Adoption Time!!!

[alexisrhodes13]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If you deleted them for whatever reasons you believed you had, that means they no longer exist in your Inbox. However, that doex not mean they never existed there.

I sent them to you at least once each, & it was your choice what to do with them after that. However, clearly you chose to forget them, but that does not put the onus on me to remind you.

I see no reason to waste time responding to Kaitou, scanning the majority of his post & seeing it as largely redundancy & lies.

Okay, obviously you have to stop and reread your posts for spelling. As far as the context, let's see how this works.

I asked for your reasons.

You said you emailed me your reasons.

I said I deleted your emails.

You said that it wasn't your problem and I should generate YOUR list of adoption reasons from e-mails I no longer have, yet you still do as you never fail to remind anyone who will listen that I said you could have trusted status and then *gasp* changed my mind.

Never mind the fact if you're as intelligent as you present yourself, the reasons should be in your head. Why bring logic into this, after all?

Here's an easier question, since you refuse to answer my first. What story are you interested in adopting>

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by alexisrhodes13

Okay, obviously you have to stop and reread your posts for spelling. As far as the context, let's see how this works.

I asked for your reasons.

You said you emailed me your reasons.

I said I deleted your emails.

You said that it wasn't your problem and I should generate YOUR list of adoption reasons from e-mails I no longer have, yet you still do as you never fail to remind anyone who will listen that I said you could have trusted status and then *gasp* changed my mind.

Never mind the fact if you're as intelligent as you present yourself, the reasons should be in your head. Why bring logic into this, after all?

Here's an easier question, since you refuse to answer my first. What story are you interested in adopting>

Maybe I do make spelling mistakes. However, this thread alone proves I am not the only one who does so. It also proves I am not the only one who needs to read things & attempt to remember their content before deleting/posting them, or you would have never had the problem you seem to be relying on me to fix now.

Never mind that I didn't tell you to generate the lost from E-mails you said you no longer had/had deleted. Also, never mind that I am not (the) one that has any problem with logic being a factor.

Which story do I wish to adopt? I'd take many of them if that were a possibility. (I have made no effort to remember your list of stories, same as you have done with my list of reasons.) However, it must be obvious to you now people around here don't much care for me, so what I might want matters not.

[Kaitou1412]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

However, clearly you chose to forget them, but that does not put the onus on me to remind you.

You want to bring up a list you wrote and sent to someone, acknowledge she forgot the content, acknowledge that she deleted it, and still contend that doesn't make the burden yours? All this even after you prominently made the point that you are focused solely on clarifying your points?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I see no reason to waste time responding to Kaitou, scanning the majority of his post & seeing it as largely redundancy & lies.

You disagree and initiate what you consider to be combat concerning my fun at your expense, thereby forcing me to reiterate my own points defensively, and then want to call this redundancy? Perhaps you'd realize how pathetic this sounded if you first pulled your head out of your ass. The closest thing in my posts to redundancy stems from your own redundancy in your post, causing me to confront the same points repeatedly. You have no place to talk about another's repetition when you can't even recognize your own.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Maybe I do make spelling mistakes. However, this thread alone proves I am not the only one who does so.

No one else has made spelling mistakes, only grammar mistakes stemming from the fact that we rewrite our sentences to ensure comprehension. Additionally, you're the only one who insists your mistakes are few and far between (after previously stating there were none at all, no less). Do you see the difference, or will you drop yourself below our level when it comes time to take the pain onto yourself?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, never mind that I am not (the) one that has any problem with logic being a factor.

Yes, we can all see you always introduce logic into a situation. Illogic, that is.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Which story do I wish to adopt? I'd take many of them if that were a possibility.

Then why not drop the names of these stories?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

(I have made no effort to remember your list of stories, same as you have done with my list of reasons.)

Double standard, much?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

However, it must be obvious to you now people around here don't much care for me, so what I might want matters not.

Then why even bother making the topic if your not going to get anything? This marks proof positive that you created this topic only to bash authors and initiate yet another flame war. Either that or we're overestimating your level of intelligence.

[alexisrhodes13]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Maybe I do make spelling mistakes. However, this thread alone proves I am not the only one who does so. It also proves I am not the only one who needs to read things & attempt to remember their content before deleting/posting them, or you would have never had the problem you seem to be relying on me to fix now.

Never mind that I didn't tell you to generate the lost from E-mails you said you no longer had/had deleted. Also, never mind that I am not (the) one that has any problem with logic being a factor.

Which story do I wish to adopt? I'd take many of them if that were a possibility. (I have made no effort to remember your list of stories, same as you have done with my list of reasons.) However, it must be obvious to you now people around here don't much care for me, so what I might want matters not.

You have made no effort to remember my threads? Are you just so damn lazy that you didn't bother to read my first forum post ever? The first response to this very thread? If you can't be bothered to remember what you want, why the hell do you want it?

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

You want to bring up a list you wrote and sent to someone, acknowledge she forgot the content, acknowledge that she deleted it, and still contend that doesn't make the burden yours? All this even after you prominently made the point that you are focused solely on clarifying your points?

Clearly one of us needs to be focused on clarifying our points, since this question alone makes clear you don't understand mine.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Perhaps you'd realize how pathetic this sounded if you first pulled your head out of your ass.

I can't remove something from a place it never was located.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

The closest thing in my posts to redundancy stems from your own redundancy in your post, causing me to confront the same points repeatedly.

You confront the same things repeatedly, but also mistakenly; They are not repetition if you understand them each the first time.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

You have no place to talk about another's repetition when you can't even recognize your own.

I fully recognize my own... But that is a big circle, as I am repetitive to respond to your redundancy, which seems similar to what you claim to be the reason for yours.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

No one else has made spelling mistakes, only grammar mistakes stemming from the fact that we rewrite our sentences to ensure comprehension.

I point you to your own post, where you say:

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Perhaps the problem is YOU'RE grandiose self-image and undeserved sense of self-worth.

I already quoted this solely to point out what was clearly a spelling mistake, & not a mistake of any other kind, including the kind you can blame on me.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Additionally, you're the only one who insists your mistakes are few and far between (after previously stating there were none at all, no less). Do you see the difference, or will you drop yourself below our level when it comes time to take the pain onto yourself?

I don't recall ever saying there were none at all. I admit to making mistakes, but am still waiting for you to stop trying to correct me long enough to correct yourself...

Also, I will "drop" myself if you wish, but not below your level, which our respective posts have proven me to be above.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Yes, we can all see you always introduce logic into a situation. Illogic, that is.

Illogic is an antonym of logic, not a type. Also, it is interesting you say this when you have already proven several times over how you misunderstand me, claim yourself to not make mistakes you clearly do, & seem to think you state logic when the opposite is clearly the case.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Then why not drop the names of these stories?

I dropped them long ago... From the list of people & things I care about.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Double standard, much?

I say I have done the same thing to one list you have done with another, & you call that a "double standard"? Don't continue using phrases improperly to appear smarter, as the opposite appears likely.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

Then why even bother making the topic if your not going to get anything?

Again: Spelling mistake or grammar? Surely a mistake, no matter which type.

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

This marks proof positive that you created this topic only to bash authors and initiate yet another flame war. Either that or we're overestimating your level of intelligence.

It's esitimated improperly, but not above its actual location... Clearly, I overestimated yours, however, as I have already stated in this thread why I made it, & you still assume another incorrect reason for its creation.

[Kaitou1412]

First, it's very interesting that you suddenly feel like responding to what you call "lies" even after you said you'd have no part in dealing with "lies."

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Clearly one of us needs to be focused on clarifying our points, since this question alone makes clear you don't understand mine.

Wow. You're even too stupid to recognize rhetorical questions.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I can't remove something from a place it never was located.

This is proof you don't know what the world looks like.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You confront the same things repeatedly, but also mistakenly; They are not repetition if you understand them each the first time.

Illogic at its finest.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I fully recognize my own... But that is a big circle, as I am repetitive to respond to your redundancy, which seems similar to what you claim to be the reason for yours.

My repetition is far from redundancy. Your repetition, on the other hand, is a text book example of redundancy. Considering your username is redundant reversed, I can't imagine why you insist you're not redundant. Or is this the hacker again?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I point you to your own post, where you say:



I already quoted this solely to point out what was clearly a spelling mistake, & not a mistake of any other kind, including the kind you can blame on me.

So "you're" is an incorrect spelling? As I said, it's a grammar problem, not spelling. If you want to make a point, it helps to first have an understanding of the point.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I don't recall ever saying there were none at all.

Go back over posts made with your TJChurch account. You'll find plenty of times you considered yourself to be perfect.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I admit to making mistakes, but am still waiting for you to stop trying to correct me long enough to correct yourself...

That is a double standard at its finest.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, I will "drop" myself if you wish, but not below your level, which our respective posts have proven me to be above.

Right, that's why in our first meeting, you were the one to open with character assassination in response to my attempts to be helpful.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Illogic is an antonym of logic, not a type.

Then why did you assert it as logic? It's the only thing you introduce into situations and grasp firmly, and you called this "logic."

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, it is interesting you say this when you have already proven several times over how you misunderstand me

I don't misunderstand you at all, you just keep changing your mind and attempt to call it such in the vain attempt to make some fool believe it.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

claim yourself to not make mistakes you clearly do

I never said any such thing. I said no one in this topic, with the exception of you, has made a spelling mistake. I acknowledge we've all made grammatical mistakes. This truly is the most pathetic thing you've said in this topic yet.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

& seem to think you state logic when the opposite is clearly the case.

More projection. How original.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I dropped them long ago... From the list of people & things I care about.

Yet you continue this topic and wanted to talk about it fairly recently. You really are the jester of the court...

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I say I have done the same thing to one list you have done with another, & you call that a "double standard"? Don't continue using phrases improperly to appear smarter, as the opposite appears likely.

...and this proves it. I was talking about your standards for alexis, not me. If we were talking about your standards for me, you'd never hear the end of it. One thing no one ever debates about you is that nobody matters when you're not happy and the immense double standards. We're only entitled to our lives when you're content, and we must be mind readers and tolerate poor grammar, abysmal punctuation, and horrible spelling and consider their constant emergence to be "not that often." Meanwhile, everyone else must be verbally clear, perfectly punctuated, and without spelling flaw and consider the times they're not to be "constant."

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Again: Spelling mistake or grammar?

Why are you asking? You previously asserted that it's a spelling mistake. Did you not read your own post? Also, I assert that such an assertion makes the dictionaries laugh at you since they know it's nothing of the sort.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Surely a mistake, no matter which type.

And that's not redundancy forcing me to reiterate? Again, I never said I don't make mistakes, I even acknowledged it posts ago. All I said is there's no spelling mistakes outside of your own. If you're too stupid to comprehend the difference between spelling and grammar, then perhaps you should go talk to a preschooler. Last time I checked, they were learning the difference.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It's esitimated improperly, but not above its actual location...

We couldn't possibly underestimate your intelligence. Besides the fact that you splay it out for the world to see, you're the only person in existence with a negative level of intelligence. And there's the famed double standard again: your spelling mistake, yet another immediately following, thereby continuing to contradict, the assertion that your mistakes are rare. Also, FYI, web browsers these days have their own spell checks installed. Are you asserting you're smarter than a computer and, therefore, don't have to recognize what it's telling you? That and a constant state of inebriation are the only reasons any person, even someone with down syndrome, has for inputting spelling mistakes.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Clearly, I overestimated yours, however, as I have already stated in this thread why I made it, & you still assume another incorrect reason for its creation.

The words of a compulsive liar carry as much weight as a saturated tissue. It's not "another" reason, it's the same reason as before. Creatures of lower intelligence may fail to make that connection since I said it with different words, but any sentient being would be able to recognize this fact if it took the time to read posts.

Allow me to reiterate the same point you wish to ignore just so you can call it redundancy: If this topic was about adoption, then why not list the story titles? Even under the moronic assertion that you lost them, one which proves you aren't monitoring the stories when you log into CHYOO to look for change and affirm that the editors are inactive, alexis even included the titles of her stories; all you had to do was pick and choose. You haven't done this either, which can only mean you don't want to adopt a story; if you wanted to adopt, you would have made the effort to redirect the topic back onto adoption. However, even under your moronic excuse, this leads to another question: If you didn't know the titles, then why make the topic in the first place? The underlying truth you can't comprehend due to your own pathetic level of intelligence is that no one can help you if no one knows the stories to which you are referring. Let's throw in one more: Why make the topic if you know you won't be getting help anyway? It'd be a waste of time and effort on your part to ask for the stories, even if you did have the titles. If you really want to claim you have some sort of intelligence, then address why every post you submit demonstrates your intelligence level is decreasing with time.

Finally, it's rather interesting that you're now ignoring alexis completely. Are you afraid to confront someone that doesn't leave little typos for your amusement?

[hell_kaiserV2]

Originally Posted by Kaitou1412

It's the only thing you introduce into situations and grasp firmly

Wrongo. Timmy has a very firm grasp on another item too. If he doesn't hold it, no one else will. People think it's too hard to find and attached to something disgusting. But it's easy to forget about his dick since he bitches and cries a lot.

[tnadnuder]

1] Like a bid disease, hell_kaiser comes back to remind us all why we never wanted the first version of him.

2] I am trying to ignore a lot of things now, but what I have trouble ignoring are the daily E-mails from alexis, asking me if I'd "at leadt" let her know my list again, &/or what stories I want.

[hell_kaiserV2]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

1] Like a bid disease, hell_kaiser comes back to remind us all why we never wanted the first version of him.

Like a bad disease, TJChurch comes back to remind us all why we never wanted the first version of him.

Tim, the only person to say they don't want me here is you. Everyone else couldn't care less.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

2] I am trying to ignore a lot of things now, but what I have trouble ignoring are the daily E-mails from alexis, asking me if I'd "at leadt" let her know my list again, &/or what stories I want.

1. More things we have to take your word for. Pic it, or the spelling mistake and daily emails didn't happen.

2. If you don't name the stories, how can you or anyone else adopt them?

3. Alexis isn't the only person who asked you for that list. So answer Menoetes, Kaitou1412, and me. What reasons are on this list you keep talking about?

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Like a bad disease, TJChurch comes back to remind us all why we never wanted the first version of him.

The high feedback & positive reviews & responses I get here & on the site say otherwise... You wouldn't exist here except to react to me.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Tim, the only person to say they don't want me here is you. Everyone else couldn't care less.

As you say yourself, more than one person dislikes you. Nobody has yet to say they want you here. Know why? They don't.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

1. More things we have to take your word for. Pic it, or the spelling mistake and daily emails didn't happen.

You don't have to take my word for it. Take Alexis' word they didn't happen... Wait; She never said that, because she can't without lying.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

2. If you don't name the stories, how can you or anyone else adopt them?

I was reminded there is a thread besides this one for story adoption; It would work today the same way it did before, one would think.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

3. Alexis isn't the only person who asked you for that list. So answer Menoetes, Kaitou1412, and me. What reasons are on this list you keep talking about?

I only referred to her work when mentioning the list. (Checking again, I never specifically named anyone.) The list is about her stories, and she is the only one that needs to see it/them (the reasons). Admit it or not, she has. It ends there.

[hell_kaiserV2]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

The high feedback & positive reviews & responses I get here & on the site say otherwise...

Stop bragging about how you review and rate your own threads. Or better yet, stop doing that in the first place.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You wouldn't exist here except to react to me.

I do more on CHYOO in one day than you've done ever. Just because I have an extra account doesn't mean I don't do anything besides make fun of you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

As you say yourself, more than one person dislikes you.

You can't even read. Know how I know? I said you were the only person to say you don't like me here.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Nobody has yet to say they want you here. Know why? They don't.

It also seems nobody wants Menoetes, Torg, jakelyon, Zingiber, and other authors here since no one said they were wanted either. See how stupid your argument is?

Nobody has yet to say they want you here either, Tim. Know why? They don't. And unlike everyone else who adds to the site, they say that you're not welcome. See the difference?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You don't have to take my word for it. Take Alexis' word they didn't happen... Wait; She never said that, because she can't without lying.

So how do we not take your word for it? Good old Timmy, can't even keep his thoughts straight.

Without pics, it's likely you're lying, and you are a well known troll and liar, unlike alexis. Who should we trust?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I was reminded there is a thread besides this one for story adoption; It would work today the same way it did before, one would think.

Doesn't change my question. The stories can't be adopted by anyone unless they're named, and you're the only person with the names of the stories. Doesn't matter which topic, you just spell their names out in one of them. You haven't done that at all. Either talk about adoption or shut up.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I only referred to her work when mentioning the list. (Checking again, I never specifically named anyone.) The list is about her stories, and she is the only one that needs to see it/them (the reasons). Admit it or not, she has. It ends there.

You said it's a list of reasons for adoption, so it can't end there unless you don't want the stories to be adopted.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Stop bragging about how you review and rate your own threads. Or better yet, stop doing that in the first place.

Easy enough, considering I never started.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I do more on CHYOO in one day than you've done ever. Just because I have an extra account doesn't mean I don't do anything besides make fun of you.

You probably have a million, but "h_k" is the only name on all the ones you ever use. Don't lie about what little you accomplish.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You can't even read. Know how I know? I said you were the only person to say you don't like me here.

I know exactly what you said, but not saying they hate you doesn't mean they don't.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

It also seems nobody wants Menoetes, Torg, jakelyon, Zingiber, and other authors here since no one said they were wanted either. See how stupid your argument is?

Not at all... Those people themselves post more than just posts against others.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Nobody has yet to say they want you here either, Tim. Know why? They don't. And unlike everyone else who adds to the site, they say that you're not welcome. See the difference?

Not really, nor do I see where anyone says I'm unwelcome.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

So how do we not take your word for it? Good old Timmy, can't even keep his thoughts straight.

My thoughts are very straight. My point was that even I might say to take what she says over what I say, if she ever said it.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Without pics, it's likely you're lying, and you are a well known troll and liar, unlike alexis. Who should we trust?

Check her post count; She said little if anything before this topic. For all you know, her only posts are trolling &/or lies.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Doesn't change my question. The stories can't be adopted by anyone unless they're named, and you're the only person with the names of the stories. Doesn't matter which topic, you just spell their names out in one of them. You haven't done that at all. Either talk about adoption or shut up.

I have done lots of writing about adoption. Also, lots of others have named stories in the other adoption thread with no assistance from me. How they are brought up or by who doesn't change their chances of getting adopted (except for the ones Torg takes-over himself, which still leaves LOCKED threads for years in them.)

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You said it's a list of reasons for adoption, so it can't end there unless you don't want the stories to be adopted.

I said it's a list, & it is. I mentioned the list referring to one writer, & that writer has seen the list. Like it or not, for you & I, it ends there.

[hell_kaiserV2]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Easy enough, considering I never started.

You said, in this topic, that you do rate your own threads.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You probably have a million, but "h_k" is the only name on all the ones you ever use. Don't lie about what little you accomplish.

Isn't that cute, he still wants to act like he's stalking me. On CHYOO, every active account has several approved threads, and one has control of three stories. Unlike you, I give something of quality to the site and don't lie about it. On the forums, I only need the hell_kaiser accounts, since I only need to harass you and deal with the few problems other people have with CHYOO.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I know exactly what you said, but not saying they hate you doesn't mean they don't.

1. You clearly don't know what I said since you said I said something I never said.

2. The same can be said for you: not saying they hate you doesn't mean they don't.

3. Unlike you, I've received thanks and praises from people that aren't myself.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Not at all... Those people themselves post more than just posts against others.

1. That's another strike against you since the only thing you post about is how much your life sucks and how you can't use CHYOO the way you want to.

2. You're the only person who doesn't have a post besides one against others. I've helped yoyo1324 with account problems, I've attempted to help you in the past, and I've tried a great deal more with other users, and that's just my two old accounts. Don't group me in with a whiny baby like you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Not really, nor do I see where anyone says I'm unwelcome.

24ward says you're not welcome, calling you the worst thing to ever happen to CHYOO and adds you to the blocked list of his stories. whizzper said you're not welcome, and even commented after your banishment that he hopes the door hits you on the way out. deathofcards says you're not welcome, saying he thinks your threads are horrible and your personality is worse. Torg banned your accounts because you removed yourself from his blocked lists. If you want, I'll dig up more times people have said you're not welcome.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

My thoughts are very straight. My point was that even I might say to take what she says over what I say, if she ever said it.

So there's no choice but to take your word for it.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Check her post count; She said little if anything before this topic. For all you know, her only posts are trolling &/or lies.

Her only posts with the alexisrhodes13 account have been to you, and she's yet to lie. If there were more posts, I could easily prove she hasn't lied at all.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have done lots of writing about adoption. Also, lots of others have named stories in the other adoption thread with no assistance from me. How they are brought up or by who doesn't change their chances of getting adopted (except for the ones Torg takes-over himself, which still leaves LOCKED threads for years in them.)

Tim's intelligence level decreases again. Threads are adopted because writers name them in adoption requests. Right now, you're the only one with the names of these stories and why they should be adopted. You're the only one who can do something about it. If someone else could do something about it, they would have done it by now. If you wanted these stories to be adopted, you would have realized all of this and written the names by now.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I said it's a list, & it is. I mentioned the list referring to one writer, & that writer has seen the list. Like it or not, for you & I, it ends there.

You said

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

a "Top 10 List" of reasons for adoptions.

If the thread is about adoption, your own post says the list is related and that it does not end here for anyone. If you made this topic about adopting, your own post proves that list needs to be posted in one of these topics.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You said, in this topic, that you do rate your own threads.

I don't believe I posted that, but if I did, it was a hacker.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Isn't that cute, he still wants to act like he's stalking me.

No I don't; I never did.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

On CHYOO, every active account has several approved threads, and one has control of three stories.

I doubt some have even one approved thread.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Unlike you, I give something of quality to the site and don't lie about it.

That is not unlike me, & is precisely what I do. It is others that lie about it to discredit me & make them feel better about themselves, among other reasons.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

On the forums, I only need the hell_kaiser accounts, since I only need to harass you and deal with the few problems other people have with CHYOO.

You don't need to harass me, & are one (at least) of the problems with the sites.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

1. You clearly don't know what I said since you said I said something I never said.

2. The same can be said for you: not saying they hate you doesn't mean they don't.

3. Unlike you, I've received thanks and praises from people that aren't myself.

3] Believe it when I see it. I have seen mine from others.

2] You first said more than one dislikes me; Pick the point you wish to fail to make.

1] I never claimed you said something you didn't. Not everything has to be about you.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

1. That's another strike against you since the only thing you post about is how much your life sucks and how you can't use CHYOO the way you want to.

That's flat-out untrue, like many things you've said.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

2. You're the only person who doesn't have a post besides one against others. I've helped yoyo1324 with account problems, I've attempted to help you in the past, and I've tried a great deal more with other users, and that's just my two old accounts. Don't group me in with a whiny baby like you.

I have several posts that have nothing to do with anyone else. I have been harassed by you with no attempt to help anything (you admitted so earlier in the post).

I'm not a whiny baby, or in any group with you.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

24ward says you're not welcome, calling you the worst thing to ever happen to CHYOO and adds you to the blocked list of his stories. whizzper said you're not welcome, and even commented after your banishment that he hopes the door hits you on the way out. deathofcards says you're not welcome, saying he thinks your threads are horrible and your personality is worse. Torg banned your accounts because you removed yourself from his blocked lists. If you want, I'll dig up more times people have said you're not welcome.

You can make all these claims you want, but they don't say it here. As for the blocks, those same people accept my threads, so just call them indecisive.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

So there's no choice but to take your word for it.

You said it, not me.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Her only posts with the alexisrhodes13 account have been to you, and she's yet to lie. If there were more posts, I could easily prove she hasn't lied at all.

She has yet to lie, except to ask for a list in public she has privately seen several times... Also, tat's why there haven't been more posts; Because she can't post more without lying. (Putting aside the possibility she has other accounts like the two of us.)

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Tim's intelligence level decreases again.

It never did a first time, but it may seem that way on accident when I have to try to lower myself to your lack of smarts.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Threads are adopted because writers name them in adoption requests. Right now, you're the only one with the names of these stories and why they should be adopted. You're the only one who can do something about it. If someone else could do something about it, they would have done it by now. If you wanted these stories to be adopted, you would have realized all of this and written the names by now.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who can search a word in the "advanced search" area, & find threads that remain locked years after being written. It's gotten to the point people perhaps aren't looking because they know that to be the case & want to be able to continue to blame me.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You said... If the thread is about adoption, your own post says the list is related and that it does not end here for anyone. If you made this topic about adopting, your own post proves that list needs to be posted in one of these topics.

I said the thread was about adopting, & my first sentence refers to a new list of "orphaned" stories in the new year... That's all that need be done, if that. I didn't title the thread, "Adoption List," nor did I ever promise to post it, so I need not do so.

[hell_kaiserV2]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I don't believe I posted that, but if I did, it was a hacker.

And now you're blaming a hacker for your own dumbass comment.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

No I don't; I never did.

You just said you know how I use all of my accounts. That's saying you're stalking me.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I doubt some have even one approved thread.

And I doubt you have a hacker.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

That is not unlike me, & is precisely what I do.

Always saying a lie does not make it truth, it just makes you redundant. You have no work of high quality, and constantly lie about the quality of your work.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It is others that lie about it to discredit me & make them feel better about themselves, among other reasons.

And there's your big ego again. Nobody lies to discredit you, that's just you saying other do it so you can seem like the big boy in the room.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You don't need to harass me

Someone has to bring you down to earth, and nobody else wants the job.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

& are one (at least) of the problems with the sites.

I'm not a problem for anyone, so long as they don't react like you to my criticisms.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

3] Believe it when I see it. I have seen mine from others.

Believe it when I see it. I have seen mine from others.

And I guess that means you admit I'm not your hacker since your hacker would have seen all the low thread ratings I left you and all the harsh feedback I gave.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

2] You first said more than one dislikes me; Pick the point you wish to fail to make.

I always have. I never said everyone said it though, and the ones who didn't do hate you, they just haven't said it. You really should learn how to read some time.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

1] I never claimed you said something you didn't.

Yeah you did. You claimed I said multiple people dislike me, when I said the only person to say that has been you. Classic Timmy, can't even follow a conversation.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Not everything has to be about you.

Not everything has to be about you, either. That doesn't stop you from making every topic about you.

Besides, you talked about what I said and claimed I said something I didn't say. You brought me into the focus of the conversation, so this excuse is just that, and a very bad one at that.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

That's flat-out untrue, like many things you've said.

That's flat-out untrue, like many things you've said.

Every time you post in a topic, you turn the topic onto how it affects you, or onto something unrelated that affects you. You've yet to help one person besides yourself.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have several posts that have nothing to do with anyone else.

That doesn't help your case. Besides, those posts that only deal with you turn into flame wars where you blame a hacker for all your problems or blame editors for all your mistakes.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have been harassed by you with no attempt to help anything (you admitted so earlier in the post).

You still can't read. I said I harass you, I did not say that's the only thing I do to you. I originally posted with the intent of helping you. You didn't like what you read, so you turned into a baby. Even when I tired to bury the hatchet, you said, "Let's bury it in your head."

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I'm not a whiny baby

Then why do you always whine like a baby?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

or in any group with you.

Then why did you group me with you?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You can make all these claims you want, but they don't say it here.

So if they don't say it in this topic, it doesn't exist even if it's somewhere else on the forum? Then nobody has said I'm not welcome either since you are nobody.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

As for the blocks, those same people accept my threads, so just call them indecisive.

Call them tricked by your multiple accounts.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You said it, not me.

No, you just implied it the whole time. Still doesn't mean we will though, we all know how much you lie and can't keep your thoughts straight.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

She has yet to lie, except to ask for a list in public she has privately seen several times

Isn't that cute? He doesn't even know what a lie is.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, tat's why there haven't been more posts; Because she can't post more without lying. (Putting aside the possibility she has other accounts like the two of us.)

I love the use of baby talk, it finally shows your age.

You lie in every post. Lying doesn't mean she can't keep posting. Either she likes me harassing you more, or she's just given up trying to reason with you. But since you claim there are daily emails, then I guess she hasn't given up.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It never did a first time, but it may seem that way on accident when I have to try to lower myself to your lack of smarts.

Hilariously pathetic, as usual. Even if you're lowering yourself to my level (which we both know you're not since I'm already above your level), that would still mean you intelligence level decreased.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I'm sure I'm not the only one who can search a word in the "advanced search" area, & find threads that remain locked years after being written.

No one else has, making the responsibility yours.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It's gotten to the point people perhaps aren't looking because they know that to be the case & want to be able to continue to blame me.

Blame you for what, you egomaniac?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I said the thread was about adopting, & my first sentence refers to a new list of "orphaned" stories in the new year... That's all that need be done, if that. I didn't title the thread, "Adoption List," nor did I ever promise to post it, so I need not do so.

You named the topic "Adoption Time!!!" How can it be adoption time without an adoption list? That's a promise that you need to post the list of stories and the reasons for adoption.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And now you're blaming a hacker for your own dumbass comment.

Why not?! You are the proof hackers make dumbass comments all the time. Besides, I also said first that I don't believe I ever said what you claimed I said.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You just said you know how I use all of my accounts. That's saying you're stalking me.

Considering a simpleton could know that information, that means lots of people smarter than that could also certainly know it without stalking you.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And I doubt you have a hacker.

Who said I have one?! I potentially have several. You yourself have listed many members that dislike me to varying degrees.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Always saying a lie does not make it truth, it just makes you redundant.

True, but there is nothing wrong with repeating the truth, & nothing in doing so that makes it a lie.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You have no work of high quality, and constantly lie about the quality of your work.

I have plenty of work others have rated as being of high quality, whereas you lie about what work you do.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And there's your big ego again. Nobody lies to discredit you, that's just you saying other do it so you can seem like the big boy in the room.

Many people lie to discredit me (including you), & there is no need for me to say anything to look like the big boy when I am in a room full of comparative midgets.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Someone has to bring you down to earth, and nobody else wants the job.

Yet you in your own posts name people & instances where they have supposedly attempted to do so.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I'm not a problem for anyone, so long as they don't react like you to my criticisms.

You are a problem for whoever you choose to harass. When I respond to you plenty, they see no reason to do so. If I chose to remain silent, you would spend some time crowing about your supposed victory over me, before moving on to your next victim.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Believe it when I see it. I have seen mine from others.

We already knew you had nothing intelligent to say; No need to prove it by using something I myself said.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And I guess that means you admit I'm not your hacker since your hacker would have seen all the low thread ratings I left you and all the harsh feedback I gave.

I don't believe I ever said you hadn't seen it.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I always have. I never said everyone said it though, and the ones who didn't do hate you, they just haven't said it. You really should learn how to read some time.

I know how to read & write. Perhaps it is time for you to at least learn one of those actions.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Yeah you did. You claimed I said multiple people dislike me, when I said the only person to say that has been you. Classic Timmy, can't even follow a conversation.

I follow fine. You said I'm the only one to say it, but I thought we agreed that doesn't mean I'm the only one to do/feel it.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Not everything has to be about you, either. That doesn't stop you from making every topic about you.

I posted about the adoptable stories I had seen. It was not I who chose what part of that to concentrate on when responding.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Besides, you talked about what I said and claimed I said something I didn't say. You brought me into the focus of the conversation, so this excuse is just that, and a very bad one at that.

I am not attempting to make an excuse for anything. Maybe that is your new choice action, instead of lying & denying truths.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

That's flat-out untrue, like many things you've said.

Every time you post in a topic, you turn the topic onto how it affects you, or onto something unrelated that affects you. You've yet to help one person besides yourself.

That's simply quoting me again, & then going back to your old habit of harassing me, & claiming I did something I didn't do. This thread was to be about adopting stories. If people prefer to make a thread about the poster, that is not the person's fault.

Not that I've seen you help anyone.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

That doesn't help your case.

It certainly refutes your claim I was responding to when I wrote it.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You still can't read. I said I harass you, I did not say that's the only thing I do to you. I originally posted with the intent of helping you.

You already admitted to harassing me; Too late to change it now.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You didn't like what you read, so you turned into a baby. Even when I tired to bury the hatchet, you said, "Let's bury it in your head."

I attacked in response to someone harassing me. You never tried to end it without taking another shot.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Then why do you always whine like a baby?

I don 't.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Then why did you group me with you?

I didn't do so with that attempt, but I have yet to see you make a post that didn't have something to do with me, or in many cases, be aimed directly at me.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

So if they don't say it in this topic, it doesn't exist even if it's somewhere else on the forum? Then nobody has said I'm not welcome either since you are nobody.

If it is somewhere else, then link to it. As for you not being welcome, if I'm nobody, why do you only bother to harass me?

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Call them tricked by your multiple accounts.

I have had multiple accounts, & admitted as much. Regardless, the writers on the "blocked" lists for stories & the ones whose threads get accepted are both me, so the latter cancels-out any mention of the former happening... They don't do those things because of disliking me.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

No, you just implied it the whole time. Still doesn't mean we will though, we all know how much you lie and can't keep your thoughts straight.

I tell the truth far more than you, & have innumerable "straight" trains of thought.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Isn't that cute? He doesn't even know what a lie is.

I am well-aware what one is. If nothing else, your posts are full of them.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I love the use of baby talk, it finally shows your age.

Not hardly; Simply trying to respond to your far inferior intelligence.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You lie in every post. Lying doesn't mean she can't keep posting. Either she likes me harassing you more, or she's just given up trying to reason with you. But since you claim there are daily emails, then I guess she hasn't given up.

There were daily E-mails, but not since she started posting here. (Perhaps unlike you, she has a life.)

Also, I tell the truth in many of my posts. It is simply when confronted with lies against/about me, I figure, "When in Rome,...".

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Hilariously pathetic, as usual. Even if you're lowering yourself to my level (which we both know you're not since I'm already above your level), that would still mean you intelligence level decreased.

Let's talk about "hilariously pathetic", since that is an area we know you are somewhat of an expert in. Your simple use of the phrase, "you intelligence level" proves you are not at the least equal to my intelligence level, as the correct word is "your".

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

No one else has, making the responsibility yours.

I don't see it as a responsibility to do anything, same as I don't see your proof others have failed to.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Blame you for what, you egomaniac?

I'd respond if I thought the question was posed to me. Instead, I'll let an egomaniac respond to that, one you have not admitted to being obsessed with.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You named the topic "Adoption Time!!!" How can it be adoption time without an adoption list? That's a promise that you need to post the list of stories and the reasons for adoption.

I named it, "Adoption Time!!!" If I posted the title of one story with several locked threads that I feel needs adopted largely for that reason, is the thread not about a story & its potential adoption? Yes, and no need for a list.

[hell_kaiserV2]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Why not?! You are the proof hackers make dumbass comments all the time.

So now I'm a hacker again? You won't find any dumbass comments on the forums besides your own.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Besides, I also said first that I don't believe I ever said what you claimed I said.

Anyone who takes the time to read this topic knows you admit to self-rating. How about you read it too?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Considering a simpleton could know that information, that means lots of people smarter than that could also certainly know it without stalking you.

Yet only a simpleton claims to know what I do with my accounts. And he's completely wrong about what I do.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Who said I have one?!

You did. Still can't follow the conversation.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

True, but there is nothing wrong with repeating the truth, & nothing in doing so that makes it a lie.

Then how about you tell the truth at least once?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have plenty of work others have rated as being of high quality, whereas you lie about what work you do.

I have plenty of work other have rated as being of high quality, whereas you lie about what work you do. And unlike your work, those high praises are not self-rates.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Many people lie to discredit me (including you)

All we have to do to discredit you is tell the truth, which is why it's all we ever do.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

& there is no need for me to say anything to look like the big boy when I am in a room full of comparative midgets.

Yet you always talk about doing high quality work, having lots of it, and how everyone is jealous of you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Yet you in your own posts name people & instances where they have supposedly attempted to do so.

No, they just tell you how they feel about you. I'm the only one who really makes attacks on you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You are a problem for whoever you choose to harass.

And the only person I harass is you. No one else has needed me to harass them since they use a big kid potty instead of a diaper like you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

When I respond to you plenty, they see no reason to do so.

That hasn't stopped people from telling you how they feel about you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If I chose to remain silent, you would spend some time crowing about your supposed victory over me, before moving on to your next victim.

Right, that's why you're the only user I've ever harassed.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

We already knew you had nothing intelligent to say; No need to prove it by using something I myself said.

If I wanted to sound intelligent, I wouldn't copy one of your comments. Besides, when I copy you, that means it applies to you, not me.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I don't believe I ever said you hadn't seen it.

Another lost train of thought.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I know how to read & write.

Then why don't you ever use this ability to follow forum conversations or write quality threads?

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Perhaps it is time for you to at least learn one of those actions.

I have, and the fact that I follow forum conversations and have high quality threads proves it.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I follow fine.

You might follow fine, but you definitely don't follow conversations.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You said I'm the only one to say it, but I thought we agreed that doesn't mean I'm the only one to do/feel it.

Trying to confuse the issue again? This doesn't deal with the fact that you put words in my mouth. And it doesn't mean you're the only one to feel it, but that doesn't mean you're not the only one either. And with how I treat others, I know there's no reason for anyone that isn't you to feel that way.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I posted about the adoptable stories I had seen.

No you didn't. If you did, there would be a list of stories and we wouldn't have to keep asking you for the list of stories.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It was not I who chose what part of that to concentrate on when responding.

So you're saying only this topic exists again? Every topic you post in is something you make about you. Even when users make fun of you, they keep it on topic. Besides, alexis only asked about the list of reasons for adoption and then talked about herself and why her stories shouldn't be up for adoption. She said nothing about you in particular. That part of the conversation was started by you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I am not attempting to make an excuse for anything.

That's the only thing you do besides lie and talk about yourself.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Maybe that is your new choice action, instead of lying & denying truths.

I've never done these ever. Can't say the same about you without lying.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

That's simply quoting me again, & then going back to your old habit of harassing me, & claiming I did something I didn't do.

When it applies to you and not me, "Rubber, glue, back to you" is the best way to do it. Timmy, go over your posts. You will see every one talk about you, how something affects you, and how you feel about CHYOO.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

This thread was to be about adopting stories. If people prefer to make a thread about the poster, that is not the person's fault.

Except no one tries talking about you except you. The topic only becomes about you because you make it about you, not because someone else does.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Not that I've seen you help anyone.

Proving you don't help anyone else, since you would have seen me help someone if you at least tried to help someone besides yourself.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It certainly refutes your claim I was responding to when I wrote it.

Yes, but it also admits you only talk about yourself.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You already admitted to harassing me; Too late to change it now.

What change? I said I harass you, and I do. I don't deny that. I deny you saying that that's the only thing I do and you saying that I said that it's the only thing I do.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I attacked in response to someone harassing me.

At first, you attacked in response to me telling you where your threads need work.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You never tried to end it without taking another shot.

Not true, go through your posts again. You're the one who won't end it without taking another shot. In fact, you're the one who starts every flame war you've ever been in.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I don 't.

Not according to every other forum member who doesn't stay quiet.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I didn't do so with that attempt

You put me in your group, because the only way you know how to attack someone is to tell them what you've heard all your life.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

but I have yet to see you make a post that didn't have something to do with me, or in many cases, be aimed directly at me.

Still proves you're not interested in helping other user.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If it is somewhere else, then link to it.

24ward http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=805215
whizzper http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=696479
deathofcards http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=833784
Torg http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=761489

I didn't link to the posts where they say this, only the topics the posts are in, so make the effort to scroll through the topics.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

As for you not being welcome, if I'm nobody, why do you only bother to harass me?

Because then I can say "I harass nobody" without lying.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have had multiple accounts, & admitted as much.

But you don't say what their names are. You make us figure it out and try to trick us.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Regardless, the writers on the "blocked" lists for stories & the ones whose threads get accepted are both me so the latter cancels-out any mention of the former happening... They don't do those things because of disliking me.

But they don't know that they're both you since you hide your account name, so this excuse means nothing.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I tell the truth far more than you, & have innumerable "straight" trains of thought.

I tell the truth far more than you, and have innumerable "straight" trains of thought. And I don't have to lie and be redundant to try and convince people, unlike you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I am well-aware what one is.

You can't or you'd know that what you described wasn't a lie.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If nothing else, your posts are full of them.

That's your posts Timmy, not mine. Mine are loaded with truth.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Not hardly; Simply trying to respond to your far inferior intelligence.

Inferior to Einstein, yes, but not to you. If you were smart, you would know that "not hardly" means it's not baby talk, but the rest of your sentence means it's baby talk.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

There were daily E-mails, but not since she started posting here.

You already said you were getting daily emails after she started posting here. Too late to change your mind now.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

(Perhaps unlike you, she has a life.)

A shut-in like you doesn't even know what a life is.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also, I tell the truth in many of my posts.

Those are all the ones that say "I'm a troll."

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

It is simply when confronted with lies against/about me, I figure, "When in Rome,...".

So you only lie about other users. Thanks for the confession.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Let's talk about "hilariously pathetic", since that is an area we know you are somewhat of an expert in. Your simple use of the phrase, "you intelligence level" proves you are not at the least equal to my intelligence level, as the correct word is "your".

Not hardly; Simply trying to respond to your far inferior intelligence.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I don't see it as a responsibility to do anything

Then you shouldn't have made the topic.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

same as I don't see your proof others have failed to.

No one else has posted about it. It proves itself.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I'd respond if I thought the question was posed to me. Instead, I'll let an egomaniac respond to that, one you have not admitted to being obsessed with.

Saying you're not going to respond to to the question is responding to the question. You just didn't answer it. And I've yet to admit to having an obsession with anyone. Unlike you, I have a life that extends beyond my bedroom door.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I named it, "Adoption Time!!!" If I posted the title of one story with several locked threads that I feel needs adopted largely for that reason, is the thread not about a story & its potential adoption? Yes, and no need for a list.

But you didn't post the title of a story. You admit that you need a list of stories, and you don't have a list of stories, which means this paragraph is another failed excuse. Plus, you said you had a list of reasons that are explain why. Why would you bring the list up if you didn't need to?

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

So now I'm a hacker again? You won't find any dumbass comments on the forums besides your own.

I don't recall ever saying you weren't one. Let's add that to your list of dumbass comments, placed where you seem to think my such list exists.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Anyone who takes the time to read this topic knows you admit to self-rating. How about you read it too?

How about you read the posts that actually exist, & who wrote them? Yourself included.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Yet only a simpleton claims to know what I do with my accounts. And he's completely wrong about what I do.

Anyone can claim whatever they want with nothing said by it of their intelligence, especially if their claims are incorrect.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You did. Still can't follow the conversation.

I said I have certainly one, & probably more.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Then how about you tell the truth at least once?

I do, near-constantly. Try it sometime.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I have plenty of work other have rated as being of high quality, whereas you lie about what work you do. And unlike your work, those high praises are not self-rates.

Mine are also not self-ratings & unlike yours, they are also not something originally written by someone else.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

All we have to do to discredit you is tell the truth, which is why it's all we ever do.

You have to state lies & opinions to discredit me, which is the vast majority of what you do.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Yet you always talk about doing high quality work, having lots of it, and how everyone is jealous of you.

As I said, I state facts.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

No, they just tell you how they feel about you. I'm the only one who really makes attacks on you.

You also said they place me on "blocked" lists, etc., which is not stating anything.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And the only person I harass is you. No one else has needed me to harass them since they use a big kid potty instead of a diaper like you.

Neither of us use diapers; These posts are where you get rid of your crap.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

That hasn't stopped people from telling you how they feel about you.

They can say whatever they want; Doesn't mean I care.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Right, that's why you're the only user I've ever harassed.

Or so you claim. Who knows how many accounts you've had?

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

If I wanted to sound intelligent, I wouldn't copy one of your comments. Besides, when I copy you, that means it applies to you, not me.

You copy me to make it apply to me. However, when originally stated, my comments often apply to you. Try to follow.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Another lost train of thought.

Another statement of fact. Try to keep on the tracks, & don't blame me when you fail.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Then why don't you ever use this ability to follow forum conversations or write quality threads?

I do both. Waiting for you to do one.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I have, and the fact that I follow forum conversations and have high quality threads proves it.

It might, if you did. You don't, so it doesn't.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You might follow fine, but you definitely don't follow conversations.

There you go again, trying to use humor when everyone truly laughs at you... Except me; I see you as sad & pathetic.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Trying to confuse the issue again?

Why? I never tried to confuse you the first time; It's simply done easily.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

This doesn't deal with the fact that you put words in my mouth.

Then why do you feel the need to repeat much of what I say in your responses after you quote me?

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And it doesn't mean you're the only one to feel it, but that doesn't mean you're not the only one either.

Pick a side, & you may find this easier.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And with how I treat others, I know there's no reason for anyone that isn't you to feel that way.

If you don't treat them the same way, which is something we have yet to rule-out.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

No you didn't. If you did, there would be a list of stories and we wouldn't have to keep asking you for the list of stories.

Look around; You can post about stories without naming them.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

So you're saying only this topic exists again?

Not hardly.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Every topic you post in is something you make about you.

ALso not hardly true.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Even when users make fun of you, they keep it on topic.

Often only by making me the topic when I was not originally.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Besides, alexis only asked about the list of reasons for adoption and then talked about herself and why her stories shouldn't be up for adoption.

She made few such statements, & keeps asking questions, about a list she's already seen.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

She said nothing about you in particular. That part of the conversation was started by you.

Try again. From her first post in the thread:

Originally Posted by alexisrhodes13

Now having spent a few hours scrolling through your posts and getting the measure of just what kind of netizen you are,

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

That's the only thing you do besides lie and talk about yourself.

Not only is it not something I often do, but it is something I rarely do, especially dealing with people like you & posts like yours that there is no excuse for.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I've never done these ever. Can't say the same about you without lying.

Never stopped you before; You even lie in the previous sentence.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

When it applies to you and not me, "Rubber, glue, back to you" is the best way to do it. Timmy, go over your posts. You will see every one talk about you, how something affects you, and how you feel about CHYOO.

This thread starts referring to me, but the first post (by me) is largely about stories with "Locked" threads.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Except no one tries talking about you except you.

That's all you do besides lying & repeating what I post verbatim.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

The topic only becomes about you because you make it about you, not because someone else does.

Your own posts go against that.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Proving you don't help anyone else, since you would have seen me help someone if you at least tried to help someone besides yourself.

I have tried to help others. You have tried to help nobody but yourself.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Yes, but it also admits you only talk about yourself.

It admits I talk about myself, but not that this is all I do. Talking/Writing about stories & their problems is not writing about myself or anyone else.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

What change?

The change to saying you try/tried to help me.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I said I harass you, and I do. I don't deny that. I deny you saying that that's the only thing I do and you saying that I said that it's the only thing I do.

Too late now; The proof already exists, no matter what either of us wish to post now.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

At first, you attacked in response to me telling you where your threads need work.

That was far from the first; No "Rewind" now.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Not true, go through your posts again. You're the one who won't end it without taking another shot. In fact, you're the one who starts every flame war you've ever been in.

I post about Locked stories, naming nobody, That doesn;t start a flame war with anyone. Meanwhile, you are on "v2" due to your admitted harassment of others.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Not according to every other forum member who doesn't stay quiet.

Actually, some other members (like me) post about other stories & situations mainly, & about me very little. As for the others, they post about/to me largely hoping to get those types of responses. "Be careful what you wish for".

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You put me in your group, because the only way you know how to attack someone is to tell them what you've heard all your life.

I put you there because you claim posting mainly to harass me, & they're the only posts of yours I've read.

[quote=hell_kaiserV2;43578366]Still proves you're not interested in helping other user.[/quotes]

Proves no such thing. I'd love to help other users. Some, like you, seem to prefer attacking me to taking assistance I can offer.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I didn't link to the posts where they say this, only the topics the posts are in, so make the effort to scroll through the topics.

Do your own work... For once.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Because then I can say "I harass nobody" without lying.

No, you can't. You can't say hardly anything & be honest. Proof? You rarely have done so.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

But you don't say what their names are. You make us figure it out and try to trick us.

No need; Others point them out for me. Proof? I have seen posts claiming "MistreatEd is one of TJChurch's..." new accounts, etc.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

But they don't know that they're both you since you hide your account name, so this excuse means nothing.

The same amount of things I hide.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I tell the truth far more than you, and have innumerable "straight" trains of thought. And I don't have to lie and be redundant to try and convince people, unlike you.

No; You only have to verbatim repeat what I say, & lie supposedly without needing to.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You can't or you'd know that what you described wasn't a lie.

I know when I am describing a lie. You either post lies about me, or repost what you already quoted that I said.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

That's your posts Timmy, not mine. Mine are loaded with truth.

You quote & repeat me so much, you have which lies & which doesn't reversed.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Inferior to Einstein, yes, but not to you.

Both.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

If you were smart, you would know that "not hardly" means it's not baby talk, but the rest of your sentence means it's baby talk.

No need to explain to me; Unlike you, I am smart enough to know what it is & that I explained why.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You already said you were getting daily emails after she started posting here. Too late to change your mind now.

WERE... Past tense.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

A shut-in like you doesn't even know what a life is.

I certainly do. It's one of the reasons you quote me: To appear to have one.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Those are all the ones that say "I'm a troll."

Those were not me, but a hacker... Perhaps you.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

So you only lie about other users. Thanks for the confession.

I admit to lying, but not about who/what. Your turn.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Not hardly; Simply trying to respond to your far inferior intelligence.

It seems you are, as I suggested, trying to appear of superior intelligence by quoting me, though you also quote what you yourself call "baby talk".

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Then you shouldn't have made the topic.

I made the thread in an attempt to help, not to fulfill any responsibility.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

No one else has posted about it. It proves itself.

All that proves itself is others' reliance on me & your constant lies & need for me for your posts to happen.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Saying you're not going to respond to to the question is responding to the question.

Saying I won't respond is solely saying I won't.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

You just didn't answer it.

I don't plan to.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

And I've yet to admit to having an obsession with anyone. Unlike you, I have a life that extends beyond my bedroom door.

You admitted to an obsession with me, but until now, I was unaware you knew the room had a door.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

Plus, you said you had a list of reasons that are explain why. Why would you bring the list up if you didn't need to?

What list? The one of reasons that "are explain why"? I don't understand any list of that type, or I might post it.

[Black_Frost]

I hate interrupt a good flame war, but I have to jump in here:

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Do your own work... For once.

You mean to tell me that you won't even read the posts to which hell_kaiserV2 was referring and linked, even after you demanded said links? How lazy can you get? Or is this more denial? Either way, you just fucked the dog. If it's laziness, we now know why your threads are so pathetic and the dialogue so bland: you can't be bothered to understand what was happening previously and you have no experience with dialogue. If it's denial, then you stated that you don't bother taking any feedback and criticism with even the slightest consideration that it may be true or something from which you could draw inspiration; which proves everything that has ever been said to you on the forums.

And tnadnuder, considering you insist on correcting everyone, it would be pertinent to first learn the rules of writing. The reason for the baby comments are certainly a result of the fact that you lack the writing comprehension of a five year old.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

I hate interrupt a good flame war, but I have to jump in here:

Don't worry; You weren't interrupting a good anything; Half his responses to what I said included reprintings of the exact sentence I aaid.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

You mean to tell me that you won't even read the posts to which hell_kaiserV2 was referring and linked, even after you demanded said links?

I "demanded" nothing, & followed nothing.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

How lazy can you get? Or is this more denial?

Actually, neither.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

If it's laziness, we now know why your threads are so pathetic and the dialogue so bland: you can't be bothered to understand what was happening previously and you have no experience with dialogue.

Neither is true. My dialogue is decent, & the rest of my threads are good.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

If it's denial, then you stated that you don't bother taking any feedback and criticism with even the slightest consideration that it may be true or something from which you could draw inspiration; which proves everything that has ever been said to you on the forums.

I check threads that get feedback claiming spelling problems against dictionaries, etc. However, I rarely find any such problems actually exist, & also often find spelling & grammar issuses in approved threads that are/were not in my word-processor program files of the thread when I wrote it.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

And tnadnuder, considering you insist on correcting everyone, it would be pertinent to first learn the rules of writing. The reason for the baby comments are certainly a result of the fact that you lack the writing comprehension of a five year old.

There may be a comprehension probem, but if so, it is not mine. Less than a year ago, I had a contract offer from "the oldest American independent [self-publishing] press", winners of the National Book Award.

[Black_Frost]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Don't worry; You weren't interrupting a good anything; Half his responses to what I said included reprintings of the exact sentence I aaid [sic].

No, this is a good flame war. It involves you, who is changing his mind with every post and putting words in another person's mouth, all the while said person continues to confront such posts with moronic comments that undertake the vain attempt to set the record straight in the eyes of the first person. It's all around entertainment, and the only way two clowns can draw an audience to the CHYOO forums.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I "demanded" nothing,

Your post:

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

If it is somewhere else, then link to it.

Based on how you carry yourself, anything you say is clearly a demand.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

& followed nothing.

You've now added the admission that you couldn't be bothered to even click on the links. This makes your prior comment rather suspect, since this leads to the obvious conclusion that you have no way of knowing whether or not hell_kaiserV2 did the work.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Actually, neither.

If you refuse to view the contents of the links, then they're the two most logical choices. If they're both wrong, then please enlighten the world to this third option, one which I'm certain will reveal a billy goat.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Neither is true. My dialogue is decent, & the rest of my threads are good.

That's a matter of opinion. However, the ratings on your threads and the contents of the forum suggest I'm not alone in my opinion while you're the proverbial cheese.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I check threads that get feedback claiming spelling problems against dictionaries, etc. However, I rarely find any such problems actually exist, & also often find spelling & grammar issuses [sic] in approved threads that are/were not in my word-processor program files of the thread when I wrote it.

Which is it? The first half of this excuse states the blunders don't exist, while the second half claims the editors inserted problems after the fact. This isn't Schrödinger's Cat. Your threads are clearly visible to anyone who wishes to undergo the agony of reading them, they can't exist in a paradoxical state of being marred with errors while simultaneously pristine and flawless if they can be accessed by the public. The threads in your word processor can be perceived this way by everyone but you, but the threads already on CHYOO are the box after it's been opened.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

There may be a comprehension probem [sic], but if so, it is not mine. Less than a year ago, I had a contract offer from "the oldest American independent [self-publishing] press", [sic] winners of the National Book Award.

That's not something to brag about. That company is Vanity Publishing, meaning you would have been forced to pay them to get your work published (which is probably why you didn't sign; if you'd signed, you would have bragged about signing the contract, not about being offered a contract). Real publishers pay the author for the privilege of being allowed to put their company name on the work that they believe will fly off the shelves. You were offered that contract from a Vanity Publisher because the company knows that the only people willing to buy your work are you and your loved ones; thus why you would have been forced to do all the selling yourself. If you want to brag, talk about offers you've received from real publishers, assuming any actually exist outside your imagination.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

No, this is a good flame war. It involves you, who is changing his mind with every post and putting words in another person's mouth, all the while said person continues to confront such posts with moronic comments that undertake the vain attempt to set the record straight in the eyes of the first person. It's all around entertainment, and the only way two clowns can draw an audience to the CHYOO forums.

Actually, it's not a good war, in large part becasuse I (someone not doing what you claim I am) responding largely to repostings of what I say (not meaning the quotes; He says it again after quoting it). I also am not moronic or vain, but it is clear I am seen that way, again perhaps due to the idiocy of the observer.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Your post:...
Based on how you carry yourself, anything you say is clearly a demand.

You quote me, & then say something is "clear" in one of your many incorrect observations.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

You've now added the admission that you couldn't be bothered to even click on the links.

You make it sound as though I denied that previously, which I never did.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

This makes your prior comment rather suspect, since this leads to the obvious conclusion that you have no way of knowing whether or not hell_kaiserV2 did the work.

Actually, he admitted to not having done it.

Originally Posted by hell_kaiserV2

I didn't link to the posts where they say this, only the topics the posts are in, so...

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

If you refuse to view the contents of the links, then they're the two most logical choices. If they're both wrong, then please enlighten the world to this third option, one which I'm certain will reveal a billy goat.

I'm not in denial but as I've proven, he didn't do the work, & admitted as much. One of the times (but not the first) I would be doing more work than he did/would.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

That's a matter of opinion. However, the ratings on your threads and the contents of the forum suggest I'm not alone in my opinion while you're the proverbial cheese.

I get the low ratings on threads, but also the high; The irony is the same ones often get 2 votes with an average of 3. One is often a 5, the highest possible, & the other the lowest possible. Also ironic is the fact I assume many posting against me are the same ones giving me the high feedback/ratings.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Which is it? The first half of this excuse states the blunders don't exist, while the second half claims the editors inserted problems after the fact. This isn't Schrödinger's Cat. Your threads are clearly visible to anyone who wishes to undergo the agony of reading them, they can't exist in a paradoxical state of being marred with errors while simultaneously pristine and flawless if they can be accessed by the public.

I am well-aware of that. Try to simplify it thusly: I am speaking about a group of threads all written by me. Some have errors added after submission, while others get feedback claiming errors that are found to not actually exist. Don't over-complicate things needlessly.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

That's not something to brag about. That company is Vanity Publishing, meaning you would have been forced to pay them to get your work published (which is probably why you didn't sign; if you'd signed, you would have bragged about signing the contract, not about being offered a contract). Real publishers pay the author for the privilege of being allowed to put their company name on the work that they believe will fly off the shelves. You were offered that contract from a Vanity Publisher because the company knows that the only people willing to buy your work are you and your loved ones; thus why you would have been forced to do all the selling yourself. If you want to brag, talk about offers you've received from real publishers, assuming any actually exist outside your imagination.

Actually, I bragged about the vanity publishing because I didn't want to seem egomaniacal. I have also gotten them from others who would probably have offered me large sums of money if I had time to read the long, many-page contract before thre deadline they set for the signing. Unfortunately, life offline didn't leave me with the open time to devote to such reading, even to further my own writing. Perhaps in the future.

[24ward]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You can make all these claims you want, but they don't say it here. As for the blocks, those same people accept my threads, so just call them indecisive.

Okay, I'll say it here: Tim is the worst thing to happen to CHYOO and I try to block his usernames but he interferes with that editorial decision, even adding me to the block list on my own stories. I approved some threads early on until I realized what a sociopathic bully he was and I have repeatedly communicated to him directly that none of his threads are welcome. I consider them generally of low quality and certainly not worth the effort of dealing with his bullshit. He pesters me to not only approve his threads but make him a trusted writer, oddly enough without identifying himself as TJChurch or whatever or referring to any story in particular (similar to his modus operandi here of general bitching without providing specifics that would allow action to be taken). He is the only writer I block, everyone else is welcome to contribute. You can call it personal animosity but it's really just lesson learned.

HKv2, your tenacity in dealing with his muddled logic and ad hominum nonsense is impressive!

[Black_Frost]

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Actually, it's not a good war, in large part becasuse I (someone not doing what you claim I am) responding largely to repostings of what I say (not meaning the quotes; He says it again after quoting it). [sic]

The bulk of hell_kaiserV2's posts are not copies of your posts, quotes aside. Yes, copying is extremely apparent in those posts, but the majority of his comments are not copied from you, something I can tell because I read this topic. However, even if the posts were as you erroneously paint them, then it would only amplify the quality since it shows simpletons at war and how it makes you feel.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I also am not moronic or vain, but it is clear I am seen that way, again perhaps due to the idiocy of the observer.

In my comment, I had made those "moronic" and "vain" comments about hell_kaiserV2, something you would have known if you had read my comment instead of simply scanning it for insults you assumed would be aimed at you. I clearly stated "said person" following my labeling of hell_kaiserV2 as "person," and referred to the first party as both "you" and "the first person."

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You quote me, & then say something is "clear" in one of your many incorrect observations.

If it was an incorrect observation, I would not have captured the essence of this flame war with my comments. Furthermore, you have demonstrated, in this topic, that you always attempt to disprove what you perceive to be "incorrect observations," much as you did with my perception of the quality of the flame war. Therefore, were it such a comment, you would have made efforts to disprove it and support your claim. Instead, you present this simple negative.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

You make it sound as though I denied that previously, which I never did.

You implied an affirmation. That is all the reason in the world to make it sound as though you made a formal acknowledgement. However, none of this changes the fact that we now have your denial on record. With this, it has been established that you are either too lazy to follow the links or in denial about others opinions of you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Actually, he admitted to not having done it.

That is an admission that hell_kaiserV2 did the work. The supplied links lead to the comments, and all you had to do was scroll down to the comments: hell_kaiserV2's words.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I'm not in denial but as I've proven, he didn't do the work & admitted as much.

You have proven no such thing. On the contrary, you have proven he did the work and you did not do what little work was required of you (reading the comments and scrolling).

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

One of the times (but not the first) I would be doing more work than he did/would.

Considering you failed to do the work that was required of you, this is a clear falsehood.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I get the low ratings on threads, but also the high

The average of which is low ratings, proving you get predominantly low ratings.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

The irony is the same ones often get 2 votes with an average of 3. One is often a 5, the highest possible, & the other the lowest possible.

That is not irony, that is a simple difference of opinion between two readers. By your definition, it is ironic Shakespeare is praised so highly by some while criticized so harshly by others. Additionally, the fact that your averages then plummet further when a third party renders its verdict is proof that comparing you to Shakespeare was an insult to The Bard.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Also ironic is the fact I assume many posting against me are the same ones giving me the high feedback/ratings.

If this was true, it would be irony. However, that would be only your assumption based upon an obscenely high opinion of yourself, and assumes that none of these high ratings are coupled with condescending remarks, such as one of my own:

A grand testament to the low quality of your writing and lack of character. Please, write more, show us how petty and jealous you are of lilguy and other authors.

You may not find this feedback anymore since I reported such a spiteful thread and it has been deleted, but you know in your heart such a feedback was given to you, just as my Firefox browser remembers me submitting it to you.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I am well-aware of that. Try to simplify it thusly: I am speaking about a group of threads all written by me. Some have errors added after submission, while others get feedback claiming errors that are found to not actually exist. Don't over-complicate things needlessly.

I'm only following your words. You said your threads existed in a constant paradox, and you also claim there is no changing what one has said. Therefore, your threads are both filled with blunders and without flaw, which makes you look like a fool.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

Actually, I bragged about the vanity publishing because I didn't want to seem egomaniacal.

That boat sailed the moment you bragged about your high quality of writing and brought up even one contract offer.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

I have also gotten them from others who would probably have offered me large sums of money

Name them. Also address why such offers were not mentioned on your blog, and address why someone with such offers from real publishers so much as considered using a Vanity Publisher.

Originally Posted by tnadnuder

if I had time to read the long, many-page contract before thre [sic] deadline they set for the signing. Unfortunately, life offline didn't leave me with the open time to devote to such reading, even to further my own writing. Perhaps in the future.

So you met them alone? Also address why you have all this free time at the present.

[tnadnuder]

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

However, even if the posts were as you erroneously paint them, then it would only amplify the quality since it shows simpletons at war and how it makes you feel.

If you actually read the topic, you would know my "painting" is not done erroneously. Most of his posts are quotes from me, lies, & misuses of spelling & grammar. Subtract that, & you maybe get 2 sentences a post.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

In my comment, I had made those "moronic" and "vain" comments about hell_kaiserV2, something you would have known if you had read my comment instead of simply scanning it for insults you assumed would be aimed at you. I clearly stated "said person" following my labeling of hell_kaiserV2 as "person," and referred to the first party as both "you" and "the first person."

Again, mislabeling something as "clear", much as you labeled my other work as "erroneous". I don't aim for insults aimed at me, though I can see why one would as much as posts by others are filled with those.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

If it was an incorrect observation, I would not have captured the essence of this flame war with my comments.

As I have already said, you have not done so correctly.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Furthermore, you have demonstrated, in this topic, that you always attempt to disprove what you perceive to be "incorrect observations," much as you did with my perception of the quality of the flame war.

There, you are right. I disprove them, also proving them to be incorrect.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Therefore, were it such a comment, you would have made efforts to disprove it and support your claim. Instead, you present this simple negative.

Sometimes, I choose to only do the simple thing, in hopes people don't erroneously misunderstand what I am reading &/or writing.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

You implied an affirmation. That is all the reason in the world to make it sound as though you made a formal acknowledgement. However, none of this changes the fact that we now have your denial on record. With this, it has been established that you are either too lazy to follow the links or in denial about others opinions of you.

I made no implication. You simply made yet another incorrect inferrence. Also, me saying I "never" denied it is a statement of fact, as you had no denial on record. I certainly will never admit to being lazy, even in cases where it might be true, of which this is not one.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

That is an admission that hell_kaiserV2 did the work. The supplied links lead to the comments, and all you had to do was scroll down to the comments: hell_kaiserV2's words.

Trying to have it both ways, are we? If "all [i] have to do" is scroll down, that states that his links don't lead to the comments themselves.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

You have proven no such thing. On the contrary, you have proven he did the work and you did not do what little work was required of you (reading the comments and scrolling).

Actually, I quoted him saying he only linked to the topics, not the posts with the comments. Some threads, like this one, stretch out for multiple pages, all the more I would have to scroll through to find the comments he is referring to. This thread also proves it is possible to link/refer to one post by someone.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Considering you failed to do the work that was required of you, this is a clear falsehood.

It would be if it proved such a thing, but such a thing was not proven, as it is not the case.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

The average of which is low ratings, proving you get predominantly low ratings.

From people who rate without reading.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

That is not irony, that is a simple difference of opinion between two readers. By your definition, it is ironic Shakespeare is praised so highly by some while criticized so harshly by others. Additionally, the fact that your averages then plummet further when a third party renders its verdict is proof that comparing you to Shakespeare was an insult to The Bard.

I have seen rare opinions rendered by any "third party", and it was you, not I, that compared me to Shakespeare. (Perhaps that proves the third party is sometimes someone who gave me a low rating first, but then decided to post higher ratings they actually believe me to deserve.) As for the irony, I was pointing out the irony it is always one rating of the highest possible & one of the absolute lowest, not just the "difference of opinion".

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

If this was true, it would be irony. However, that would be only your assumption based upon an obscenely high opinion of yourself

If it is true, it is not an assumption of anything.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

You may not find this feedback anymore since I reported such a spiteful thread and it has been deleted, but you know in your heart such a feedback was given to you, just as my Firefox browser remembers me submitting it to you.

This is a testament to your lack of character & not mine. Also, cease attempting to tell me what I know in my heart, as you clearly are unable to even know what I know.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

I'm only following your words. You said your threads existed in a constant paradox, and you also claim there is no changing what one has said.

I never made such a claim. Perhaps I stated something about my threads you incorrectly believed described a paradoxical situation, but that is not what I truly said.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Therefore, your threads are both filled with blunders and without flaw, which makes you look like a fool.

It makes me look not foolish, since they don't refer to he same exact threads, but as someone who has both good and bad occasions of writing. Normal people like myself have those and admit to them.

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

That boat sailed the moment you bragged about your high quality of writing and brought up even one contract offer.

Mentioning a contract offer when not a paid writer is like mentioning a raise at any other job: Reason for celebration, not to seem egomaniacal. Also, what is the harm in mentioning my high quality when others have said they feel the same way about my work?

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

Name them. Also address why such offers were not mentioned on your blog, and address why someone with such offers from real publishers so much as considered using a Vanity Publisher.

I see no reason for naming such offers when h_k can't even do the minimal work to link to comments he has already referred to. Also, I for one feel in this time of unpredictable futures, one should consider all offers they recieve. Lastly, no mention on my blog is nothing that need be discussed here (if in fact I don't have another blog that does mention them).

Originally Posted by Black_Frost

So you met them alone? Also address why you have all this free time at the present.

I see no need to address any amount of "free time". Also, as to my meetings, I have yet to meet with anyone in person.