wizzard426
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2006
- Posts
- 1,743
Let's pray you are that stupid. Let's pray we get that lucky!I hope the president is immune. Love Joe to put a hit out on Trump. And pardon himself
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's pray you are that stupid. Let's pray we get that lucky!I hope the president is immune. Love Joe to put a hit out on Trump. And pardon himself
There is no text in the Constitution that immunizes the President. Just a point for the textualists on SCOTUS. There is text giving limited immunity to Congress. If the framers intended for the President to have immunity they certainly knew how to include such language. There is no precedent because no previous President has been indicted for any crimes before, during, or after his term. Except #45. He has been sued over or indicted for crimes before, during, and after. Quite an anomaly. But we had never before elected a promiscuously corrupt business man to such a high office. Go figure!The entire situation is illogical. Precedent establishes that the President has near total immunity and yet here we are asking if he's really immune or not. It's ridiculous.
Yes. All correct. But once we go there, which President will act with authority?There is no text in the Constitution that immunizes the President. Just a point for the textualists on SCOTUS. There is text giving limited immunity to Congress. If the framers intended for the President to have immunity they certainly knew how to include such language. There is no precedent because no previous President has been indicted for any crimes before, during, or after his term. Except #45. He has been sued over or indicted for crimes before, during, and after. Quite an anomaly. But we had never before elected a promiscuously corrupt business man to such a high office. Go figure!
Yes, the talking heads are speculating the trump justices will protect him from a pre-election ruling.After reading the justice’s comments and questions about the arguments put forward by both sides, I strongly doubt the court rules that presidents have absolute immunity. A middle ground decision is the most likely scenario. The case will be remanded to the lower court for an evidentiary trial on the four charges. Don’t expect a trial this year, if ever.
The justices don’t give a shit about the election calendar, nor should they.Yes, the talking heads are speculating the trump justices will protect him from a pre-election ruling.
Tell that to Gore and Bush the LesserThe justices don’t give a shit about the election calendar, nor should they.
The 2000 election case had nothing to do with the immunity questionTell that to Gore and Bush the Lesser
And yet they fucked in the trial schedule take an appeal for ABSOLUTE immunity and ‘rump will only face punishment for UNOFFICIAL and PERSONAL acts. No one had tried to indict any President for official actsThe justices don’t give a shit about the election calendar, nor should they.
Yeah well, that wasn’t the point was itThe 2000 election case had nothing to do with the immunity question
Of course they are cognizant of the election calendar and the impact their decision has on the manner of things. To think they are blind to that or aren't including that in their decisions is idiotic.The justices don’t give a shit about the election calendar, nor should they.
https://garveys-ghost.blogspot.com/2024/04/where-vox-clears-trump-of-insurrection.htmlOne of the legs of the "Trump is an insurrectionist" argument is the speech that Trump gave on Jan 6. Those proposing this argument, including the Colorado court, claim that Trump knew or should have known that peopld would take his speech as a call to violence. Indeed, they say that Trump should not have even exercised his right to petition his government BECAUSE such people would likely be in attendance.
Now, sane people know this is a bunk argument even without citing the follow up video that was deleted from Twitter BY Twitter telling people to go home.
I get that you’re upset with the court for agreeing to review an unprecedented case with profound constitutional implications.And yet they fucked in the trial schedule take an appeal for ABSOLUTE immunity and ‘rump will only face punishment for UNOFFICIAL and PERSONAL acts. No one had tried to indict any President for official acts
Fuck SCrOTUS
Blue Tidal Wave.. fix a bunch of shit !
Justices numbers to equal districts!
You’re unhappy with the Bush v Gore decision. Bummer.Yeah well, that wasn’t the point was it
I didn’t say they’re not cognizant of the election calendar. I said they don’t give a shit about the election calendar.Of course they are cognizant of the election calendar and the impact their decision has on the manner of things. To think they are blind to that or aren't including that in their decisions is idiotic.
No, you missed the point again. Back to my post #60 the point being SCOTUS can move fast if it wants to, then they did but now they don’t.You’re unhappy with the Bush v Gore decision. Bummer.
I think that's the perception they'd prefer for people to have. I don't think it's fully the truthI didn’t say they’re not cognizant of the election calendar. I said they don’t give a shit about the election calendar.
The ruling wasn’t driven by the calendarNo, you missed the point again. Back to my post #60 the point being SCOTUS can move fast if it wants to, then they did but now they don’t.
He's being prosecuted for campaigning for office and for taking care that the election laws of the United States are faithfully executed.Trump was commander-in-chief for such military operations himself while he was president. That isn't anything like he is being charged with--he is being fingered for multiple--MULTIPLE--criminal acts that are separate from his duties as president. He is also being fingered for treason--for ORCHESTRATING A COUP ATTEMPT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.
Get a clue.
Conspiring to overturn the results is what he is being prosecuted for.He's being prosecuted for campaigning for office and for taking care that the election laws of the United States are faithfully executed.