U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we took the race out of it...like became blind....and looked only at the facts....we'd "judge" more accurately. As it is...Zimmerman was told he should not follow...he did anyway. He said he was beat to the ground..nose broken...vid shows otherwise.
He and the black kid....together, make up the majority...not the minority.... of current american population. So who is calling who out as having committed a racially motivated murder? As far as I understand....the kid hadn't committed any crime and is now dead.
Fuck what the politicians and race/hater screamers have to say. Facts are facts.
If we took the race out of it...like became blind....and looked only at the facts....we'd "judge" more accurately. As it is...Zimmerman was told he should not follow...he did anyway. He said he was beat to the ground..nose broken...vid shows otherwise.
He and the black kid....together, make up the majority...not the minority.... of current american population. So who is calling who out as having committed a racially motivated murder? As far as I understand....the kid hadn't committed any crime and is now dead.
Fuck what the politicians and race/hater screamers have to say. Facts are facts.
If we took the race out of it...like became blind....and looked only at the facts....we'd "judge" more accurately. As it is...Zimmerman was told he should not follow...he did anyway. He said he was beat to the ground..nose broken...vid shows otherwise.
He and the black kid....together, make up the majority...not the minority.... of current american population. So who is calling who out as having committed a racially motivated murder? As far as I understand....the kid hadn't committed any crime and is now dead.
Fuck what the politicians and race/hater screamers have to say. Facts are facts.
And just what facts are you speaking of?
And you dont have all the facts, either. I suppose that you have no grip on the legal issues, besides.
So says Pat Buchanan, and here Obama promised us we would get past all this shit:
Zimmerman is a security guard.
He made a call to 911 and was told not to follow.
He continued to follow.
He shot and killed a pedestrian.
He lied (as video shows he had no broken nose or facial injury after "being beaten face to sidewalk" ) about it being self defense.
Understand it now ?
Which legal issues do you mean ?
He went down and personally inflamed the incident. He didn't run on that.
He went down and personally inflamed the incident. He didn't run on that.
He was an off the books security guard years ago. He's an insurance salesman now.
I don't see what being a pedestrian has to do with anything.
There is no proof he lied. To the contrary the police report backs him up.
Your "facts" look like shit and this is the whole problem. Everyone says they have "facts" and they contradict each other so obviously they aren't all facts.
Zimmerman did have some position as "gate keeper" for this community or he would not have been in the position to patrol the area. Simple googling can confirm this or not. It isn't the issue so makes no difference.
His defense is based on the fact that he shot and killed in, self defense.
His backup was that he was being beaten ... specifically his face was being bashed against the sidewalk....and that his nose was broken..... and so he shot and killed in defense of his life.
Video taken 30 minutes after being brought in to the police department shows NO evidence of blood on his shirt...no bloody skull....no injuries - (with the exception of a bump on his nose) to support his claim of being beaten.
He did call in and the recording shows us that he was asked "are you following him"...to his affirmative response, he was told " you don't have to do that. He did continue to do so.
They are not MY facts. The are the clear facts as have been presented to the public. His own defense attorney could not comment on the lack of physical evidence to support Zimmerman's defense of his life due to his being beaten.
The fact that the victim was a pedestrian holds validity because that was the furthest description anyone could give him.. He was not an intruder. He was not breaking and entering. He was not causing a public disturbance. The only thing he was doing ... was walking thru a neighborhood . He was a pedestrian.
Zimmerman is a security guard.
He made a call to 911 and was told not to follow.
He continued to follow.
He shot and killed a pedestrian.
He lied (as video shows he had no broken nose or facial injury after "being beaten face to sidewalk" ) about it being self defense.
Understand it now ?
Zimmerman did have some position as "gate keeper" for this community or he would not have been in the position to patrol the area. Simple googling can confirm this or not. It isn't the issue so makes no difference.
His defense is based on the fact that he shot and killed in, self defense.
His backup was that he was being beaten ... specifically his face was being bashed against the sidewalk....and that his nose was broken..... and so he shot and killed in defense of his life.
Video taken 30 minutes after being brought in to the police department shows NO evidence of blood on his shirt...no bloody skull....no injuries - (with the exception of a bump on his nose) to support his claim of being beaten.
He did call in and the recording shows us that he was asked "are you following him"...to his affirmative response, he was told " you don't have to do that. He did continue to do so.
They are not MY facts. The are the clear facts as have been presented to the public. His own defense attorney could not comment on the lack of physical evidence to support Zimmerman's defense of his life due to his being beaten.
The fact that the victim was a pedestrian holds validity because that was the furthest description anyone could give him.. He was not an intruder. He was not breaking and entering. He was not causing a public disturbance. The only thing he was doing ... was walking thru a neighborhood . He was a pedestrian.
Revision....if Zimmerman was not a "security guard" for this community.... it does hold weight in this case. If he was not in an guarding capacity...what was he doing stalking a pedestrian ?
He's not a security guard, he doesn't really hold any official position. There is a "neighborhood watch" that he's a part of but it's not an official position. I don't much care what's in the police report since it seems most likely that these were some cops who honestly didn't care what happened.
Obama didn't enflame anything, the flames were already there. Its a good thing he commented on the situation. He's supposed to comment on things happening in the country and the only thing devisive going on here is the Right being completely unwilling to abandon Zimmerman. This is one of those rare cases where the Right could collectively have shown themselves to be human beings and simply say it's unfortunate someone died, we don't think race caused this but we do think there should be a trial and Zimmerman should have been arrested.
I'll give you everyone of your statements but the last one. If it is not thought that Zimmerman comitted a crime then there should be no arrest or trial. That would just be window dressing and then people would say that it was a bogus trial. Zimmerman may have comitted a crime, but with what has been released, there is just as much evidence that he did not, as there has been that he did. When a case goes political like this, there is no way that everyone is going to be happy, or even satisfied.