The Kraft Rulez

RobDownSouth

No Kings
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Posts
77,539
The Kraft Rulez defined:

  • Accuse your political opponent of being gay
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being an alt
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a pedo
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a misogynist
  • If that doesn't work, mock your opponent's weight, hair style, national origin, race, avatar and/or geographic location
  • If that doesn't work, brag that you have your political opponent on ignore
  • Repeat as needed

The one thing in Karen Kraft's writings that people should notice is the amount of "arguments" constructed on things like
  • "you probably..."
  • "I bet you..."
  • "I'm sure you..."
  • and the like.

Assumption is piled on supposition, mixed with profanity, and sprinkled with invective, in an endless series of virtuoso displays of muddled thinking.
 
Last edited:
Lit debate in general is filled with strawmen, ad hom, projection, assumptions and you-are-a-poopyhead a-thon.
 
Lit debate in general is filled with strawmen, ad hom, projection, assumptions and you-are-a-poopyhead a-thon.

I find this to be true in all conversational debate. I have been guilty of all.
 
  • Accuse your political opponent of being gay
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being an alt
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a pedo
  • Repeat as needed



Assumption is piled on supposition, mixed with profanity, and sprinkled with invective, in an endless series of virtuoso displays of muddled thinking.

Lol...this is what sean/lt and their alts do every single time...

Amazing!!!
 
Fallacies

Lit debate in general is filled with strawmen, ad hom, projection, assumptions and you-are-a-poopyhead a-thon.

A fallacy is, very generally, an error in reasoning. This differs from a factual error, which is simply being wrong about the facts. To be more specific, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
 
The fallacy in your post is fact that it has nothing to do with what you quoted from Wok's post. :rolleyes:

go take a nap, grampa and dream your dreams of other men's cocks and assholes and big, steaming piles of shit.
 
The Kraft Rulez defined:

  • Accuse your political opponent of being gay
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being an alt
  • If that doesn't work, accuse your political opponent of being a pedo
  • Repeat as needed

The one thing in Karen Kraft's writings that people should notice is the amount of "arguments" constructed on things like
  • "you probably..."
  • "I bet you..."
  • "I'm sure you..."
  • and the like.

Assumption is piled on supposition, mixed with profanity, and sprinkled with invective, in an endless series of virtuoso displays of muddled thinking.

shut up, Cissy
 
Back
Top