Best self description EVER!!!!!!!!!This seems to advance my theory that there are those who advocate a position and then lose their minds when the rest of society doesn't follow along with their whackjob ideas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Best self description EVER!!!!!!!!!This seems to advance my theory that there are those who advocate a position and then lose their minds when the rest of society doesn't follow along with their whackjob ideas.
First of all, ICanhelp1, Or mr. Wizzard, or whatever the heck...
You clearly do NOT stand for the law if you seem to think that Donald Trump ought to be above it, and that any attempts to enforce the law against a lawbreaker with whom you share your own fucked-up and dubious values amounts to a "Partisan Judicial Witch Hunt." You clearly do NOT stand for the law, unless it is wielded by an authoritarian with no acccountability to the Constitution or common civilized society, who can do what he pleases. If you stood for the law, then you would be hoping that justice would be served against those who would flout it. Even if you agree with their dubious social and political views.
And second of all, STOP SAYING YOU HAVE ONLY ONE LIT ACCOUNT.
You do not. Just fucking stop with that bullshit.
Just ADMIT what we all know. At least, admit that you are Wizzard526 and Icanhelp1. Maybe then we will gain a tiny ounce of respect for you. But you childishly insist that "I have only 1 lit account" and we all know it's bullshit. If you have only 1 lit account, then the user who currently calls himself "Censurat" has never, ever, ever had any screen names before that one. (he has at least 85 by my count.)
Anyone who thought this case has a chance to be tried before the election is delusional.Supreme Court Will Likely Send Trump Presidential Immunity Case to Lower Courts: Sen. Graham
By Jack Phillips
4/28/2024
The Supreme Court will likely send former President Donald Trump’s presidential immunity case back to the lower courts for further review, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on April 28.
The nation’s highest court last week heard arguments made by President Trump’s lawyers and special counsel Jack Smith’s team regarding whether the 45th president should be declared immune from prosecution in connection to Mr. Smith’s election case. President Trump has argued that he should enjoy absolute immunity from prosecution, while the special counsel has argued otherwise.
Some conservative-leaning justices appeared to lean toward agreeing with at least some of President Trump’s arguments, while others, including Chief Justice John Roberts, suggested that the case be sent back to an appeals court in Washington. Earlier this year, a panel of judges on that court rejected the former president’s arguments, setting up his appeal to the Supreme Court.
Mr. Graham, who is also a lawyer, said on April 28 on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he believes the high court is going to “find that presidential immunity exists for President Trump, like every other president, but you’ve got to be within the scope of being president.”
More here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/su...oReport&src_src=partner&src_cmp=BonginoReport
If this is true Jack Smith will not be able to try Trump before the election or maybe even ever. let the bed-wetting begin.
Lit has it's share of paranoid Mofos.dudly, I'm not BB.
Every time you open your mouth about this you only prove that everything else you attempt to say is a fact is merely based on bullshit rather than reality.
So Jack Smith and the Democrats are delusional? That was the plan.Anyone who thought this case has a chance to be tried before the election is delusional.
Where did Jack Smith say that the case would be heard before the election?So Jack Smith and the Democrats are delusional? That was the plan.
The whole purpose of this "phony" case, based on BS law, the illegal appointment of Jack Smith, was intended to keep Trump from running. It was purely election interference directed solely by Joe Biden and his corrupt Democrats. If it is sent back to the appeals court, it's over.Where did Jack Smith say that the case would be heard before the election?
That wasn't an answer to my question.The whole purpose of this "phony" case, based on BS law, was intended to keep Trump from running. It was purely election interference directed solely by Joe Biden and his corrupt Democrats. If it is sent back to the appeals court, it's over.
He didn't bring the case to pursue after the election. His effort was designed to put Trump in prison before the election. This case like Crossfire Hurricane is Deep State election interference.That wasn't an answer to my question.
So he never said that the case would be brought before the election.He didn't bring the case to pursue after the election. His effort was designed to put Trump in prison before the election. This case like Crossfire Hurricane is Deep State election interference.
The next shoe to drop will be his totally illegal appointment. Which will toss both him and his case out of court.The wall clock by my desk says 'half past conviction' or said another way, 'thirty minutes' closer to guilty.
I think Jack Smith has the same brand of 'justice' clock as most Americans. It's the one where time is running out for 'truth, justice, and the American way' but like Superman, Jack keeps on ticking.
Tick tock ... tick tock, Trump tock ...
That's a s-t-r-e-t-c-h! What fantasy notion brought that on?The next shoe to drop will be his totally illegal appointment. Which will toss both him and his case out of court.
No, you are not BB.dudly, I'm not BB.
Every time you open your mouth about this you only prove that everything else you attempt to say is a fact is merely based on bullshit rather than reality.
Clarence Thomas' inquiry about the appointment of Smith during Trump's immunity hearing about the legal brilliance contained in this: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US v. Trump amicus final.pdfThat's a s-t-r-e-t-c-h! What fantasy notion brought that on?
Smith was appropriately appointed and has sufficient ability to prosecute the case.Clarence Thomas' inquiry about the appointment of Smith during Trump's immunity hearing about the legal brilliance contained in this: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US v. Trump amicus final.pdf
You need to pay attention. I posted this weeks ago.
Read the friggin' brief. It was written by some of the greatest legal minds in the country.Smith was appropriately appointed and has sufficient ability to prosecute the case.
Ive read it.Read the friggin' brief. It was written by some of the greatest legal minds in the country.
Not yet anyway.Ive read it.
Greatest is relative.
SCOTUS isn't ruling on whether he can prosecute the case.
Yes,your guy likes useless appealsNot yet anyway.
It will be brought up at the Appellate level. SCOTUS might send the immunity question back to the Appeals Court with guidance on how to decide the immunity question.Yes,your guy likes useless appeals
The argument is useless outside of delaying the inevitable
They won't.It will be brought up at the Appellate level. SCOTUS might send the immunity question back to the Appeals Court with guidance on how to decide the immunity question.