Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he will be convicted on allAnd the remaining trial, a trail in search of a crime, is on life support just waiting for the plug to be pulled.
If he is guilty, he will be convicted.he will be convicted on all
the fix is in
The jury will decide a verdict.Listening and reading the NY case
Its obvious the "judge" is one sided
The case should be tossed based on the testimony
she should throw the case out and jail the corrupt SP"Judge" Aileen Cannon (Trump's possible running mate in 2024) has put a hold on all three Federal trials in order to allow Donald Trump to campaign as an unconvicted Federal felon in 2024.
On what charge?she should throw the case out and jail the corrupt SP
Did you lurn yer.loyer skeelz from HisArpy?
destruction of evidence, false documents submitted to the CourtOn what charge?
He didn't do either of those things.destruction of evidence, false documents submitted to the Court
Technically he didn't, he just tried to cover up the fact that it happened.He didn't do either of those things.
The questions are being asked. And the court will rule.Technically he didn't, he just tried to cover up the fact that it happened.
That whole episode is a head scratcher. The FBI field agents are not normally that sloppy. So the question has to be asked, "Were they directed to do that shit from above, or were they purposely sloppy in an attempt to torpedo the case?" It'll be a long time before we have the answer to that question.
So the question has to be asked, "Were they directed to do that shit from above, or were they purposely sloppy in an attempt to torpedo…
you'll whine if it goes against you and celebrate if it aligns with you.
I never said you were doing either.Project much? I'm not whining at all. In this case the unredacted communications pretty much tell the story. It wouldn't surprise me if the case were to be dismissed with extreme prejudice.
All you do is whine, you and the rest of the fat old white guys, commonly referred to as deplorables.Project much? I'm not whining at all. In this case the unredacted communications pretty much tell the story. It wouldn't surprise me if the case were to be dismissed with extreme prejudice.
*chuckle* I'm letting the cards fall where they may. It's those that have chosen to engage in "lawfare" that are fucking up by the numbers so if you want to vent, aim your ire at them.He clearly did commit the crimes- that is the problem.
The issue is, he is too rich and powerful to convict and he can basically buy his way out of trouble.
If you believe in the law, and a just and fair society, you should find this troubling. The fact that you are actually ROOTING for him to get off scott free, is in itself troubling, and speaks volumes about your utter lack of morals.
Here again, you are missing the point.*chuckle* I'm letting the cards fall where they may. It's those that have chosen to engage in "lawfare" that are fucking up by the numbers so if you want to vent, aim your ire at them.