Go Back   Literotica Discussion Board > Main Literotica Forums > General Board

Reply
 
Thread Tools

Old 09-22-2014, 02:50 PM   #1
vetteman
Forged In Fire
 
vetteman's Avatar
 
vetteman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 128,242
Communists Agitating In New York

Did the Mayor order them in?




‘F*** the Police’: Communists, Radicals Spotted Throughout Climate March in New York City Demanding ‘Revolution, Nothing Less’


Sep. 21, 2014 3:58pm Oliver Darcy

Tens-of-thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of New York City Sunday to demand political leaders take action on climate change.

While the protest remained peaceful, much of the “People’s Climate March” appeared to be made up of fringe elements of the political left.



Dozens of signs denouncing capitalism were spotted at the demonstration, often held by self-proclaimed socialists.

“Capitalism is destroying the planet,” a sticker on one woman’s shirt read, “We need revolution, nothing less.”

In one instance, activists shouted “f**k the police,” demanding justice for the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

Others took advantage of the demonstration’s liberal-leaning crowd, attempting to sell literature and t-shirts to them.



An individual with the socialist newspaper “The Militant” was selling newspapers to attendees, while Occupy Wall Street members asked for “donations” in exchange for shirts.

Members of the Socialists Workers Party also manned a table, passing out flyers attempting to make “the case for ecosocialism.”

The Manhattan march comes two days before the United Nations Climate Summit. More than 120 world leaders will convene Tuesday for the meeting aimed at galvanizing political will for a new global climate treaty by the end of 2015.

The march also coincides with New York’s annual climate week, which will include a string of events this week, some featuring celebrities, CEOs and climatologists.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...-nothing-less/
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 02:58 PM   #2
islandman
 
islandman's Avatar
 
islandman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Twenty-Deuce
Posts: 65,404
Evidently vetteman doesn't believe in a citizen's right to free speech or to peaceably assemble.

AKA, the First Amendment.


  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:02 PM   #3
vetteman
Forged In Fire
 
vetteman's Avatar
 
vetteman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 128,242
islandman
This message is hidden because islandman is on your ignore list.


  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:02 PM   #4
Bunny Slippers
Fluffy Nutter
 
Bunny Slippers's Avatar
 
Bunny Slippers is online now
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 38,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by islandman View Post
Evidently vetteman doesn't believe in a citizen's right to free speech or to peaceably assemble.

AKA, the First Amendment.


where do you see he doesn't? ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:06 PM   #5
KingOrfeo
Literotica Guru
 
KingOrfeo is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 27,200
Communists, socialists, etc., do get to agitate, y'know. You don't have any problem with that, do you, vette?
__________________
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."

-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. . . . Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there are in any country uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right."

-- Thomas Jefferson
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:26 PM   #6
BobDownSouth
Laurel's Secret Favorite
 
BobDownSouth's Avatar
 
BobDownSouth is offline
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 44,005
Vettebigot hates free speech almost as much as he hates blacks, Mexicans, women and democracy.

If we ever see another Republican in the White House, those jackboots are coming out of the closet and things are going to change around here, yessiree!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
A man who claims to defend rights and objects to the right to have abortions? That's no defender of rights!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand

Native Americans? I do not think that they have any right to live in a country merely because they were born here...they act and live like savages
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:29 PM   #7
BotanyBoy
I just love flowers.
 
BotanyBoy's Avatar
 
BotanyBoy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Duderville NorCal
Posts: 13,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDownSouth View Post
Vettebigot hates free speech almost as much as he hates blacks, Mexicans, women and democracy.

If we ever see another Republican in the White House, those jackboots are coming out of the closet and things are going to change around here, yessiree!
Don't forget 10A and the will of the people, he clearly stated he prefers federal supremacy to trample voters on states rights issues because if they don't he wants POTUS impeached for not doing so.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:31 PM   #8
BobDownSouth
Laurel's Secret Favorite
 
BobDownSouth's Avatar
 
BobDownSouth is offline
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 44,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by BotanyBoy View Post
Don't forget 10A and the will of the people, he clearly stated he prefers federal supremacy to trample voters on states rights issues because if they don't he wants POTUS impeached for not doing so.
Life would be so much simpler for him if people would just stop disagreeing with him. Why can't they simply be "disappeared" into the camps, like preggo bitches would disappear during his high school days?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
A man who claims to defend rights and objects to the right to have abortions? That's no defender of rights!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand

Native Americans? I do not think that they have any right to live in a country merely because they were born here...they act and live like savages
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:40 PM   #9
vetteman
Forged In Fire
 
vetteman's Avatar
 
vetteman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 128,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOrfeo View Post
Communists, socialists, etc., do get to agitate, y'know. You don't have any problem with that, do you, vette?
I have a problem with any group who advocates a form of government designed to subvert the present system with principles repugnant to the Constitution and the founding principles.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:44 PM   #10
BotanyBoy
I just love flowers.
 
BotanyBoy's Avatar
 
BotanyBoy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Duderville NorCal
Posts: 13,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman View Post
I have a problem with any group who advocates a form of government designed to subvert the present system with principles repugnant to the Constitution and the founding principles.
Says the guy who wants to impeach POTUS for not blowing off 10A and going all "Big gubbmint smash will of people!!" LMFAO.

What exactly about socialism is repugnant to the constitution and the founding principles? LOL
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:47 PM   #11
KingOrfeo
Literotica Guru
 
KingOrfeo is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 27,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman View Post
I have a problem with any group who advocates a form of government designed to subvert the present system with principles repugnant to the Constitution and the founding principles.
But, said Constitution says they do get to agitate, just like the Teabaggers and Minutemen and White Nationalists do -- you don't have any problem with that, do you?
__________________
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."

-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. . . . Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there are in any country uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right."

-- Thomas Jefferson
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:48 PM   #12
KingOrfeo
Literotica Guru
 
KingOrfeo is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 27,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by BotanyBoy View Post
What exactly about socialism is repugnant to the constitution and the founding principles? LOL
The fact that it had not yet been conceived in 1789.
__________________
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."

-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. . . . Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there are in any country uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right."

-- Thomas Jefferson
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 03:57 PM   #13
islandman
 
islandman's Avatar
 
islandman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Twenty-Deuce
Posts: 65,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman View Post
islandman
This message is hidden because islandman is on your ignore list.


You're living in a democratic society with constitutional principles embedded within, you fascist pig.

Better yet, gtfo of my country!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 04:07 PM   #14
BotanyBoy
I just love flowers.
 
BotanyBoy's Avatar
 
BotanyBoy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Duderville NorCal
Posts: 13,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOrfeo View Post
The fact that it had not yet been conceived in 1789.
LOL I didn't think he would even be capable of putting that much thought into it...and even if he weren't hiding in his iggy bunker like a total fucking pussy he would be looking for a C&P to answer me with for the simple fact he is to stupid to articulate any kind of reality based response to that question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by islandman View Post
You're living in a democratic society with constitutional principles embedded within, you fascist pig.

Better yet, gtfo of my country!
LOL not to him he's not...it's vettey society and vettey only, everyone else who doesn't agree with him 110% is just un-american!!! And as such get's slapped with a "Socialist" or "Communist" label because that's what those terms mean, "Doesn't agree with vettey n' co." because he's demonstrated several times that he wouldn't know an actual socialist/communist if one bit him in the fucking face.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 04:08 PM   #15
vetteman
Forged In Fire
 
vetteman's Avatar
 
vetteman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 128,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOrfeo View Post
But, said Constitution says they do get to agitate, just like the Teabaggers and Minutemen and White Nationalists do -- you don't have any problem with that, do you?
There are limits on the Communist Party:

50 U.S.C. § 842 : US Code - Section 842: Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations -

The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.] - See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/5....qyeK16b2.dpuf
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 04:12 PM   #16
islandman
 
islandman's Avatar
 
islandman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Twenty-Deuce
Posts: 65,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman View Post
There are limits on the Communist Party:

50 U.S.C. § 842 : US Code - Section 842: Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations -

The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.] - See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/5....qyeK16b2.dpuf
People marching with signs is now considered "force and violence"?

Also, can we broaden this Code to cover all the whacknuts who have "stocked up on guns and ammo" in preparation of an upcoming revolution?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 04:54 PM   #17
1sickbastard
Oh, the derp...
 
1sickbastard's Avatar
 
1sickbastard is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Monster Island
Posts: 18,829
Are you folks still insisting the bette-man actually think through his positions, be able to defend them, or even exhibit some sort of ideological consistency?

Seriously, we all know that's not going to happen. After all, this is the guy who does C&P from breibert.com.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 05:00 PM   #18
islandman
 
islandman's Avatar
 
islandman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Twenty-Deuce
Posts: 65,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1sickbastard View Post
Are you folks still insisting the bette-man actually think through his positions, be able to defend them, or even exhibit some sort of ideological consistency?

Seriously, we all know that's not going to happen. After all, this is the guy who does C&P from breibert.com.

Just trying to rationalize how a man who risked his life to defend the Constitution can justify denying its protections to his fellow citizens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 05:11 PM   #19
doctor_insanus
Just Another Face
 
doctor_insanus's Avatar
 
doctor_insanus is offline
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Not-Too-Distant Future
Posts: 7,464
You wouldn't know Constitutional rights or founding principles if they crawled up your ass and died.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 05:16 PM   #20
1sickbastard
Oh, the derp...
 
1sickbastard's Avatar
 
1sickbastard is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Monster Island
Posts: 18,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by islandman View Post
Just trying to rationalize how a man who risked his life to defend the Constitution can justify denying its protections to his fellow citizens.
He was drafted?
He decided he wanted to help John Wayne kill commies?

I don't by the "defend the Constitution" bit, even though that is the oath one swears when entering into US Military service. Vietnam had zero to do with defending the Constitution.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 05:31 PM   #21
vetteman
Forged In Fire
 
vetteman's Avatar
 
vetteman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 128,242
Notice how "climate" is used to protest Capitalism. Did they head off to China or India to protest the environment? They came to Wall Street. The Communist have hijacked the movement to use it in their war against capitalism and freedom.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 05:34 PM   #22
BotanyBoy
I just love flowers.
 
BotanyBoy's Avatar
 
BotanyBoy is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Duderville NorCal
Posts: 13,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman View Post
Notice how "climate" is used to protest Capitalism. Did they head off to China or India to protest the environment? They came to Wall Street. The Communist have hijacked the movement to use it in their war against capitalism and freedom.
Or it could be because all the HQ's of a large number of companies that blow toxic shit all over peoples back yard/air/water supply are likely on or near Wall Street.....but don't let that little tidbit of reality burst your anti commie 50's propaganda vomit.

And you still didn't answer the question, what about socialism is so repugnant to the constitution?

Last edited by BotanyBoy : 09-22-2014 at 05:36 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 05:46 PM   #23
KingOrfeo
Literotica Guru
 
KingOrfeo is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 27,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1sickbastard View Post
He was drafted?
He decided he wanted to help John Wayne kill commies?

I don't by the "defend the Constitution" bit, even though that is the oath one swears when entering into US Military service. Vietnam had zero to do with defending the Constitution.
Oh, I doubt most soldiers, etc., who take that oath know all that much about the Constitution anyway.
__________________
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."

-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. . . . Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there are in any country uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right."

-- Thomas Jefferson
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 06:04 PM   #24
vetteman
Forged In Fire
 
vetteman's Avatar
 
vetteman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 128,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOrfeo View Post
Oh, I doubt most soldiers, etc., who take that oath know all that much about the Constitution anyway.
Couple of dumb bastards. My generation learned about the Constitution in fucking school, before we were old enough to join, you idiots.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2014, 06:23 PM   #25
KingOrfeo
Literotica Guru
 
KingOrfeo is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 27,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetteman View Post
There are limits on the Communist Party:

50 U.S.C. § 842 : US Code - Section 842: Proscription of Communist Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations -

The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and whatever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.] - See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/5....qyeK16b2.dpuf
You will agree, of course, as any decent, patriotic American will agree, that the Smith Act Trials were a shame and disgrace to our nation.
__________________
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."

-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. . . . Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise. Whenever there are in any country uncultivated lands and unemployed poor, it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to violate natural right."

-- Thomas Jefferson
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Copyright 1998-2013 Literotica Online. Literotica is a registered trademark.