It is a place where women rule.

Hi folks. Long time listener, first time caller.
(i.e. I registered today and this is my first thread.)

Note: I mention children in this post, but in conformity to the rules here, they are not depicted as having or witnessing sex.

Okay it's not a place like ones depicted in stories such as Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death. My inspiration in more of Israel—or, however bad and only to a small extent, Islamic State.

It started the late 1940's: when countries like India and Pakistan got their independence, and Israel came into existence. An area of land—say a fraction of Israel's size, but which is still significant, was more-or-less secured by feminists/proto-feminists who declared a country or country-of-sorts—likely more peacefully than the other two entities—and invited women around the world to join them. (At least 1% of 1% of them did.)

Seventy years later, it's doing well with over a million people. Most of them are female: definitely over 95%, 98%, 99%, or the like, of those over 12, are female.

There's a president—obviously female—who lives with three other women. Like many others, she practices separatist lesbianism: most of the women there don't buy into the whole "born-this-way" theory of homosexuality, and while they don't hate transwomen—indeed many consider them better than men—they are nonetheless treated as second-classed citizens, as are men.

This country/country-of-sorts has it's own industries, media, armed forces, and airline. Children are being taught woman-centric constructed languages ["conlangs" such as Esperanto, Lojban, Klingon, etc]: one which is now spoken fluently by about 5-15% of the women under 24.

They are surrounded by countries whose people have traditional religious views, and they've been getting female refugees. As they aren't expansionist, they have fewer enemies, though, and some of the women have even bought properties in such countries.

Women like Angela Merkel, Tokako Doi, and Hillary Clinton have visited this place and have been photographed with the president, who tries to make it look that they were state-sponsored visits.

Men?

Again, a few are allowed. There is a small geo-discontiguous district less than 100 km away from the country/country-of-sorts where husbands/boyfriends, sons, and even fathers are allowed to live: the women in their lives either visiting them during weekends or the women doing the daily commute to the grand feminine city. America has the Statue of Liberty, they have the Statues of Women (who, of course, are much higher—maybe twice as high): which can be seen in such commutes.

A few millionaire men live in this city of women, and there's even a Catholic church with a few priests: though at times one needed state permission to worship there and proselyting is very limited.

Men are safe, though they should know their places. For example, some stores and restaurants don't allow men, or have conditions such as they have to be accompanied by women. When a man gets on a bus, he generally has to be blindfolded or hooded so he won't look at the women and get naughty thoughts: though long-term male residents, boys, and transwomen are exempted.

Now, as reported, there are a few, relatively very small, places in this country/country-of-sorts where men walk around naked, engage in public acts of femdom BDSM, have sex with each other—at time solely to amuse women who are into such, but those are select areas: and not general. First of all, children need to be protected from such. Ditto many women. For some, even 10 000 men in the country/country-of-sorts is too much; and the sight of a naked man?!? Disgusting! Men should be dressed conservatively: except maybe in those small designated places where those sister-citizens who rather look at naked men, and engage in sexual play and even heterosexual sex with such men, as oppose to more wholesome forms of lovemaking, can do so.


I've given it a bit of thought and have several other ideas, but I welcome questions, comments, and suggestions.

The story, as almost all of my stories, is a third person POV, though I'm making it as a visit by a somewhat conservative—at least in appearances—prominent anchor/journalist of a major TV network (American and/or internationally known): his name and the name of the network fictionalized. He will be accompanied by a young attractive colleague who was very recently promoted from entertainment to news—his potential successor: though young enough as not to be a threat before his retirement; as well as two female photographers.

I don't intend for him to have sex in this area, but again, I'm open to ideas. The women? of course!

Also, are there stories in Literotica like what I'm thinking of for comparison?

I see that Literotica has a non-erotic tag, and in some of the parts of the story I might include such.

You could say that this female country is in the north, with religious neighbors like you said on most sides, but to the south is a country of men, mostly gay, and they adopt any unwanted male babies born in the country of women. Between these two countries is an area kind of like Las Vegas - a place where the laws are relaxed to allow sex clubs, gambling, hotels for tourists who want a sexy vacation, and daytime businesses like fancy restaurants and agencies where women can sell surrogate pregnancies to male couples who want a child.

You could place the tale in western Tehuantepec's matriarchal Zapotec society, centered in recently-quake-devastated Juchitan. (Zapotec boys and trannies weave nifty textiles.) Make up entertaining sexual characteristics for neighboring Oaxaca and Chiapas. A pervy invasion of Sea People could be entertaining.

Hmmmm.

Some Mexican elements could help, though I know little of the place.

I'm thinking over the suggestions, though the thing is, I like to keep it modern. I know too little about history to make it a period thing: I even get lost when in the 19th century; and given all this singularity talk, I'm not as confident putting it in the future—at least not far—indeed, even the near future looks too messy or unclear.

Because this country/country-of-sorts will have women from around the world coming in, it will be pretty multicultural, multiracial, and multilingual. If Mexicans accounted for, say, +1% of the world's population, they might account for +1% of the ancestry of the inhabitants (i.e. over 10 000). These women (and transwomen) might be disproportionate in that 1%

To divulge more, I'm thinking more of Islamic countries—like Israel's neighbours. I'm thinking Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia. In the 1940s, things in many of those places were in flux and the Islamacists (at least the modern types we've come to hear about), if any, were nascent. By the time they have gotten powerful and threatening, the women's country/country-of-sorts was also strong. For Israelis it's a religio-tribal thing. For the women, it's a sisterhood thing: some have been intimately acquainted with male oppression and would rather die than suffer it again.

As for male babies, I'm still thinking that out. Some ideas—and the women's country/country-of-sorts might practice a few of these:

1. the aforementioned commuting
2. sex-selected abortions
3. medical therapies to increase the chances that children would be girls

I've also thought of transgenderism, though these women insist on it being serious. I'm thinking castration, but as I know little about gender-reassignment, I'm not sure.

Currently my rule is boys have to leave around 6 to 12 years of age—a boy with two blood sisters gets to stay until he's 12 (and 2 brothers need 4 blood sisters), with one it's until he's 9, and with none then it's 6 . Between that and his 18th birthday, where does he go? I've thought of transgirls. Such is somewhat happening in society, but again, Literotica rules re depictions of minors.

Another are switcheroos. In many countries, boys are favoured over girls; in the women's country/country-of-sorts the reverse is true. So imagine a couple from a traditional country are trying to have a son because, for among other reasons, the head of the house needs a son to carry the name and someone to escort his daughters when they're in public when he's gone. Meanwhile, in the country/country-of-sorts a woman in a separatist-lesbian couple/polyamorous-group—impregnated either artificially or with a few male studs—the latter generally in the previously mentioned small districts—bore a son. Fine while gender dimorphism isn't as pronounced, but as he gets older others might not want their daughters at that couple/group's house—after all, he'll soon be turning into a man and that's discomforting: and really, do we really want a boy to grow up in a place where males—or at least many male—really don't belong?

Hence the switcheroo. I was even thinking of a ritual where the former gives up their baby girl to the latter and the latter give up their baby boy to the former.

This way there's a bit of a, I think they called it in Rome, imperial hostage situation. The traditional couple will raise the boy well not only because they love him, but also they know their bio-daughter is being raised by women who while might be infidels, at least love the feminine. Ditto the reverse: the son might be indoctrinated in the patriarchal society, but at least he won't be looked down on for being male. There might even be rare visits and when they get old enough, a romance between the boy-now-man and girl-now-woman.

I suppose like stereotypical Jews, while some of these women are Marxists, some are quite the entreprenuers and businesswomen. I've thought of creating districts within the district to accommodate these differences and serve as tests—political laboratories. I've thought Communist, hardcore capitalism, more extreme radical feminism—a parody of fascism perhaps (or perhaps more a parody than the country/country-of-sorts in general might be), and a weird form of femino-Islam—perhaps to women what the Nation of Islam is to blacks.

Gambling? Possibly—but only for male tourists or rich women.

Tourism? The rule of thumb I'm currently using is no more than 1% men. That's about 10 000. In that quota there might be 2000 set aside for male visitors who pay for the right to be in this country/country-of-sorts. If the cost is $100 000 a year per slot, that'd be $2000 a week: meaning up to and perhaps more than 500 000 male visitors but only 2000 at any given time. I suppose many a man in the world would pay $2000—even on top of other costs—to go to a place for a week where +99% of the adults are women.

Keep in mind, while public male nudity is restricted to the small areas, things like toplessness is not uncommon—a lot of guys would like that—which is why I kind of prefer more temperate climates.

As for gays, because the origins of this place go back to the 1940s and the women tended to be indifferent, and the proportion of permitted men was higher back then—say about 15%-20%, there is a bit of a gay district. While many of the women regard men fucking women as generally oppressive—though less so if perhaps the men are tied down, the idea of men fucking men is one many of the women have regarded/regard, even decades earlier, with either indifference or amusement.

Drugs are restricted, but it's not as bad as the US. Female addicts are treated as ill and not criminals, though because they are indifferent to the lives of men, some male drug tourists can go to certain places and drug themselves to their hearts' content with profitably-priced drugs provided by the state. Also male pit-fighting might be allowed, perhaps with primitive weapons: though if allowed, hefty deposits have to be put up for medical expenses and estates. Some women would want race quotas—more white men fighting each other—more PC/less-not-PC.

There's also some medical tourism. Let's say there is a man who lost his testicles in an accident and has no intention of living there, while another who wants to become a transwoman because of the typical reasons men want this, he's wants to return to the country/country-of-sorts, his place of origin is bad, and/or he's such a male feminist that he wants to drastically reduce his natural desire to dominate women. Both can go to a hospital for men in this place and a live transplant can be made. Men can also sell organs to women.

While prostitution isn't illegal, it is tightly regulated. Basically, women visitors can dominate male prostitutes while men can be dominated by prostitutes, with taxes so hefty for the reverse it's generally not worth it. If a man wants to perform cunnilingus, he need only, say, pay the equivalent of US$20 tax. If he wants a blowjob, it's perhaps $1000—double if he's not tied down—which perhaps pays for a government bureaucrat to watch the cunnilingus—make sure the oral sex isn't reciprocated or something like it. With male prostitutes with male clients and female prostitutes with female clients, the taxes are somewhere in-between.

At least until the internet came along, there was a bit of a lesbian and femdom porn industry.

Last, but not least, kinda like Israel—at least in its early days, during the Cold War, they kind of played both sides. If there are Communist and capitalist districts, they might have gotten lots of funding from their respective sponsors. The country/country-of-sorts also has a lot of foreign agents: CIA, KGB/GRU, Mossad, et al, though mostly sleepers with large caches of weapons should any of the neighbours get both aggressive with the country/country-of-sorts and theirs. (I wonder what would happen if a CIA agent lived in a Yedzidi town, and just before Islamic State swooped in, he opened a cache of hundreds of guns and ammo for the inhabitants—even zip guns—for them to defend themselves. They still likely would have lost but it would have made the invasion harder: IS would have been bled a bit more with a strategic benefit to Washington. (Who knows: such might have happened.)