COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

The Cool Science Stuff Thread

morning_picdump-34-13.jpg
 
CBS: 'Drinking Bird' energy?

Scientists in Hong Kong and China have proposed a creative way to generate renewable energy —using a classic "drinking bird" figurine that may feel like a throwback to high school physics class.

They outlined their approach in a new study published Thursday in the online journal Device. With a "drinking bird" as a generator, the scientists said they were able to successfully harness energy created through the natural process of water evaporation and convert it into electricity. According to the study, this "drinking bird" system was ultimately able to produce an output voltage of more than 100 V, which sets it apart from other studies attempting to explore the efficacy of water evaporation as a clean energy source.

It's an innovative idea that suggests a fairly basic energy conversion mechanism —in this case, one that converts heat energy into mechanical energy— can harvest the energy released through water evaporation using the evaporation's own latent heat and something called the triboelectric effect. That's the transfer of electric charges that occurs between two objects when they touch or slide against each other.

The study's authors said their research "provides a practical method for powering small electronic devices using evaporation energy."

"The drinking bird triboelectric hydrovoltaic generator offers a unique means to power small electronics in ambient conditions, utilizing water as a readily available fuel source," said Hao Wu, a professor at South China University of Technology who co-authored the study, in a statement. "I still feel surprised and excited when witnessing the actual results."

The "drinking bird" is a teaching tool that for a time cropped up often in early physics lessons, as it was used to demonstrate the basics of thermodynamics, which focuses on the relationships between heat and other fundamental forms of energy. When placed behind a cup of water, the bird, with its head doused in water initially, would eventually tilt forward over the edge and appear to "drink" from the cup, before swinging back upright and then repeating the same pattern of movements again.

Although it looked in some ways like a toy, students learned that the "drinking bird" was actually a simplified heat engine. The apparatus was relying on gravity shifts and a series of thermodynamic processes, including evaporation, temperature shifts and subsequent pressure changes to catalyze, and sustain, its own movement. In order to do that, the "drinking bird" was harnessing different energy types from each of those processes and converting it into the mechanical energy it needed to swing back and forth.

The "drinking bird" in the scientists' renewable energy model works in a similar way, and the device behavior in and of itself has always mirrored organic behaviors that occur on Earth. If an unusual model like this one proves effective, the opportunities for electricity generation could be enormous. Energy generation through natural water evaporation is equal to about half of the energy absorbed globally through sunlight, and, as the study points out, the organic evaporation process involves some of the "most significant amount of energy transfer" on the planet.

Others in the scientific community have for years explored the potential value of harnessing the power of natural evaporation, with another report published in the journal Nature Communications in 2017 acknowledging the massiveness of the energy flux involved in evaporative processes worldwide. Different research groups have proposed varying methods to use evaporation as a clean energy source, and some have offered creative suggestions —like one involving tree transpiration— to reduce costs and improve electricity output while still remaining renewable.

For their next research phase, Wu said that he and his colleagues will design a tailored "drinking bird" to use in additional test, instead of using the commercial figure.

"Additionally, we will explore various application opportunities for this device," said Zuankai Wang, a professor at Hong Kiong Polytechnic University and one of the study's co-authors, in another statement. He said their goal is to deliver "a practical product that can be used in our daily lives."
Click to expand...
 
The Telegraph Fusion Power For the Grid Much Closer Than You Think
Commercial nuclear fusion has gone from science fiction to science fact in less than a decade. Even well-informed members of the West’s political class are mostly unaware of the quantum leap in superconductors, lasers, and advanced materials suddenly changing the economics of fusion power.

Britain’s First Light Fusion announced last week that it had broken the world record for pressure at the Sandia National Laboratories in the US, pushing the boundary to 1.85 terapascal, five times the pressure at the core of the Earth.

Days earlier, a clutch of peer-reviewed papers confirmed that Commonwealth Fusion Systems near Boston had broken the world record for a large-scale magnet with a field strength of 20 tesla using the latest high-temperature superconducting technology. This exceeds the threshold necessary for producing net energy, or a “Q factor”, above 1.0.

“Overnight, it basically changed the cost per watt of a fusion reactor by a factor of almost 40,” said Professor Dennis Whyte, plasma doyen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The March edition of the IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity published six papers ratifying different aspects of the technology.

The magnets are used to fuse hydrogen isotopes by squeezing super hot plasma inside a tokamak device. The temperature must be ten times hotter than the surface of the sun in order to replicate solar fusion because the Earth’s magnetic field is that much weaker.


The “old” low-temperature magnets are made of niobium alloys operating near absolute zero at -270C. The new magnets lift the temperature from 4 kelvins to 20 kelvins using rare earth barium copper oxide (ReBCO) with a radical new design. They combine superconductivity with extreme magnetic power. This leverages a “multiple order-of-magnitude increase” in fusion capability.

Commonwealth’s chief executive, Bob Mumgaard, told me the game-changing technology scarcely existed 10 years ago, and was still in its infancy five years ago. “The breakthrough is in superconductors. Much stronger magnets mean that we can build a plant that is 40 times smaller,” he said.

It is time to drop the old joke that fusion is 30 years away, and always will be. A poll at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s forum in London found that 65pc of insiders think fusion will generate electricity for the grid at viable cost by 2035, and 90pc by 2040.

The Washington-based Fusion Industry Association says four of its members think they can do it by 2030. If the industry is anywhere close to being right, we need to rethink all our energy assumptions. Britain’s planned gas plants are rendered obsolescent almost before they are built.

In late December, China launched its own fusion consortium, combining its top universities and state industries in an Apollo-style national endeavour. “Controlled nuclear fusion is the only direction for future energy,” said the State Council. This is the new front in the technology arms race.

The world’s long-running $20bn ITER research project, a consortium of the US, Japan, Europe, China, and Russia, looks ever more like a beached whale in this contest. It has collected valuable science over the decades but has been dogged by geopolitics and delays, and has never produced more energy than it put in, unlike the Lawrence Livermore lab in the US using the rival technology of inertial fusion.

The baton has passed to tech tycoons in a hurry. Commonwealth Fusion, a spin-off from MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Centre, is backed by Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Sir Richard Branson. It aims to produce its first plasma next year and reach a steady Q factor of 10 by the late 2020s, the energy target for commercial take-off.

Dr Mumgaard said Commonwealth is eyeing costs of $60-80 MWh with scale, undercutting the 24/7 cost of intermittent renewables paired gas peaker plants or with energy storage in most places. “It might be even lower. We don’t use uranium. There is no risk of melt-downs,” he said.

Regulators in the UK and the US plan to treat fusion plants like hospitals, since they use tiny amounts of deuterium-tritium. Radioactive release is nothing like a uranium fission reactor. This means they can be built almost anywhere and rolled out fast.

Britain is going gangbusters on all fronts, a legacy of ITER’s Joint European Torus project at Culham, but also a feat of leadership. “Of all the countries in the world, the UK is most aggressively pursuing fusion power,” said American scientists Matthew Moynihan and Alfred Bortz, co-authors of Fusion’s Promise.

They said the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) under Sir Ian Chapman had done a masterful job in creating the Fusion Cluster and the £650m Fusion Futures Programme, accelerating the move from pure research to megawatts for the grid. “All this work has made the UK the technical leader in the race to fusion power,” they said.

Tokamak Energy near Oxford is a pioneer of the new ReBCO magnet technology, and may be sitting on priceless intellectual property.

The UKAEA is building its own tokamak on the site of an old coal-fired plant in Nottinghamshire, with a spherical design that has never been tried before but promises to slash costs.

England hosts three world-class fusion start-ups spanning the two key rival technologies.

First Light leads in inertial fusion. Two others are developing magnetic fusion: Tokamak Energy and Canada’s General Fusion, which is locating its demonstration plant at the Culham Campus, quite a coup for the Fusion Cluster. Any one of them has a chance of striking gold.

The allure of fusion is by now well understood. It generates four million times more energy than fossil power, without emitting CO2 or methane. It creates almost no long-term waste. Its main by-product is inert helium.

It uses almost no land, and little water, and can be made practically invisible. Unlike today’s fission, it produces industrial high-grade heat to help decarbonise glass, cement, steel, ammonia, hydrogen, etc. It runs continuously if you need it, or is dispatchable if you don’t.

The fuel is effectively limitless for thousands of years and can be obtained anywhere: deuterium from seawater, and tritium by breeding with small amounts of lithium. There is no risk of a runaway chain reaction. It does not use fissile materials and is useless for weapons.

Lev Artsimovich, the Polish-Russian father of the tokomak, was once asked when fusion would come of age. “When humanity really needs it,” he replied. So it is proving to be.
Click to expand...
 
Any scientists here who, yes, have expertise in their domain but no idea how to do analytics? I am your answer. Seriously. Two more people have their PhD and I played a big role...here's the feedback I got from my most recent client who defended last Sunday:

He is very insightful in statistics and a great instructor in explaining what he has done. I depend on him to handle very complexed things in statistics. Although I have an extensive background, it was only because of his help. He gets the job done. I recently used it to help with chapter 4 of my dissertation. If he did not help me, my dissertation would have flopped. I needed to learn how to fix it or how to analyze the data I collected. He was a God send. I have recently, defended my dissertation and was successful, and I owe it to him. Without his help, I just don’t know what I would have done. My committee was very impressed with the data and how it was analyzed, but more so with how I presented it. The committee stated it was a dissertation on another level, very extensive in its thoroughness and extremely impressive. But more importantly, they were impressed with how I presented the data in my defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dr_mabeuse
The March of Science: Female Orgasms
Replies
7
Views
771
AllardChardon
AllardChardon
The Heretic
Did you have a chemistry set when you were a kid?? They're illegal now!
2
Replies
25
Views
822
Cap’n AMatrixca
Cap’n AMatrixca
KookyDooky
The Doors Of Perception
Replies
13
Views
584
PlanetaryNebula
PlanetaryNebula
Back
Top