Krauthammer Rips Obama ‘Gibberish’

THE USA isn't looked up to anymore. Now China is the economic empire. Well obama even said who cares if USA is number 2 or 3.

Well thanks to the lefties that drink the kool aid and praise obama.. now this is what we have.

Sad.
 
Last edited:
Somebody shake Krauthammer awake and tell him it's not 1975 anymore. Who cares about any of that shit?
 
The Noble Peace Prize now has no value because of obama.

So plenty of otherthings will have less value as well.
 
Somebody shake Krauthammer awake and tell him it's not 1975 anymore. Who cares about any of that shit?

meanwhile, you NIGGERZ were screaming 2001-2008 how Bush made us less respected

you NIGGERZ are putrid HIPPO CREEPS

FUCKOFF you LOSER
 
Last edited:
The three Russian ship have turned around.
Two north Korea flagged ships that's being watched.
 
Krauthammer is always ripping on Obama. No big surprise.
 
I guess it just proves no one is all bad, even Obama.

In reality, though, our foreign policy should begin and end at the US border.

The Cold War is over, lets put our own country first for a change.
 
Obama is a foreign policy disaster, get a load of this shit:

Krauthammer rips Obama ‘gibberish’ and the biggest ‘decline in U.S. influence’ since World War II

Krauthammer homed in on Obama’s remarks concerning a “transition” from Bashir Assad’s regime, saying the Russians were ready to go along, noting that there were some obvious actions by Russian President Vladimir Putin that would make that an understatement.

“It’s the tone Obama takes, the conciliatory tone — and he had something else to say about the Russians where he said, ‘I’m not quite prepared that they are signing on to our idea of a transition where [Syrian President Bashir] Assad steps down,’” Krauthammer continued. “What in God’s name is he talking about? The Russians are opposing that. The Russians are blocking that The Russians are supporting Assad. They block all resolutions to bring him down. They block all resolutions for an arms embargo. They are sending helicopter gunships. They’ve announced they will send anti-aircraft equipment so the Syrians can shoot down anybody in the future who might want to do a rescue or some kind of support of the Syrian people from the air. And we’ve just had the news that the Russians are preparing to send three ships from their Black Sea port to the Syrian port of Tartus, where the Russians have a base and facilities that Putin has revived for the first time since the Cold War. And we have a president who says ‘I’m not sure they are signing on to our program.’”

That presence of Russian warships in war-torn Syria was what The Washington Post columnist deemed a “challenge” to western powers.

“This is a challenge to the United States and to the West,” he continued. “This is a thumb in the eye to the United States. And this is the Russians planting their flag saying Syria is our property, our client, our state and we are going to do as we wish and the United States has a president who not only says anything to oppose that or to critique it but says we are working with them because ‘I’m confident they don’t condone the massacres.’”



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/20/k...s-influence-since-world-war-ii/#ixzz1yNPD5ovR

:rolleyes: On the one hand, RWs are calling Obama an insane, constitution-destroying warhawk for things like Libya and Afghanistan and cyber-attacks on Iran and drone-strikes anywhere. OTOH, they call him some kind of weak-kneed pacifist who has caused a "decline in U.S. influence." Make up your fucking minds.
 
I guess it just proves no one is all bad, even Obama.

In reality, though, our foreign policy should begin and end at the US border.

The Cold War is over, lets put our own country first for a change.

It's in the interest of putting our own country first, with the understanding the Cold War is over, that I support bringing the troops home from their European and Asian bases. We now have sufficient submarine, aircraft carrier, and airlift power to make our presence felt should the immediate safety of the US be threatened, we can place cruise missiles on targets at weill, and pput boots on the ground rapidly anywhere needed. The support of the Socialist economy in Europe with American defense support, allowing them to ridicule our protection while living in its shadow, is not in our self interest. They'll miss us when we're gone....

http://www.wallpapers-free.co.uk/backgrounds/historical/nazi_third_reich/hitler-in-front-of-the-eiffel-tower.jpg
 
Don't leave out his debacle in Egypt, that other foreign policy disaster of his, the one you defended.:rolleyes:

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: I hope you do not wish the Mubarak regime had survived! Even an MB government would be better. The revolution was long overdue (and might yet be thwarted by the damned corrupt generals). In any case, all Obama did was speak out in favor of the revolution, rather belatedly.
 
The support of the Socialist economy in Europe with American defense support, allowing them to ridicule our protection . . .

Protection from whom? Not Russia, and not any of the Islamic or African countries, and definitely not China. So, who?
 
Obama - in America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world

That's his foreign policy vet.
 
:rolleyes: On the one hand, RWs are calling Obama an insane, constitution-destroying warhawk for things like Libya and Afghanistan and cyber-attacks on Iran and drone-strikes anywhere. OTOH, they call him some kind of weak-kneed pacifist who has caused a "decline in U.S. influence." Make up your fucking minds.

He "leads from behind " in Libya. He institutes a surge in Afghanistan that is fully half of what the generals on the ground recommend. And he has more drone attacks, a radio controlled war, than any of his antecedants.

He is unique in history by showing how much of a douchebag he is by employing bombs and guns and munitions.
 
Total bullshit on your part. He stupidly enabled the present situation we see now.

Which is way better than the situation before the Arab Spring, except in Syria.

His incompetent foreign policy has the whole Middle East on the verge of new war . . .

What "new war"? Whatever the Arab Spring leads to, it won't be war between any two Arab countries, unless they decide on some kind of Arab League joint intervention in Syria, which would probably be a good thing. Nor will it lead to any Arab state making war on Israel; not even the Muslim Brotherhood wants that.

. . . and he's stupidly miscalculating the intentions of the Russians ala Jimmy Carter.

What do you think are the intentions of the Russians now? Not any military threat to the West, certainly.

And how did Carter miscalculate same back in the '70s? There's no reason to expect him to have anticipated the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, and no way he could have prevented it. Otherwise, detente was a really good idea at the time.

He's been a disaster in all aspects of his presidency.

Not in foreign policy. Not in the economy, either. What else is there, really?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top