LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Time to end war once and for all?

R

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
Has war outlived its usefulness? It is time to outlaw and abolish it like many countries and states have with capital punishment?

I used to be a supporter of war when it was a way for men to prove their masculinity as well as to thin out excess males from the population. What exactly is the point or reason for it now if we are going to have women and homosexuals doing it? Its just a destructive, harmful, waste of live and cause of death, despair and destruction with no redeeming social purpose anymore other than to fuel the military-industrial complex and give politicians a way to manipulate the public and work them up into supporting the government.

War is dead. Its time to abolish once and for all. Lets save the tax money, balance the budget, and stop death, destruction, and injustice overseas. It may seem far fetched, but rewind fifteen years when support for capital punishment was at 70% or more, both parties were in favor of it and few politicians dared to express any opposition. Now, gradually, it is being phased out state by state, country by country. Personally, I am a staunch proponent of capital punishment for nearly all convicted murderers but you see how something that seemed like it would be forever can be done away with.

War is far more deadly and unjust than capital punishment, so where are the cries to abolish it?
 
What's your enforcement plan if a country tells you to go fuck yourself and then blows up your main railway station?
 
Colonel Hogan said:
What's your enforcement plan if a country tells you to go fuck yourself and then blows up your main railway station?
Click to expand...

We would still have a military force, with fast strike capabilities backed by air and missle support. Also, we would maintain an arsenal of WMDs (nuclear, biological, chemical). We would still have a deterent. We would just shun ground combat like we did for more or less in the period after Vietnam ended. No more of these unending occupations. Also, cut defense spending to levels we can afford.
 
renard_ruse said:
I used to be a supporter of war when it was a way for men to prove their masculinity as well as to thin out excess males from the population. What exactly is the point or reason for it now if we are going to have women and homosexuals doing it? .

..........................

War is far more deadly and unjust than capital punishment, so where are the cries to abolish it?
Click to expand...


for the first part..war was okay as long as straight men were doing it?

and as for the second part... the 60's called, they want you to know about hippies
 
renard_ruse said:
We would still have a military force, with fast strike capabilities backed by air and missle support. Also, we would maintain an arsenal of WMDs (nuclear, biological, chemical). We would still have a deterent. We would just shun ground combat like we did for more or less in the period after Vietnam ended. No more of these unending occupations. Also, cut defense spending to levels we can afford.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes::rolleyes: This response needs to start with eyerolls.

"Shunning ground combat" in favor of WMDs and missile strikes hardly equates to the abolition of war. The fact that you understand the reality of having to have any military force along with understanding the reality that you might actually have to use it, destroys your original premise.

Abolishing war is meaningless if the only way to enforce the prohibition is to subject the violating country to superior force, i.e. "war."

Meanwhile, what makes you think you would have the option of not using ground troops? While it is a truism of war to never let the enemy choose the battlefield, sometimes it cannot be avoided. When such is the case, military strategists will use the best weapons and personnel that affords the best chance of victory.
 
renard_ruse said:
We would still have a military force, with fast strike capabilities backed by air and missle support. Also, we would maintain an arsenal of WMDs (nuclear, biological, chemical). We would still have a deterent. We would just shun ground combat like we did for more or less in the period after Vietnam ended. No more of these unending occupations. Also, cut defense spending to levels we can afford.
Click to expand...

Isn't that the tactic of the iSlammers?
 
renard_ruse said:
Has war outlived its usefulness? It is time to outlaw and abolish it like many countries and states have with capital punishment?

I used to be a supporter of war when it was a way for men to prove their masculinity as well as to thin out excess males from the population. What exactly is the point or reason for it now if we are going to have women and homosexuals doing it? Its just a destructive, harmful, waste of live and cause of death, despair and destruction with no redeeming social purpose anymore other than to fuel the military-industrial complex and give politicians a way to manipulate the public and work them up into supporting the government.

War is dead. Its time to abolish once and for all. Lets save the tax money, balance the budget, and stop death, destruction, and injustice overseas. It may seem far fetched, but rewind fifteen years when support for capital punishment was at 70% or more, both parties were in favor of it and few politicians dared to express any opposition. Now, gradually, it is being phased out state by state, country by country. Personally, I am a staunch proponent of capital punishment for nearly all convicted murderers but you see how something that seemed like it would be forever can be done away with.

War is far more deadly and unjust than capital punishment, so where are the cries to abolish it?
Click to expand...

We must end war before war ends us.
 
Colonel Hogan said:
What's your enforcement plan if a country tells you to go fuck yourself and then blows up your main railway station?
Click to expand...

He plans to blame the women and send manly men to save the day!

No wait... He laments the addition of women and homosexuals to the fighting force, because it takes the manly darwinisms out of combat, but rejoices in using missles, drones and mass killing machines.
 
renard_ruse said:
I used to be a supporter of war when it was a way for men to prove their masculinity as well as to thin out excess males from the population. What exactly is the point or reason for it now if we are going to have women and homosexuals doing it?
Click to expand...

ahahahahahaha!
 
While we're creating our proletariat utopia please outlaw poverty, unhappiness, and ugliness.
 
Well said, Frisco

Back then religion WAS money, control and power.



Did you fail EVERY subject in school?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Need for Critical Thinking
Replies
14
Views
344
bookworm69
B
StrangeDarkStar
Waiting Time for Story Approval
Replies
1
Views
96
Shaglus_Ziegler
Shaglus_Ziegler
JenniferSmithJones
Funny facts about humans, mammals, and genetics
Replies
3
Views
172
JenniferSmithJones
JenniferSmithJones
FiveInch033
Real economics....not the bubble Marxists live in..
2
Replies
30
Views
488
RightField
RightField
T
Please help! Looking for a story
Replies
0
Views
220
Throwaway619
T
Back
Top