Writers Who Disengage Feedback From Public View

Lynn_MXX

Really Experienced
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Posts
219
Is it a cop-out? I've never posted a story, therefore unfair of me to say yes. But when an author has done this, it's always disappointing. And nobody ever gets private feedback from me.

If I've enjoyed a particular story, I always like to see how other people have rated it. Other times, I'll have a quick look at the comments to gauge whether a story's worth reading or not. If there's lots of public comments, then this is a very good sign.

Another of those good signs are when those comments are angry and abusive. As human beings, we tend to be very thin skinned and a lot of authors will let those comments get to them. Think about it though; you've written a novel, and people get very angry at the bad behaviour of fictitious characters. You must have made those characters very real to invoke such venom!

I'm not against commenters posting themselves as anonymous either. Yes, it is gutless of them, and since they're gutless, why shouldn't we know? And the one's who are abusive towards the author? They're are often very funny, though my laughter is directed at the composer of the comment for their lack of control. They're just as transparent to almost everyone else too, in my opinion. It's a bit disrespectful of authors not to realise this.

Once I've posted my first story, I will look forward to all the abuse, all the hate, death threats and all the flaming. That's if my story is good enough, of course. If it isn't, they'll simply ignore me
 
Last edited:
This was recently hashed over to pieces here:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=778747

This is a reading site, not a creative writing site, unless the one posting the story explicitly asks for feedback. The site gives the author the ability to not get feedback--so they are explicitly saying they don't want it if they turn it off. Readers have no obligations to the authors here--neither do the authors have any obligations to the readers. If reader is compelled to "instruct" authors who have explicitly signaled they don't want it, this is saying more about the reader's need than the author's.
 
This IS a creative writing site Sir Split (my initial definition of your abbreviation), how could it not be? Writing novels is being creative. And of course authors want feedback, or at least praiseworthy feedback. Though it's all praiseworthy, in my opinion; even if the commenters or the authors don't realise it (as explained above)

Thanks for the link though, it looks interesting.
 
This IS a creative writing site Sir Split (my initial definition of your abbreviation), how could it not be? Writing novels is being creative. And of course authors want feedback, or at least praiseworthy feedback. Though it's all praiseworthy, in my opinion; even if the commenters or the authors don't realise it (as explained above)

Thanks for the link though, it looks interesting.

It's not a creative writing site in terms of there being an expectation of critique when you post. It has not been set up as such a site--obviously, precisely because of the author capability you are questioning. And that's not the only comment-cut-off capability the site gives to the authors.

Why can't you take the sledgehammer hint that the author just didn't post the story to get a critique when he/she turned off comments and/or voting. Their request seems quite obvious and the site is set up to make it their choice.

You have a burning need to instruct others in how to write when they haven't asked for it?
 
Last edited:
Is it a cop-out? I've never posted a story, therefore unfair of me to say yes. But when an author has done this, it's always disappointing. And nobody ever gets private feedback from me.

If I've enjoyed a particular story, I always like to see how other people have rated it. Other times, I'll have a quick look at the comments to gauge whether a story's worth reading or not. If there's lots of public comments, then this is a very good sign.

Another of those good signs are when those comments are angry and abusive. As human beings, we tend to be very thin skinned and a lot of authors will let those comments get to them. Think about it though; you've written a novel, and people get very angry at the bad behaviour of fictitious characters. You must have made those characters very real to invoke such venom!

I'm not against commenters posting themselves as anonymous either. Yes, it is gutless of them, and since they're gutless, why shouldn't we know? And the one's who are abusive towards the author? They're are often very funny, though my laughter is directed at the composer of the comment for their lack of control. They're just as transparent to almost everyone else too, in my opinion. It's a bit disrespectful of authors not to realise this.

Once I've posted my first story, I will look forward to all the abuse, all the hate, death threats and all the flaming. That's if my story is good enough, of course. If it isn't, they'll simply ignore me

In my opinion most people start off wanting feedback, just to generally see what people think. I know that is why I started here. However, as time goes by and you start getting 'trolled' meaning you are receiving comments that are not constructively negative feedback, but vicious attacks.

Just like in real life some are more thick skinned than others. Most of us have learned to laugh at 'any mouse' but for some it is just not worth it and they disable.

It is a shame as I have read a couple of great stories and would have liked the opportunity to tell the author I have enjoyed their work, but it's their choice and they are the only ones who need be happy be happy with it.
 
Probably marks me as nuts, but I like the feedback, especially the mean ones. Course that's me, some don't want to get it or can't read between the lines. I mean really, when you think about it. The really vile feedback is just them having a good orgasm reading the story and then lashing out because it's incest or whatever. Take a look in loving wives and read the feedback.

Loving wives isn't about loving wives, and if it is it probably gets lots of nasty feedback. What those people want to read is about a wife who sluts it around. They want it to end with her either, being beaten up by everyone and left pregnant, or left pregnant and running off with the boyfriend.

You get similar in the non consent category, people get off reading it but don't want to admit it. Course they are in a way nicer in the feedback there. They don't go after you, instead they comment on how everybody dies of AIDS. Honestly I don't understand the correlation but well it's anonymous, the poor guy doesn't know if he's coming, going, or even male. :eek:
 
This particular horse has been beaten to death, beyond death, and beyond resurrection. Authors are at liberty to receive feedback or refuse feedback. Authors are absolutely free. So are readers. The readers can, in the words of the proprietors of this site, talk about the stories they love or hate; however misguided, impertinent or idiotic their comments may be, or how wise, perceptive and well-intentioned, as well.

In short, free press, free speech. Which carry with them the right not to listen or read.
 
Quite a few here are looking for a place to store their writing with some sort of copyright and time stamp, not caring about feedback in the least.

If the OP really wants an outlet to leave feedback and doesn't have one on the story, they can always utilize the Story Feedback forum.
 
Last edited:
I am always tempted to disengage the comments

Hi Lynn!
I am not sure how things are in other categories, but I post short stories in the Loving wife category. You wouldn't believe the comments that readers can write. Some people out there have serious problems, probably resulting from a bad past experience. Many can't understand that a writer creates a character and despite the original idea, the character takes a life of itself, evolves, and does things that can be tasteless for some readers. A few readers can't even tell the difference between a writer and his characters. Sometime I clean up the comments if they are extreme, but when they are not anonymous I tend to leave them.
It is my choice however.
 
Quite a few here are looking for a place to store their writing with some sort of copyright and time stamp, not caring about feedback in the least.

If the OP really wants an outlet to leave feedback and doesn't have one on the story, they can always utilize the Story Feedback forum.

I started posting here (and double posting elsewhere) to keep archived copies on the net rather than in my own computers. I wasn't fooled that slapping a copyright notice on them meanting anything, though.
 
I started posting here (and double posting elsewhere) to keep archived copies on the net rather than in my own computers. I wasn't fooled that slapping a copyright notice on them meanting anything, though.

Same for me really. I know if someone takes my writing as theirs, there isn't anything I can do about it.

I've been around since November 02, but removed everything off Literotica and had this user name deleted along with others in 08 and left Lit. I regretted it later having lost a few stories and poems in the 3 years of my absence. If I decide to split in the future, I will leave my writing here for archive, not caring if anyone swipes it.
 
Quite a few here are looking for a place to store their writing with some sort of copyright and time stamp, not caring about feedback in the least.

If the OP really wants an outlet to leave feedback and doesn't have one on the story, they can always utilize the Story Feedback forum.

Well the copyright thing has been beaten to death and we are obviously screwed on that note.

However having the writing here as a 'storage bin' is great, especially as I had a hell of a scare with my PC last week when my daughter stepped into some type of virus and I thought I had lost all my files.
 
Well the copyright thing has been beaten to death and we are obviously screwed on that note.

However having the writing here as a 'storage bin' is great, especially as I had a hell of a scare with my PC last week when my daughter stepped into some type of virus and I thought I had lost all my files.

Backing up is always good. A $20 flash drive can hold as much as a pickup truck bed full of paper. Password protect it, keep it up-to-date and lock it away. And it's virtually theft-proof.
 
I started posting here (and double posting elsewhere) to keep archived copies on the net rather than in my own computers. I wasn't fooled that slapping a copyright notice on them meanting anything, though.

I've been putting my writtings on Google Docs. It feels like a much better alternative than relying only on Lit. I don't constantly feel I need to make multiple and frequent backups because I trust Google will do a reasonable job with archiving. Also I'm not sure if there is a storage limitation or a content restriction, but its nice to just log-on from almost anywhere and access my stories or any other notes I want to keep.
 
Back
Top