Watch for libs to suddenly advocate new power plants

off2bed · Mar 28, 2012

...because their beloved brownshirt EPA is pushing new rules that will make it financially nearly impossible to build a new power plant. This way, they can pretend to be all "Drill baby, drill!" while knowing it'll never happen.

The time to bankrupt the coal industry is about to arrive.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-usa-carbon-idUSBRE82Q0W120120327

Good thing for them, everyone is distracted by the "racist" Democrat shooting a black thug in Florida, and won't notice the rule.

semen4her · Mar 28, 2012

Yeah, you make sense.

You are one of the dumbest sons of bitches ever.

Smell ya later, loser.

RobDownSouth · Mar 28, 2012

The new limit is 1000 parts of pollution per megawatt hour.

Coal belches 1800 parts
Natural gas belches 850 parts.

No more coal-fired plants. Deal with it.

koalabear · Mar 28, 2012

off2bed said:
...because their beloved brownshirt EPA is pushing new rules that will make it financially nearly impossible to build a new power plant. This way, they can pretend to be all "Drill baby, drill!" while knowing it'll never happen.

The time to bankrupt the coal industry is about to arrive.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-usa-carbon-idUSBRE82Q0W120120327

Good thing for them, everyone is distracted by the "racist" Democrat shooting a black thug in Florida, and won't notice the rule.

Good way to slip carbon credits in the backdoor.

mercury14 · Mar 28, 2012

off2bed said:
...because their beloved brownshirt EPA is pushing new rules that will make it financially nearly impossible to build a new power plant. This way, they can pretend to be all "Drill baby, drill!" while knowing it'll never happen.

The time to bankrupt the coal industry is about to arrive.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-usa-carbon-idUSBRE82Q0W120120327

Good thing for them, everyone is distracted by the "racist" Democrat shooting a black thug in Florida, and won't notice the rule.

Your article doesn't say the new rules would make it financially nearly impossible to build a new plant. Where are you getting that information?

unregistered · Mar 28, 2012

mercury14 · Mar 28, 2012

RobDownSouth said:
The new limit is 1000 parts of pollution per megawatt hour.

Coal belches 1800 parts
Natural gas belches 850 parts.

No more coal-fired plants. Deal with it.

It just means coal plants have to buy equipment to reduce their emissions, not that we wont have any new coal plants.

mercury14 · Mar 28, 2012

vetteman said:
New plants that will never be built until the lot of them over at the EPA are behind bars or kicked to the curb. Close all of the coal fired plants and give up 40 percent of the electrical generating power of the country.

But you have no proof? You're just making things up again.

unregistered · Mar 28, 2012

Dribble · Mar 28, 2012

vetteman said:
You have to proof either.

you need to cut back on your drinking again Vette...the "t" is no where near the "n" on my keyboard

mercury14 · Mar 28, 2012

vetteman said:
You have to proof either.

I didn't make any claims - I just pointed out that you don't have any evidence to back yours. Neither does off2fap. Once again you're confusing things you want to be true for actual facts.

TexasWife25 · Mar 28, 2012

mercury14 said:
I didn't make any claims - I just pointed out that you don't have any evidence to back yours. Neither does off2fap. Once again you're confusing things you want to be true for actual facts.

I lol'd!

randybrwy · Mar 28, 2012

vetteman said:
New plants that will never be built until the lot of them over at the EPA are behind bars or kicked to the curb. Close all of the coal fired plants and give up 40 percent of the electrical generating power of the country.

Yeah,that's right. http://www.ckyo.info/jpg

KingOrfeo · Mar 28, 2012

Hey, I'm all for nuclear power, plant-safety technology is a lot better than it used to be. They've never had an accident in France, have they?

Super-Surprise · Mar 28, 2012

http://files.sexyandfunny.com/photos/img_orig/img4bdfe33888290.jpg

amicus · Mar 28, 2012

GoFuckYourself said:
http://files.sexyandfunny.com/photos/img_orig/img4bdfe33888290.jpg

~~~

They Float!

Izzat titty pink?

ami :kiss:

did the proper thing, :kiss:

did it again for da pear...

RightField · Mar 28, 2012

mercury14 said:
But you have no proof? You're just making things up again.

You're asking for proof that much more stringent polution regulation will constrict the use of coal based plants? Surely you're not that naive? That was the whole purpose of the bill and its consistent with the stated democrat energy policy.

Of course Democrat policy has a long history of accomplishing exactly the opposite of what is intended, but I think that's not the case with this legislation.

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 28, 2012

off2bed said:
...because their beloved brownshirt EPA is pushing new rules that will make it financially nearly impossible to build a new power plant. This way, they can pretend to be all "Drill baby, drill!" while knowing it'll never happen.

The time to bankrupt the coal industry is about to arrive.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-usa-carbon-idUSBRE82Q0W120120327

Good thing for them, everyone is distracted by the "racist" Democrat shooting a black thug in Florida, and won't notice the rule.

I am a great fan of giving people what they demand and they demanded no more coal.

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 28, 2012

mercury14 said:
Your article doesn't say the new rules would make it financially nearly impossible to build a new plant. Where are you getting that information?

When I was asked earlier about, uh, the issue of coal. Uhhh, y'know, under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket....
We would put a cap-and-trade system in place, eh, that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there. So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're gonna be charged a huge sum for all that, uh, greenhouse gas that's being emitted.
Barack Hussein Obama
Editorial board meeting, San Francisco Chronicle
January 2008

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 28, 2012

Well, according to plan; if you can't get it through a Democratic Congress, act like a king and just order it.

From a lying rw source:

(Reuters) - The first-ever U.S. proposal to restrict carbon dioxide emissions would have once been a major shock to electricity companies by making it uneconomic to build new coal-fired power plants.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-coal-epa-idUSBRE82R08120120328

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 28, 2012

Just think of it as a TAX on BIG RICH EVIL COAL.

(not so much as a "penalty")

Remember, taxes don't get passed on to the consumer, right merc?

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 28, 2012

mercury14 said:
I didn't make any claims - I just pointed out that you don't have any evidence to back yours. Neither does off2fap. Once again you're confusing things you want to be true for actual facts.

You probably should have went and looked for some facts yourself in order to shut them up...

unregistered · Mar 28, 2012

4est_4est_Gump · Mar 28, 2012

Yeah, so very clever.

Switching to natural gas, but drilling won't solve anything.

What to watch for now is actually not the advocation of new power plants but a war on natural gas; it's based on CARBON (CH4).

unregistered · Mar 28, 2012

Watch for libs to suddenly advocate new power plants

Disambiguator

Suck Macaque

No Kings

~Armed and Fuzzy~

Pragmatic Metaphysician

unregistered

Guest

Pragmatic Metaphysician

Pragmatic Metaphysician

unregistered

Guest

Literotica Guru

Pragmatic Metaphysician

Porn Buddy

Virgin

Literotica Guru

Loves ****

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Run Forrest! RUN!

Run Forrest! RUN!

Run Forrest! RUN!

Run Forrest! RUN!

Run Forrest! RUN!

unregistered

Guest

Run Forrest! RUN!

unregistered

Guest

Similar threads