
They're
 
They show up here ..., and their bitching.

Grammar buddy sez: They are or they're
 
They show up here ..., and their bitching.

Grammar buddy sez: They are or they're
their meaning : belonging to or connected with them

Grammar says lot of stuff, but reading comprehension comes into play into sentence structure. Come back when you've got a degree in English, or any other discipline. Or is the AJ equation of 1x anything = 1 still in effect?
 
Your syntax needs the lesson, not me (or whoever you think I am).
It's your reading comprehension that is at fault. You're not having a good morning, and you failed to take my advice and go hide in Wat's thread. Now you're whole day is ruined.....*chuckles*
 
It's your reading comprehension that is at fault. You're not having a good morning, and you failed to take my advice and go hide in Wat's thread. Now you're whole day is ruined.....*chuckles*
Wait! 😡😡😡
Who’s thread??? Lmao!
 
It's your reading comprehension that is at fault. You're not having a good morning, and you failed to take my advice and go hide in Wat's thread. Now you're whole day is ruined.....*chuckles*
Never mind. Continue giving the whatfers to Joe!
 
Wat has a thread on the GB. It is their safe space. Or I guess according to AJ I should have wrote, "It is the're safe space".
Dammit. I really need to utilize all of this webcite (haha I crack myself up).
 
Like WTF is wrong with ican't and AJ. They show up here, fresh out of the fart sack, sipping on their coffee, the day isn't even broke yet, and their bitching.

Must be the wife didn't give em a hummer, so now they are going to do nothing but bitch all day?


lol, no their, do i need to get you a fucking dictionary???

They show up here ..., and their bitching.

Grammar buddy sez: They are or they're

their meaning : belonging to or connected with them

Grammar says lot of stuff, but reading comprehension comes into play into sentence structure. Come back when you've got a degree in English, or any other discipline. Or is the AJ equation of 1x anything = 1 still in effect?

Your syntax needs the lesson, not me (or whoever you think I am).
cap'n hypocrite is having a bad morning.
 
Back
Top