santos sues Jimmy Kimmel over his 'Will Santos say it?'

butters

High on a Hill
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Posts
81,755
the fraudster is suing Jimmy Kimmel for using fake usernames etc..., to get santos to say stuff that Kimmel then aired on tv :)

In December, Kimmel launched a segment on his show called “Will Santos say it?” where he aired videos Santos made on Cameo in response to requests Kimmel had made using what the lawsuit—filed in Manhattan federal court on Friday—described as “fake user profiles” and “phony names and narratives.”
In the videos, Santos congratulates a non-existent fan for winning a meat-eating contest and congratulates another non-existent fan for cloning her dog, among other things, all based on requests Kimmel made through Cameo, which allows fans to pay for personalized messages from an array of celebrities and public figures.
Santos also accuses Kimmel of fraud, claiming Kimmel misrepresented himself to obtain the videos “for the sole purpose of capitalizing on and ridiculing (Santos’) gregarious personality.”

i'm not here to argue the legalities—Kimmel 'owning the videos he had to pay for' v not having the legal right to broadcast them—but it's still funny as fuck to me that the delusional santos 'gregarious personality' could be bought so very very easily

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertain...1&cvid=9673cd1a7c8d4239d5baaacdb30655b8&ei=22
 
in a new grift, santos is using Cameo to 'raise money' for 9-11 victims and also for a pro-Israel group, The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. He says 20% of proceeds will go to these two causes, as he uses his drag Kitara persona 'for a limited time'.

will these causes get people to invest $350 a pop Cameos of Kitara? but, more importantly, will they see ANY of the promised money? i wouldn't count on it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=0bbebad9986c447de6d2637f90a7c56a&ei=63
 
The man has no shame at all, and anyone contributing to his 80-20 split fund has no sense.
If you want to support the genocide you can send money direct.
 
in a new grift, santos is using Cameo to 'raise money' for 9-11 victims and also for a pro-Israel group, The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. He says 20% of proceeds will go to these two causes, as he uses his drag Kitara persona 'for a limited time'.

will these causes get people to invest $350 a pop Cameos of Kitara? but, more importantly, will they see ANY of the promised money? i wouldn't count on it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=0bbebad9986c447de6d2637f90a7c56a&ei=63

How long will that POS float in the bowl until it is finally flushed???

🤬

The same goes for the orange POS.

🤬
 
How long will that POS float in the bowl until it is finally flushed???

🤬

The same goes for the orange POS.

🤬
unfortunately, and with a few defined restrictions, former members of the house retain the privileges of accessing the house floor (when the house is in session), gym and dining facilities, car park and congressional library... so he can waltz about the place any time he wants to get his face in the press.

  • A former Member is not entitled to the privilege of the House floor if they:
    • Become a registered lobbyist or the agent of a foreign principal as defined by the House.
    • Have any direct personal or pecuniary interest in any legislative measure pending before the House or reported by any committee of the House.
    • Are employed for the purpose of influencing, directly or indirectly, the passage, defeat, or amendment of any legislative proposal.
  • The Speaker may exempt ceremonial or educational functions from these restrictions1.
 
unfortunately, and with a few defined restrictions, former members of the house retain the privileges of accessing the house floor (when the house is in session), gym and dining facilities, car park and congressional library... so he can waltz about the place any time he wants to get his face in the press.

Yeah, that rule needs to be changed.

🤬

But I was really talking about that POS being relevant at all.

🤬
 
Back
Top