Jared Taylor Warned Us About the Civil Rights Movement, by John Engelman

JohnEngelman

Virgin
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Posts
3,663
Since the publication of his Paved With Good Intentions in 1992, Jared Taylor, has made a career of drawing attention to bad results of the good intentions of the civil rights movement. It has been a dangerous occupation. When one is accused of racism truth is no defense. It is evidence for the prosecution.

The Second World War made the civil rights movement possible. After the revelations of the Holocaust fewer Americans wanted to believe that racial differences mattered, or that they even existed. Moreover, American Negroes had participated loyally to the war effort. Many Americans had difficulty understanding why a battle scared black combat veteran of the War could not dine in a restaurant that served men who had not been in uniform.

Nevertheless, it was not until the Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court Decision of 1954 that the civil rights movement really began to influence American politics.

If We Do Nothing is an anthology of essays and reviews written by Jared Taylor during 25 years. In his essay “Brown vs. Board: The Real Story,” Jared Taylor draws attention to three facts about the Brown vs Board Education Supreme Court decision that merit wide circulation.

The Brown vs. Board of Education decision was based on the Fourteenth Amendment, which states, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”

This might seem to include the privilege of attending nearby public schools, even if they are integrated. Nevertheless, Jared Taylor points out, “The same Congress that passed the Amendment in 1866 established segregated schools in the District of Columbia.”

Kenneth Clark, was a black psychologist who became famous with doll studies cited in the Brown decision. Dr. Clark pointed out that when he gave black girls a choice between taking a white doll and a black doll most of the girls choose the white doll.

Dr. Clark used this to argue that school segregation harms the self image of blacks. Jared Taylor points out that black girls who attended integrated schools were more likely to choose white dolls. He suggests that school integration is bad for the image of blacks, because they can see that most of the whites are more intelligent than they are.

Finally, those advocating school integration argued that it would improve academic performance of blacks. Jared Taylor points out that, “the average black 12th grader reads and does math at the level at the level of the average white 8th grader. This has been true…whether black students have no, few, or many white classmates.”

The Brown vs. Board of Education decision is probably the most famous Supreme Court Decision, and possibly the most popular among whites who have not attended black majority public schools. Jared Taylor points out that it was based on false assumptions, and that it has had harmful effects.

The most immediate effect was to promote white flight to school districts with small black populations and to private schools with hardly any black students in them at all. A longer term effect, although Jared Taylor does not emphasize this, has been to reduce the confidence of most whites in the government, and in liberal reform.

Race is the liberals’ weakest issue, and the issue where liberal hypocrisy has been most obvious. In his essay, “The Racial Ideology of Empire,” Jared Taylor writes, “Even today, the politicians and editorialists who bray the loudest about Southern redneck ‘racism’ live in guilded white ghettos and send their children to private schools.”

It is not “ignorant prejudice” that causes even white liberal parents to want their children to attend schools where the black population is small. Jared Taylor writes, “when blacks start enrolling in formerly white schools, race relations are best if the number of blacks is kept at no more than 15 to 25 percent. Research has confirmed…40 percent is the point at which things often go seriously wrong…

“Theft, violence, and insubordination of all kinds go up as the racial balance changes.”

The Montgomery Bus Boycott, that lasted from December 5, 1955 to December 20, 1956, turned the civil rights movement into a mass political movement that eventually changed the United States. Jared Taylor points out that it was less spontaneous than often believed. Rosa Parks was more than a humble seamstress. She was a secretary for the NAACP, which had planned the event for ten years.

Rosa Parks was selected because she was the kind of black person who would appeal to black church goers, partially Jared Taylor suggests, because she was light skinned.

For these reasons Jared Taylor calls Rosa Parks “a transparent fraud.” That seems a bit harsh to me. She was a skilled and successful political operative.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott also launched the political career of Martin Luther King, Jr., who was at the time a twenty-six year old black clergyman. Yes, as Jared Taylor says, Martin Luther King “was an adulterer, plagiarizer, and a Communist sympathizer.” He was also a leader of genius. Many people including me think his “I have a dream” speech is one of the greatest speeches in the English language.

Dr. King's promiscuity was unacceptable in a married man and a clergyman. Nevertheless, he does not seem to have been guilty of unwanted sexual advances. It is reasonable to assume that his advances, like those of John Kennedy, were wanted and often solicited. Men of King's fame and charisma face temptations most of us men do not.

Dr. King's plagiarism in his PhD. thesis is difficult to understand in one who developed his skill as a speaker and essay writer.

In his sermon, "How Should a Christian View Communism," which is published in his book Strength to Love Dr. King said:

Communism "enunciates movingly the theory of a classless society, but alas! its methods for achieving this noble end are all too often ignoble. Lying, violence, murder, and turture are considered to be justifiable means to achieve the millennial end."

Dr. King welcomed the support of members of the American Communist Party. Nevertheless, there is no evidence that he ever passed classified information to the Soviet Union, or took orders from the Soviet government or the American Communist Party. The behavior of King's enemies assisted the writers of Communist propaganda.

More than any other human being Martin Luther King made the 1960’s what they were in the United States. It would have been a different decade without him. He achieved his goals without terrorism and a successful guerrilla army. He lacked the ability to punish insubordination. He made people want to do what he wanted them to do. He skillfully projected the image of a humble man of God who was too good of a Christian to hate his enemies. He also had a gift for bringing out the worst in his enemies.

At any rate Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King have become secular saints. The admiration expressed for them by liberals and many conservatives is genuine. One achieves nothing by complaining that his opponents were unfair because they were more skillful.
 
In his essay, “Africa in Our Midst,” Jared Taylor describes the behavior of many blacks in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The official story from the mainstream media at the time was of President Bush’s incompetence in dealing with the disaster, and of blacks victimized by an indifferent white establishment. Jared Taylor writes, “robbery, rape and even murder became routine…200 officers just walked off the job…Young [black] men robbed and raped with impunity.”

The Southern Pacific Law Center quoted the end of this essay in a hit piece, posting, "Blacks and whites are different. When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization — any kind of civilization — disappears."

Typically, SPLC made no effort to refute Jared Taylor’s claims. An outspoken race realist is like a guest at a Georgetown dinner party who tells the person sitting next to him in a voice that carries that the hostess worked her way through Vassar as a call girl. Even if everyone knows that that is true – no, especially if everyone knows that that is true – that guest will be erased from everyone’s invite list.

In his essay, “Race and Literature: Why Is It Always Liberal?” Jared Taylor regrets the influence of the novel To Kill a Mockingbird while acknowledging, “It is a great novel.” He adds, “It would be possible to write a novel about a prominent white Democratic politician…who gradually wakes up to racial reality.”

Literature cannot change strong opinions. It can shape opinions that are inchoate. Millions of whites, and more than a few blacks are privately aware that the civil rights movement has not been the unqualified success television and Hollywood tell them. They might respond positively to a novel about a white married couple that is trying to raise their children while living and working in or near a black ghetto that they cannot move away from. Their children attend a high school where the percentage of blacks is much higher than forty percent.

Such a novel would include admirable blacks. Blacks after all are more likely to be victims of black criminals than are whites. The novel would also include black criminals. Powerful white liberals suffering from what George Orwell called, “money sheltered ignorance,” while sending their children to white private schools would be portrayed, not as proud of their villainy, but as morally conflicted people with good intentions.

Jared Taylor claims, “Diversity of race or tribe or language or religion are the main reasons people kill each other on a large scale.” Nevertheless, he acknowledges that beginning with the eighteenth century the deadliest wars have been fought in Europe by European whites against other European whites.

Civil wars by ethnically equivalent adversaries speaking the same language are often more lethal than international conflicts. During the American Civil War approximately 620,000 people died from combat and war related causes. During the Second World War, with a much larger population, the United States suffered an estimated 318,000 war related deaths.

During the First World War Russia lost an estimated 2,840,000 to 3,394,000 war dead. During the Russian Civil War, which followed the First World War, estimates are as high as eight million war dead.

Nevertheless, diversity does have costs. In his essay, “Diversity Destroys Trust,” Jared Taylor writes, “Robert Putnam of Harvard became an academic celebrity in 2000 with his book Bowling Alone.” When Professor Putnam tried to find benefits in diversity “he found that racial and ethnic diversity destroys trust in neighbors and institutions.” He also discovered to his chagrin that the more contact one has with blacks the less likely one is to have a positive opinion of them. This of course disproves the liberal belief that proximity dispels racial animosities.

Those who maintain “Diversity is our strength,” have difficulty finding tangible benefits. Even the immigration of talented and well behaving races depresses wages.

In his essay, “The Ways of Our People,” Jared Taylor claims, “It is unlikely that the concept of noblesse oblige has non-white parallels.”

Noblesse oblige permeates Confucianism. Chapter V, Section 16 of The Analects of Confucius has Confucius saying, “Kung-sun Ch’iao possessed four virtues characteristic of Great Man: humility, respect for superiors, graciousness toward dependents, and a sense of justice toward subordinates.”

Japanese CEO’s earn much less than their American counterparts. They also manage corporations that produce better cars, motorcycles, and consumer electronics than corporations managed by those better paid American CEO’s. Unlike American corporations, Japanese corporations do not regard their employees as expendable resources to be dismissed as casually as worn office furniture.

Jared Taylor knows his constituency. He knows what they want to read. Nevertheless, when he preaches to the choir he loses effectiveness as a missionary. By overstating his case he makes it easy for those who dislike what he has to say to dismiss all of it. Nevertheless, he appropriately warns us, “If we do nothing, the nation we leave to our children and grandchildren will be a desolated, third-world failure, in which whites will be a despised minority.”
 
“If we do nothing, the nation we leave to our children and grandchildren will be a desolated, third-world failure, in which whites will be a despised minority.”
He sings the song of his people..... replacement theory rhapsody
 
He sings the song of his people..... replacement theory rhapsody
Replacement is happening. Many Democrats look forward to the time when whites will be a minority in the United States. I am a white Democrat, but I dislike the way the Democrat party has changed since 1963.
 
The sooner his kind are dead, the better off the rest of us will be...and everyday he is getting closer to death!!
I have been banned twice from Jared Taylor's website because of my habit of praising Jews and Orientals. I frequently praised them by quoting him and others whose essays were posted there. Many regulars hated me for it. Nevertheless, I had a following there. Jared Taylor and I like and respect each other. Soon after banning me the first time he sent me a autographed copy of the book I am reviewing here.
 
Replacement is happening. Many Democrats look forward to the time when whites will be a minority in the United States. I am a white Democrat, but I dislike the way the Democrat party has changed since 1963.
Yes, you demonstrate that you know the lyrics well.
 
I have been banned twice from Jared Taylor's website because of my habit of praising Jews and Orientals. I frequently praised them by quoting him and others whose essays were posted there. Many regulars hated me for it. Nevertheless, I had a following there. Jared Taylor and I like and respect each other. Soon after banning me the first time he sent me a autographed copy of the book I am reviewing here.
Fuck off and die, you racist piece of shit!
 

Fuck off and die, you racist piece of shit!
I was wondering when the insults would start. When they do I know that I have won the argument.

smuggrin.jpg

One of the people I learned about on Jared Taylor's website was Professor J. Philippe Rushton. He is often called a "scientific racist." I agree with him almost entirely. Some of the people on the website did not like the way I quoted Professor Rushton's praise of Jews and Orientals. I enjoyed reminding them that Professor Rushton spoke at six of Jared Taylor's conferences. This made them even angrier. :D
 
I was wondering when the insults would start. When they do I know that I have won the argument.

View attachment 2177762

One of the people I learned about on Jared Taylor's website was Professor J. Philippe Rushton. He is often called a "scientific racist." I agree with him almost entirely. Some of the people on the website did not like the way I quoted Professor Rushton's praise of Jews and Orientals. I enjoyed reminding them that Professor Rushton spoke at six of Jared Taylor's conferences. This made them even angrier. :D
Yes Rushton, the person who I have repeatedly shown his work to be discredited....and yet you fail to understand. After a while there is no point to try and educate a person. If you were a dog, who failed to learn to not bite humans, it would be put down. I only wish the same was true about your kind. Fuck off and die!!
 
Yes Rushton, the person who I have repeatedly shown his work to be discredited....and yet you fail to understand. After a while there is no point to try and educate a person. If you were a dog, who failed to learn to not bite humans, it would be put down. I only wish the same was true about your kind. Fuck off and die!!
Like Charles Murray Professor Rushton has been condemned. He has never been disproved. Neither has Charles. The following charts prove his assertions.

=========================
2006 College & University
Guidance, Scholarships, Money and Info Gateways
(For Students, Parents, College Advisors, Mentors,
and Cultural Groups)
==========================


SAT and ACT Scores by Race/Ethnicity: 2003

In recent years the noted pattern of test scores has reflected similar numbers--
Editor, 2005

SAT Ethnic Group Scores (Math/Verbal+total)

• American Indian---482/480 (962)
• Asian American-----575/508 (1083)
• African American-----426/431 (857)
• Puerto Rican----457/448 (905)

Other Hispanic----464/457 (921)

• White-----534/529 (1063)
• Other ----513/501 (1014)

Source: www.collegeboard.com

Average ACT Composite Score by Race/Ethnicity, 2003
----------------------------------------------------

• African American ----16.9
• American Indian---18.7
• Caucasian---- 21.7
• Mexican American----18.3
• Asian American---- 21.8
• Hispanic----19.0
• Other ----19.3
• Multiracial-----20.9
• Prefer Not to Respond -----21.8
• No Response-----20.1

Source: www.act.org

Quote from attached SAT/ACT article:

"Readiness for college science and math coursework was particularly low among
African American students. Only 5 percent of African American test-takers scored
at or above the college-readiness benchmark for college biology, and just 10
percent attained the readiness benchmark for college algebra. Ferguson said
Black students were less likely than others to take tough, college-prep courses
and "often don't receive the information and guidance they need to properly plan
for college."

For overview and more info, go to:
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0DXK/15_20/109265562/p1/article.jhtml

http://www.blackexcel.org/06-sat-act-scores-by-race-ethnicity.htm


bellcurves.jpg

Those who continue to blame the race gap on white racism cannot explain its persistence despite expensive government spending programs like Head Start and No Child Left Behind. Professor J. Philippe Rushton and Charles Murray do explain with fact based and logical arguments.
 
Professor J. Philippe Rushton and Charles Murray do explain with fact based and logical arguments.
Fuck off and die.

Rushton....piece of shit too, but he is dead and retracted.......lol

*chuckles* I forgot to add, Neanderthals had a larger brain than homo-sapiens....guess they were smarter too eh?
 
Last edited:
I'm fairly certain you have this tattooed somewhere on your body.
I'd suggest if he doesn't,to put it on his forehead.....he's an admitted pussy already, claims if he did, people would get angry at him...why would that be? *chuckles*
 
Fuck off and die.

Rushton....piece of shit too, but he is dead and retracted.......lol

*chuckles* I forgot to add, Neanderthals had a larger brain than homo-sapiens....guess they were smarter too eh?
The parts of the Neanderthal brain that were larger than those of the Cro Magnons who displaced them were the parts determining coordination and reflections. The part that was smaller was the frontal lobes. Those determine conscious thinking and reasoning.

The remains of the camp sites of the Neanderthals and Cro Magnons demonstrate that the Cro Magnons were more intelligent. The Cro Magnons practiced trade. The Neanderthals did not. The Cro Magnons had more effective weapons.
 
About the only thing about your post I agree with is that civil rights movement came from WW2.
When they arrived in Britain they were for the most part as allies,and treated as such,since there are no segregation laws there.
In fact when the US Army told the local authorities pubs had to be segregated,some put up signs Blacks Only.
Somewhere on YouTube there is a video about The Battle of Bamber Bridge which covers this.
 
The parts of the Neanderthal brain that were larger than those of the Cro Magnons who displaced them were the parts determining coordination and reflections. The part that was smaller was the frontal lobes. Those determine conscious thinking and reasoning.

The remains of the camp sites of the Neanderthals and Cro Magnons demonstrate that the Cro Magnons were more intelligent. The Cro Magnons practiced trade. The Neanderthals did not. The Cro Magnons had more effective weapons.
Fuck you're stupid, you just walked right into that...*chuckles* (Phillip J Rushton on "Race,Evolution and Behaviour")

Go do a little research on it, you fucking racist piece of shit.......lol

The latest discovery on the whole Neanderthal brain size debate between homo sapiens and neanderthals comes down to a gene mutation which homo sapiens posses. This gene TKTL1, in homo sapiens responds with a proliferation of neural progenitor cells. You should go do some further reading....

Last the brain size comparison is with modern humans, if I had been referring to Cro Magnons I would have wrote genus homo, you ignorant piece of racist shit!!!
 
Last edited:
Fuck you're stupid, you just walked right into that...*chuckles* (Phillip J Rushton on "Race,Evolution and Behaviour")

Go do a little research on it, you fucking racist piece of shit.......lol

The latest discovery on the whole Neanderthal brain size debate between homo sapiens and neanderthals comes down to a gene mutation which homo sapiens posses. This gene TKTL1, in homo sapiens responds with a proliferation of neural progenitor cells. You should go do some further reading....

Last the brain size comparison is with modern humans, if I had been referring to Cro Magnons I would have wrote genus homo, you ignorant piece of racist shit!!!
The differences between Neanderthals and Cro Magnons are far too significant to be explained by a single gene mutation.
 
The differences between Neanderthals and Cro Magnons are far too significant to be explained by a single gene mutation.
Were talking between homo sapiens and neanderthals, and maybe do some reading and educate yourself, though you seem to enjoy looking like and being thought of as a fucking racist idiot...*chuckles*
 
Replacement is happening. Many Democrats look forward to the time when whites will be a minority in the United States. I am a white Democrat, but I dislike the way the Democrat party has changed since 1963.
The "Democrat party"?

Do you mean the Democratic Party? :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top