Just a video I stumbled onto that I found fascinating. Watch the whole thing.


Btw, what the student observes here, a student who DOESN'T agree with him, and his response, is ample evidence to show that charges of anti-Semitism against his are ludicrous.
 
Last edited:
On Fox News last month, he said of the president, “He's so quick, he's relentless, but you look at what he's been able to accomplish with the amount thrown at him. I don't think that combination has ever happened in American history.” In a particularly hilarious tweet, he called Trump “the most moral president on record.” Yes, the man who has cheated on multiple wives, slept with a porn star and hasn’t ever asked God for forgiveness is more moral than the man who freed the slaves. Never mind the many women who accuse him of everything from unwanted kissing to outright rape.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...-kirk-triggered-by-reality-column/1551334001/
 
Okay, you quoted a USA Today opinion piece about him and his organization, stating at the top of the page that it is only the author's opinion. I happen to disagree with that author. So do a lot of people, as demonstrated by the crowds of supporters he draws. So a lot of people like him, a lot don't. Is there substance to your grievance over his voice being posted here beyond that?
 
will someone please reiterate to the one demanding attention that i have previously stated my intent of not bothering to interact with the kind of human being he presents as.

of course, just like the others whose crazy worlds i refuse to engage with, he'll no doubt keep bouncing up and down, yapping like a jack russell on speed demanding attention he's not gonna get.
 
will someone please reiterate to the one demanding attention that i have previously stated my intent of not bothering to interact with the kind of human being he presents as.

We have to be gentle. He has by far the thinnest skin of any of the newcomers. 😥
 
JS: Hey, you?!

Me: Me???

JS: The Lord, my God, hatest abortion! And now I shall spew forth the many reasons why it's so in his glorious name of Love.

Me: Well, I mean, ok but I was just sitting here minding my own business and didn't really ask to...

JS: Silence! Now listen as I, a devout Christian, espouse his redeeming love through the teachings of one Charlie Kirk.
 
JS: Hey, you?!

Me: Me???

JS: The Lord, my God, hatest abortion! And now I shall spew forth the many reasons why it's so in his glorious name of Love.

Me: Well, I mean, ok but I was just sitting here minding my own business and didn't really ask to...

JS: Silence! Now listen as I, a devout Christian, espouse his redeeming love through the teachings of one Charlie Kirk.
Did I say I like Kirk as a Christian apologist?. Don't believe I did. Did I force you to come onto a thread and listen to Kirk destroy liberal arguments? Again, that didn't happen.

Yes, God is a God of love. Yes, that love extends to the baby in the womb. Yes, love, by definition means that the lover will hate that which seems to destroy or harm the object of its love. Good news too, Bn2, because God loves you too, and offers forgiveness.

But that's not the point here in your comment, is it? You come onto a thread you know you will disagree with, someone else's thread, then, when a point is raised you disagree with, you say, "I was just sitting here minding my own business." That's exactly what you were NOT doing! You stepped into the ring, stepped into the debate, and even threw out the first blows.

If you don't want to read or here the content on a thread, here's an idea: don't read that thread. I hate pop music and commercial radio. I hate music streaming platforms that sell out to and are controlled by the music industry. So guess what.... I don't listen to them! And surprise, surprise, I don't know what the latest pop songs are. Haven't for years. I don't care.

I'm glad to have the debates. I enjoy the debates. But please be honest. Don't come on someone else's thread, start a debate, then claim the other person stepped into your house and started preaching.
 
Glad that a variety of views are allowed to speak on campuses.

However, Kirk reminds me of Ben Shapiro but with a voice that’s easier on the ear. And no, that’s not a metaphor in support of his debate style and tactics.
 
Last edited:
Did I say I like Kirk as a Christian apologist?. Don't believe I did. Did I force you to come onto a thread and listen to Kirk destroy liberal arguments? Again, that didn't happen.

Yes, God is a God of love. Yes, that love extends to the baby in the womb. Yes, love, by definition means that the lover will hate that which seems to destroy or harm the object of its love. Good news too, Bn2, because God loves you too, and offers forgiveness.

But that's not the point here in your comment, is it? You come onto a thread you know you will disagree with, someone else's thread, then, when a point is raised you disagree with, you say, "I was just sitting here minding my own business." That's exactly what you were NOT doing! You stepped into the ring, stepped into the debate, and even threw out the first blows.

If you don't want to read or here the content on a thread, here's an idea: don't read that thread. I hate pop music and commercial radio. I hate music streaming platforms that sell out to and are controlled by the music industry. So guess what.... I don't listen to them! And surprise, surprise, I don't know what the latest pop songs are. Haven't for years. I don't care.

I'm glad to have the debates. I enjoy the debates. But please be honest. Don't come on someone else's thread, start a debate, then claim the other person stepped into your house and started preaching.
Blah, blah, blah.

I think I have been fairly consistent in my questioning, nay, my outright disdain for your fake ass Christianity. You posting numerous clips of Kirk only further confirms what I know.
 
Did I say I like Kirk as a Christian apologist?. Don't believe I did. Did I force you to come onto a thread and listen to Kirk destroy liberal arguments? Again, that didn't happen.

Yes, God is a God of love. Yes, that love extends to the baby in the womb. Yes, love, by definition means that the lover will hate that which seems to destroy or harm the object of its love. Good news too, Bn2, because God loves you too, and offers forgiveness.

But that's not the point here in your comment, is it? You come onto a thread you know you will disagree with, someone else's thread, then, when a point is raised you disagree with, you say, "I was just sitting here minding my own business." That's exactly what you were NOT doing! You stepped into the ring, stepped into the debate, and even threw out the first blows.

If you don't want to read or here the content on a thread, here's an idea: don't read that thread. I hate pop music and commercial radio. I hate music streaming platforms that sell out to and are controlled by the music industry. So guess what.... I don't listen to them! And surprise, surprise, I don't know what the latest pop songs are. Haven't for years. I don't care.

I'm glad to have the debates. I enjoy the debates. But please be honest. Don't come on someone else's thread, start a debate, then claim the other person stepped into your house and started preaching.
If God was about love he wouldn’t have made Hell or allow abortion.
 
If you don't want to read or here the content on a thread, here's an idea: don't read that thread. I hate pop music and commercial radio. I hate music streaming platforms that sell out to and are controlled by the music industry. So guess what.... I don't listen to them! And surprise, surprise, I don't know what the latest pop songs are. Haven't for years. I don't care.
Dear God PB board, what plague have I accidentally conjured to be brought unto thee???
Prepare to be assailed on the sins of the whoring Taylor Swift and virtues of Christian Rock Gospel.
 
Kirk isn't wrong here. He's not saying the indictment is made up or wrong. He actually calls dude out as a criminal in one of the debates that I believe is posted on here.

Once again your side lifts a snippet, removes context, and tries to make it say what Kirk never said.

Kirk's point is that the Judicial branch, particularly in the lower courts, and the executive branch, in its way too many and overreaching enforcement arms, is owned by the far left, hard core liberal deep state. Those branches HAVE to maintain some appearance of impartiality in order to move forward with agenda to destroy everything that isn't leftist. Which means they have to take out at least some leftists. So they pick easy targets and cases they would be openly exposed for not acting on, but they cover for much larger crimes and villains on the left who have far deeper corruption. Then they use these easy cases on the left, the ones they almost HAVE to try, and say, "We are even-handed, see? So now we can go after everyone on the right, take them out for anything, down to filling out a form wrong, and even fabricate crimes to charge them with. But hey, it's okay. We took out a Democrat too."

That is the corruption being addressed, and it is VERY real.

Notice that my side actually plays lengthy sections of video or gives lengthy, in context quotes before making our care. Your side simply picks a quote out of context, "contextualizes" that quote to fit your narrative, then goes on long rants about it. That's not debate. That's not discussion. That is called lying.
 
Blah, blah, blah.

I think I have been fairly consistent in my questioning, nay, my outright disdain for your fake ass Christianity. You posting numerous clips of Kirk only further confirms what I know.
Then you don't have to come onto my threads or those like them, and you don't have to read or hear what I or Kirk said. Pretty simple, I think.
 
Back
Top