Adoption Time!!!

[Black_Frost]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If you actually read the topic, you would know my "painting" is not done erroneously. Most of his posts are quotes from me, lies, & misuses of spelling & grammar. Subtract that, & you maybe get 2 sentences a post.

You are close, but that only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. For every line hell_kaiserV2 copies from you, there are at least two original sentences. For every quote of you, there is clearly one original sentence.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Again, mislabeling something as "clear", much as you labeled my other work as "erroneous". I don't aim for insults aimed at me, though I can see why one would as much as posts by others are filled with those.

If you weren't skimming for insults, then you would have followed the conversation and known full well those comments were meant for hell_kaiserV2.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

As I have already said, you have not done so correctly.

Then prove it's been done incorrectly.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

There, you are right. I disprove them, also proving them to be incorrect.

Mind my words. I said "attempt to disprove them." They are only attempts because you fail.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Sometimes, I choose to only do the simple thing, in hopes people don't erroneously misunderstand what I am reading &/or writing.

Try again. You already admit you disprove them. No turning back now.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I made no implication.

You said they didn't link to the posts, which implies you followed them.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You simply made yet another incorrect inferrence [sic].

Inferences only exists because one first implies something.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, me saying I "never" denied it is a statement of fact, as you had no denial on record.

Way to miss the point.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I certainly will never admit to being lazy, even in cases where it might be true, of which this is not one.

Actions speak louder, or rather prove more effectively, than words.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Trying to have it both ways, are we? If "all [i] have to do" is scroll down, that states that his links don't lead to the comments themselves.

Either link would lead to the same page, all that changes is what the site does for you. By your logic, an ambulance doesn't drive you into an Emergency Room because it stops at the door.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Actually, I quoted him saying he only linked to the topics, not the posts with the comments.

Same page.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Some threads, like this one, stretch out for multiple pages, all the more I would have to scroll through to find the comments he is referring to.

This is an admission of laziness.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

This thread also proves it is possible to link/refer to one post by someone.

Where? The html coding doing it for you? You can't seriously be comparing something the site supplies for users to something users have to dig up themselves and consider yourself intelligent.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It would be if it proved such a thing, but such a thing was not proven, as it is not the case.

You already confessed to laziness. Too late to change your mind.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

From people who rate without reading.

So you know how everyone on the site works?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have seen rare opinions rendered by any "third party", and it was you, not I, that compared me to Shakespeare. (Perhaps that proves the third party is sometimes someone who gave me a low rating first, but then decided to post higher ratings they actually believe me to deserve.) As for the irony, I was pointing out the irony it is always one rating of the highest possible & one of the absolute lowest, not just the "difference of opinion". [sic]

A confession that you don't know the definition of irony.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If it is true, it is not an assumption of anything.

Unless you can prove it, it's an assumption even if it is true.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

This is a testament to your lack of character & not mine.

It's nothing of the sort. You claimed people were giving you high ratings, I proved that high ratings can just as easily be condescending. Furthermore, considering it was on a thread where you did nothing but criticize someone for making a typo, the only thing demonstrated is exactly what I said in my feedback.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, cease attempting to tell me what I know in my heart, as you clearly are unable to even know what I know.

Then why so angry? If you didn't remember reading this feedback, you wouldn't have snapped like this.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I never made such a claim. Perhaps I stated something about my threads you incorrectly believed described a paradoxical situation, but that is not what I truly said.



It makes me look not foolish, since they don't refer to he same exact threads, but as someone who has both good and bad occasions of writing. Normal people like myself have those and admit to them.

You already said they existed in a paradox. Too late to change your mind now. Furthermore, if there are threads that exist with errors from the editor, then feedback can't be entirely misapplied. Then criticizing feedback applies to the editor's mistake. Since you claim these don't exist, in only further proves how little you know and your lack of character.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Mentioning a contract offer when not a paid writer is like mentioning a raise at any other job: Reason for celebration, not to seem egomaniacal.

Were it brought up in a normal conversation, it would reason for celebration. Since you brought it up in defense of your high quality of writing, it's egomaniacal.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, what is the harm in mentioning my high quality when others have said they feel the same way about my work?

People clearly don't feel the same way. Just look at your ratings and read the forums.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I see no reason for naming such offers when h_k can't even do the minimal work to link to comments he has already referred to.

The two needs are mutually exclusive, proving you're copping out once again.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, I for one feel in this time of unpredictable futures, one should consider all offers they recieve [sic].

You only get offers from Vanity Publishers because you go to Vanity Publishers. And you only go to Vanity Publishers when you know you won't get anywhere with real publishers.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Lastly, no mention on my blog is nothing that need be discussed here (if in fact I don't have another blog that does mention them).

Neither is your life something that needed to be discussed here, but you still brought it into the conversation. Since you brought your life into the discussion and your blog is about your life, this marks another cop out.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I see no need to address any amount of "free time".

You brought up your free time. Don't bring up topics you aren't willing to discuss.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, as to my meetings, I have yet to meet with anyone in person.

You aren't offered a contract unless you meet them in person. Try again. You'll hit the right lie eventually, and you're bound to find someone too stupid to remember all the wrong lies eventually.

[alexisrhodes13]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I currently have a list of 114 stories on the site with "Locked" threads (many of which I have both approved & locked threads on)... Also, I have noted (on/in the list) that I would be more than happy to take over a great percentage of them if better editors can't be found.

I find it hard to adopt threads if we don't have names. Maybe five or ten? So we have something to work with.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by alexisrhodes13

I find it hard to adopt threads if we don't have names. Maybe five or ten? So we have something to work with.

I previously in the thread said 114, & I often don't even count such things. Also, I previously with this name (my current one doesn't even work when I try to Login with the Username & password I was given in an E-mail) said I found 20, "including one on the 'most-viewed' list posted today". So you can probably throw a hat full of titles in the air & find one.

Seriously, I'd help, but I've been spending months on a PC I'm borrowing at times from someone else; The hard-drive that had the titles of stories with "Locked" stuff doesn't even work Windows-wise anymore.

[Kaitou1412]

tnadnuder, I locked this thread before not only because it went off-topic, but because it contributed nothing to CHYOO Feedback and Story Adoption. Restarting that identical discussion with absolutely no names while demanding users do the work that is required of you is the same spamming the forums. Don't restart the discussion unless you're going to name the stories.