Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment

Hoe hoe hoe.


And it's not even Xmas.


Just sayin'.


Liners can be patched very nicely these days. Polymers have come a long way.

But it is over concrete...


http://t3.***********/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTYZN46j2kHU7cHqraylW7xvMtj5-IdsUgR1OMjPBfxO53LndXZ
"Richie loved to use 22s because the bullets are small and they don't come out the other end like a 45, see, a 45 will blow a barn door out the back of your head and there's a lot of dry cleaning involved, but a 22 will just rattle around like Pac-Man until you're dead."
Vincent 'Vinnie' Antonelli​
 
The coffee is good this morning.


The KoolAid must be, too.

h4B8117AE



Dipshit.
 
q=tbn:ANd9GcTYZN46j2kHU7cHqraylW7xvMtj5-IdsUgR1OMjPBfxO53LndXZ[/IMG]
"Richie loved to use 22s because the bullets are small and they don't come out the other end like a 45, see, a 45 will blow a barn door out the back of your head and there's a lot of dry cleaning involved, but a 22 will just rattle around like Pac-Man until you're dead."
Vincent 'Vinnie' Antonelli[/CENTER]


A few years back, there was some guy the Columbians shot in the head five times with a .22 and failed to kill him.


When in doubt, empty the magazine.

419671_146976128819596_1799978738_n.jpg
 
http://t3.***********/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTYZN46j2kHU7cHqraylW7xvMtj5-IdsUgR1OMjPBfxO53LndXZ
"I never touched a gun in my life.
"That and that alone forever doomed me to middle management."

Vincent 'Vinnie' Antonelli




:D
 
Nothing but bullies:

– The Washington Post reported that Secretary Sebelius has been soliciting donations from health industry executives to help finance Obamacare implementation, because she doesn’t have enough money in her own budget to do so.

Meredith McGehee, government ethics expert and policy director for the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center, noted that this last move was deeply troubling because Secretary Sebelius appeared to be “using the power of government to compel giving or insinuate that giving is going to be looked at favorably by the government.” Given her regulatory authority over the industries being asked to donate, health executives could easily interpret her solicitations for money as a thinly veiled shakedown threat: “Nice little health company you have here; it’d be a shame if something happened to it.”
http://pjmedia.com/blog/is-obamacares-fatal-flaw-taking-effect/?singlepage=true

The Party of Jackson, Sharpton and Obama...
 
Bullies:

The First Amendment marks out three areas in which the federal government is limited: no “prohibiting the free exercise” of religion, no “abridging the freedom of speech or of press,” no impeding the “right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The Obama administration has compiled a sorry record in all three categories. But anyone who bothered to notice was dismissed by the elite media as paranoid and alarmist. Until now. Suddenly it is acceptable to complain about Obama’s “appalling” approach to the First Amendment.

Obama’s “living” Constitution now looks considerably less enlightened to reporters whose phone calls have been traced. The First Amendment has long been crumbling under slipshod jurisprudence. Obama is just giving it a final kick.

A “living” Constitution obviously lends itself to an unlimited and abusive federal government, as it renders all written protections passé. There is no quicker way to kill a constitution than to say it is alive. That just means the federal government is freed up to do whatever it wants. The Constitution has no meaning except what those in power give it at any particular moment.

Journalists didn’t mind this fashionable travesty when it meant religious freedom was squashed in the name of “women’s health” or political speech curtailed in the name of “campaign finance reform.” But now that the living-constitutionalists are snooping on phone records and hacking into e-mails in the name of national security, they balk. This is “chilling,” they say. We’re told that press freedom is sacred, often from the same pundits who cast complaints about the HHS mandate as partisan carping.
George Nuemayr, American Spectator
http://spectator.org/archives/2013/05/22/obamas-assault-on-the-first-am
 
The IRS scandal provides Republicans and conservatives with the opportunity to repeal and replace Obamacare now. The House Republican majority should refuse to fund the expansion of the IRS necessary to manage Obamacare. Without that funding, and hiring thousands of additional agents, the IRS cannot even begin to manage Obamacare.

President Obama may throw a fit. He may refuse to sign funding bills to keep the federal government open. No matter. Let him close his government down if he wants. Nobody wants the IRS playing political games with their health care and health records, like it did with the constitutional rights to freedom of speech and Equal Protection of Tea Party and conservative organizations. Contribute to the Republican Party? Attend a Tea Party protest? Good luck getting your Obamacare health insurance tax credit application approved. Good luck finding a doctor the government will pay to do that operation your kid needs.

Obama can flail away all he wants. The public will now back the Republicans in this fight, just as it did in the sequester battle. But won’t the public feel that the Republicans would be irresponsible to just refuse to fund Obamacare, leaving the health system in chaos?

That is why the Republicans need to back up their IRS Obamacare chokehold with legislation proposing free market, Patient Power health care reforms to replace Obamacare. (A comprehensive, free-market health reform plan to replace Obamacare has already been proposed by John Goodman and myself in our NCPA paper, “Health Care for All Without the Affordable Care Act.”)
Peter Ferrara
http://spectator.org/archives/2013/05/22/time-to-go-for-the-kill
 
So amendments good or amendments bad? Just trying to keep track before the next gun thread is posted.
 
Back
Top