So this Iran deal...

29 Leading U.S. Nuclear Scientists Praise 'unprecedented' Iran Deal

In letter to Obama, scientists - among them 5 Nobel laureates - say deal can serve as 'guidepost for future nonproliferation agreements.'

Twenty-nine top U.S. nuclear scientists - including five Nobel laureates - sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Saturday praising the nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran in July.



Someone should tell Haaretz that this deal is supposed to be a "Bad Thing™".

the Iran deal shows how weak obama/kerry are .... if not retarded.

We had the power, not Iran.

1. no, we come into your country to inspect when ever we want
2. you get money, after 1 year of playing by OUR rules
3. you can islam as islam is evil


maybe this is why obama never had a real job

since there are SIDE deals

no one can say the deal is good, cause they havent read the side deals cause its not avaible

so its BS to say its good

https://www.google.com/#q=US+wont+rekease+side+deal+with+iran

WE HAVE TO SIGN IT BEFORE WE NOW WHATS IN IT!

Fuck, I have to agree with Cap'n Hypocrite, NeverEndingMoron.

You are painfully fucking stupid.

I may never forgive you for proving him right.
But then, stopped clocks and all that.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

29 Leading U.S. Nuclear Scientists Praise 'unprecedented' Iran Deal

In letter to Obama, scientists - among them 5 Nobel laureates - say deal can serve as 'guidepost for future nonproliferation agreements.'

Twenty-nine top U.S. nuclear scientists - including five Nobel laureates - sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Saturday praising the nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran in July.



Someone should tell Haaretz that this deal is supposed to be a "Bad Thing™".

Click to expand...

the NYTimes is not a credible source

try again

2bnot2b said:

the NYTimes is not a credible source

try again

Click to expand...

Haaretz seems to think so. Are you saying that Israel's largest daily paper is wrong?

By the way, the NY Times didn't write the letter. That was all of those Nuclear scientist types, including five Nobel laureates.

Care to try again?

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Haaretz seems to think so. Are you saying that Israel's largest daily paper is wrong?

By the way, the NY Times didn't write the letter. That was all of those Nuclear scientist types, including five Nobel laureates.

Care to try again?

Click to expand...

I dont believe it

Im sure the TIMES made it up


also DOESNT respond to this

since there are SIDE deals

no one can say the deal is good, cause they havent read the side deals cause its not avaible

so its BS to say its good

https://www.google.com/#q=US+wont+re...deal+with+iran

WE HAVE TO SIGN IT BEFORE WE NOW WHATS IN IT!

I gotta go, play with yourself

2bnot2b said:

since there are SIDE deals

no one can say the deal is good, cause they havent read the side deals cause its not avaible

so its BS to say its good

https://www.google.com/#q=US+wont+rekease+side+deal+with+iran

WE HAVE TO SIGN IT BEFORE WE NOW WHATS IN IT!

Click to expand...

Any side deals with Iran were with the IAEA, not the US, regarding Iran's past military dimensions of it's nuclear program and were a major sticking point in the negotiations. I'm sure this has been pointed out to you at least a thousand times.

Careful there "Not BusyBody", your mannerisms are betraying you.

Of course it exists "Not BusyBody" you can read it right here:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2235612/iranletteraug2015.pdf

I don't expect you will though.

The first signature on the letter is from Richard L. Garwin, a physicist who helped design the world’s first hydrogen bomb and has long advised Washington on nuclear weapons and arms control. He is among the last living physicists who helped usher in the nuclear age.

Also signing is Siegfried S. Hecker, a Stanford professor who, from 1986 to 1997, directed the Los Alamos weapons laboratory in New Mexico, the birthplace of the bomb. The facility produced designs for most of the arms now in the nation’s nuclear arsenal.

Most of the 29 who signed the letter are physicists, and many of them have held what the government calls Q clearances — granting access to a special category of secret information that bears on the design of nuclear arms and is considered equivalent to the military’s top secret security clearance.

Many of them have advised Congress, the White House or federal agencies over the decades. For instance, Frank von Hippel, a Princeton physicist, served as assistant director for national security in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Clinton administration.

The five Nobel laureates who signed are Leon N. Cooper of Brown University; Sheldon L. Glashow of Boston University; David Gross of the University of California, Santa Barbara; Burton Richter of Stanford; and Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

hopefully you will give yourself 10 lashes for falling under the lustful dreams of entitlements and became an obama supporter. supporting the union, well that will require the help of drugs...only retards support unions

with time, and education, you can be fixed

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Fuck, I have to agree with Cap'n Hypocrite, NeverEndingMoron.

You are painfully fucking stupid.

I may never forgive you for proving him right.
But then, stopped clocks and all that.

Click to expand...

NeverEndingMe said:

hopefully you will give yourself 10 lashes for falling under the lustful dreams of entitlements and became an obama supporter. supporting the union, well that will require the help of drugs...only retards support unions

with time, and education, you can be fixed

Click to expand...

You can't even manage to be right twice a day like the proverbial stopped clock.

Tell me, is it physically painful to be so bone-jarringly stupid? I've always been the curious sort.

I get it but pumpkin your jealousy will get you nowhere. you've been dead wrong on obama, dead wrong on the obama, dead wrong on the obama.

oh yeah, and you've been wrong on Clinton's, union's, obamacare, and just about everything.

only you can fix you!

Ulaven_Demorte said:

You can't even manage to be right twice a day like the proverbial stopped clock.

Tell me, is it physically painful to be so bone-jarringly stupid? I've always been the curious sort.

Click to expand...

Sorry NeverEndingMoron, my tolerance for interacting with raving idiots was mostly taken up by "Not BusyBody", none left for you today.

I'm sure you'll understand, if someone explains the words that exceed two syllables to you.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

29 Leading U.S. Nuclear Scientists Praise 'unprecedented' Iran Deal

In letter to Obama, scientists - among them 5 Nobel laureates - say deal can serve as 'guidepost for future nonproliferation agreements.'

Twenty-nine top U.S. nuclear scientists - including five Nobel laureates - sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Saturday praising the nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran in July.



Someone should tell Haaretz that this deal is supposed to be a "Bad Thing™".

Click to expand...

Cross-linked this in the Obamagood thread on the Politics Board.

NeverEndingMe said:

the Iran deal shows how weak obama/kerry are .... if not retarded.

We had the power, not Iran.

1. no, we come into your country to inspect when ever we want
2. you get money, after 1 year of playing by OUR rules
3. you can islam as islam is evil


maybe this is why obama never had a real job

Click to expand...

What do you do when our allies, who are sick of the sanctions and see our demands as irrational, end their own sanctions, and Iran gets both money and no inspections regime? The US has very little Iranian assets frozen, it's mostly Europe.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

29 Leading U.S. Nuclear Scientists Praise 'unprecedented' Iran Deal

In letter to Obama, scientists - among them 5 Nobel laureates - say deal can serve as 'guidepost for future nonproliferation agreements.'

Twenty-nine top U.S. nuclear scientists - including five Nobel laureates - sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Saturday praising the nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran in July.



Someone should tell Haaretz that this deal is supposed to be a "Bad Thing™".

Click to expand...

We sort of slowed Iran up a little....thats about it. If that is the best we can do, so be it. The sanctions were working....thats why they are at the table. But with China and Russia, the US couldnt stand alone.

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Any side deals with Iran were with the IAEA, not the US, regarding Iran's past military dimensions of it's nuclear program and were a major sticking point in the negotiations. I'm sure this has been pointed out to you at least a thousand times.

Careful there "Not BusyBody", your mannerisms are betraying you.

Click to expand...

so YOU would sign contracts where part of the contracts are known to you?

So This Makes The Letter Bs

The letter also noted that the deal bans research on nuclear weapons "rather than only their manufacture," adding that contrary to criticism that Iran will be allowed to pursue nuclear arms without constraint after 10 years, the deal "includes important long-term verification procedures that last until 2040, and others that last indefinitely.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/beta/1.670232

after 24 days, excludes the plant where the military has its research and

ran Openly Refuses UN IAEA Inspectors Access to Military Sites

Iranian double talk is clear when a top official praises the nuclear deal but warns of no IAEA inspector access to military sites.

The Iranian security adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei explained in a broadcast interview last week that United Nations nuclear inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency would not be given access to Tehran’s sensitive military nuclear sites.

Ali Akbar Velayati made the statement in a broadcast interview with Aljazeera on July 31, 2015 (clip# 5026) that was monitored and translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

“First, allow me to emphasize that the issue of the missiles and of Iran’s defensive capabilities were not part of the negotiations to begin with,” Velayati said.

“No matter what pressure is exerted, Iran never has negotiated and never will negotiate with others – America, Europe, or any other country – about the nature and quality of missiles it should manufacture or possess, or about the defensive military equipment that it needs. This is out of the question.

“We in Iran will independently determine what military equipment we need in order to defend our land, the regime of the Islamic Republic, the Iranian people, and the interest of our country.

“Therefore, we will not hesitate to obtain these weapons, with the exception of nuclear weapons or WMD, such as chemical weapons, which are internationally prohibited.

“Therefore, the missile issue is not a part of the nuclear agreement with the P5+1.

“Any different statement about this is baseless.

“Regardless of how the P5+1 countries interpret the nuclear agreement, their entry into our military sites is absolutely forbidden. The entry of any foreigner, including IAEA inspectors or any other inspector, to the sensitive military sites of the Islamic Republic is forbidden, no matter what,” Velayati stated firmly. (italics added)

The interviewer asked: “That’s final?”

“Yes,” Velayati replied. “Final.”

Ulaven_Demorte said:

29 Leading U.S. Nuclear Scientists Praise 'unprecedented' Iran Deal

In letter to Obama, scientists - among them 5 Nobel laureates - say deal can serve as 'guidepost for future nonproliferation agreements.'

Twenty-nine top U.S. nuclear scientists - including five Nobel laureates - sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Saturday praising the nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran in July.



Someone should tell Haaretz that this deal is supposed to be a "Bad Thing™".

Click to expand...

who cares what LEFT WING WHACK JOB PAID SHILLS say

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Any side deals with Iran were with the IAEA, not the US, regarding Iran's past military dimensions of it's nuclear program and were a major sticking point in the negotiations. I'm sure this has been pointed out to you at least a thousand times.

Careful there "Not BusyBody", your mannerisms are betraying you.

Click to expand...

what lawyer would allow ANYONE to sign any deal or contract or agreement without SEEING what is in it or has a side deal with a third party?

2bnot2b said:

what lawyer would allow ANYONE to sign any deal or contract or agreement without SEEING what is in it or has a side deal with a third party?

Click to expand...

Your agreement with someone else does not invalidate my agreement with you. If you fail to live up to your side of our bargain then our agreement is void.

If our agreement says that you can't do X or Y or you will be penalized it doesn't matter if Cap'n AJ's agreement says that you can do X but not Y.

If you do X or Y then our agreement is over and you suffer the consequences as laid out in that ageeement.

2bnot2b said:

The letter also noted that the deal bans research on nuclear weapons "rather than only their manufacture," adding that contrary to criticism that Iran will be allowed to pursue nuclear arms without constraint after 10 years, the deal "includes important long-term verification procedures that last until 2040, and others that last indefinitely.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/beta/1.670232

after 24 days, excludes the plant where the military has its research and

ran Openly Refuses UN IAEA Inspectors Access to Military Sites

Iranian double talk is clear when a top official praises the nuclear deal but warns of no IAEA inspector access to military sites.

The Iranian security adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei explained in a broadcast interview last week that United Nations nuclear inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency would not be given access to Tehran’s sensitive military nuclear sites.

Ali Akbar Velayati made the statement in a broadcast interview with Aljazeera on July 31, 2015 (clip# 5026) that was monitored and translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

Click to expand...

I stopped right there. MEMRI? LMAO...

Give me a fucking break "Not BusyBody"..
You poopoo the NY Times then cite an Israeli propaganda outfit?

Ulaven_Demorte said:

I stopped right there. MEMRI? LMAO...

Click to expand...

so the Iranians DIDNT say what he was quoted as saying?

is that what you are saying?

Ulaven_Demorte said:

Your agreement with someone else does not invalidate my agreement with you. If you fail to live up to your side of our bargain then our agreement is void.

If our agreement says that you can't do X or Y or you will be penalized it doesn't matter if Cap'n AJ's agreement says that you can do X but not Y.

If you do X or Y then our agreement is over and you suffer the consequences as laid out in that ageeement.

Click to expand...

you arent serious

2bnot2b said:

so the Iranians DIDNT say what he was quoted as saying?

is that what you are saying?

Click to expand...

I wouldn't put it past MEMRI to stage the entire interview at Netanyahu's request.