LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
The ever-unhelpful Rational Wiki has taken upon itself to issue a glossary of manosphere terms that, with great sarcastic flair, maligns the manosphere in the unrelenting fashion we’re so familiar with. Bashing the Rational Wiki, while being a great opportunity to show how stupid and inaccurate they are, is useless. Why? Because the radical feminists behind the Wiki are closely related (politically, if not genetically) to the radical feminists who, along with the misognyist Conservatives, dominate the gender discussion in the media.
Instead, I propose that we re-define many of the terms found in the manosphere ourselves, and go our own way. While the feminist media continues to prattle on about how the manosphere is the new terrorist group, and Conservatives continue to be the actual terrorist group, we can redefine things to take the manosphere in a direction that renders feminists AND Conservatives irrelevant.
Alpha, Beta, Omega - Ranks of sexual attractiveness hierarchy into which males have always been classified by females. Often written off by feminists as a result of the Patriarchy, the concept of putting males into a hierarchy of sexual attractiveness has not only been practiced by females in the human race since before any Patriarchy, but in every animal race on Earth… well, except the ones in which males get eaten. Also see: Hypergamy.
Creep Shaming - When an unattractive man makes a move on a woman, it’s considered creepy. Creep shaming is justified in some cases when the guy really says something stupid or won’t back off, however. But for the most part women creep shame whenever some short guy or someone who isn’t traditionally attractive oppresses her by saying “hi”.
Egalitarianism - The ultimate goal of those whose neo cortex brains are fully in charge. The concept that men’s rights and women’s rights are far too limited in and of themselves, and that equal rights for all genders is the only way to go. Egalitarianism does not ignore the injustices being inflicted upon men or women, and unlike MRAs or feminists, does not obsess over one side versus the other. The egalitarian mind recognizes that institutionalized misogyny exists, and it hurts women and men. They also realize that institutionalized misandry is quite strong and, surprisingly, it hurts women as much as it hurts men.
Egalitarianism also, unfortunately, demands that one fight a battle on at least two fronts: against misogyny and misandry. Realizing that gender politics are dominated by angry radical feminist man-haters on one end and knuckle-dragging Conservative misogynists on the other, is not a red pill that is easy to swallow. Egalitarians are constantly being offered the Faustian bargain of getting too fed up with the misogynists and running to the radical feminists for comradery and aid, or getting too fed up with the misandry infesting the world and running to the Conservatives for their awesome political presence and resources. Also see: the straight and very, very narrow.
Eco Psych - The feminist derogatory term for what has been routinely observed in nature: namely, hypergamy and male disposability.
Foreign Women - A class of women glamorized by some parts of the manosphere as being more submissive and, in the words of the Rational Wiki, “untouched by feminism.” Most likely this is because foreign women (read: third world) are characterized as coming from a depressed socioeconomic background, giving most American men a socioeconomic advantage. The painful irony of this is that this depiction of foreign women plays right into the concept of hypergamy and female-enforced male hierarchies. Instead of fighting hypergamy and abolishing it, the obsession over foreign women seeks to help men satisfy the demands of hypergamy. See: playing the rigged game.
Ironically, foreign women can be here just to find a man of higher socioeconomic status - and can (but don’t necessarily) divorce him afterwards, taking him for everything he’s got, or taking as much as she can get. This would be a terrible irony for those in the manosphere who revere these third world women. There is also the fact that not all foreign women fit these stereotypes.
Friendzone - Also called “Let’s Just be Friends.” It is when person A is in love or lust with person B and person B does not reciprocate. Also called unrequited love/lust. Radical feminists have exaggerated the meaning of Friendzone to a hellish magnitude, adding additional horrifications such as “Friendzone = That bitch rejected me how dare she!” or “Friendzone = She owes me for being so nice to her!” and other overly-embellished forms of panic-mongering propaganda, going so far as to associate the word with mass killer Elliot Rodger, who actually did (ab)use the concept of the Friendzone. (Also note: Elliot Rodger also spoke English, so if you meet someone who does, RUN.)
Using the word “Friendzone” around one of these types of feminists is, unbelievably, even more hazardous than discussing women’s use of contraception around a Conservative. Also see: being caught carrying wearing a turban in Alabama shortly after 9/11.
The Friendzone shall hereby be re-defined as not the worst place in the universe. If caught in it, go pursue ten other women and do not just ignore her as a friend. However, if you’re giving her pedicures and buying her stuff, definitely stop doing that - save that for your actual girlfriend.
Game - Low level Pickup Artist (PUA) mooks use this term to describe ‘seduction’. In reality both terms describe behavior that reinforces the man’s role as a contestant and the woman as the final judge of his sexual attractiveness and (a great portion of) his (perceived) value as a human being. Game reinforces the woman’s role as the gatekeeper to, and sole monopolizer of, romantic companionship and sex. Also see: Door to door salesmen.
The PUA concept of Game does not even talk about women coming up and talking to him. Nope, the man is always the aggressor in the minds of these mooks. Real PUAs know how to ATTRACT women, that is, to get women to come to them and initiate. (They’re also the ones who parlay their matured skills into making money in the business world, because advanced people skills and all that.)
Go Find Ten Other Women - The PG-13 version of “Go Fuck Ten Other Women”, a term used by mook level PUAs. Basically their use of the term means when you’re Friendzoned by a woman, or otherwise rejected, go have sex with ten other women, because there’s really no difference between women.
In keeping with redefining Manosphere terms, there’s a better definition of “Go Find Ten Other Women”: When a man is rejected by a woman for any reason, if he must engage in the pursuit of women (read: spend his life being a door to door salesman), he needs to be pursuing other women. Not because stupid mook-level PUAs say that all women are the same, but actually because they’re not. It is the fact that each woman is either marginally or largely different from another, that “go find ten other women” works. If they were all the same, would they not all reject him as the first one did? This is just part of why PUAs are so hilariously stupid.
If the PUAS were so smart, they would realize “go find ten other women” is good sense (inasmuch as any man being a door to door salesman can convince himself that he is practicing good sense) because it makes him less obsessive over one single woman. Never put all your eggs in one basket unless you’re putting a ring on her finger.
HB (Hot Babes) - Also known as “10”’s. Like Bo Derek, for instance. Sex with women who are at the top of the “looks” scale are the holy grail of Pickup Artists. Hot Babes is, thus, the ultimate statement of male superficiality. Similar to how women judge men by their socioeconomic status. Looks also serve to absolve HB’s of their occasionally shitty attitudes. (Let us not assert percentages here: no one knows how many “10” women are assholes.)
HB is hereby re-defined as an intelligent, egalitarian woman, “10” looks (and sex with her) being optional and not required. Alternatively, HB can mean Honey Badgers, a group of actual egalitarians who advocate for men’s rights. See: Karen “Girl Writes What” Straughan.
Hypergamy - Nature’s virtually inviolate edict that women of any animal species on Earth must seek a male of higher socioeconomic status than herself. Except the species in which the female eats the male. Feminists hate this term for obvious reasons - it is the gateway to realizing why Patriarchy came into existence.
Male Disposability - The original sin of nature. Where humanity’s first Biblical sin was pride, nature’s was establishing men as the butt monkey of all animal species. It is men who get saddled with the majority of birth defects, men who die violently most often, and it is men who are stuck with the task of competing for reproductive privilege. This is true of all living species on Earth, not just humans. Weak women get looked after by each other and by men, for the good of the species; weak men, on the other hand, get discarded - again, this is true of every animal species on Earth. Cowardice from a woman is overlooked, cowardice by a man will get him shamed and can get him killed. A man abandoning a woman (even a stranger) to any kind of danger is one of the worst kinds of sins. A woman abandoning a helpless man in danger is, well, who even cares? He’s a dude. Also see: “Abandoning Men: Jill Gets Welfare–Jack Becomes Homeless” by Peter Marin and the Alicia Patterson Foundation. Ever wonder why homelessness isn’t a major issue? Because the vast majority are males.
Male Disposability is also called the Spiked Floor - if a man fails to achieve a modicum of socioeconomic success, he hits the spiked floor, and is considered worthless. It is not institutional, like Patriarchy - if the institution is the bedrock of society, then male disposability is actually more like plate tectonics: it underlies all institutions and species of sexually reproducing animal life, ever.
Of course, institutionalized female disposability does occur - see: China and India, where females are killed as soon as they’re born, or before, if they can be detected by ultrasound. Note: This is also a Bad Thing. Seriously.
Manosphere - Picture the Arabic speaking world. Now picture a Conservative talking about anyone who speaks Arabic. The Manosphere is the world of men’s groups talking online about men’s issues, much like the Arabic world is full of people who speak Arabic. Conservatives see Arabic speaking people as terrorists; likewise, radical feminists see the manosphere as just one giant den of misogyny. And where the most radical feminists go, so do the media. (Except the Conservative media - see: Faustian bargain.)
During the whole Mad Max: Fury Road controversy, commenters on the Mary Sue went so far as to vigorously assert that Men’s Rights Activists and Return of Kings were all one and the same: much in the same spirit as when people visiting Mosques go looking for the bomb making room. If it’s an Islamic temple, it’s gotta have a bomb making room, it’s what you do - and if it’s the manosphere, misogyny is everywhere, it’s what you do. (Never tax these lazy minds with talk of women in the men’s rights movement, of course.) But remember of course, when “Kill All Men” reinfests social media outlets during a particularly nasty Radfem relapse of insanity, Not All Feminists Are Like That.
MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) - This term is perhaps the one in most desperate need of redefinition. The traditional meaning of MGTOW is to avoid marriage altogether, and to avoid long term relationships with women, because of society’s inherent sexism against men. MGTOW also discusses, to a lesser extent, men pursuing their freedom to live their own lives, independently of society’s expectations and demands regarding traditional masculinity.
It is that secondary point that needs to be the sole definition of MGTOW. MGTOW should be defined as men ignoring what society defines as 'manly’ in favor of living his life the way he wants. As a secondary definition, MGTOW should be about men being wise to the dangers of marriage: paternity fraud, the husband being arrested if he is the victim of abuse, etc. MGTOWs should be concentrating on refusing to obey the traditional laws of dating - namely, the man must metaphorically climb mountains to reach the woman at the top who then judges his suitability. If she’s playing that game then forget it, there’s always porn, or maybe even an online matchmaking site where both sides are on more equal footing. MGTOWs should also provide community support for gay men and men of alternative sexual orientations.
What MGTOWs should not do is spend all their time hating on women and telling other men to just avoid all women in general. Remember those feminists who say “Shut up about all men aren’t like that?” MGTOW as it stands today is “All women are like that.” Christopher Nolan once directed a sci-fi film about a black hole with less mass than this kind of hypocrisy. MGTOW needs a reform that looks kindly upon marriage with egalitarian women, and which focuses on finding - and being a suitable man for - said suitable women.
Minion or Menion (new term) - A term best used to describe a male radical feminist. Note, it also perfectly describes a woman who votes for the Republican Party. Or a black person who votes Republican. Or anyone who’s not a rich white male who votes Republican. In other words it aptly describes people who live their lives as expendable henchmen who work tirelessly for a cause that actually sees them as children of a lesser god until they need to motivate them with lies and astonishingly transparent rationalizations, to act as socio-political cannon fodder.
Neo Cortex - That part of the mind that governs intelligence, sentience, consciousness, etc. It is often referred to as the opposite of the lizard brain, or the limbic cortex / amygdala (note: the two are not the same). In terms of the manosphere, the neo cortex is what enables women to rise above hypergamy, and men to realize they do not have to play the hypergamy game with women who won’t rise above it.
Nerds, Geeks, and other Socially Awkward Men - Rapists, or could-be-rapists, in the 2014 edition of the radical feminist dictionary. Amazingly enough, they put body-building fanatic Elliot Rodger in this category. Nerds, Geeks and Socially Awkward Men are in all seriousness advised to consider self defense classes, as radical feminists have energized bullies in every age group to step up their violent campaign of terror against Those Who Don’t Fit In - because now they can say “I’m beating up a potential rapist.” Your odds of a physical beat down rise geometrically if you’re caught talking to a woman. Thank the radical feminists for this. Particularly Arthur Chu.
Nice Guy - A pro-Palestinian activist speaking out in Rabin Square, Tel Aviv. Okay, not really, nice guys get marginally fewer bullets in their head. They do, however, get vilified by radical feminists to the same extent, though. Like the term 'Friendzone’, Nice Guys are given an overexaggerated aura of malice, often literally photoshopped upon them by radical feminists in social media. (See: Fedora, neck beard, etc.) There was an infamous “Nice Guys of OkCupid” article which used heavily cherry-picked examples of self proclaimed Nice Guys saying genuinely horrible things about women, and this has been used as the quintessential example of “whiny nice guys”. These same radical feminists, of course, never vilify the women who complain about being chronically Friendzoned or routinely rejected by men (what honestly few there actually are in this world).
Basically, feminists hate low-status men just like any other woman. The Nice Guy Panic[tm] is just their way of justifying their hatred of nice guys by depicting them as gender terrorists. 99% of nice guys don’t feel women owe them for being nice and their anger at bad boys is about the societal devastation that is caused by bad boys who have women flocking at them: fatherless kids, taxpayers paying for bad boys who go to jail for fucking shit up, etc. Of course, some nice guys pine for women who love bad boys, and this is unhealthy: no, really. These women are highly abusive to good men, and can bring not only domestic violence but also STDs that they caught from those bad boys. Avoid them, nice guys. Wait for a nice girl. It’ll save you a few dents, dings, heart aches, paternity fraud cases, and cold sores.
Not All Feminists Are Like That (NAFALT) - A friendly reminder that not all feminists are frothing radical zealots. Also a hilariously ironic statement coming from the same rabid crowd of hatemongers that fly into a blood rage whenever anyone says “Not All Men Are Like That”.
Oneitis - The PUA term for a man who pines for one woman, and gets rejected. The PUAs actually manage to get this one right, though in keeping with their form, their solution for it (go fuck ten other women, because all women are like that) sucks. Oneitis is actually a potentially degenerative condition in which pining for one woman can become obsessive and downright dangerous. Truly, the solution for this is to get over her and pursue other women.
Orbiter - A potentially smart term which was then ruined by PUAs. This is defined by PUAs as a man who gets stuck in the Friendzone and continues to like the woman who Friendzoned him. A better definition of Orbiter is a man who gets stuck in the Friendzone and keeps pining for the woman who rejected him. There is a difference between liking and pining for: remaining friends with a woman who doesn't want a relationship with you is okay, and PUAs have a problem with this. Pining and wishing for her to want you romantically, however, is the real problem with 'orbiters'. To break free from orbit, he must wise up and pursue other women, or perhaps just go to an online dating site. Orbiters are inherently stricken with Oneitis and can fall out of orbit, causing a deep impact - their obsession can make her life miserable… or, as we’ve seen in the news sometimes, drastically shorten it. Hint: women can also be Orbiters, with the same potentially tragic results.
Paleomasculinism - The belief that Patriarchy is the natural order of things. Those who adhere to this odd belief fail to understand that male disposability, not male domination/female submission, is the actual bedrock or plate tectonics of life.
Patriarchy - The culture which depresses the socioeconomic status of women in favor of putting men above them. Originally developed by lower mentalities of ages past as a solution to male disposability: it establishes a glass ceiling above which women are not supposed to rise. This glass ceiling, of course, is below or barely above the male spiked floor. The point is to keep men above women so that men will have a better chance at being appealing to a woman.
Patriarchy is, thus, an institutionalized act of salving the problem of male disposability, not solving it. The salve, of course, is oppression of women. Basically, Patriarchy and male disposability are two wrongs trying to balance themselves out as a right. It is the first solution humans could come up with by using their neo cortex, and the current evolution of the neo cortex dictates that like male disposability, Patriarchy is outdated. Human sentience, as it has evolved, has offered the gift of egalitarianism - in which nobody is disposable. No glass celings or spiked floors for anyone.
Red Pill - Originally coined to define a person who discovers institutionalized misandry. Hereby re-defined to include, by necessity, the realization that Patriarchy is not the solution to male disposability, but rather, egalitarianism is the proper end to this dilemma. A Red Pill male is hereby re-defined as a brother at arms for Red Pill women, not someone who chides her for, as the Rational Wiki described it, “stealing the spotlight”. The Red Pill male finds Red Pill women to be a refreshing twist in the plot line of life, not a rival.
Sex - Rational Wiki says the manosphere sees this as the center of their universe; or, at least the galaxy. Or something. Yeah, they’re kind of accurate about that one. But that needs to change. Sex with hypergamic women and radical feminists is like kissing a Strigoi from Guillermo del Toro’s “The Strain”. Especially the ones who caught herpes from their days of fucking bad boys, or who have a nasty predisposition to holding grudges (Catherine Kieu, the Duke Lacrosse case, etc).
Pursuit of sex often leads men to do stupid things, such as Orbiting at the very least, and Elliot Rodgers on the other, extreme end. Pursuit of sex drives men to strive for success as well; in which case men need to find other reasons to succeed: such as reasons of their own invention. Achievements made in the pursuit of sex, be they the founding of a corporation or the hypothetical invention of hyperspace travel, nonetheless end in exactly one way: meeting a woman who doesn’t care about you, but rather your social status. If she wasn’t with you when you were worth shit on a shoe, she ain’t actually with you now: she’s with her hypergamic fantasies, which you might happen to fulfill at the moment. At. The. Moment.
To understand the true importance of sex in your life, first, find a good porn and have at it by yourself. Then when you’re done, re-consider the woman you’re chasing. Is she still worth it? No? Then you need to re-think things a bit. You might still need to re-think things anyway, but if she’s not so hot after you’ve had a wank, you really need to stop pursuing her.
In all honesty, men need to take the same attitude toward sex that women do - it ain’t so damned important that you have to sacrifice your dignity and standards for it. Until a man can do that, he will always be easy to manipulate sexually, leading to many of the horrors that the worst women in the world inflict upon men. Or, worse, a man’s obsession with sex will lead to his ruin and also perhaps a woman’s severe and tragic detriment. To put it another way, think of what will happen if men stop placing so much importance on sex: think of all the sexual manipulation that won’t be happening anymore. To put it kindly for the women readers: when men stop chasing sex so much, it will sort out, en masse, the women who rely on sexual manipulation and those who don’t. Without a single slap, gunshot, stab wound, or even an evil misogynist discouraging word, men could knock the Earth right off its axis: and no shaming tactics or law enforcement activity in the universe can stop them. It just takes willpower and self-awareness.
In short: we can all learn a lesson about sex from the Japanese Herbivore men. If we understand exactly what lesson they are imparting to us.
Shit Testing - A fairly accurate PUA term to describe women who test men during courtship to see where he stands in the Alpha/Beta/Omega hierarchy. As usual, PUAs fail when it comes down to how to react to these women. PUAs explain how to pass the shit test; but the real solution is to pass by the shit test - as in, detect when a shit test is in progress, and promptly abandon pursuit of that woman and look for someone else.
The Wall - A term used both by PUAs and women to describe when a woman reaches a certain age - between 25 and 30 - where their attractiveness declines significantly. Rational Wiki seems to think this doesn’t happen in reality, even while actual legions of women complain about how they can’t get a man anymore when they hit their 30s. In reality, The Wall is not real, but not for the reasons Rational Wiki says: it’s not real because neither women nor PUAs have any business deciding for men who they should find attractive. Besides, women in their 30s find men all the time. The Wall doesn’t exist because no woman has any real problem finding men - they just have a problem finding men who meet their standards, and no one has a right to shame men who like older women who aren’t as attractive in the PUA sense.
Instead, I propose that we re-define many of the terms found in the manosphere ourselves, and go our own way. While the feminist media continues to prattle on about how the manosphere is the new terrorist group, and Conservatives continue to be the actual terrorist group, we can redefine things to take the manosphere in a direction that renders feminists AND Conservatives irrelevant.
Alpha, Beta, Omega - Ranks of sexual attractiveness hierarchy into which males have always been classified by females. Often written off by feminists as a result of the Patriarchy, the concept of putting males into a hierarchy of sexual attractiveness has not only been practiced by females in the human race since before any Patriarchy, but in every animal race on Earth… well, except the ones in which males get eaten. Also see: Hypergamy.
Creep Shaming - When an unattractive man makes a move on a woman, it’s considered creepy. Creep shaming is justified in some cases when the guy really says something stupid or won’t back off, however. But for the most part women creep shame whenever some short guy or someone who isn’t traditionally attractive oppresses her by saying “hi”.
Egalitarianism - The ultimate goal of those whose neo cortex brains are fully in charge. The concept that men’s rights and women’s rights are far too limited in and of themselves, and that equal rights for all genders is the only way to go. Egalitarianism does not ignore the injustices being inflicted upon men or women, and unlike MRAs or feminists, does not obsess over one side versus the other. The egalitarian mind recognizes that institutionalized misogyny exists, and it hurts women and men. They also realize that institutionalized misandry is quite strong and, surprisingly, it hurts women as much as it hurts men.
Egalitarianism also, unfortunately, demands that one fight a battle on at least two fronts: against misogyny and misandry. Realizing that gender politics are dominated by angry radical feminist man-haters on one end and knuckle-dragging Conservative misogynists on the other, is not a red pill that is easy to swallow. Egalitarians are constantly being offered the Faustian bargain of getting too fed up with the misogynists and running to the radical feminists for comradery and aid, or getting too fed up with the misandry infesting the world and running to the Conservatives for their awesome political presence and resources. Also see: the straight and very, very narrow.
Eco Psych - The feminist derogatory term for what has been routinely observed in nature: namely, hypergamy and male disposability.
Foreign Women - A class of women glamorized by some parts of the manosphere as being more submissive and, in the words of the Rational Wiki, “untouched by feminism.” Most likely this is because foreign women (read: third world) are characterized as coming from a depressed socioeconomic background, giving most American men a socioeconomic advantage. The painful irony of this is that this depiction of foreign women plays right into the concept of hypergamy and female-enforced male hierarchies. Instead of fighting hypergamy and abolishing it, the obsession over foreign women seeks to help men satisfy the demands of hypergamy. See: playing the rigged game.
Ironically, foreign women can be here just to find a man of higher socioeconomic status - and can (but don’t necessarily) divorce him afterwards, taking him for everything he’s got, or taking as much as she can get. This would be a terrible irony for those in the manosphere who revere these third world women. There is also the fact that not all foreign women fit these stereotypes.
Friendzone - Also called “Let’s Just be Friends.” It is when person A is in love or lust with person B and person B does not reciprocate. Also called unrequited love/lust. Radical feminists have exaggerated the meaning of Friendzone to a hellish magnitude, adding additional horrifications such as “Friendzone = That bitch rejected me how dare she!” or “Friendzone = She owes me for being so nice to her!” and other overly-embellished forms of panic-mongering propaganda, going so far as to associate the word with mass killer Elliot Rodger, who actually did (ab)use the concept of the Friendzone. (Also note: Elliot Rodger also spoke English, so if you meet someone who does, RUN.)
Using the word “Friendzone” around one of these types of feminists is, unbelievably, even more hazardous than discussing women’s use of contraception around a Conservative. Also see: being caught carrying wearing a turban in Alabama shortly after 9/11.
The Friendzone shall hereby be re-defined as not the worst place in the universe. If caught in it, go pursue ten other women and do not just ignore her as a friend. However, if you’re giving her pedicures and buying her stuff, definitely stop doing that - save that for your actual girlfriend.
Game - Low level Pickup Artist (PUA) mooks use this term to describe ‘seduction’. In reality both terms describe behavior that reinforces the man’s role as a contestant and the woman as the final judge of his sexual attractiveness and (a great portion of) his (perceived) value as a human being. Game reinforces the woman’s role as the gatekeeper to, and sole monopolizer of, romantic companionship and sex. Also see: Door to door salesmen.
The PUA concept of Game does not even talk about women coming up and talking to him. Nope, the man is always the aggressor in the minds of these mooks. Real PUAs know how to ATTRACT women, that is, to get women to come to them and initiate. (They’re also the ones who parlay their matured skills into making money in the business world, because advanced people skills and all that.)
Go Find Ten Other Women - The PG-13 version of “Go Fuck Ten Other Women”, a term used by mook level PUAs. Basically their use of the term means when you’re Friendzoned by a woman, or otherwise rejected, go have sex with ten other women, because there’s really no difference between women.
In keeping with redefining Manosphere terms, there’s a better definition of “Go Find Ten Other Women”: When a man is rejected by a woman for any reason, if he must engage in the pursuit of women (read: spend his life being a door to door salesman), he needs to be pursuing other women. Not because stupid mook-level PUAs say that all women are the same, but actually because they’re not. It is the fact that each woman is either marginally or largely different from another, that “go find ten other women” works. If they were all the same, would they not all reject him as the first one did? This is just part of why PUAs are so hilariously stupid.
If the PUAS were so smart, they would realize “go find ten other women” is good sense (inasmuch as any man being a door to door salesman can convince himself that he is practicing good sense) because it makes him less obsessive over one single woman. Never put all your eggs in one basket unless you’re putting a ring on her finger.
HB (Hot Babes) - Also known as “10”’s. Like Bo Derek, for instance. Sex with women who are at the top of the “looks” scale are the holy grail of Pickup Artists. Hot Babes is, thus, the ultimate statement of male superficiality. Similar to how women judge men by their socioeconomic status. Looks also serve to absolve HB’s of their occasionally shitty attitudes. (Let us not assert percentages here: no one knows how many “10” women are assholes.)
HB is hereby re-defined as an intelligent, egalitarian woman, “10” looks (and sex with her) being optional and not required. Alternatively, HB can mean Honey Badgers, a group of actual egalitarians who advocate for men’s rights. See: Karen “Girl Writes What” Straughan.
Hypergamy - Nature’s virtually inviolate edict that women of any animal species on Earth must seek a male of higher socioeconomic status than herself. Except the species in which the female eats the male. Feminists hate this term for obvious reasons - it is the gateway to realizing why Patriarchy came into existence.
Male Disposability - The original sin of nature. Where humanity’s first Biblical sin was pride, nature’s was establishing men as the butt monkey of all animal species. It is men who get saddled with the majority of birth defects, men who die violently most often, and it is men who are stuck with the task of competing for reproductive privilege. This is true of all living species on Earth, not just humans. Weak women get looked after by each other and by men, for the good of the species; weak men, on the other hand, get discarded - again, this is true of every animal species on Earth. Cowardice from a woman is overlooked, cowardice by a man will get him shamed and can get him killed. A man abandoning a woman (even a stranger) to any kind of danger is one of the worst kinds of sins. A woman abandoning a helpless man in danger is, well, who even cares? He’s a dude. Also see: “Abandoning Men: Jill Gets Welfare–Jack Becomes Homeless” by Peter Marin and the Alicia Patterson Foundation. Ever wonder why homelessness isn’t a major issue? Because the vast majority are males.
Male Disposability is also called the Spiked Floor - if a man fails to achieve a modicum of socioeconomic success, he hits the spiked floor, and is considered worthless. It is not institutional, like Patriarchy - if the institution is the bedrock of society, then male disposability is actually more like plate tectonics: it underlies all institutions and species of sexually reproducing animal life, ever.
Of course, institutionalized female disposability does occur - see: China and India, where females are killed as soon as they’re born, or before, if they can be detected by ultrasound. Note: This is also a Bad Thing. Seriously.
Manosphere - Picture the Arabic speaking world. Now picture a Conservative talking about anyone who speaks Arabic. The Manosphere is the world of men’s groups talking online about men’s issues, much like the Arabic world is full of people who speak Arabic. Conservatives see Arabic speaking people as terrorists; likewise, radical feminists see the manosphere as just one giant den of misogyny. And where the most radical feminists go, so do the media. (Except the Conservative media - see: Faustian bargain.)
During the whole Mad Max: Fury Road controversy, commenters on the Mary Sue went so far as to vigorously assert that Men’s Rights Activists and Return of Kings were all one and the same: much in the same spirit as when people visiting Mosques go looking for the bomb making room. If it’s an Islamic temple, it’s gotta have a bomb making room, it’s what you do - and if it’s the manosphere, misogyny is everywhere, it’s what you do. (Never tax these lazy minds with talk of women in the men’s rights movement, of course.) But remember of course, when “Kill All Men” reinfests social media outlets during a particularly nasty Radfem relapse of insanity, Not All Feminists Are Like That.
MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) - This term is perhaps the one in most desperate need of redefinition. The traditional meaning of MGTOW is to avoid marriage altogether, and to avoid long term relationships with women, because of society’s inherent sexism against men. MGTOW also discusses, to a lesser extent, men pursuing their freedom to live their own lives, independently of society’s expectations and demands regarding traditional masculinity.
It is that secondary point that needs to be the sole definition of MGTOW. MGTOW should be defined as men ignoring what society defines as 'manly’ in favor of living his life the way he wants. As a secondary definition, MGTOW should be about men being wise to the dangers of marriage: paternity fraud, the husband being arrested if he is the victim of abuse, etc. MGTOWs should be concentrating on refusing to obey the traditional laws of dating - namely, the man must metaphorically climb mountains to reach the woman at the top who then judges his suitability. If she’s playing that game then forget it, there’s always porn, or maybe even an online matchmaking site where both sides are on more equal footing. MGTOWs should also provide community support for gay men and men of alternative sexual orientations.
What MGTOWs should not do is spend all their time hating on women and telling other men to just avoid all women in general. Remember those feminists who say “Shut up about all men aren’t like that?” MGTOW as it stands today is “All women are like that.” Christopher Nolan once directed a sci-fi film about a black hole with less mass than this kind of hypocrisy. MGTOW needs a reform that looks kindly upon marriage with egalitarian women, and which focuses on finding - and being a suitable man for - said suitable women.
Minion or Menion (new term) - A term best used to describe a male radical feminist. Note, it also perfectly describes a woman who votes for the Republican Party. Or a black person who votes Republican. Or anyone who’s not a rich white male who votes Republican. In other words it aptly describes people who live their lives as expendable henchmen who work tirelessly for a cause that actually sees them as children of a lesser god until they need to motivate them with lies and astonishingly transparent rationalizations, to act as socio-political cannon fodder.
Neo Cortex - That part of the mind that governs intelligence, sentience, consciousness, etc. It is often referred to as the opposite of the lizard brain, or the limbic cortex / amygdala (note: the two are not the same). In terms of the manosphere, the neo cortex is what enables women to rise above hypergamy, and men to realize they do not have to play the hypergamy game with women who won’t rise above it.
Nerds, Geeks, and other Socially Awkward Men - Rapists, or could-be-rapists, in the 2014 edition of the radical feminist dictionary. Amazingly enough, they put body-building fanatic Elliot Rodger in this category. Nerds, Geeks and Socially Awkward Men are in all seriousness advised to consider self defense classes, as radical feminists have energized bullies in every age group to step up their violent campaign of terror against Those Who Don’t Fit In - because now they can say “I’m beating up a potential rapist.” Your odds of a physical beat down rise geometrically if you’re caught talking to a woman. Thank the radical feminists for this. Particularly Arthur Chu.
Nice Guy - A pro-Palestinian activist speaking out in Rabin Square, Tel Aviv. Okay, not really, nice guys get marginally fewer bullets in their head. They do, however, get vilified by radical feminists to the same extent, though. Like the term 'Friendzone’, Nice Guys are given an overexaggerated aura of malice, often literally photoshopped upon them by radical feminists in social media. (See: Fedora, neck beard, etc.) There was an infamous “Nice Guys of OkCupid” article which used heavily cherry-picked examples of self proclaimed Nice Guys saying genuinely horrible things about women, and this has been used as the quintessential example of “whiny nice guys”. These same radical feminists, of course, never vilify the women who complain about being chronically Friendzoned or routinely rejected by men (what honestly few there actually are in this world).
Basically, feminists hate low-status men just like any other woman. The Nice Guy Panic[tm] is just their way of justifying their hatred of nice guys by depicting them as gender terrorists. 99% of nice guys don’t feel women owe them for being nice and their anger at bad boys is about the societal devastation that is caused by bad boys who have women flocking at them: fatherless kids, taxpayers paying for bad boys who go to jail for fucking shit up, etc. Of course, some nice guys pine for women who love bad boys, and this is unhealthy: no, really. These women are highly abusive to good men, and can bring not only domestic violence but also STDs that they caught from those bad boys. Avoid them, nice guys. Wait for a nice girl. It’ll save you a few dents, dings, heart aches, paternity fraud cases, and cold sores.
Not All Feminists Are Like That (NAFALT) - A friendly reminder that not all feminists are frothing radical zealots. Also a hilariously ironic statement coming from the same rabid crowd of hatemongers that fly into a blood rage whenever anyone says “Not All Men Are Like That”.
Oneitis - The PUA term for a man who pines for one woman, and gets rejected. The PUAs actually manage to get this one right, though in keeping with their form, their solution for it (go fuck ten other women, because all women are like that) sucks. Oneitis is actually a potentially degenerative condition in which pining for one woman can become obsessive and downright dangerous. Truly, the solution for this is to get over her and pursue other women.
Orbiter - A potentially smart term which was then ruined by PUAs. This is defined by PUAs as a man who gets stuck in the Friendzone and continues to like the woman who Friendzoned him. A better definition of Orbiter is a man who gets stuck in the Friendzone and keeps pining for the woman who rejected him. There is a difference between liking and pining for: remaining friends with a woman who doesn't want a relationship with you is okay, and PUAs have a problem with this. Pining and wishing for her to want you romantically, however, is the real problem with 'orbiters'. To break free from orbit, he must wise up and pursue other women, or perhaps just go to an online dating site. Orbiters are inherently stricken with Oneitis and can fall out of orbit, causing a deep impact - their obsession can make her life miserable… or, as we’ve seen in the news sometimes, drastically shorten it. Hint: women can also be Orbiters, with the same potentially tragic results.
Paleomasculinism - The belief that Patriarchy is the natural order of things. Those who adhere to this odd belief fail to understand that male disposability, not male domination/female submission, is the actual bedrock or plate tectonics of life.
Patriarchy - The culture which depresses the socioeconomic status of women in favor of putting men above them. Originally developed by lower mentalities of ages past as a solution to male disposability: it establishes a glass ceiling above which women are not supposed to rise. This glass ceiling, of course, is below or barely above the male spiked floor. The point is to keep men above women so that men will have a better chance at being appealing to a woman.
Patriarchy is, thus, an institutionalized act of salving the problem of male disposability, not solving it. The salve, of course, is oppression of women. Basically, Patriarchy and male disposability are two wrongs trying to balance themselves out as a right. It is the first solution humans could come up with by using their neo cortex, and the current evolution of the neo cortex dictates that like male disposability, Patriarchy is outdated. Human sentience, as it has evolved, has offered the gift of egalitarianism - in which nobody is disposable. No glass celings or spiked floors for anyone.
Red Pill - Originally coined to define a person who discovers institutionalized misandry. Hereby re-defined to include, by necessity, the realization that Patriarchy is not the solution to male disposability, but rather, egalitarianism is the proper end to this dilemma. A Red Pill male is hereby re-defined as a brother at arms for Red Pill women, not someone who chides her for, as the Rational Wiki described it, “stealing the spotlight”. The Red Pill male finds Red Pill women to be a refreshing twist in the plot line of life, not a rival.
Sex - Rational Wiki says the manosphere sees this as the center of their universe; or, at least the galaxy. Or something. Yeah, they’re kind of accurate about that one. But that needs to change. Sex with hypergamic women and radical feminists is like kissing a Strigoi from Guillermo del Toro’s “The Strain”. Especially the ones who caught herpes from their days of fucking bad boys, or who have a nasty predisposition to holding grudges (Catherine Kieu, the Duke Lacrosse case, etc).
Pursuit of sex often leads men to do stupid things, such as Orbiting at the very least, and Elliot Rodgers on the other, extreme end. Pursuit of sex drives men to strive for success as well; in which case men need to find other reasons to succeed: such as reasons of their own invention. Achievements made in the pursuit of sex, be they the founding of a corporation or the hypothetical invention of hyperspace travel, nonetheless end in exactly one way: meeting a woman who doesn’t care about you, but rather your social status. If she wasn’t with you when you were worth shit on a shoe, she ain’t actually with you now: she’s with her hypergamic fantasies, which you might happen to fulfill at the moment. At. The. Moment.
To understand the true importance of sex in your life, first, find a good porn and have at it by yourself. Then when you’re done, re-consider the woman you’re chasing. Is she still worth it? No? Then you need to re-think things a bit. You might still need to re-think things anyway, but if she’s not so hot after you’ve had a wank, you really need to stop pursuing her.
In all honesty, men need to take the same attitude toward sex that women do - it ain’t so damned important that you have to sacrifice your dignity and standards for it. Until a man can do that, he will always be easy to manipulate sexually, leading to many of the horrors that the worst women in the world inflict upon men. Or, worse, a man’s obsession with sex will lead to his ruin and also perhaps a woman’s severe and tragic detriment. To put it another way, think of what will happen if men stop placing so much importance on sex: think of all the sexual manipulation that won’t be happening anymore. To put it kindly for the women readers: when men stop chasing sex so much, it will sort out, en masse, the women who rely on sexual manipulation and those who don’t. Without a single slap, gunshot, stab wound, or even an evil misogynist discouraging word, men could knock the Earth right off its axis: and no shaming tactics or law enforcement activity in the universe can stop them. It just takes willpower and self-awareness.
In short: we can all learn a lesson about sex from the Japanese Herbivore men. If we understand exactly what lesson they are imparting to us.
Shit Testing - A fairly accurate PUA term to describe women who test men during courtship to see where he stands in the Alpha/Beta/Omega hierarchy. As usual, PUAs fail when it comes down to how to react to these women. PUAs explain how to pass the shit test; but the real solution is to pass by the shit test - as in, detect when a shit test is in progress, and promptly abandon pursuit of that woman and look for someone else.
The Wall - A term used both by PUAs and women to describe when a woman reaches a certain age - between 25 and 30 - where their attractiveness declines significantly. Rational Wiki seems to think this doesn’t happen in reality, even while actual legions of women complain about how they can’t get a man anymore when they hit their 30s. In reality, The Wall is not real, but not for the reasons Rational Wiki says: it’s not real because neither women nor PUAs have any business deciding for men who they should find attractive. Besides, women in their 30s find men all the time. The Wall doesn’t exist because no woman has any real problem finding men - they just have a problem finding men who meet their standards, and no one has a right to shame men who like older women who aren’t as attractive in the PUA sense.
